
GODSTRUEcHURCH IS SPIRITUAL EDEN GOD SON HOLY SPIRIT = Dua Lipa ARE BACK home
-
God’s Nature Being Dispensed into Us for Our Living in Spirit, Love, and Light
-
In the Church—the Body of Christ— As the Enlarged Corporate Expression in the Flesh
-
In the New Jerusalem As the Consummate Corporate Expression in the New Creation
IN THE NEW JERUSALEM AS THE CONSUMMATE CORPORATE EXPRESSION IN THE NEW CREATION
The final stage of God’s manifestation will be in the New Jerusalem as the consummated corporate expression in the new creation. Revelation 21:1-3 says, “I saw a new heaven and a new earth; for the first heaven and the first earth passed away, and the sea is no more. And I saw the holy city, New Jerusalem, coming down out of heaven from God, prepared as a bride adorned for her husband. And I heard a loud voice out of the throne, saying, Behold, the tabernacle of God is with men and He shall tabernacle with them.” In eternity past God purposed to have a corporate expression so that He might be fully expressed and glorified (Eph. 3:9-11; 1:9-11). For this, He created the heavens, the earth, and mankind. Eventually, the old heaven and the old earth will pass away through fire and be renewed into the new heaven and new earth (2 Pet. 3:10-13) into which the New Jerusalem will come for God’s eternal expression.
1. The Holy City
The New Jerusalem in the new heaven and new earth will be the holy city, “the city of the living God, heavenly Jerusalem” (Heb. 12:22). The designation “holy city” signifies that the New Jerusalem is a city sanctified and separated unto God for fulfilling His purpose. It is both sanctified and separated unto God positionally and sanctified and saturated with God dispositionally. It is holy both extrinsically and intrinsically. It is an entity, entirely and thoroughly holy, that fits in with God’s holy nature for God’s expression to fulfill His heart’s desire.
Today the church, as the manifestation of God in the flesh, is the house of God, whereas in the new heaven and new earth the New Jerusalem, as the manifestation of God in the new creation, will be the city of God. The city is much bigger than the house, signifying that the New Jerusalem, as the manifestation of God in His new creation, will be the enlargement and consummation of the church to express God in eternity.
As the old Jerusalem was the center and capital of God’s kingdom in the nation of Israel, the New Jerusalem will be the administrative center of the eternal kingdom of God in the new universe for the manifestation of God for the ages to come.
At the beginning of the Scripture in God’s old creation there was a garden, the garden of Eden (Gen. 2:8). At the end of the Scripture in God’s new creation there will be a city, the city of the New Jerusalem. The garden and the city at the two ends of the Scripture reflect each other, with the tree of life which is in both of them as the link (Gen. 2:9; Rev. 22:2). The garden was the issue of God’s creation; whereas the city will be the consummation of God’s building, a building which God has been carrying out through all the dispensations: the dispensation of the patriarchs, the dispensation of the law, the dispensation of grace, and the dispensation of the kingdom, of the old creation. Out of His old creation through all the dispensations, God has been doing His building work in the way of regeneration and resurrection. The ultimate result and the ultimate consummation of this building work will be the New Jerusalem in the new heaven and new earth as God’s manifestation in His new creation for eternity. It is not a creation by God’s divine power in the way to call things not being as being; but it is a building by God’s divine life in the way to regenerate the things which exist with the resurrection life that they may be one with God in His divine life and nature for His expression.
2. The Bride of the Lamb and the Tabernacle of God
The New Jerusalem in the new heaven and new earth is the bride, the wife (Rev. 21:9) of the Lamb Christ as His counterpart (John 3:29) and the tabernacle of God as His habitation (Rev. 21:3). Christ and God are one. They are one God, but triune. And the tabernacle is one entity with two aspects to meet the different needs of its Triune God. To Christ, the Lamb, the Redeemer, the New Jerusalem is His bride as His counterpart for His satisfaction. To God, the Originator, the Creator, the New Jerusalem is His tabernacle as His habitation for His rest. As the bride of the Lamb, the New Jerusalem comes out of Christ, her Husband, and becomes His counterpart, just as Eve came out of Adam, her husband, and became His counterpart (Gen. 2:21-24). She is prepared by participating in the riches of the life and nature of Christ the Lamb. As the tabernacle of God, the New Jerusalem is built by God with what He is. It is wholly constituted of the nature of God to be His habitation.
In both the Old and the New Testaments God likens His chosen people to a spouse (Isa. 54:6; Jer. 3:1; Ezek. 16:8; Hosea 2:19; 2 Cor. 11:2; Eph. 5:31-32) and a dwelling place for Himself (Exo. 29:45-46; Num. 5:3; Ezek. 43:7-9; Psa. 68:18; 1 Cor. 3:16-17; 6:19; 2 Cor. 6:16; 1 Tim. 3:15). The spouse is for His satisfaction in love, and the dwelling place is for His rest in expression. Both aspects will be ultimately consummated in the New Jerusalem. In her, God will have the fullest satisfaction in love and the uttermost rest in expression for eternity.
(Conclusion of the New Testament, The (Msgs. 001-020), Chapter 13, by Witness Lee)
Gender of the Holy Spirit
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Main article: Gender of God in Christianity
This article may need to be rewritten to comply with Wikipedia's quality standards. You can help. The talk page may contain suggestions. (March 2011)
In Christian theology, the gender of the Holy Spirit has been the subject of some debate in recent times.
The grammatical gender of the word for "spirit" is feminine in Hebrew (רוּחַ, rūaḥ),[1] neutral in Greek (πνεῦμα, pneûma) and masculine in Latin (spiritus). The neutral Greek πνεῦμα is used in the Septuagint to translate the Hebrew רוּחַ.
The Holy Spirit was furthermore equated with the (grammatically feminine) Wisdom of God by two early Church fathers, Theophilus of Antioch (d. 180) and by Irenaeus (d. 202/3). However, the majority of theologians have, historically, identified Wisdom with Christ the Logos.
Gregory of Nazianzus in the fourth century wrote that terms like "Father" and "Son" in reference to the persons of the trinity are not to be understood as expressing essences or energies of God but are to be understood as metaphors. The same position is still held in the 1992 Catechism of the Catholic Church.[2]
Grammatical gender
[edit]
Even in the same language, a difference may arise relating to what word is chosen to describe the Holy Spirit. In Greek the word pneuma is grammatically neuter[3] and so, in that language, the pronoun referring to the Holy Spirit under that name is also grammatically neuter. However, when the Holy Spirit is referred to by the grammatically masculine word Parakletos "counselor", the pronoun is masculine (since the pronoun refers to Parakletos rather than pneuma), as in John 16:7-8.[4]
William D. Mounce argues that in the Gospel of John, when Jesus referred to the Holy Spirit as Comforter (masculine in Greek), the grammatically necessary masculine form of the Greek pronoun autos is used,[5] but when Jesus speaks of the Holy Spirit as Spirit, grammatically neuter in Greek,[6] the masculine form of the demonstrative pronoun ekeinos ("that masculine one") is used.[5] This breaking of the grammatical agreement expected by native language readers is an indication of the author's intention to convey the personhood of the Holy Spirit.[7] Daniel B. Wallace, however, disputes the claim that ekeinos is connected with pneuma in John 14:26 and 16:13-14, asserting instead that it belongs to parakletos. Wallace concludes that "it is difficult to find any text in which πνευμα is grammatically referred to with the masculine gender".[8]
In Hebrew the word for Spirit (רוח) (ruach) is feminine, (which is used in the Hebrew Bible, as is the feminine word "shekhinah" in rabbinic literature, to indicate the presence of God, Arabic: سكينة sakina, a word mentioned six times in the Quran).
In the Syriac language too, the grammatically feminine word rucha means "spirit", and writers in that language, both orthodox and Gnostic, used maternal images when speaking of the Holy Spirit. This imagery is found in the fourth-century theologians Aphrahat and Ephrem the Syrian. It is found in earlier writings of Syriac Christianity such as the Odes of Solomon[9] and in the Gnostic early-third-century Acts of Thomas.[10]
Historian of religion Susan Ashbrook Harvey considers the grammatical gender to have been significant for early Syriac Christianity: "It seems clear that for the Syrians, the cue from grammar—ruah as a feminine noun—was not entirely gratuitous. There was real meaning in calling the Spirit 'She'."[11]
In the Catholic Church, the Holy Spirit is referred to in English as "He" in liturgical texts;[12] however, the Holy See directs that "the established gender usage of each respective language [is] to be maintained."[13]
Discussion in mainstream Christianity
[edit]
Ancient church
[edit]
For Semitic languages, such as ancient Syriac, the earliest liturgical tradition and established gender usage for referring to the Holy Spirit is feminine.[14]
The Syriac language, which was in common use around AD 300, is derived from Aramaic. In documents produced in Syriac by the early Miaphysite church (which later became the Syriac Orthodox Church) the feminine gender of the word for spirit gave rise to a theology in which the Holy Spirit was considered feminine.[15]
Recent discussions
[edit]
Some recent authors (1980s to present), while retaining masculine reference to Father and Son, have used feminine language for the Holy Spirit. These authors include Clark H. Pinnock,[16] Thomas N. Finger,[17] Jürgen Moltmann,[18] Yves M.J. Congar,[19] John J. O'Donnell,[20] Donald L. Gelpi,[21] and R.P. Nettlehorst.[22][23][24]
Discovering Biblical Equality maintains that viewing God in masculine terms is merely a way in which we speak of God in figurative language. The author reiterates that God is spirit and that the Bible presents God through personification and anthropomorphism which reflects only a likeness to God.[25]
There are some churches (see below) who teach that the Holy Spirit is feminine based on the fact that both feminine nouns and verbs, as well as feminine analogies, are thought to be used by the Bible to describe the Spirit of God in passages such as Genesis 1:1-2, Genesis 2:7, Deut. 32:11-12, Proverbs 1:20, Matthew 11:19, Luke 3:22, and John 3:5-6. These are based on the grammatical gender of both the nouns and verbs used by the original authors for the Spirit, as well as maternal analogies used by the prophets and Jesus for the Spirit in the original Bible languages.
There are biblical translations where the pronoun used for the Holy Spirit is masculine, in contrast to the gender of the noun used for spirit in Hebrew and Aramaic.[3] In Aramaic also, the language generally considered to have been spoken by Jesus, the word is feminine. However, in Greek the word (pneuma) is neuter.[3] Most English translations of the New Testament refer to the Holy Spirit as masculine in a number of places where the masculine Greek word "Paraclete" occurs, for "Comforter", most clearly in the Gospel of John, chapters 14 to 16.[26] These texts were particularly significant when Christians were debating whether the New Testament teaches that the Holy Spirit is a fully divine hypostasis, as opposed to a created force.
Feminine gender in other faith traditions
[edit]
Latter-day Saints
[edit]
In the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints gender is seen "as an essential characteristic of eternal identity and purpose".[27] The LDS Church believes that before humans lived on earth, they existed spiritually, with a spirit body with defined gender,[28] and that the Holy Spirit had a similar body, but was to become a member of the three personage Godhead[29] (Godhead consisting of God, or Heavenly Father, Jesus Christ, and the Holy Ghost).
Branch Davidians
[edit]
Some small Christian groups regard the gender of the Holy Spirit to be female, based on their understanding that the Hebrew word for Spirit, ruach, can be feminine or masculine. Their views derive from skepticism toward Greek primacy for the New Testament.[clarification needed] Foremost among these groups, and the most vocal on the subject are the Branch Davidian Seventh-day Adventists.[citation needed]
In 1977, one of their leaders, Lois Roden, began to formally teach that a feminine Holy Spirit is the heavenly pattern of women. In her many studies and talks she cited numerous scholars and researchers from Jewish, Christian, and other sources. They see in the creation of Adam and Eve a literal image and likeness of the invisible Godhead, male and female, who is "clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made".[30]
They take the Oneness of God to mean the "familial" unity which exists between them, which unity is not seen in any other depiction of the Godhead by the various non-Hebrew peoples. Thus, having a Father and Mother in heaven, they see that the Bible shows that those Parents had a Son born unto them before the creation of the world, by Whom all things were created.[31][32][33][34]
Unity Church
[edit]
The Unity Church's co-founder Charles Fillmore considered the Holy Spirit a distinctly feminine aspect of God considering it to be "the love of Jehovah" and "love is always feminine".[35]
Messianic Jews
[edit]
The B'nai Yashua Synagogues Worldwide,[36] a Messianic group headed by Rabbi Moshe Koniuchowsky, holds to the feminine view of the Holy Spirit.[37][38] Messianic Judaism is considered by most Christians and Jews to be a form of Christianity.
There are also some other independent Messianic groups with similar teachings. Some examples include Joy In the World;[39][40] The Torah and Testimony Revealed;[41] Messianic Judaism - The Torah and the Testimony Revealed;[42] and the Union of Nazarene Jewish Congregations/Synagogues,[43][44] who also count as canonical the Gospel of the Hebrews which has the unique feature of referring to the Holy Spirit as Jesus' Mother.[45]
Some scholars associated with mainline denominations, while not necessarily indicative of the denominations themselves, have written works explaining a feminine understanding of the third member of the Godhead.[46]
Moravian Brethren
[edit]
There was a well established place in liturgy, prayer and doctrine for the Holy Spirit as the Mother amongst the Moravian Brethren, exemplified by Count Zinzendorf especially.[47]
Gnosticism
[edit]
In the Secret Book of John, an ancient codex from the Nag Hammadi Library used in Christian Gnosticism, the divine female principle Barbelo is referred to as the Holy Spirit.[48]
In art
[edit]
Main article: The Trinity in art
In Christian iconography, the Holy Spirit is most often represented as a dove. There is also a far less common tradition of depicting the Holy Spirit in human form, usually as male. Thus, Andrei Rublev's The Trinity represents the Trinity as the "three men" who visited Abraham at the oak of Mamre[49] often considered a theophany of the Trinity.[50] In at least one medieval fresco, however, in the St. Jakobus church in Urschalling, Germany, the Holy Spirit is depicted as a female.[51]
See also
[edit]
-
Maid of Heaven, representation of the Holy Spirit in the Bahá'í Faith
References
[edit]
-
^ Jacobs, Joseph and Blau, Ludwig. "Holy Spirit", Jewish Encyclopedia, 1906
-
^ "In no way is God in man's image. He is neither man nor woman. God is pure spirit in which there is no place for the difference between the sexes. But the respective 'perfections' of man and woman reflect something of the infinite perfection of God: those of a mother and those of a father and husband." CCC 370.
-
^ Jump up to:a b c "Catholic Exchange". 24 June 2006. Retrieved 2009-05-13.
-
^ Jump up to:a b William D. Mounce, The Morphology of Biblical Greek (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1994), pp. 241-242
-
^ John 14:26; 15:26; 16:13-14.
-
^ Grudem, Wayne (1995). Systematic Theology: An Introduction to Biblical Doctrine. Grand Rapids: Zondervan. p. 232. ISBN 0-310-28670-0.
-
^ Daniel B. Wallace, Greek Grammar Beyond the Basics: An Exegetical Syntax of New Testament Greek (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1996), 332.
-
^ Susan Ashbrook Harvey, "Feminine Imagery for the Divine: The Holy Spirit, the Odes of Solomon, and Early Syriac Tradition," St. Vladimir's Theological Quarterly 37, nos. 2-3 (1993): 111-120.
-
^ Acts of Thomas 5:50, quoted in More Than Just a Controversy: All About The Holy Spirit
-
^ Harvey, "Feminine Imagery," 136.
-
^ Trigilio, John; Brighenti, Kenneth (2006). The Catholicism Answer Book. Sourcebooks. pp. 7–8. ISBN 978-1-4022-0806-5.
-
^ Liturgiam Authenticam Archived January 18, 2012, at the Wayback Machine, 31 (a)
-
^ Feminine-Maternal Images of the Spirit in Early Syriac Tradition, by Emmanuel Kaniyamparampil, O.C.D. Archived 2016-03-05 at the Wayback Machine
-
^ Clark H. Pinnock, "The Role of the Spirit in Creation," Asbury Theological Journal 52 (Spring 1997), 47-54.
-
^ Thomas N. Finger, Christian Theology:An Eschatological Approach vol. 2 (Scottdale, Penn.:Herald, 1987), 483-490.
-
^ Jurgen Moltmann, The Spirit of Life: A Universal Affirmation (Minneapolis: Fortress, 1992), 157-158.
-
^ Yves M.J. Congar, I Believe in the Holy Spirit, vol. 3 (New York: Seabury, 1983), 155-164.
-
^ John J. O'Donnell, The Mystery of the Triune God (London:Sheed & Ward, 1988), 97-99.
-
^ Donald L. Gelpi, The Divine Mother: A Trinitarian Theology of the Holy Spirit (New York:University Press of America, 1984).
-
^ More Than Just a Controversy: All About The Holy Spirit - by R.P. Nettelhorst
-
^ Appendix 3 -The Holy Spirit in the Old Testament - The Occurrences of Spirit
-
^ "God is not a sexual being, either male or female─something that was considered to be true in ancient Near Eastern religion. He even speaks specifically against such a view in Num 23:19, where the text has Balaam saying God is not a man [ish], and in Deut 4:15–16, in which he warns against creating a graven image in "the likeness of male or female." But though he is not a male, the "formless" deity (Deut 4:15) has chosen to reveal himself largely in masculine ways." House, H. Wayne (reviewer). "God, Gender and Biblical Metaphor." J of Biblical Manhood and Womanhood, 10:1 (Spring 2005) p. 64
-
^ Nestle and others, Novum Testamentum Graece, 27th ed. (Stuttgart: Deutsche Bibelgeselschaft, 1993)
-
^ "Gender Is an Essential Characteristic of Eternal Identity and Purpose", Ensign, Oct. 2008, 67
-
^ "Strengthening the Family: Created in the Image of God, Male and Female", Ensign, Jan. 2005, 48–49
-
^ "It's all Greek to Them The Holy Spirit He, She, or It?". Archived from the original on 2019-12-01. Retrieved 2009-06-04.
-
^ "She is a Tree of Life". Archived from the original on 2009-05-01. Retrieved 2009-06-04.
-
^ "Shelter from the Storm". Archived from the original on 2009-05-01. Retrieved 2009-06-04.
-
^ Charles Fillmore. Jesus Christ Heals. pp. 182–183.
-
^ "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2009-04-16. Retrieved 2009-06-04.
-
^ Who/What is the Ruach HaKodesh? Sermon Delivered 12-25-04 Part One
-
^ Who/What is the Ruach HaKadosh? Sermon Delivered 1-1-05 Part Two
-
^ Messianic Judaism - The Torah and the Testimony Revealed - Haas genealogy
-
^ "The Union of Nazarene Jewish Congregations/Synagogues". Archived from the original on 2007-12-10. Retrieved 2010-04-30.
-
^ "Home". unjs.org. Archived from the original on 2009-03-25. Retrieved 2009-06-04.
-
^ For example, R.P. Nettlehorst, professor at the Quartz Hill School of Theology (associated with the Southern Baptist Convention) has written on the subject. [1][2][3].
-
^ Atwood, Craig D. (2011-11-19). "Lecture at Moravian Theological Seminary".
-
^ Marvin Meyer; Willis Barnstone (June 30, 2009). "The Secret Book of John". The Gnostic Bible. Shambhala. Retrieved 2021-10-15.
-
^ "Rublev's Icon of the Trinity". wellsprings.org.uk. Retrieved 2008-12-23.
External links
[edit]
Website - Genesis ONE
https://adamandevegodsfirstchurch.org
Website - Genesis TWO
https://martynkenney3.wixsite.com/website-3
Website - Genesis THREE
https://martynkenney3.wixsite.com/website-1
Website - Genesis FOUR
https://martynkenney3.wixsite.com/website-2
Website - Genesis FIVE
https://martynkenney3.wixsite.com/website
Website - Genesis SIX
https://martynkenney3.wixsite.com/holyspirit
Website - Genesis SEVEN
https://martynkenney3.wixsite.com/website-4
Donations taken for ALL CHARITIES ON EITHER PAGE
https://www.genesisgodsfirstchurch.org/
https://www.genesisgodsfirstchurch.org/help-ukraine
GOD WAS MANIFEST IN THE FLESH 1 Timothy 3.16
The aims of the Society ● To publish and distribute the Holy Scriptures throughout the world in many languages. ● To promote Bible translations which are accurate and trustworthy. ● To be instrumental in bringing light and life, through the Gospel of Christ, to those who are lost in sin and in the darkness of false religion and unbelief. ● To uphold the doctrines of reformed Christianity, bearing witness to the equal and eternal deity of God the Father, God the Son and God the Holy Spirit, One God in three Persons. ● To uphold the Bible as the inspired, inerrant Word of God ● For the Glory of God and the increase of His Kingdom through the circulation of Protestant or uncorrupted versions of the Word of God.
www.trinitarianbiblesociety.org
A VITAL DOCTRINE
The architects and advocates of the modern English translations of the Holy Scriptures often assure us that their numerous alterations, omissions and additions do not affect any vital doctrine. While this may be true of hundreds of minute variations, there is nevertheless a substantial number of important doctrinal passages which the modern versions present in an altered and invariably weakened form.
These inspired words of the Apostle Paul to Timothy in 1 Timothy 3.16 have always been held to affirm the essential deity and pre-existence of the Lord Jesus Christ, but this testimony is not maintained by the modern versions when they do not unequivocally declare that Christ was “God manifest in the flesh”. The New International Version reads “He appeared in a body” with a footnote stating “some manuscripts God”. The New American Standard Bible has “He who was revealed in the flesh” with a marginal note “Some later mss. read God” (the 1995 Updated Edition omits the note). These, as most modern versions in following the United Bible Societies’ Greek New Testament, omit the deity of Christ in this verse.
EROSION OF THE SACRED TEXT
Countless millions of the Lord’s people, from the dawn of the Christian era to the present day, have read these words in their Bibles precisely as they appear in our Authorised Version, but now this powerful testimony to the Godhead of our Saviour is swept out of the Scriptures and disappears without trace. If we have the temerity to murmur or complain about this erosion of the sacred text of God’s Word, we are liable to be accused of defending the Authorised Version on emotional rather than on rational grounds. However. our present purpose is not so much to vindicate this English translation as to demonstrate that we have good reason to believe that the Holy Spirit inspired the Apostle Paul to write qeo.j evfanerw,qh evn sarki,, “God was manifest in the flesh”. If these were the words of the Holy Spirit, they are to be cherished as truth and not rejected as an ancient perversion of it.
THE TRUTH PROCLAIMED
The vital doctrine attested by this text is briefly set forth in the appendix to the Laws and Regulations of the Trinitarian Bible Society, quoted from the Westminster Confession of Faith (section 8, para 2), “two whole, perfect, and distinct natures, the Godhead and the manhood, were inseparably joined together in one Person, without conversion, composition, or confusion. Which person is very God and very man, yet one Christ, the only Mediator between God and man”. This Confession of Faith was published with an “Epistle to the Reader” subscribed by forty-four able and godly ministers of the Word, including Thomas Manton, Thomas Goodwin, Thomas Watson and Matthew Poole.
This preface explains that the “learned composers...were willing to take the pains of annexing scripture proofs to every truth, that the faith of people might not be built upon the dictates of men, but the authority of God”. The Scripture proofs annexed to section 8, para. 2, include 1 Timothy 3.16, “God was manifest in the flesh”. The Westminster Divines evidently regarded this verse as one of the essential proofs of the Trinitarian doctrine of the Bible, that the Father is God, the Son is God and the Holy Spirit is God.
THE TRUTH DENIED
The denial of the eternal Godhead of the Lord Jesus Christ has troubled the Church in every period of its history. Although the opponents of the truth have been known by different names, Arians, Socinians, Unitarians, Jehovah’s Witnesses and others, they have had many things in common, including an intense hostility to the doctrine set forth in this text of Holy Scripture.
GOD WAS MANIFEST IN THE FLESH x 2 as now returned as Martyn Nathan and Dua = Love - Lipa = Beautiful His Holy Spirit to live amonst their people as it is written 🔑📜🖌🔐🔓🎉
In his Outlines of Theology, Professor A. A. Hodge, expounding the true doctrine on the basis of this verse, declares that Socinians, Arians and Trinitarians worship different gods and that every non-Trinitarian conception of God presents a false god to the mind and conscience. He contends that it is an historical fact beyond dispute that in whatever church the doctrine of the Trinity has been abandoned or obscured, every other characteristic doctrine of the Gospel has gone with it. There can be no mutual toleration without treason. A UNITARIAN AMONG THE REVISERS OF 1881-1885 Unfortunately this “mutual toleration” was attempted by those responsible for the Revised Version, and Dr. G. Vance Smith, minister of St. Saviour’s Gate Unitarian Chapel, York, was invited to join in the revising body. Dr. Smith attended a Communion service in Westminster Abbey in company with the other Revisers and in a letter to The Times of 11th July, 1870, he declared that he received the sacrament without joining in the Creed and without compromise of his principles as a “Unitarian”. This evoked a solemn protest signed by several thousand clergy, and a resolution of the Upper House of Convocation in February, 1871, “That it is the judgment of this House that no person who denies the Godhead of our Lord Jesus Christ ought to be invited to join either company to which is committed the revision of the Authorised Version of Holy Scripture…and that any such person now on either company should cease to act therewith”. Vance Smith nevertheless remained on the committee. Among passages robbed of their true significance was 1 Timothy 3.16 where “God was manifest in the flesh” was altered to “who was manifest…” This was entirely satisfactory to Dr. Smith, who commented, “The old reading has been pronounced untenable by the Revisers, as it has long been known to be by all careful students of the New Testament… It is another example of the facility with which ancient copyists could introduce the word ‘God’ into their manuscripts – a reading which was the natural result of the -
GOD WAS MANIFEST IN THE FLESH 3 - growing tendency in early Christian times to look upon the humble Teacher as the incarnate Word, and therefore as ‘God manifested in the flesh’.” Most of the Revisers were also of the opinion that the original words written by the Apostle did not include the name of God, and as a result the Revised Version presents this text in a weakened form. Notwithstanding the hostile note in the margin of the Revised Version at this place, there is abundant ancient evidence for the text as we have it in the Authorised Version, and comparatively little for the adulterated text of the modern versions.
THE PROBLEM STATED
The most ancient surviving manuscripts of the Greek New Testament were written throughout in characters in some respects similar to capital letters (“Uncials”). In these uncial manuscripts it was the normal practice to abbreviate the name of God, using the first and last letters only, with a short line above these two letters as the sign of contraction, thus:- God = qeo.j, in uncials QEOC, abbreviated QC. The Greek word meaning “who” is o]j. The apostrophe fulfils the function of our aspirate “h” and was not written in the uncial form, which was therefore OC. The little stroke in the first letter and the stroke over the two letters were the only means of distinguishing between “God” and “who”, and a moment’s carelessness on the part of the scribe could easily reduce the Divine Name to the simple relative pronoun. The distinguishing strokes were often written very faintly and age and use have made them fainter still. Some early manuscripts have, “the mystery…which was manifested” (Greek o]). Some early copyists saw the obvious grammatical solecism in the wrongly abbreviated reading before them and endeavoured to “correct” it by reducing who to which, thus carrying the error a stage further.
GOD WAS MANIFEST IN THE FLESH 4 THE PRINTED GREEK EDITIONS
Many modern scholars insist, with the Unitarian Vance Smith, that misguided piety prompted some early copyists or their later correctors to insert these two distinguishing strokes in 1 Timothy 3.16 to make the verse testify to the deity of Christ. The scholars responsible for the earlier Greek editions found “God was manifested” in practically all the manuscripts at their disposal, and they did not question that this was the true reading. The Greek of Ximenes, Erasmus, Beza, Stephanus and the Elzevirs, and the various translations derived from their editions all have “God” in this verse. The 19th and 20th century editions of the Greek prepared by Lachmann, Tischendorf, Tregelles, Alford, Westcott and Hort, the Revisers of 1881, Nestle-Aland, Souter, Kilpatrick, and the United Bible Societies’ Greek New Testament, have all rejected the name of God from this text and have replaced it with “who”. The effect on the various translations is shown in the following quotations from English and European versions. THE ENGLISH VERSIONS These three were translated from the Latin Vulgate which has quod, which. ❏ Wyclif 1380: “that thing that was schewid in fleisch…” ❏ Rheims-Douay Roman Catholic version 1582: “which was manifested in flesh.” ❏ Ronald Knox modern English R.C. version 1945: “it is a great mystery we worship. Revelation made in human flesh.” The following were translated from the Greek:- ❏ Tyndale 1534: “God was shewed in the flesche.” ❏ Great Bible 1539: “God was shewed in the flesche.” ❏ Geneva New Testament 1557: “God is shewed in the flesche.” ❏ Bishops’ Bible 1568: “God was shewed manifestly in the flesh.”
GOD WAS MANIFEST IN THE FLESH 5 ❏ King James Version:
“God was manifest in the flesh,” ❏ New King James Version: “God was manifested in the flesh,” ❏ English Standard Version: “He was manifested in the flesh,” ❏ Revised Version of 1885: “He who was manifested in the flesh,” ❏ American Standard Version: “He who was manifested in the flesh,” ❏ New American Standard Version: ‘He who was revealed in the flesh,” ❏ New International Version: “He appeared in a body,” ❏ Today’s New International Version: “He appeared in a body,” ❏ Revised Standard Version: “He was manifested in the flesh,” ❏ New Revised Standard Version: “He was revealed in flesh,” ❏ New Living Translation: “Christ appeared in the flesh” ❏ Young’s Literal Translation: “God was manifested in flesh,” ❏ Douay-Rheims (1899 American edition): “which was manifested in the flesh,” ❏ New Jerusalem Bible: “He was made visible in the flesh,” ❏ New American Bible: “Who was manifested in the flesh,” ❏ Holman Christian Standard Bible: “He was manifested in the flesh,” ❏ New World Translation: “he was made manifest in flesh” ❏ Phillips: “the one who showed himself as a human being,” ❏ New Century Version: “He was shown to us in a human body,” ❏ Revised English Bible: “He was manifested in the flesh,” ❏ Good News Bible: “He appeared in human form,” ❏ Contemporary English Version: “Christ came as a human.” European Versions with “God” ❏ Italian (Diodati): “Iddio e state manifestato in carne.” ❏ French (Osterwald): “Dieu a ete manifeste en chair.” ❏ Spanish (Valera): “Dios ha side manifestado en carne.” ❏ German (Luther): “Gott ist offenbaret im Fleisch.” ❏ Portuguese (Almeida): “Dens se manifestou em carne.” …and many others.
GOD WAS MANIFEST IN THE FLESH 6
THE DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR ASCERTAINING THE TRUE TEXT
I t must be acknowledged that none of the original autograph writings of the Apostles has been discovered, but there are now over 5,300 New Testament manuscripts available, greatly varying in age, extent and reliability. Of these a comparatively small number of ancient manuscripts are in “uncial” or capital letters, and the majority are in small characters and are referred to as “minuscules” or “cursives”. Many of the cursives were derived from manuscripts more ancient than any now in existence. Dr. Scrivener, probably the most able textual scholar of the 19th century, described these as respectable ancestors who are known to us only through their descendants. Apart from papyrus fragments, the oldest existing manuscripts cannot be assigned to a date earlier than the middle of the fourth century. Before and after that period translations were undertaken in several languages including Syriac, Latin, Coptic, Sahidic, Bohairic, Gothic, Ethiopic, Armenian, Georgian and Slavonic. Some of these translations were made from Greek manuscripts more ancient than any we now possess. Existing manuscripts of these versions are not of very ancient date and they have suffered at the hands of transcribers, but they yield valuable testimony to the contents of the ancient Greek manuscripts used by the translators in those early times. A wealth of evidence is also furnished by the copious writings of early Christian scholars from the 1st century onwards, usually referred to as the “Fathers”, who quoted often and at length from the Greek Scriptures then in their hands. Although the existing manuscripts of these writings are not all of the greatest antiquity, they often serve as a guide to the Greek text as it was known to Christian readers in the earliest period of the history of the Church.
GOD WAS MANIFEST IN THE FLESH 7
THE MOST ANCIENT MANUSCRIPTS
The most ancient surviving Greek manuscripts of the Holy Scriptures differ greatly from each other and exhibit the worst corruptions of the text in great abundance. Many of the later manuscripts were executed with far greater care and are more reliable guides to the true text. The early manuscripts were adulterated in various ways, sometimes through mere carelessness, sometimes through ignorance of the language, sometimes through deliberate heretical attempts to suppress what was written, and sometimes through pious but misguided endeavours to embellish or enlarge upon what was written. It is no less true to fact than paradoxical in sound, that the worst corruptions to which the New Testament has ever been subjected originated within a hundred years after it was composed; and that Irenaeus and the African Fathers, and the whole Western, with a portion of the Syrian Church, used manuscripts far inferior to those employed by Stunica, Erasmus or Stephens thirteen centuries later when moulding the Textus Receptus. (F. H. A. Scrivener, Introduction to the Criticism of the New Testament) HERESIES RELATING TO THE PERSON OF CHRIST During the first four centuries of the present era the peace of the Church was disturbed by a number of heresies relating to the Person and work of the Lord Jesus Christ and the personality and deity of the Holy Spirit. It is significant that two very ancient manuscripts belonging to the latter part of this period, the Codex Vaticanus and Codex Sinaiticus, present in a weakened form a whole series of important passages concerned with these vital doctrines. These two documents, which have been favoured by modern scholars engaged in the translation of the Holy Scriptures, represent a very small minority of the existing manuscripts. The 19th century witnessed a steady drift away from the deity of
GOD WAS MANIFEST IN THE FLESH 8
Christ and towards “unitarianism”. It is not surprising that scholars who have been caught up in this tide of unbelief should welcome the support of these unreliable documents. It is more than unfortunate that earnest evangelical Christians who do not doubt the deity of our Lord should be prepared to surrender such precious declarations of God’s Holy Word without even attempting to examine and assess the evidence. It must also be admitted that some able evangelical scholars have examined the evidence and have been persuaded that they should reject the name of God from this verse, and that the text in its weakened form may still be understood to relate to Christ. The diluted rendering has thus been favoured by Unitarians, Roman Catholics, Jehovah’s Witnesses, liberals and also by some whose evangelical integrity has been beyond reproach. Are we then right when we insist that Paul was inspired to write “God was manifested in the flesh” or may we safely accept one of the alternatives – “who was manifested”, “He was manifested”, “He who was manifested”, or “which was manifested”? It is self evident that these statements do not affirm the same truth and that they cannot all be right. Think about what this says. “He was manifested in the flesh” or, as the NIV says, “He appeared in a body” could be said about any human being. Henry the VIII appeared in a body. You have a body. Paul himself was manifested in the flesh, but only Christ was God manifest in the flesh. Any man of Nazareth would be manifest in the flesh, but only Jesus of Nazareth was God manifest in the flesh. THE CLAIMS MADE BY THE REVISERS OF 1881 Many of the assertions of the Revisers are not in accordance with the facts. Dr. Roberts, a Presbyterian member of the Revision Committee, Bishop Ellicott the Chairman, and Westcott and Hort, whose Greek Text was in the hands of the Revisers, all allege that the word “God” in this text is not supported by the early Greek manuscripts,
GOD WAS MANIFEST IN THE FLESH 9
by the ancient versions or by the early Christian writers. They also claim that the reading, “Who was manifested” has powerful testimony from these ancient sources, and that it is more probable that “God” has been spuriously added to the majority of manuscripts than that the divine name has been accidentally omitted from the minority, or reduced to the relative pronoun “who”. PROBABLE ORIGIN OF THE ERRONEOUS READING The practice of writing “God” in an abbreviated form in the uncial manuscripts made the distinction between “God” and “who” dependent upon two small strokes, one written within the first letter and the other written above the two letters. An accident or deliberate omission of these two strokes would be sufficient to account for the substitution of “who” in a very ancient manuscript from which a few later manuscripts were derived. Transcribers confronted with the odd reading, “Great is the mystery who was manifested”, would be tempted to make the sentence grammatical by altering “who” to “which”, and achieved this by a further abbreviation of the Greek o]j to o]. This reading survives in a few manuscripts, including the Codex D of the 6th century. THE DOUBTFUL VALUE OF THE SINAI MANUSCRIPT Westcott and Hort and many modern scholars have attached great importance to the Vatican manuscript, but this does not contain the First Epistle to Timothy at all. The only Greek manuscript of great antiquity which can plausibly be quoted in favour of “who” is the Codex Sinaiticus of the 4th century, but this manuscript is characterised by numerous alterations and omissions. A comparison of these three manuscripts with the Received Text reveals 2,877 omissions in the Vatican manuscript, 3,455 omissions in the Sinai manuscript, and 3,704 omissions in Codex D. In view of these figures a small but significant omission from
GOD WAS MANIFEST IN THE FLESH 10
1 Timothy 3.16 in the Sinai manuscript and a larger omission in Codex D would hardly seem beyond the bounds of possibility. THE TESTIMONY OF THE CODEX ALEXANDRINUS “A” This almost complete uncial manuscript, probably of the 5th century, was given to King Charles I of England by Cyril Lucar, Patriarch of Constantinople, and is displayed in the British Museum near to the Codex Sinaiticus. Codex Alexandrinus is a very important witness to the deity of Christ in this passage. The critics assert that it originally had “who” and that a later hand altered this to “God” by adding the two strokes required. However, many distinguished scholars who have examined this manuscript during the last three hundred years have explained that these strokes were written in the original manuscript, that they had become indistinct with the passage of the centuries and had been written over at a later time to make them clearer, and that the original strokes could still be discerned. The passage has been examined so many times that the parchment is worn away, rendering its present evidence doubtful, but we may refer to the weighty opinions of those who had the manuscript in their hands long ago. They agreed that it supports the Received Text, “God was manifest in the flesh”. Patrick Young had custody of this manuscript from AD 1628-1652 and he assured Archbishop Ussher that the original reading was “God”. In 1657 Huish collated the manuscript for Walton, who printed “God” in his massive Polyglot. Bishop Pearson wrote in 1659 “we find not ‘who’ in any copy”. Mill worked on his edition of the Greek from 1677 to 1707 and clearly states that he found “God” in the Codex Alexandrinus at this place. In 1718 Wotton wrote, “There can be no doubt that this manuscript always read ‘God’ in this place”. In 1716 Wetstein wrote, “Though the middle stroke has been retouched, the fine stroke originally in the letter is discernible at each end of the fuller stroke of the corrector”.
GOD WAS MANIFEST IN THE FLESH 11
In his “Lectures on the true reading of 1 Timothy 3.16” (1737- 1738) Berriman declared, “If at any time the old line should become all together indiscernible there will never be just cause to doubt but that the genuine and original reading of this manuscript was ‘God’ ”. Woide, who edited this Codex in 1785, remarked that he had seen traces of the original stroke in 1765 which had ceased to be clearly visible twenty years later. One of the 1881 Revisers, Prebendary Scrivener, who examined the manuscript at least twenty times, asserted that in 1861 he could still discern the all-important stroke which Berriman had seen more clearly in 1741. THE EVIDENCE PROVIDED BY OTHER GREEK MANUSCRIPTS The great majority of the Greek manuscripts have “God was manifested”, and very few indeed have “who” or “which”. At the time of the Revision nearly three hundred Greek manuscripts were known to give indisputable support to the Received Text, while not more than a handful of Greek manuscripts could be quoted in favour of “who” or “which”. It is thus apparent that the correct and best attested reading of this verse is preserved in the Authorised Version. THE TESTIMONY OF THE ANCIENT VERSIONS Almost all of the ancient versions appear to read “who” or “which” instead of “God” in this passage: namely, the Old Latin, Latin Vulgate, Coptic, Peshitta-Syriac, Gothic, Armenian and Ethiopic translations. However, modern scholars have been inclined to overestimate the value of the testimony of the ancient versions in this place. The Peshitta-Syriac version was evidently influenced by Greek manuscripts like Codex D and the Latin versions, which have “which was manifested” instead of “God was manifested”. This reading no doubt would have become popular at a time of Nestorian influence in the Syrian Church. Nestorius denied the union of the two natures of God and man in the one
GOD WAS MANIFEST IN THE FLESH 12
Person of Christ. He was accused of teaching that there were two distinct persons – the Person of God the Son and the Person of the man Christ Jesus. This teaching was condemned by the Council of Ephesus in AD 431 at which Cyril of Alexandria presided. (Cyril himself witnesses in favour of “God” in 1 Timothy 3.16.) The Syriac version was older by two centuries than the Nestorian heresy, and it is possible that the earliest Syriac manuscripts had “God was manifested”. Under the influence of the Latin versions the later Syriac manuscripts could have been altered to read “which was manifested”. This reading would be acceptable to the Nestorian element because it appeared to be in harmony with their error, and it would be acceptable to any of the orthodox who were prepared to regard the Apostle’s words as an allusion to Colossians 1.27 and 2.2 and therefore a personal tribute to Christ. One of the Syriac versions, which was remarkable for its literal adherence to the Greek, was attributed to Philoxenus Bishop of Hierapolis in Eastern Syria, AD 488-518. This version actually includes the name of God in 1 Timothy 3.16 and indicates that Philoxenus found “God” in the Greek or Syriac manuscripts in his hands. THE GOTHIC VERSION Another ancient version likely to prefer the weaker rendering of this important verse was the Gothic translation by Ulphilas, who became Bishop of the Goths in AD 348. He was known to favour the heresy of Arius, who denied the pre-existence of the Son of God, affirming that He was created by God and not of one substance with the Father. Existing manuscripts of the Gothic version indicate some measure of corruption from Latin sources. The Latin versions all have “which was manifested”. Finding this erroneous reading in the sources available to him, Ulphilas would have no difficulty in adopting it, but would be likely to welcome it as favourable to his “Arian” views.
GOD WAS MANIFEST IN THE FLESH 13
THE ARMENIAN AND ETHIOPIC VERSIONS The 5th century Armenian version was influenced partly by the Syriac and partly by the Latin. Extant manuscripts differ greatly from each other and closely resemble the Latin Vulgate. It is probable that when the Armenian church submitted to Rome in the 13th century the Armenian text was revised in accordance with the Latin. The Ethiopic version was probably translated in the 6th or 7th century, but extant manuscripts are of comparatively recent date. According to Scrivener, it was the work of someone whose knowledge of Greek was far from perfect and the text has numerous interpolations from Syriac and Arabic sources. The present text may be compounded from two or more translations, and great caution is needed in applying this version to the criticism of the New Testament. An accidental or deliberate omission in one early Greek copy gave rise to a small company of similarly defective Greek manuscripts. These influenced the Latin versions, which in their turn influenced the versions in several other languages. These versions cannot therefore be regarded as witnesses of indisputable authority against the Received reading, “God was manifest in the flesh”, which is supported by the majority of the Greek manuscripts. Nor can the ancient versions be fairly quoted in support of “the mystery…who was manifested”. In this particular text they have more in common with the old Latin “quod manifestum est” – “which was manifested”, an ancient error also found in the Greek Codex D and still reflected by the Roman Catholic versions. THE TESTIMONY OF THE “FATHERS” Bishop Ellicott insisted that the reading “God”, as in the Received Text, was a “plain and clear error” and that there was decidedly preponderating evidence for “who”. His “preponderating evidence” included an imposing list of ancient writers, but it is evident that his judgment of this class of evidence was affected by his strong prejudice against the Received Text.
GOD WAS MANIFEST IN THE FLESH 14
The early writers allowed themselves great latitude in quoting the general sense of passages of Scripture relevant to their subject and it was not always incumbent upon them to quote the whole verse in every context. If an enemy of the truth denied that Christ had a natural body, the orthodox writer would emphasise that “Christ was manifest in the FLESH”. If anyone questioned whether his natural body was visible, the writer would remind him that, “He was MANIFEST in the flesh”. In other contexts it might be equally suitable to the writer’s purpose to write “One who was manifest in the flesh”, or “He who was manifest in the flesh”, while the copy upon the writer’s desk contained the full reading, “God was manifest in the flesh”. EXPOSITORS OFTEN QUOTE ONLY WHAT IS IMMEDIATELY RELEVANT TO THEIR THEME Even at the present time a minister accustomed to use no other version but the Authorised Version may well mention in his sermon, prayers and written articles, “One who was manifested in the flesh in the mysterious miracle of the incarnation”, and none of his hearers or readers would imagine for one moment that the word “God” was missing from his text in the preacher’s Bible. It must therefore be allowed that early writers availed themselves of the same liberty without intending to conceal the full reading. These same early writers would no doubt have been astonished if they had been told that Biblical scholars today would read such an inference into their quotations. CYRIL OF ALEXANDRIA This principle may be illustrated from Cyril of Alexandria who wrote “God manifest…” in two places, while in another he wrote, “Ye do err, not knowing the Scriptures, nor indeed the great mystery of Godliness, that is Christ, who was manifested in the flesh”. Elsewhere he wrote, “I consider the mystery of godliness to be no other but the Word of God the Father, who Himself was manifested in the flesh”. These uses of “who” cannot be quoted against the presence of “God” in the manuscripts in Cyril’s hands.
GOD WAS MANIFEST IN THE FLESH 15
GREGORY OF NYSSA The critics have done their best to demolish the evidence of the 5th century Codex Alexandrinus, but Gregory of Nyssa frequently and powerfully testified for “God manifest in the flesh” at least a hundred years before this manuscript was written. Gregory died in AD 394 and his life spanned the period during which the 4th century Codex Sinaiticus was written. In those of his writings that have survived he has “God” in this text no less than twenty-two times. Even distinguished textual critics have been capable of “plain and clear errors”. Griesbach quoted Gregory of Nyssa as hostile to the Received Text, but he appears to have borrowed this information from Wetstein before passing it on to Scholz and Alford. The words quoted by Wetstein were not the words of Gregory at all, but the opinion of Apollinaris against whom Gregory was writing. Euthalius in the 5th century attributed to a “wise and pious Father” the section title for 1 Timothy 3.16-4.7. This title makes mention of “God incarnate” and was used by Gregory of Nyssa in his dispute with Apollinaris in the 4th century. Diodorus of Tarsus (died AD 370) quotes Paul’s actual words and asserts that he finds them in Paul’s epistle to Timothy. Chrysostom (died AD 407) has at least three references to God manifest in the flesh, and there can be no doubt that this reading was prevalent in the 4th century. The testimony of Dionysius of Alexandria carries the attestation of the Received Text back to AD 264. It has been alleged that the letter to Paul of Samosata was not actually the work of Dionysius, but it cannot be denied that it belongs to the 3rd century and has “God”. Obvious allusions to this text in the writings of Ignatius, Barnabas and Hippolytus make it clear that Christian readers in the 2nd century found in their Scriptures what we find in our Authorised Version – a declaration that “God was manifest in the flesh”.
GOD WAS MANIFEST IN THE FLESH 16
Among 5th century witnesses was a writer formerly confused with Athanasius. At the time of the Nestorian controversy this now anonymous writer insisted that the correct reading was “God”. This writer would have settled the great debate about the testimony of the Codex Alexandrinus in favour of “God”. The anonymity of the writer does not weaken the force of his testimony. The Vatican, Sinai and Alexandrian manuscripts are all “anonymous” and so are most of the ancient documents. THE WEAKNESS OF THE “ARGUMENT FROM SILENCE” Westcott and Hort and other modern scholars have argued that if the correct reading had been “God manifest…” Origen and Eusebius would have quoted it. Nothing can be proved in this way. It is known with absolute certainty that Gregory of Nyssa read “God manifest…”, but it will never be known why he did not quote this text in his treatise on the deity of the Son and the Holy Spirit. If this treatise were the only surviving work of Gregory of Nyssa, scholars would wrongly argue from his “silence” that he could not have read “God” in the Greek manuscripts in his hands. The critics include the silence of Origen and Eusebius among their arguments for the rejection of the Received reading, “God was manifest”, but there are other cases where the testimony of Origen and Eusebius has been regarded by the same modern scholars as being of little value. For instance, in the Authorised Version, Matthew 5.22 reads, “…whosoever is angry with his brother without a cause shall be in danger of the judgment”. In the modern versions the words “without a cause” are omitted on little more evidence than that of the Codex Sinaiticus, Codex Vaticanus and Jerome’s Latin. In this place the Received Text and the Authorised Version have the support of nearly all other extant manuscripts, all the Syriac and Old Latin manuscripts, and the Memphitic, Armenian and Gothic versions. Eusebius, the Latin Fathers from Irenaeus and Origen’s old Latin version all bear the same testimony, but all are set aside in favour of the Sinai and Vatican manuscripts. A note in the Greek text underlying the New English Bible announces that the translators regarded “without a cause” as “an early explanatory addition”.
GOD WAS MANIFEST IN THE FLESH 17
The reader is entitled to doubt whether these scholars have attached sufficient weight to the external evidence and to wonder to what extent subjective presumptions of the superiority of the Vatican and Sinai manuscripts have influenced their assessment of all the other documents. THE INTERNAL EVIDENCE Dr. Bloomfield and other learned authorities have demonstrated that the new reading “the mystery…who was manifested” violates all the rules of construction and exhibits only too clearly the marks of accidental or deliberate corruption. The context makes it plain that Paul is presenting six propositions relating to the Lord Jesus Christ, in Whose divine Person – God was (1) Manifest in the flesh (2) Justified in the Spirit (3) Seen of angels (4) Preached unto the Gentiles (5) Believed on in the world (6) Received up into glory. It cannot be doubted that the weak alternative is old, but it is an ancient error. From the earliest times a host of reliable documentary witnesses have survived to assure us that the first readers of Paul’s Epistle to Timothy read this verse as we read it here. THE MISLEADING CHARACTER OF THE MARGINAL NOTES IN MODERN TRANSLATIONS Most modern versions have a footnote which attempts to explain in general terms the textual reason for removing the deity of Christ. The New Revised Standard Version has in the text, “He was revealed in flesh” and a marginal note, “Gk Who; other ancient authorities read God; others, Which”.
The Gnostic Goddess, Female Power, and the Fallen Sophia ©2010 Max Dashu 1 Thou Mother of Compassion, come Come, thou revealer of the Mysteries concealed... Come, thou who givest joy to all who are at one with Thee Come and commune with us in this thanksgiving... —Gnostic hymn [Drinker, 150] Before the Roman triumph of Christianity, serious disagreements had already appeared among the believers. Gnostics were the first Christians to be expelled from the church as heretics. But not all Gnostics were Christian. Jewish Gnosticism predated Christianity, and pagan Gnostics who praised Prometheus and the Titans for opposing the tyranny of Zeus. [Geger, 168; Godwin, 85] Persian dualism, Hellenistic Neo-Platonism, and Egyptian mysticism were all influential in shaping Gnosticism. There was no one unified body of Gnostic belief. Though some Gnostic gospels were among the earliest Christian texts, all were banned from the orthodox canon that became the New Testament. Most people don't realize that the New Testament is a carefully screened selection from a much larger body of Christian scriptures. The others were not simply excluded from the official collection, but were systematically destroyed when Christianity became the state religion. [Epiphanius, in Legge, xliii] Egyptian Gnostics managed to protect an important cache of scriptures from the book-burners by burying them in large jars. Until the discovery of these Nag Hammadi scrolls in 1947, what little was known of the Gnostics came mostly from their sworn enemies, the orthodox clergy. [Pagels 1979: xxxv, xvii; Allegro, 108; Wentz, 363fn, lists a few surviving manuscripts known by 1900.] One of the few scriptures that did survive intact is the Pistis Sophia, while others are known fragmentarily from quotations in orthodox writings, especially those of Irenaeus and Hippolytus of Rome. Among the anathematized scriptures were writings featuring Wisdom as a creative female divinity. Some highlighted female disciples of Yeshua, particularly Maryam of Magdala, as advanced initiates into secret teachings unknown to the male disciples. For example, the Pistis Sophia names Mary Magdalene, Salome and Martha. [Legge, 51, 55] Some Gnostics maintained that the three Marys were part of the inner circle of Christian disciples and that women were present at the Last Supper. (They must have been, since it was a Seder; the Christian bible says that Jesus “lay down at table” with the disciples—reclining was the custom at Seders). [Schussler-Fiorenza, 55]) A woman, possibly Mary Magdalene, sits at the Last Supper in early murals of the Roman catacombs. [Drinker, 154-5] Female leadership is a key theme in the writings, and in contemporary accounts about these communities. Tertullian complained that Gnostics elected women priests, bishops and prophets to baptize, teach, exorcize and heal. They rejected authoritarian priesthood and gave the kiss of peace to all: “they all have access equally, they listen equally, they pray equally—even pagans, if any happen to come.” [Pagels 1979: 42] Tertullian was horrified that females were not barred from priestly acts: These heretical women—how audacious they are! They have no modesty; they are bold enough to teach, to engage in argument, to enact exorcisms, to undertake cures, and, it may be, even to baptize! [De Praescriptione Haereticorum, in Pagels 1979: 60] Bishop Irenaeus of Lyons noticed that women were especially drawn to heresy. He explained the female defections from his own congregation by calumniating the Gnostic Marcus as a sorcerer and seducer who used aphrodisiacs. The bishop refused to acknowledge the real reason for women’s attraction to this community: that Marcus encouraged women to prophesy (which meant to “preach,” in early Christian parlance). Another aspect of his congregation’s appeal were its prayers to feminine forms of the Divine— Wisdom, Silence, Grace. [Pagels 1979: 59] For Irenaeus these were just more reasons to disparage them. GNOSTIC MYSTICISM The Gnostic Goddess, Female Power, and the Fallen Sophia ©2010 Max Dashu 2 The Gnostic approach to Christianity had a strong pagan tinge. Its symbolic teachings were transmitted “in secret and by a method of initiation and allegory which was directly copied from the Mysteries then current in the pagan world...” [Legge, iii, xli] For the institutional church, Jesus was divine in a way humans could never attain, and salvation came only through him. But Gnostics saw Jesus as a person who had attained realization, and they followed him in seeking the source of divinity in “the depth” of Being. [Valentinus, in Pagels 1979: 37] In the Gospel of Thomas Jesus says, “I am not your master. Because you have drunk, you have become drunk from the bubbling stream which I have measured out... He who will drink from my mouth will become as I am; I myself shall become he, and the things that are hidden will be revealed to him.” [Gospel of Thomas, 13, 108, online] Similar passages survived even in the canonical scriptures, here and there: “... you will do the same things I do. You will do even greater things than I do.” [John 14:12] Gnostic spiritual practice aimed for reunion of human consciousness with the Pleroma, the “fullness” pervading the universe. [Allegro, 112-3] A saying attributed to Simon Magus describes “an infinite power... the root of the universe” living in everyone. [Hippolytus, in Pagels 1979: 134]
The Gospel of Truth says “... in you dwells the light that does not fail...” [Pagels 1979: 128] The Arab Gnostic Monoimus taught that theology was not the right starting point, and counseled seekers to stop thinking about external matters, and to look for the divine within instead. Understanding would come from investigating the origins of the passions and involuntary states, and the discovery of Deity, “unity and plurality, in thyself.” The human is a reflection of the Mother-Father, which is like a musical harmony that “manifests all things, and generates all things.” [in Hippolytus, VIII, V, online] These teachings were not new, nor were they uniquely Christian. In fact, when Yeshua says that “The kingdom of God is within you” he is speaking as a Jew, although his words are recorded in the Christian Gospel of Luke. Kemetic temple inscriptions exhorted the seeker to “Know thyself,” a saying later inscribed at Delphi. It was adopted by Greek sages like Socrates and Pindar, who wrote “Learn what you are and be such.” [Allegro, 223] Self-knowledge involved becoming aware of past lives, according to the Anatolian Theodotus, seeking consciousness of “who we were, and what we have become... from what we are being released; what birth is, and what is rebirth.” [Pagels 1979: xix] Gnostics believed in the growth and perfectibility of the soul over countless lifetimes. They sought to progress through meditation, chanting, retreats to the wilderness, austerities, the praise of silence. Modern scholars remark on the similarities to Hinduism or Buddhism, something that the ancients recognized. Around the year 225, Hippolytus named the “brahmins” as an influence on Gnosticism, citing vegetarianism, the concept of god as light, and adepts wise in Nature’s mysteries. [Pagels 1979: xxi] Many Christians believed in reincarnation, especially the Egyptians, including Origen and Synesius of Ptolemais. Origen's writings show his conviction that past actions bore fruit in later lifetimes. He was later declared a heretic for it, and others followed. Centuries later, the Church hierarchy was fighting this still-widespread belief. In 553 the council of Constantinople decreed: “Whosoever shall support the mythical doctrine of the pre-existence of the Soul, and the consequent wonderful opinion of its return, let him be anathema.” [Wentz, 359fn, 362] Gnostics passed on secret, unwritten teachings about how to reach heightened states of consciousness. Traces remain in the Nag Hammadi scrolls, which recommend austerities, chanting, and meditation in silence. The sage Zostrianos went into the desert seeking visions of the eternal Light. He counseled seekers to overcome physical desires and still the “chaos in mind” through meditation. [Pagels, 135-6] In Allogenes , the glorious Youel speaks of a Triple Power which exists in silence, but emits a beelike sound: “zza zza zza...” Stilling the self is the secret to realizing this state. [Allogenes, online] The Discourse on the Eighth and Ninth also recommends seeking in silence. The teacher tells his disciple, “Language is not able to reveal this. For the entire Eighth, my son, and the souls that are in it, and the angels, sing a hymn in silence.” [Braschler et al, online] Gnostics often conceived of the eternal mystic Silence as the Mother. Some said that Sige (Silence) was God's female partner, as bishop Irenaeus related, while the scripture Eugnostos the Blessed names her as "Sophia, Mother of the Universe, whom some call Love." [Parrot, online] Here, and The Gnostic Goddess, Female Power, and the Fallen Sophia ©2010 Max Dashu 3 throughout Gnostic scriptures, we find strong echoes of Hebrew traditions of Khokhmah, “Wisdom.” The Gnostic Valentinus paired the Primal Father, the Word, with “Mother of the All,” who was Grace, Silence, Womb. His disciple Marcus said that communion wine was her blood. [Pagels 1979: 52-3, 55] Paired divinities were characteristic of many Gnostic sects, including several that paired Jesus with Sophia. Other Gnostics declared that God was neither male nor female—or both. [Arthur, 54] Sige (Silence) was called “God the Father and God the Mother.” [Alexandre, 426] The Apochryphon of John refers to Deity as matropater, the “mother-father." [Arthur, 7]
SOPHIA Egypt, whose ancient religion deeply influenced Gnostic philosophy, still revered its goddesses. Isaic aretalogies (praise-songs based on the affirmation “I am”) made their way into several Gnostic scriptures. The Gospel of Thomas contains an invocation from ancient litanies of Isis: “Come, lady revealing hidden secrets...” [Holland-Smith, 68; find Budge cite] In an aretalogy embedded in the Apocryphon of John, a goddess descends into “the inner part of Emente”—Amentet, the old Kemetic name for the underworld—like Inanna or Persephone. [Arthur, 167] Great Isis had become syncretized in Egypt with Judaic Wisdom traditions of Khokhmah, the female presence that took part in the creation. Her name was translated into Greek as Sophia and other Hellenistic names. The writings of Philo (a Hellenistic Egyptian Jew) and Plutarch identified Isis as Sophia (“Wisdom”). [Long, 46; Allegro, 157] The early, pre-Christian Gnostic scripture Eugnostos the Blessed hail “the all-wise Sophia, Genetrix.” The Origin of the World praises her as the being “who created great luminaries and all of the stars and placed them in the heaven so that they should shine upon the earth”. [Arthur, 65] This verse clearly echoes the Isis aretalogy of Cyme: “I divided earth from heaven, I created the ways of the stars...” [Long, 84] The first words in the Bible are Be reshít: “In the beginning…” The Hebrew name Reshít represents Wisdom in the Palestinian Targum and the Samaritan Liturgy. Several Greek texts draw on these traditions in addressing the goddess as Arche (“beginning”). [Arthur, 61] Other scriptures name the Divine Female as Ennoia (Thought), Pronoia (Forethought) or Protennoia (Primal Thought), Pistis (Faith), Eidea (Image, Ideal), or Charis (Grace). [Long, 87ff; Arthur, 55; Legge, xxxix] These Greek titles were often used interchangeably with Sophia. The Discourse on the Eighth and Ninth emphasizes the primacy of Arche (the Beginning): “I have found the Arche of the power which is over every power, she who is without Arche. I see a spring which is bubbling over with life.” [in Arthur, 172] In another text, the waters reflect the image of Pistis Sophia, infused with animist power: “the holy water makes all things alive. It purifies.” [Pronoia intrusion, Origin of the World, in Arthur, 129] Irenaeus tells us that the Gnostics regarded Arche as a mother without origin: “another Monogenes.” This title of “singly-born” was still in play as a Goddess attribute, although the evangelist version of Jesus as “only-begotten son” was fast overtaking older pagan meanings. [Arthur, 61; see chapter 3] Goddess traditions persisted among the Sethian Gnostics in Egypt. Hippolytus wrote that they celebrated rites “very closely bordering upon those orgies of the 'Great Mother' which are observed among the Phliasians.” [Arthur, 32, 31; Hippolytus meant Phlya, known for its ancient Goddess mysteries, and not Phlious as the text implies.] (As I explain elsewhere in this series, orgias was an old Greek name for land ceremonies that, because of their association with women’s mysteries, underwent a Isis Ermouthis, a serpent form, from Paym, Fayum. The Gnostic Goddess, Female Power, and the Fallen Sophia ©2010 Max Dashu 4 strongly gendered reinterpretation as a sexually scandalous pejorative.) Epiphanius reported that the Sethians revered “the Mother and Female.” They said that the “Mother of All” planted a seed of power in her creation, which became Seth, the ancestor of the Perfect and of Jesus. [Doresse, 39] The biblical god sent the Flood to punish humans for not worshipping him, but “Wisdom opposed him.” She saved Noah's family by showering light on them. [Pagels 1979: 55]
THE DIVINE BARBELO Barbelo is another syncretic goddess of Egyptian Gnosticism. Her presentation as a divine emanation of god resembles Khokhmah. The Sethian scripture Allogenes calls her “the first Arche of blessedness, the Aeon of Barbelo, full of divinity, and the first Arche of that one without Arche, the spiritual invisible Triple Power, the All that is higher than perfect.” [Arthur, 165] Many writers refer to Mother Barbelo as part of a trinity, along with the Father and Son. Here the Christian influence comes into view, but it is tempered by Egyptian themes: the trinity abides in the female sphere of the “Eighth.” [Pagels, 166; Arthur, 166. Epiphanius said that the Gnostics placed Barbelo with Christ in the Eighth heaven. [Doresse, 43] The Trimorphic Protennoia exalts “Barbelo, the perfect glory, and the immeasurable Invisible One who is hidden.” She is called Protennoia—Primal Thought—who “dwells in the Light.” This scroll begins with an aretalogy that praises her as “the movement that dwells in the All...she who exists before the All.” From her originated a trinity of Father, Mother, and Son. [Trimorphic Protennoia, online] I move in every creature... I am the Invisible One within the All... It is I who poured forth the water. It is I who am hidden by radiant waters. It is I who gradually put forth the All by my Thought. It is I who am laden with the Voice. It is through me that Gnosis comes forth.” [Trimorphic Protennoia, online] Protennoia’s connection with the waters recalls the primal flood of Neith and Isis, who brought forth the Nile inundation. And like both goddesses gave birth to the sun, Neit to Ra and Isis to Horus, Protennoia proclaims, “I am the Womb that gives shape to the All by giving birth to the Light that shines in splendor. I am the Aeon to come. I am the fulfilment of the All, that is, Meirothea, the glory of the Mother.” [Trimorphic Protennoia, online] Attempts to reconcile conflicting traditions generated contradictions in the Barbelo literature. The Gospel of the Egyptians says that Barbelo “originated from herself,” as the ancients had said of Neith, Mother of the Gods. [http://gnosis.org/naghamm/goseqypt.html] But the Three Stelas of Seth represent her as “the first shadow of the holy Father,” who existed before her. Its author addresses her with feminine pronouns, but paradoxically praises her as “the male virginal Barbelo.”[Arthur, 165-6] A later passage reverts to goddess imagery: Thou art a Sophia. Thou art a Gnosis. Thou art truth. Because of thee, there is life. Life is from thee. Because of thee, there is mind... Thou art a cosmos of truth. Thou art a triple power... [Arthur, 166] The Sethian trinity was made up of Light, Breath, and Darkness. The Peratae had it as Father, Son and Matter, with the Son mediating between the exalted Father and a passive female principle. [Both according to the Philosophumena, in Doresse, 52, 50] The male supremacist underpinnings are clear. But there is no single Gnostic doctrine, but an exuberant diversity of them. Frequently contradictory positions are even expressed within the same text, since many of the scriptures are layered composites that underwent revisions and interpolations. The Apochryphon of John contains another aretalogy of “the perfect Pronoia of the universe,” who was the First. She represents “the light which exists in light,” but wandered in the great darkness, “into the midst of the prison,” and the depths of the underworld. [Arthur, 167] However, this book unfavorably compared “sister Sophia” to Barbelo. The Gnostic Goddess, Female Power, and the Fallen Sophia ©2010 Max Dashu 5 A splitting of Gnostic goddess images was underway, in the process of subordinating the creative female Wisdom to “the Father.” Christian authors disparaged the independence of a goddess not firmly partnered to a male god. Their altered Gnostic aretalogies reflect an emerging concept of a “fallen” goddess. Rose Arthur explains, “Themes such as the impossibility of the feminine to conceive by herself, of the dependency of Sophia upon Christ, of the ‘fault’ of the psychic woman, and the regenerative force of the male spirit are common and basic in developed Christian Gnosticism.” [Arthur, 59] The very female-positive scripture Trimorphic Protennoia, does not assign fault to Sophia but speaks instead of her defeat by the archons: “from the time when the innocent Sophia was conquered, she who descended...” [TP, online] The longest aretalogy appears in Thunder, Perfect Mind. It follows the form of the old Isis litanies: I am the first and the last. I am the honored one and the scorned one. I am the whore and the holy one. I am the wife and the virgin I am the mother and the daughter I am the members of my mother I am the barren one, and many are her sons.... I am the silence that is incomprehensible And the idea whose remembrance is frequent And the word whose appearance is multiple I am the utterance of my name. [Kurt Rudolph, Gnosis: The Nature and History of an Ancient Religion, 1984, in Long] Further on there is a veiled but pointed reference to Isis: I am the Sophia of the Greeks And the Gnosis of the barbarians I am one whose image is great in Egypt... But unlike the pagan aretalogies, Thunder is dualistic, pairing negatives—“ignorance... shame... fear”—with the divine qualities of the goddess, who it treats with much more ambivalence. Still, it can also be regarded as lifting up the despised; Elaine Pagels calls the conception of the Divine “a presence found not only in palaces but also where one least expects it: “cast out upon the dung heap... among those who are disgraced ... among those violently slain.” [Pagels 2012: 98] Rose Arthur reasons that Thunder was originally titled The Divine Barbelo, based on the abbreviations used and the association of Barbelo with the title “Perfect Mind.” [Arthur, 7, 164, 173-5] She points out that some lines in Thunder also resemble verses in the “Song of the Woman” in another Gnostic text, Origin of the World. That scripture attributes the song to Eve, and assigns her a male lord not present in Thunder. In the Hypostasis of the Archons, Eve no longer speaks; now similar declarations about her are put in the mouth of Adam. [Arthur, 162, 148] FEMALE CREATORS AND CULTURE SHEROES To understand the demotion of goddesses that accumulated in Gnostic mythology, we need to examine the older strands in which Egyptian Gnostics go out of their way to affirm the creative power of a Mother of All, and to critique her omission from the biblical account. These Gnostics embraced the Wisdom goddess as a power higher than the god who created the world. A markedly Egyptian sensibility is expressed in the Origin of the World, a Sahidic Coptic scripture among the Nag Hammadi scrolls. It mixes Greek names in with Hebrew ones, reflecting the influence of these cultures in Egypt at the time. The Gnostic Goddess, Female Power, and the Fallen Sophia ©2010 Max Dashu 6 Although this text has been Christianized, it still shows a goddess as the major force in creation. It restores Eve to her primordial sacred status as the Mother of All Living. Negative comments about the male creator are embedded in the beginning and end of this text, but conflict with its main thrust. Its author is keenly aware of the Genesis account, but poses a counter-interpretation. The biblical name for god, Elohim, is taken as a plural indicating multiple entities (rather than the ending –im acting as a grammatical intensifier). This text uses elohim to stand for the archons (elemental powers).
Sophia is described as existing in the beginning, even before Chaos. She flowed out of Pistis (“faith”) in the form of “primeval light.” And immediately her will manifested itself as a likeness of heaven, having an unimaginable magnitude...” Her wish brought a great power into being, which became like a veil between the immortals and those who came into being after them. A shadow arose, that gave birth to envy and wrath, and became like dark waters of immeasurable deepness. Pistis appeared over it, and was disturbed at what had come into being "through her fault." [Arthur, 188-89; Young, 54] Then Pistis Sophia caused a lion-like spirit to come into being out of the waters, to rule over the world of matter. She called him Yaldabaoth, Aramaic for “child of chaos” (yalda bahut). [“Ophites,” in the Jewish Encyclopedia, online] He had power, but did not know how he came to be, and was “ignorant of the power of Pistis.” And she “withdrew up to her light.” The godling concluded that he alone existed. Now the author makes a direct link to the Genesis creation story: Yaldabaoth's thought becomes the word, and moves over the waters as a spirit, and he separates the waters and land, making heaven and earth. But this male godling is unaware of the goddess who brought him into being, saying, “I am God, and there is none other existing beside me.” [Arthur, 193] Pistis retorts, “You are wrong, Samael [blind god]… there is an immortal light man that exists before you.” (Here Neoplatonism surfaces in the mix of traditions.) The god later realizes the truth of her words when he glimpses her image on the water, and he repents. [Origin of the World, online] This story Snake Goddess Gives Eve Fruit from the Tree of Knowledge. Michaelangelo’s Sistine Chapel painting is one of several European representations of the Serpent as a woman, long after the Gnostic era. The Gnostic Goddess, Female Power, and the Fallen Sophia ©2010 Max Dashu 7 is repeated by Irenaeus in his description of Ophite cosmology; there, when Ialdabaoth proclaims himself sole god, Sophia shouts, “Do not lie!” [Doresse, 38] A similar counter-narrative appears in a Buddhist critique of Hinduism, where Brahma imagines that he is the creator. [Klein, 158] Next comes a section on the Christian trinity, with Israel (later called Sabaoth) enthroned in light, Jesus at his right, and the virginal Holy Spirit at his left. Sophia daughter of Pistis instructs “him”—it later becomes clear that Sabaoth is meant—“about all the things that exist in the eighth heaven.” More creations follow, with Death creating various demonic passions, and Life (Zoë) creating good powers, all of which are androgenous. Then Pronoia’s unrequited desire for the light-man causes her to emit radiance that engenders the Adam of Light. The text, drawing on Hebrew linguistics, ties Adama to Earth (Adamah) and blood (adom). The Pistis Sophia calls this “the blood of the virgin,” which in turn engenders Eros, another androgyne power, and the grapevine, and fig, and pomegranate, and later the rose, and all other plants. The intermix of Hebrew, Greek, and Christian concepts is obvious, with longstanding Goddess symbols like the pomegranate still prominent amidst the Neoplatonism. The seven archons molded a man, but he had no spirit, and they left him. After forty days, “Sophia sent her breath into Adam.” Yaldabaoth and his archons were disturbed when they found their man, but rejoiced when they found that Adam was not able to rise. After a day of rest, they “withdrew up to their heavens.” Now, in a section known as the “Eve intrusion,” Sophia creates “the Living-Eva, that is, the Instructoress of Life,” by letting a droplet of light flow onto the water. It became an androgynous human, which Sophia molded first as a female body. Then she molded this body in the likeness of the mother, who bore another androgynous being. The text says that the Hebrews call this mother “Eve of Life (Zoë), namely, the female instructor of life.” Eva proclaims her identity with Sophia, and assumes titles of Isis, such as “consoler of the labor pains.” [Arthur, 99, 117, 131] The text calls her “Life” both in Hebrew (Eva standing for Chava) and in Greek (Zoë). “Sophia sent her daughter Zoë, who is called Eva, as an Instructoress to awaken Adam in whom there was no soul,” so that his offspring would become “vessels of the light.” [Arthur, 205] Eve saw her co-likeness lying there, and she took pity on him. She said, “Adam, live! Rise up on the earth!” And he rose and opened his eyes. When he saw Eve, he said, “You will be called the mother of the living because you are the one who gave me life.” [Arthur, 205; Young, 54] So The Origin of the World utterly reverses the primacy of Adam over Eve in Genesis. In fact, it goes further that that, making Eva herself the ensouling life-giver. Now the archangels beheld Eve and compared her to Sophia, “the likeness which appeared to us in the light.” Still jealous, they plotted to rape and “pollute” her, and to cast Adam into a sleep, teaching him that she came into being from his rib “so that the woman will serve and he will rule over her.” But Life / Eva laughed at their scheming, darkened their eyes and left her likeness beside Adam. “She entered the tree of knowledge, and remained there. She revealed to them that she had entered the tree and become tree.” The archons ran away in fear, then came back to defile Eva's likeness through rape. “And they were deceived, not knowing that they had defiled their own bodies.” (What a profound truth is said there.) Later, the first couple ate fruit, and the archons cursed them, the earth, and its fruit. At this, Sophia became furious and cast down the archons from heaven. [Young, 54; Arthur 207] This section known as the “Eve-Intrusion” contains its own aretalogy called “Song of the Woman.” [Origin of the World, 114.4-15] Rose Arthur points out that it repeats lines from the famous aretalogy Thunder, Perfect Mind [VI, 2, in Arthur, 99] It has the same paradoxical flavor. However, Origin attributes the song to Eva, and assigns her a male lord not present in Thunder. Fragments of this “Song of the Woman” are repeated in a related text, the Hypostasis of the Archons. But in that version, Eve no longer speaks these verses; it is Adam who speaks them about her. [Arthur, 131, 162, 143] A marked recession of female agency is visible in these later scriptures. Origin of the World ends with strongly Christian themes: savior, word, and apocalyptic judgment. Several other Gnostic scriptures present Eve in a similar light, as a culture hero rather than the culpable temptress of the Church fathers. In the Hypostasis of the Archons, Eve is “the spirit-endowed Woman.” Adam calls her his own mother as well as “Mother of the Living,” the original Hebrew title of Eve. “It is she who is the physician, and the Woman, and She Who Has Given Birth.” The “Female The Gnostic Goddess, Female Power, and the Fallen Sophia ©2010 Max Dashu 8 Spiritual Principle” entered into the Snake—the Teacher—and she explains that god's threat of death came out of jealousy. She promised the couple that they would be able to tell good from evil. [Pagels 1979: 31] Other Gnostic scriptures show androgynous archons, or pair them off in syzygy (mystic couples), in a manner reminiscent of the Shiva-Shakti of India. The Sophia Jesu Christi reveals the Christian savior himself “as bisexual” (a better word might be “co-gendered” given current usage of this term) and paired with “his female Sophia, ‘Mother of All,’ whom some call Pistis.” [Schussler-Fiorenza,
THE OPHITES Gnostic sects often reversed meanings of biblical myths. The villains of the Bible, such as Cain and Esau, were heroes to the Cainites and Ophites. The Ophites (“Snake-people”) revered the Serpent of paradise as the source of Gnosis, and saw Jesus as its incarnation. The serpent entwined around an egg was their divine symbol. The Ophites “kept and fed [snakes] in baskets; they held their meetings close to the holes where they lived. They arranged loaves of bread upon a table, and then, by means of incantations, they allured the snake until it came coiling its way among these offerings...” [Doresse, 44] This scene closely resembles the old Goddess Mysteries, in which women held and danced with snakes. Late Greco-Roman art shows the persistence of these ritual practices, and depicts the snakes coiling around baskets or circular chests. According to bishop Epiphanius, the Eleusinian and Phrygian Mysteries also influenced the Naassene sect of Christians. They took their name from Naas, a Hebrew word for “serpent.” [Doresse, 47-8] The Perates also embraced the Serpent as the true savior. [Couliano, 128] In the heavens they saw “the beautiful form of the Serpent coiled up in the grand beginning of the heavens and becoming, for all born Beings, the principle of all movement.” [Doresse, 51] Sethians agreed that generation began with the serpent, who was the (male) Instructor. They also compared the heavens to the belly of a pregnant woman. (This sky-mother symbolism has very ancient Kemetic origins in Neith, Hathor, and Nut.) All pregnant beings carry this “imprint of heaven, of earth, and of all that is situated immovably in the midst.” The wind born of water stirred the waves, which were like a womb bringing forth. Sethians compared the wind to the hiss of a serpent. [Doresse, 51-2; Arthur, 137] A Nag Hammadi scroll called the Testimony of Truth is sympathetic to the Serpent in the Genesis account of the Tree of Knowledge. The wise Serpent convinces Eve to eat the fruit of wisdom: “the eyes of your mind will be opened.” The author points out that the lord's threat of immediate death didn't come true, but the Serpent's promise of knowledge did. He calls the god of Genesis “a malicious envier” who begrudged humans the power of knowing. [Pagels 1979: 30] The theme of an imperfect creator god recurs in other Gnostic texts. Sophia rebukes this god as a liar and fool for claiming sole divinity. Provoked to anger by his hubris in refusing to acknowledge the female principle, or grieved that he created inferior beings, she withdraws to the upper heavens. [Hubbs, 253; Pagels 1979: 58] The Apocryphon of John says that by proclaiming his jealousy, this god proved that another Power did in fact exist, “for if there were no other one, of whom would he be jealous?” This jealousy caused “the mother” to become distressed. [Apocryphon of John, 61:8-14, in Pagels, 1992: 113] In the Hypostasis of the Archons, Wisdom and her daughter Life cry out that the arrogant god is wrong to proclaim his supremacy. Sophia answers his challenge by sending forth light into matter, all the way down to the realm of Chaos. [Pagels 1979: 58] The Gnostic Goddess, Female Power, and the Fallen Sophia
THE FALLEN SOPHIA Though Sophia was prominent in the Gnostic creation accounts, she was being stripped of the radiant holiness the Egyptians attributed to Isis, and the Hebrews to Khokhmah. The very meaning of her name, Wisdom, was in the process of being abrogated and reversed. In her groundbreaking book The Wisdom Goddess, Rose Arthur showed how the positive view of Sophia in the early, pre-Christian scriptures was gradually broken down and degraded by a masculinizing, Christianizing narrative. Her work shows that “...the fallen Sophia appears to be a specifically Christian soteiriological [salvational] motif.” [Arthur, 4, 50, 67] Arthur demonstrates that the older texts were consistently re-edited to reduce and subordinate female divinity, while exalting the male god. The Hypostasis of the Archons is no more than “a Christianized, patriarchalized and defeminized summary of On the Origin of the World.” It blatantly replaces the original goddess with the Christian god. The line “But all this came to pass according to the Pronoia of Pistis” becomes “But all these things came to pass in the Will of the Father of the All.” [71, 94, 152] The pre-Christian scripture Eugnostos the Blessed was revamped as the Sophia Jesu Christi, in which Sophia rebels against the “Father of the Universe,” repents of her fault, and is saved by her male partner, Jesus Christ. [Arthur, 4-5] The revisionist text repeatedly refers to the “fault of the woman.” [Couliano, 80-5. He estimates that 80% of the Gnostic Sophia myths are negative or ambivalent.] The same process was at work on the Pistis Sophia, where the fallen Sophia is made to sing thirteen hymns of repentence before Jesus helps her to regain the Heights. [Legge, xvii] The Origin of the World also shows signs of editorial revisions in the same patriarchalizing direction, out of character with the main text. An earlier view of the goddess as god's perfect partner gave way to myths casting her as a flawed and lower being needing his pardon and salvation. New authors developed themes of a deluded and foolish Sophia (this despite the meaning of her name, “Wisdom”). They describe her creations as defective, and accuse of her of breaking cosmic law by creating without a male partner. [Couliano, 78-9] Hippolytus described Sophia as a junior aeon who tried to imitate the Father's generation without a partner. Due to her inferior powers, her creation was “devoid of form and perfection.” The Father then emanated the aeon Limit-Cross to bar her from the Pleroma (“Fullness”). As a result Sophia undergoes a four-fold passion—Anguish, Pain, Confusion, and Supplication—and must be rescued by other aeons. [Couliano, 78] The Apocryphon of John also converted Sophia into an inferior, fallen power: “... when the mother understood that the veil of darkness had come into being imperfectly and she knew her partner had not agreed with her, then she repented...” [Arthur, 70] These texts preach female abnegation and inferiority. The Exegesis of the Soul took an even more extreme position. The female soul was debauched by “many robbers” and bore defective offspring. The author blames these events on Aphrodite, and compares the soul to a prostitute who must repent and pray to the father god. Her genitals are presented as defective, being on the outside like the male genitals. But if the soul repents and prays to the father, he will turn her organs back to the inside “so that the soul will regain her proper character.” Then she will fulfill the Father's will, receiving a salvific male partner and bearing good children. [Arthur, 36-8, 40-8. This prescribed “correction” of female genitalia looks like a justification of the late Egyptian practice of clitorical excision practiced by this period. The account of Strabo, in Geography, Book VII, chapter 2, 17.2.5, dates to about 25 BCE. Keep in mind however that the term “pharaonic circumcision” is ahistorical, since solid evidence is lacking for female genital excision in classic Kemetic times.] These patriarchalizing discourses are still contending with a deep-rooted conviction that Goddess is the ultimate source of life. Even hostile writers acknowledge that Sophia gives the breath of life to Adam, although they often show her doing it indirectly. But the prestige of the creatrix is compromised by the Gnostic view of the material creation as evil, imprisoning the souls who live in it. [Arthur, 64, 88] The scriptures often show Sophia herself falling into bondage. In one Gnostic myth, Sophia is taken prisoner by the seven archons. They subject the essence of Wisdom made flesh in female form to every indignity, including forcing her into whoredom. In another account, Sophia mistakes the lion- The Gnostic Goddess, Female Power, and the Fallen Sophia ©2010 Max Dashu 10 headed archon for an emissary of the Pleroma and he swallows her power, depriving her of her light. Weakened, Sophia “repents repeatedly” and calls to the Pleroma to rescue her. The aeon Christ is sent to her aid. [Couliano, 79] In another version, Simon Magus rescues “Helena” from a brothel in Tyre. In actuality she is the creator of the angels who made the world. She is called Kyria (Lady), a Greek title exactly corresponding to the Christian god as Kyrios. [Allegro, 141-2, 145; Eusebius II, 13, 4] The Roman theologian Hippolytus also emphasized a pairing of Simon with Helena. [Hippolytus, VI. 17] One form of this story appears in the Pseudo-Clementine Recognitions, which says that Simon fell in love with a woman named Luna. He went around presenting her as Wisdom herself, the Universal Mother who had fallen from the clouds, and himself as god born of a virgin. This account identifies Luna with Helena, bound by the archons into physical form and fallen into a Phoenician brothel. By freeing her, Simon claimed to free all humanity from the archons. Christian patriarchs regarded him as the founder of Gnosticism, [Ogden, 73- 76] and invented endless stories of his downfall. Eusebius called him “the author of all heresy.” [II, 13, 6] A Gnostic sect of Simonians existed in 2nd century Syria. Their teachings were a fusion of Hellenistic concepts with Hebraic themes. From the Silence come two roots, the male heaven and female earth (who is also called Ennoia, Thought, as in some other Gnostic accounts.) The male principle is granted primacy: he creates her from himself, and never the reverse: “the male-female having the female in itself.” [Hippolytus, VI. 17] How much this actually had to do with an actual Simon Magus is anybody’s guess, but orthodox heresiologists conflated the two, to the point of calling some Simonians the Heleniani. [Origen, Contra Celsum, 62] In any case, we are looking at another form of the “fallen” Sophia. The theme of androgyny running through many of these texts is in fact gendered. It passes itself off as even-handed, but as Jane Schaberg makes clear, the androgeny being prescribed is a male-dominant androgyny: the female contained within the male. The prescription is that women should become like men, never men like women. [Schaberg, 158] “It is a world in which women learned to double-think and see themselves as included even (and especially) when they were not... to learn to tune out.” [Schaberg, 190] Some women dealt with anti-female prejudice by passing as men, as Thecla had. Mariamne does so in the Acts of Philip. Jesus instructed her to put on male garments for her journey to Greece, to prevent the serpents from mistaking her from Eve. One version of this scripture even has Mariamne declaring outright that she is not a woman. [VIII, 94, in Schaberg, 157-9] The Kukeans said that god was born out of the Awakened Sea in the midst of the World of Light. He looked into the waters of his mother and saw his own image. He had sex with this image, the Mother of Life. She gave birth to “a multitude of gods and goddesses,” creating seventy worlds and twelve aeons. God animated a great dead image using the life of these worlds. By breathing on the Mother of Life, this image caused her fall: “its breath penetrated even to the sexual organs of the Mother and defiled her.” She was no longer able to enter the divine planes, and remained in an impure state for seven days. The Savior came to rescue her and her seven virgins. [Doresse, 59] Again the female is singled out for sexual defilement, and made to symbolize spiritual inferiority—even when she is presented as senior to the god. In the Origin of the World, Sophia sends forth a drop of light “upon the water,” and it takes shape as a divine female. The Sophia of Jesu Christi repeats this creative act, but then retracts it and replaces Sophia with a male creator. It is he who sends forth the drop of light over the veil between the worlds, says the revisionist scripture, “so that the fault of the woman should be made manifest, and that she should come into being contending with error.” [Arthur, 83, 75-6] These Christianizing scripts encoded male supremacy into religion in ways that generated pain, alienation, and demoralization for women.
DOCTRINES OF THE FLAWED FEMALE Under the oppressive climate of imperial society, with its heavy taxation, displaced populations, urban crowding, plagues, and arena executions, a profound negativity had seeped into religious consciousness. This sense of hopelessness manifested in what has been called Gnostic pessimism. People The Gnostic Goddess, Female Power, and the Fallen Sophia ©2010 Max Dashu 11 felt like prisoners in the world, and a conviction arose that creation itself was flawed. The taint reached back to the Goddess herself, since she manifested herself in matter, in birth, in bodies. The prejudice against the female as lower than the male, material as against his supernal mind, was already present in Plato. Now Gnostic doctrines identifying the female with bondage, weakness, inferiority and fault became the final means of overthrowing the Goddess Mysteries. This process was erratic. Judaic Wisdom mysticism, so influential in early Gnosticism, exalted the creative power of Khokhmah, and held that creation was good. The two creation narratives in Genesis offered opposing views of gender relations, one with both women and men in the image of god. (But god curses Eve and all her daughters with the lordship of men who would rule over them.) However, as Gnostics increasingly gravitated toward a “value-inversion,” they did not only revolt against the Biblical god in a rejection of Judaism: they rejected creation itself. They saw the world of matter as hopelessly corrupt and evil. [Geger, 168] Naturally, this view contradicted not only Judaism but the pagan cosmovision in which the Divine was present in the natural world. Even before Christianity, Judaism had become a powerful influence in the pagan Mediterranean. Jewish communities were present around the Mediterranean in sizeable numbers, and many gentiles (known as “god-fearers” attended Shabbat services in synagogues. Gem amulets with Hellenistic inscriptions often invoke Sabaoth, IA, IAO, IAIA, Sabaoth—all drawn from names of the Judaic god. These names even appear as magical formulae engraved on goddess images. But slurs against the Hebrew god were circulating among Romans and the Egyptians, who portrayed him as ass-headed. [Doresse, 42 n. 101; 43] Although Gnostic Christians were strongly influenced by Judaism, many of their writings evince a strong animus against it. Many Gnostic scriptures reinterpret the biblical cosmogony, casting its creator as a deluded archon called Ialdabaoth or Saklas or Authades. Junior to the creating Wisdom goddess, he is unaware of her presence but works with her light. This theme may have originated as a reassertion of the Egyptian goddess, whose scattered signatures are visible in the Gnostic amalgam of Hellenistic, Judaic and Persian cosmologies. Many people have interpreted Gnostic cosmologies as an affirmation of Goddess. But they too subject her to massive reinterpretation, although in different ways than the orthodox clergy (especially in the polytheism that persists in some texts). In the end, however, they ultimately degrade and deny the female Divine. Gnosticism's rejection of the “lower” world ended up dragging down Goddess in the midst of its attack on Judaism. Christian Gnostic doctrines stripped Sophia of her divine qualities and subordinated her to the Father, and to Christ who is introduced as her male better and savior. Later writers dropped the name Sophia altogether. Many if not most equated the Goddess with matter, darkness, ignorance and fault. She was literally subjected to erasure on a 2nd-century Italian relief of Aeon surrounded by the zodiac. The inscription Felix Pater (“auspicious father”) remains intact, while a female name beside the figure has been removed. [Godwin, 170-1]
Embracing a vision of the New Jerusalem (Rv 21:1−22:5) to impact on life and society
Apocalyptic biblical literature has played a significant role in motivating and mobilising Christians. As part of this genre, the Apocalypse of John has played this mobilising role within the church throughout its history. Jerusalem is often incorporated into this genre to conjure up different emotions and images to impact many different people. For example, the Jew annually recites the words to fellow Jews at every Passover meal: ‘Next year in Jerusalem’. Most Christians know the hymn ‘The holy city’, originally penned by Frederic Weatherly in 1892. It lifts many a spirit as it conjures up the idea of a beautiful, perfect, heavenly city of God. However, there is more to this apocalyptic vision, which will be explored in this article. The city upholds the hope of decent godly living today. Whilst Jerusalem is a city with an extremely chequered history, it remains to be the launching pad of a dream that believers can embrace in order to impact society for the better. The vision in Revelation 21–22 is the launch of the ‘idea’ of God’s intention for society today, and the ‘implementation impetus’ is the primary role of the church. In the greater scheme of things, the world community is the target group for a better society for everyone
Introduction
The method of writing this article will follow a biblical theological path. The text of Revelation 21:1–22:5 is assumed to be part of the traditional Canon of Scripture. Thus, there is an assumption of progressive revelation (Genesis to Revelation) and a constant of ’inspiration’ (2 Tm 3:15). Whilst a brief and cursory exegesis will be done on certain key elements of the chosen text, the method followed will be far more biblical theological where relevant passages of Scripture are engaged to develop the theological thought, as the text is engaged grammatically, historically and theologically. This will cover comparative Old Testament, New Testament and Apocalyptic passages. There will not be a direct engagement with the traditional millennial models of eschatology. However, the implications for all these views will be obvious to those reading this article from the perspective of any one of the models. The approach will be far more eclectic in nature, allowing the text and interaction of texts to create a fresh and challenging perspective through this eschatological subject with its implications for life (2 Pt 3:11). ‘Jerusalem is the universal city, the capital of two people’s, the shrine of three faiths, the setting for Judgement Day and the battlefield of today’s clash of civilizations’ (Montefiore 2012: inside Author: Martin H. Pohlmann1,2 Affiliations: 1 Department of Reformed Theology, North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, South Africa 2 Baptist Theological College, Randburg, South Africa Correspondence to: Martin Pohlmann Email: martin@btc.co.za Postal address: PO Box 50710, Randburg 2125, South Africa Dates: Received: 27 June 2014 Accepted: 27 Aug. 2014 Published: 20 Apr. 2015 How to cite this article: Pohlmann, M.H., 2015, ‘Embracing a vision of the New Jerusalem (Rv 21:1−22:5) to impact on life and society’, In die Skriflig 49(2), Art. #1854, 7 pages. http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/ ids.v49i2.1854 Copyright: © 2015. The Authors. Licensee: AOSIS OpenJournals. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License. Embracing a vision of the New Jerusalem (Rv 21:1−22:5) to impact on life and society Apocalyptic biblical literature has played a significant role in motivating and mobilising Christians. As part of this genre, the Apocalypse of John has played this mobilising role within the church throughout its history. Jerusalem is often incorporated into this genre to conjure up different emotions and images to impact many different people. For example, the Jew annually recites the words to fellow Jews at every Passover meal: ‘Next year in Jerusalem’. Most Christians know the hymn ‘The holy city’, originally penned by Frederic Weatherly in 1892. It lifts many a spirit as it conjures up the idea of a beautiful, perfect, heavenly city of God. However, there is more to this apocalyptic vision, which will be explored in this article. The city upholds the hope of decent godly living today. Whilst Jerusalem is a city with an extremely chequered history, it remains to be the launching pad of a dream that believers can embrace in order to impact society for the better. The vision in Revelation 21–22 is the launch of the ‘idea’ of God’s intention for society today, and the ‘implementation impetus’ is the primary role of the church. In the greater scheme of things, the world community is the target group for a better society for everyone. Aanneming van ’n visioen van die Nuwe Jerusalem (Op 21:1–22:5) ten einde ’n invloed op lewe en die samelewing uit te oefen. Apokaliptiese Bybelliteratuur het ’n beduidende rol in die motivering en aansporing van Christengemeenskappe gespeel. Die Openbaring van Johannes het hierdie motiveringsrol deurgaans in die geskiedenis van die kerkas deel van dié genre vertolk. Jerusalem is dikwels hierby ingesluit om ’n verskeidenheid van emosies en beelde op te roep ten einde ’n impak op ’n verskeidenheid mense te maak. Die Jood, byvoorbeeld, haal jaarliks die volgende woorde teenoor mede-Jode tydens die Paasmaaltyd aan: ‘Volgende jaar in Jerusalem’. Die meeste Christene ken die gesang ‘The holy city’ wat oorspronklik deur Frederic Weatherly in 1892 geskryf is. Dit hef menige gelowiges se gemoedere op omdat dit die beeld van ’n pragtige, perfekte stad van God oproep. Daar is egter meer aan hierdie openbaringsuitsig wat in hierdie artikel verder ondersoek word. Die hemelstad bekragtig die hoop vir ’n godvrugtige lewe vandag. Alhoewel Jerusalem ’n stad met ’n uiters veelbewoë geskiedenis is, is dit tog die beginpunt vir hierdie droom van gelowiges om die samelewing te verbeter. Die visioen in Openbaring 21–22 is die bekendstelling van die ‘idee’ van God se bedoeling vir ons hedendaagse samelewing en die ‘vervullende beweegkrag’ is die primêre rol van die kerk. Holisties beskou, is die wêreldgemeenskap die teikengroep vir ’n beter samelewing vir almal. Read online: Scan this QR code with your smart phone or mobile device to read online. http://www.indieskriflig.org.za doi:10.4102/ids.v49i2.1854 Page 2 of 7 Original Research cover). It all began with Abraham and his son, Isaac. Genesis says: Then God said, ‘Take your son, your only son, whom you love − Isaac − and go to the region of Moriah. Sacrifice him there as a burnt offering on a mountain I will show you.’ (22:2)1 The first mentioning of Jerusalem as a city name is in Joshua 10 under the rule of Adoni-Zedek. These two worlds of an ordinary city, on one hand, and then later to be the place for God’s plan to unfold in the sacrifice of Jesus Christ, were to unite into one dream city: He has founded his city on the holy mountain. The LORD loves the gates of Zion more than all the other dwellings of Jacob. Glorious things are said of you, city of God. (Ps 87:1–3) A further brief historical sketch of Jerusalem is gleaned from Montefiore’s book: Jerusalem: The bibliography. The biblical history kicks into high ratio with David taking the stronghold by force (Montefiore 2012:27): ‘Zion was said to be impregnable and how David captured it is a mystery.’ He renamed the place ‘The city of David’. It was a small place of some 15 acres but significant in terms of its location. After some significant and turbulent history, the temple and Jerusalem were destroyed by an arch rival, Nebuchadnezzar of Babylon (Montefiore 2012): In the seventh month of Kislev’, declared Nebuchadnezzar’s chronicle, preserved on a clay inscription, ‘the Babylonian king marched to the land of Hatti [Syria], besieged the City of Judah [Jerusalem] and on the second day of the month of Adar [16 March 597] took the city and captured the king’. (pp. 50–51) However, the dream and vision of Jerusalem was not lost. A series of prophets, leaders, builders and ordinary people were to redream the city under God’s inspiration. Inspired by prophets like Haggai and Zechariah, taught by Ezra the scribe, and finally led by Nehemiah, the city of Jerusalem’s walls were rebuilt and the temple repaired: At the dedication of the wall of Jerusalem, the Levites were sought out where they lived and were brought to Jerusalem to celebrate joyfully the dedication with songs of thanksgiving and with the music of cymbals, harps and lyres. (Neh 12:27) The dream of Jerusalem was alive again. God had his holiest spot in their temple: ‘Our feet are standing in your gates, Jerusalem’ (Ps 122:2) and ‘Pray for the peace of Jerusalem: ‘May those who love you be secure’ (Ps 122:6). Jerusalem would be repeatedly challenged as the winds of political change blew through the Middle Eastern region. Daniel, an exilic prophet, warned the people of Jerusalem about the ‘abomination of desolation’ in the temple three times in his prophecy (Dn 9:27; 11:31; 12:11). Daniel had seen something of this threat personified in Nebuchadnezzar during his own lifetime and warned about future occurrences: ‘From the time that the daily sacrifice is abolished and the 1.All quotations shall be from the NIV (2011), unless otherwise indicated. abomination that causes desolation is set up there will be 1,290 days’ (Dn 12:11). One of these prophesied occurrences took place with the intervention of Antiochus Epiphanes (167 BCE). Montefiore 2012: Then Antiochus forbade any sacrifices or service in the Temple, banned the Sabbath, the Law and circumcision on pain of death and ordered the Temple to be soiled with pig’s flesh. (p. 75) The final historical fulfilment of Daniel’s prophecy would be the destruction of the temple by the Romans when temple sacrifices ceased, and still cease to this very day. Brian Russell (2013:171) correctly sees that: ‘The seventy sevens, then, are consecutive.’ The 490 ‘heptads’ of Daniel’s prophecy (Dn 9:24) take us to the fall of Jerusalem in 70 CE. It is important to note Herod the Great’s contribution to the temple and to recognise that it was Herod’s temple that the historic figure Jesus was to contend with. Herod chose to create one of his masterstroke buildings to cement political relations with his Jewish subjects. ‘Herod pulled down the existing Second Temple and built a wonder of the world in its place’ (Montefiore 2012:102). Mark 13:1 makes reference to this temple: ‘As Jesus was leaving the temple, one of his disciples said to him, “Look, Teacher! What massive stones! What magnificent buildings”.’ Some of these extraordinary huge stones can still be evidenced in the remaining foundation stones of the Western ‘Wailing Wall’ in Jerusalem where Jews still pray for the vision of Jerusalem. Bauckham (1996) correctly says: Thus the New Jerusalem of the future, the bride of the Lamb, has both a forerunner in the present and an opposite in the present. The forerunner is the holy city, mother Zion. (p. 128) Revelation 21:1–22:5 in recapitulation Jerusalem is a vision that is historical, doctrinal, existential and eternal. When John describes the city of the New Jerusalem in Revelation 21, Beckwith (1979:755) says: ‘This vision of the holy city is shaped throughout by the eschatological imagery contained in the prophets and apocalyptists.’ Some of these are found in the Ezekiel vision (Ezk 40–48) and in the reflection of Isaiah, especially Isaiah 66. Beckwith (1979:755) goes in to say: ‘To the description of this new Jerusalem are transferred all the splendors of the earthly Jerusalem in the earlier eschatological writers.’ There is a perpetual recapitulation throughout Scripture, on the one hand, and then a more detailed recapitulation within the Apocalypse of John itself, bringing the book to a climax in chapters 21 to 22. The purpose of this climax is not only to point readers to the future eternity of grandeur that God has for us ‘through the Lamb’, but also to stir our memory of the biblical Jerusalem as well as hold out a ‘dream vision’ of all that God has for us. This is designed to create an existential tension to mobilise people to transform society. Bauckham (1996) adds: http://www.indieskriflig.org.za doi:10.4102/ids.v49i2.1854 Page 3 of 7 Original Research The universalism of the vision of the New Jerusalem completes the direction towards the conversion of the nations which was already clearly indicated in [Revelation] 11:13; 14:14; 15:4. Its universal scope should not be minimized. (p. 139) Though transformation is a broad term, the Christian community has a distinctive goal of transformation through Jesus Christ as ‘the Lamb’. The vision in Ezekiel 40–44 Ezekiel is an exilic prophet. He knew of the past destruction of Jerusalem and the temple. He had experienced exile with all its challenges for the Jewish people. His vision from God pointed the people back to Jerusalem, where he envisioned a new historical geographical city with a temple. The vision is more than that, however. It becomes prophetic, apocalyptic and everlasting. The line between time and eternity − what is seen and what is not seen − is blurred, and only finally realised in the writing of Revelation 21–22. Psalm 137:1 expresses the limited vision of Jerusalem by the people in Exile: ‘By the rivers of Babylon we sat down and wept when we remembered Zion.’ The Jewish people had localised God to one place on earth: ‘How can we sing the songs of the LORD while in a foreign land?’ (Ps 137:4). Ezekiel’s vision of the temple in a New Jerusalem answered their desire for a restored building, but, more importantly, went beyond it towards a global, international and eternal perspective (Bauckham 1996:136): ‘The description of the New Jerusalem in many respects closely follows Old Testament models (especially Isa 52:1; 54:11–12; 60; Ezek 40:2–5; 47:1–12; 48:30–34; Zech 14:6–21; Tob 13:16–17)’. Beckwith (1979) makes the important point about Ezekiel’s vision: In Ezekiel’s vision of the future Jerusalem the temple forms the principal object; likewise in Jewish eschatology in general it is an essential part of the glorified city, e.g. Is. 44:28, 60:13. (p. 763) Ezekiel and the Exiles were still primarily concerned about themselves and their future in Jerusalem. They wanted to get back to where they were prior to the Exile. However, the inspiration of the Spirit in Ezekiel raises the visionary expectation somewhat. By the time the Apocalypse draws on Ezekiel’s prophecy, there is no temple (Beckwith 1979:763): ‘Its absence in the vision of the Apocalyptist echoes the Christian thought of Jn. 4:21, 23.’ John’s Gospel explains this to a Samaritan woman who was confused over ‘temple’ locations. Was she to worship at the local Samaritan shrine or the traditional Jewish temple? ‘“Woman,” Jesus replied, “Believe me, a time is coming when you will worship the Father neither on this mountain nor in Jerusalem”’ (Jn 4:21). Jesus is in one sense already alluding to himself as the new Temple. The need for a ‘place’ was soon to become obsolete. The interplay between Ezekiel’s chapters and those of Revelation 21–22 are important to note. One aspect is (Wright 2011): … the extraordinary measurements of the city. (The angel measures this heavenly city, as John was told to measure the heavenly temple in 11.1; this time, we find out what the measurements were, as in the original vision of Ezekiel 40–48 which lies behind a great deal of John’s vision at this point). (p. 194) However, Botha (1988:145) is correct to emphasise that: ‘The author also differs from Ezekiel in that he elaborates upon the wall of the city and emphasizes that there is no temple.’ Isaiah’s vision (Is 65:17–66:24) Gornik (2002) on Isaiah’s vision: When Scripture paints a picture of the new creation, its most comprehensive image is the new city of God. According to Isaiah 65:17–25, the new city forms part of the peaceable home that fulfils God’s promised justice for the poor, salvation for the humble, and the renewal of creation. (p. 25) Isaiah’s prophecy is very similar to that of Ezekiel. Both these prophets were Exilic prophets moving the Israelite nation with their words towards a future of rebuilding the city of Jerusalem as well as the temple. At all costs, the people needed to get back to where they were before the Exile. Typical of most apocalyptic passages of Scripture as contained in the major and minor prophets, they cause people to look above the immediate and visualises the future − firstly in physical terms, then in spiritual terms and finally in eternal terms. ‘For prophecy never had its origin in the human will, but prophets, though human, spoke from God as they were carried along by the Holy Spirit’ (2 Pt 1:21). Whilst Isaiah was well aware of the people’s need of their city Jerusalem and the temple, he unpacks the deeper meaning of Jerusalem and the original meaning for having the temple in the first place by drawing people’s attention to the worship of God again. The prophetic hope contained within Jerusalem is always seen by the prophets within the bigger picture of God’s covenant. Whilst locality and livelihood are critically important − as can be witnessed in the present argument for Jerusalem within the Middle East political debates − the prophetic meaning points everyone to the theological sense. Moltmann (1973) helps us here when he says that: When we cease using God as helper in need, stop-gap and problem solver, we are according to Augustine − finally free for the fruitio Die et se invincem in Deo, the joy of God and the enjoyment of each other in God. (p. 80) The Apocalypse (Rv 21:1–22:5) upsets the desire often found in the Old Testament people with their focus on the temple by removing and replacing it with the presence of God (Rv 21:22): ‘I did not see a temple in the city, because the Lord God Almighty and the Lamb are its temple.’ The physical city providing Israelites with protection by its walls, living conditions and all city services are eclipsed by a cubic symbol city. Wright (2011) suggests that: … the city is not only vast in terms of its footprint − fifteen hundred miles each way, roughly the same number of square miles http://www.indieskriflig.org.za doi:10.4102/ids.v49i2.1854 Page 4 of 7 Original Research as the Roman Empire (That, of course may be part of the point). It is also fifteen hundred miles high. (p. 194) In one sense, this city eclipses the Roman Empire! The Apocalypse provides the final recapitulation in Revelation 21:1–22:5 Beckwith (1979:771) is at pains to demonstrate that Revelation 21:1–22:5 is part and parcel of the overall chapters of the Apocalypse due ‘to numerous examples showing parallelism with other parts of the book and indicating the work of the same hand’. The first comparison is Revelation 17:1 with Revelation 21:9: One of the seven angels who had the seven bowls came and said to me, ‘Come. I will show you the punishment of the great prostitute who sits by many waters.’ (Rv 17:1) One of the seven angels who had the seven bowls full of the last plagues came and said to me, ‘Come I will show you the bride, the wife of the Lamb.’ (Rv 21:9) The same angel gives the two perspectives to the same author. One perspective is on the great prostitute and the other perspective on the bride of Christ. The Apocalypse typically deals with one vision at a time, and sometimes deals with them in different chapters. Revelation 17:3 and 21:10 convey the same idea: ‘Then the angel carried me away in the Spirit into a wilderness’ versus ‘And he carried me away in the Spirit to a mountain great and high.’ The phrase the glory of God is repeated in Revelation 15:8 and 21:11. Further, Revelation 21:15 (‘The angel who talked with me had a measuring rod of gold to measure the city, its gates and its walls’) is very similar to Revelation 11:1: ‘I was given a reed like a measuring rod and was told, “Go and measure the temple of God and the altar, with its worshipers”.’ Some verses in chapter 21 (God, the Lamb, the Bride) contrast with verses in the body of the text, especially where there is reference to the ‘prostitute’. For example, Revelation 21:19 says: ‘The foundations of the city walls were decorated with every kind of precious stone. The first foundation was jasper, the second sapphire, the third agate, the fourth emerald.’ Revelation 17:4 says of the ‘woman’: The woman was dressed in purple and scarlet, and was glittering with gold, precious stones and pearls. She held a golden cup in her hand, filled with abominable things and the filth of her adulteries. There is a constant cross-referencing throughout the Apocalypse contributing to its whole as a letter, prophetic words from God and apocalyptic literature. One of the most consistent points in the Apocalypse is the significant statement in Revelation 21:23: ‘The city does not need the sun or the moon to shine on it, for the glory of God gives it light, and the Lamb is its lamp.’ The first chapter sets the scene in verse 17: When I saw him, I fell at his feet as though dead. Then he placed his right hand on me and said: ‘Do not be afraid. I am the First and the Last’. (Rv 1:17) König (2007) correctly makes the point that: … once Jesus is seen as the goal of creation and the eschatos, the consummation can be seen as reachable (in one sense, as already reached!) before the end of natural world history. (p. 39) Revelation 11:17 follows on from Revelation 4:8: ’We give thanks to you, Lord God Almighty, the One who is and who was, because you have taken your power and begun to reign.’ The theme continues onto Revelation 16:7: ‘And I heard the altar respond: “Yes, Lord God Almighty, true and just are your judgments”.’ Throughout the Apocalypse the typical motion found in an epistle is eclipsed by the ‘cubic’ vision given in Revelation 21–22. The existential is overwhelmed by the ‘eternal now’ of God who straddles the past, present and the future with equal ease. For example, Revelation 1:7 includes the final ‘end’ with ‘those who pierced him’ with equal ease. Six key verses in identifying the transferable concepts of the New Jerusalem Within the Revelation 21:1–22:5 passage, there are six key statements that fit like building blocks to create the overall Weltanschauung (Pohlmann 2008:93–244) of the Apocalypse as well as the overall perspective of God’s activity revealed in Scripture. There are parallel verses like them found dotted within the New Testament. Their concepts are transferable and applicable today. Whilst there is an eternal and future dimension to the Apocalyptic understanding of the New Jerusalem, it is primarily meant to be embraced within God’s present administration of the Kingdom (Eph 3:9–11). First verse: Revelation 21:3 The 1st verse of importance and the key verse within this section is Revelation 21:3: And I heard a loud voice from the throne saying, ‘Look! God’s dwelling place is now among the people, and he will dwell with them. They will be his people, and God himself will be with them and be their God.’ This has been the plan ever since Creation (Gn 1–3). This verse is ‘richly endowed with motifs from the prophets Isaiah, Jeremiah, and Ezekiel that are concerned with the restoration of the Jerusalem temple after its destruction: God will dwell among his people’ (Stuckenbruck 2003:1568). This verse states in one single theological construct the purpose of the election of Israel, the life of Jesus Christ and the mission of the church: The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory of the one and only Son, who came from the Father, full of grace and truth. (Jn 1:14) http://www.indieskriflig.org.za doi:10.4102/ids.v49i2.1854 Page 5 of 7 Original Research Following on from this, Pohlmann (2010) expands: Just as God positioned the famous Jerusalem Temple in Temple Mount for all to see a sign of His presence − God has now positioned the church comprising of individual Spirit filled believers − ‘in the world’ yet not ‘of the world’. (p. 139) It is God’s will to be ’among the people’. This started with Eden, regrouped with Israel (Gn 12:1–3), perfected with Jesus and now exists through his Spirit in the church. Second verse: Revelation 21:5(a) The 2nd verse of significance is Revelation 21:5(a): ‘He who was seated on the throne said, “I am making everything new!”’ Charles (1976:154) correctly informs us that: ‘The old world has vanished: God creates a new world.’ The idea of quality is what emerges here. When God creates or recreates, he puts the stamp of his character on it. Third verse: Revelation 21:6(a) The 3rd verse of significance is Revelation 21:6(a): ‘He said to me, “It is done. I am the Alpha and the Omega, the Beginning and the End”.’ This was the announcement made to John on the Isle of Patmos: When I saw him, I fell at his feet as though dead. Then he placed his right hand on me and said, ‘Do not be afraid. I am the First and the Last.’ (Rv 1:18) The reality of an ‘eternal now’ living Christ is the reality of the entire New Testament age. The conceptual results and outcome are fixed from the very beginning when Jesus triumphed over death in the resurrection. Fourth verse: Revelation 21:22 The 4th verse of significance is Revelation 21:22: ‘I did not see a temple in the city, because the Lord God Almighty and the Lamb are its temple.’ It is significant to note that the Greek word ναός is used, referring to the inner sanctuary of the Holy of Holies. Initially, God ‘walked’ in Eden with our first parents. Later, the tabernacle was built as a portable ‘sanctuary’ and ‘meeting place’. Eventually, the great temple was built on Temple Mount, housing the ‘sanctuary of meeting’. Jesus challenged this by presenting himself as the ‘new sanctuary’ (Jn 2:19): ‘Jesus answered them, “Destroy this temple, and I will raise it again in three days”.’ Here, just as in Revelation 21, the Greek word ναός is used, referring to the ‘shrine’ of meeting God in person. 1 Corinthians 3:16 and 6:19 make the same reference to the abiding Holy Spirit within the Christian life. Therefore, Revelation 21:22 is no surprise, but rather the culmination of all things implemented in God’s salvation. Fifth verse: Revelation 21:24 The 5th important verse is Revelation 21:24: ‘The nations will walk by its light, and the kings of the earth will bring their splendor into it.’ One of the ‘I am’ sayings of Jesus in the Gospel of John is: ‘I am the light of the world’ (Jn 8:12). The light of Christ eclipses everything portrayed as darkness. The radiance of this light was so overwhelming to the angry pre-converted Rabbi Saul that it struck him to the ground (Ac 9:3). What happened here on a personal level can happen on a societal and national level, if people would be willing to embrace the ‘light’ of the New Jerusalem. Sixth verse: Revelation 22:5 The last verse of importance, acting as the sixth pillar theological statement is Revelation 22:5: There will be no more night. They will not need the light of a lamp or the light of the sun, for the Lord God will give them light. And they will reign forever. Genesis 1:3–5 and 1:14–19 have been eclipsed by a ‘new heavens and a new earth’. The New Jerusalem depicts everything God and Jesus are by nature. God is by nature light and Jesus is light. Those who embrace the vision of the New Jerusalem become ‘the light of the world’. The Christian community should always be busy dispelling ‘darkness’ in favour of ‘light’. Embracing the vision for change There are obvious points about Jerusalem that we are not expected to embrace. For example, no one is expected to rebuild the city of Jerusalem or the temple or the sanctuary of the temple under Christian mandate. The Christian mandate in Acts 1:8 is away from geographical Israel’s Jerusalem and not back towards it: But you will receive power when the Holy Spirit comes on you; and you will be my witnesses in Jerusalem, and in all Judea and Samaria, and to all the ends of the earth. (Ac 1:8) God’s ultimate plan is for ‘Jerusalem’ (in the theological and eternal sense) to be taken to the earth and not the earth to Jerusalem. Embracing the presence of God through Christ in the power of the Holy Spirit God initially came to us in creating the world in which we live (Gn 1–2). This was God’s initiative and he continues to display this initiative. The choice and appointment of Abraham as covenant partner and the establishment of an ‘elect’ nation was God’s initiative (Gn 12:1–3). The advent of Jesus Christ to ‘seek and the save that which is lost’ (Lk 19:10) was God’s initiative. The Word came to live amongst us and we have seen him as the only true Son of God (Jn 1:14).Our responsibility is to embrace the presence of God by faith (Rv 21:3a): ‘Look! God’s dwelling is now among the people, and he will dwell with them.’ The word translated as ‘dwell’ is translated from the Greek word σκηνή [tabernacle], which is the same word used to describe Jesus in John 1:14. With Jesus and the presence http://www.indieskriflig.org.za doi:10.4102/ids.v49i2.1854 Page 6 of 7 Original Research of the Holy Spirit, we have the presence of God. We need to embrace the reality of God’s presence in the eschatological existential present reality, even though it has ‘not yet’ been fully realised. Be part of everything ‘new’ that God is doing Whilst the tension between the ‘now’ and the ‘not yet’ will always be felt, it should not mitigate against us embracing the restored order of things that God has already introduced. Christ has ‘destroyed the barrier, the dividing wall of hostility’ (Eph 2:14b) and made it possible that: In the last days, God says, I will pour out my Spirit on all people. Your sons and daughters will prophesy, your young men will see visions, your old men will dream dreams. (Ac 2:17) Based on the work of Christ, there is something refreshingly new and creative available to us. The church holds the key to more transformative opportunities than many people realise. These need to be embraced in order to present a ‘new city’ of hope for people. As (Kidwell 2014) puts it: The thinking goes: rather than Israel becoming like Canaan, the reverse will be the case, Canaan will be culturally absorbed into Israel, and this will serve as a sign of the triumph of God’s holiness in this kingdom. (p. 2) Enjoy the eschatological moment that we have The presence of Christ has eclipsed (König 2007:23–31) all former focuses on temporary things. As in the alphabet, Christ is the beginning and the end of the alphabet, and everything in-between! The dye has been cast and it is only a matter of time for all things to be worked out (Rm 8:28) according to the plans and the purposes of God: But when this priest had offered for all time one sacrifice for sins, he sat down at the right hand of God, and since that time he waits for his enemies to be made his footstool. (Heb 10:12–13) The Apocalypse of John demonstrates the dramatic developments unfolding. Romans 1:18 summarises the basic principle seen more illustratively in the Apocalypse: ‘The wrath of God is being revealed from heaven against all godlessness and wickedness of people, who suppress the truth by their wickedness.’ We need to embrace the fact that Satan, sin and death have been judged and Christ is our answer in overcoming these through his cross and resurrection (Rm 1:4). We have been shown the way There is no need to look any further than Christ. God is with us (Mt 1:23; Immanuel). There is no need for a special pilgrimage to Jerusalem or any other holy site in order to embrace what God has intended for us. Christ has revealed the Father to us wherever we may be. All the nations of the world are beneficiaries Wherever God’s people embrace the Gospel of Christ in truth, everybody benefits! Jesus Christ developed a gospel that was both private and public, both personal and communal. Jesus ‘went on to imprint the Kingdom of God radically on every facet of life’ (Pohlmann 2014:8). Jeremy Kidwell (2014) illustrates the same point when he reflects on Zechariah 14: The closing chapter of Zechariah offers an ‘apocalyptic’ description of the age to come. There, the writer describes the new kingdom as a sort of impenetrable bulwark in the midst of violent conflict and collapsing political order. (p. 1) In the New Jerusalem, like in the expectation of Zechariah 14, Kidwell (2014:2) notes that ‘God cares about truthfulness in the way we represent value in business’ (cf. Rv 22:24–27 compared to Zch 14:21). We should move in the direction of the eternal construct and not the time construct Just as the tabernacle, the temple, the sanctuary and the city of Jerusalem have all served a valid purpose in the past, the time is coming when created time will also have served its purpose. As 2 Peter 3:10 says: But the day of the Lord will come like a thief. The heavens will disappear with a roar; the elements will be destroyed by fire, and the earth and everything in it will be laid bare. We need to keep looking forward and upward towards the culmination of the Gospel. George Eldon Ladd (1997:682), who represents a classical premillennial model, is willing to agree with those of a realised millennial model that the New Jerusalem embraces a culmination of the Gospel: ‘The description of the city is highly symbolic. Its inhabitants include the redeemed from both the Old Testament (21:12) and the New Testament (21:4) times.’ Yet, it is more than just a glorious picture – there is a sense that the symbol of the New Jerusalem should be embraced by those who focus on God’s future. Conclusion Professor Jan du Rand (2004) offers a broad overview on the apocalyptic vision of Revelation 21–22: To a large extent, the apocalyptic eschatology of the Apocalypse is shaped within the framework of soteriology. The descent from heaven of the new Jerusalem is the eschatological fulfilment of OT as well as early Jewish apocalyptic expectations within the restorational frame. Particularly Ezekiel, Isaiah, Jeremiah and Zechariah have made meaningful contributions in this regard. The rebuilding of the temple within the relationship of the heavenly Jerusalem to the new Jerusalem is of utmost importance. (p. 275) Believers need to dream again within the biblical framework. On the one hand, there is the challenge of ‘Babylon’ (Rv 17:18) as it affects everyone on earth negatively. Believers http://www.indieskriflig.org.za doi:10.4102/ids.v49i2.1854 Page 7 of 7 Original Research have a positive hope by embracing the vision of the New Jerusalem. Jesus Christ came to bring the Kingdom and glorify the Father.
David looked up one time into the stars and he wrote down in a psalm, YHVH our Lord, when I consider your heavens, the work of your fingers, the moon and the stars that you have ordained, what is man that you are mindful of him? Why in the world would you care about us? He was out in the wilderness and there weren’t a bunch of car lights and city lights, and when he looked up at the sky, he could see the creation in a way that oftentimes in modern society we don’t. I have tended to take for granted that everyone has seen that, and my wife said some time back that it’s been on her bucket list for a few years, that she always wanted to see the sky at night. When you live in a city, you look up, and if you’re not out in the wilderness in a tent, you don’t see that much. So one time on the way back from the Feast—we had attended in Phoenix, Arizona—we were driving to see our daughter on the way home and we got out into the border area by Colorado—apparently nobody wants to live on the border—and it was empty and dark. So I said we’re going to stop, sit here for a bit, let our eyes adjust, and we got out and we looked at the night sky, and you could see; it was crystal clear, it was crisp at night and you could see those stars—it was dramatic. What’s interesting is you’re only looking at stars. The naked eye can’t see the galaxies —maybe one or two and they’re going to be a smudge; if it’s bright in the sky, it’s a star and it’s in this galaxy right here—it’s local. There are more galaxies up in the universe than there are human beings who have ever lived, by far. I don’t know, they change their numbers as they go. The figure used to be about 200 billion—that’s a lot of The New Jerusalem Page 1 of 23 galaxies. Now they’ve recalculated and said it’s not like there are more stars but there are actually more galaxies and less stars in each one—I don’t know how they calculate that—let’s just say they’ve changed the number now by a factor of ten. Now we’re in the trillions of galaxies—galaxies! You can’t see them, I don’t see them. I can go to the Hubble space telescope website and look at them and I’m just stunned—I love it. David didn’t have that but he looked up and said, what in the world—why would you care about this when all of that is yours and your creation. But you know what? God does care about this. God is indeed mindful of man, and that understanding is codified in scripture, over and over. Why would we want to deny what David himself saw that was so clear, that God wants to dwell with men? It’s such a simple concept and it is so true. John 14:1 to start. This is interesting because I have kind of explained this away in various degrees, basically because of how it was explained to me over the years. John 14:1 “Let not your heart be troubled; you believe in God, believe also in Me. (NKJV) Excuse me, Jesus said, you believe in God the Father, you need to believe in Me. So what’s the story line? Christ is the one they knew as God, from of old? No, it’s not true. Christ said, you believe in God, believe also in Me. 2) In My Father's house are many mansions; (NKJV) It was explained to me that the word mansions is just is like responsibilities, or offices; you can use it to mean different things that God will have each of us to do. What if we just take it for what it says, even though it’s been translated into English, and accept that it’s a reliable reference if you look at the Greek. He has many places to dwell in His house. If you put that together with common understanding, that means we are going to dwell with God the Father. Christ said, 2 continued) … if it were not so, I would have told you. I go to prepare a place for you. And He goes on to say, 3) … that where I am [where Jesus Christ is], there you may be also. (NKJV) So the story of the Bible is that we are going to be where Christ is, Christ is going to be where the Father is, so that we’re going to be where the Father is, in one place. When you start talking about spirit versus physical—and we’re using physical terms— we can’t define what are the limits of a spirit dwelling, so to speak, but Christ is saying, you are going to be with Me, I’m going to the Father, I’m preparing a place for you to dwell, and we will all dwell together. Actually, that’s the sermon. God is going to dwell with men. The New Jerusalem Page 2 of 23 6) Jesus said to him, “I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through Me. 7) “If you had known Me, you would have known My Father also; and from now on you know Him and have seen Him.” (NKJV) The word seen doesn’t always mean visual, it means to understand, to comprehend— it’s the same word throughout. 8) Philip said to Him, “Lord, show us the Father, and it is sufficient for us.” 9) Jesus said to him, “Have I been with you so long, and yet you have not known Me, Philip? He who has seen Me has seen the Father … (NKJV) But He goes on then, and let’s go to verse 28 because this is kind of the summary, at least in part, of this discussion. 28) You have heard Me say to you, ‘I am going away and coming back to you.’ If you loved Me, you would rejoice because I said, ‘I am going to the Father,’ (NKJV) Christ is going to the Father. He’s got to prepare a place for the firstfruits so that they can be where Christ is. We’re going to live with God the Father in a dwelling in one place. That is simply the record of scripture and is very clear when you begin to lay that out on a broader scale. Hebrews 11:8. Hebrews 11:8 By faith Abraham obeyed when he was called to go out to the place which he would receive as an inheritance. And he went out, not knowing where he was going. (NKJV) So it’s comparing now his physical inheritance to his ultimate spiritual inheritance. 9) By faith he dwelt in the land of promise as in a foreign country, dwelling in tents with Isaac and Jacob, the heirs with him of the same promise; 10) for he waited for the city which has foundations, whose builder and maker is God. (NKJV) The promise is New Jerusalem. The goal is Jerusalem—“next year in Jerusalem”, so to speak. That was the goal of Israel. But that was simply a staging place, a step in God’s plan. New Jerusalem is the ultimate promise that is going to be given to God’s people. Going over to Hebrews 12:18. Hebrews 12:18 For you have not come to the mountain that may be touched and that burned with fire, and to blackness and darkness and tempest, 19) and the sound of a trumpet and the voice of words, so that those who heard it begged that the word should not be spoken to them anymore. 20) (For they could not endure what was commanded: “And if so much as a beast touches the mountain, it shall be stoned or shot with an arrow.” The New Jerusalem Page 3 of 23 21) And so terrifying was the sight that Moses said, “I am exceedingly afraid and trembling.”) 22) But you have come to Mount Zion and to the city of the living God [the living God is God the Father, every single time in scripture, it’s always the same], the heavenly Jerusalem, to an innumerable company of angels, 23) to the general assembly and church of the firstborn who are registered in heaven, to God the Judge of all, to the spirits of just men made perfect, 24) to Jesus the Mediator of the new covenant [Jesus did not make the New Covenant, He is the Mediator of the New Covenant], and to the blood of sprinkling that speaks better things than that of Abel. (NKJV) So the promise is New Jerusalem, and Christ said we’re going to dwell in the mansion, in the home, in the dwelling place with God the Father, and that He is going to be there as well. When you come up in the resurrection and you’re expecting to receive the promise, and someone says, that’s not ready yet, we’re working on that still, we’ll get to it but just be patient, then the person who’s telling you that isn’t telling you the truth. The promise is going to be available within the context of coming up in the resurrection and dwelling with God and Jesus Christ. It’s going to be on the earth. We’re going to need to define some terms because terms seem to blend a little bit for some, as in God the Father is the Living God, but, you know, Jesus Christ isn’t dead, so He’s the Living God too, right?—no, that’s not how that works. We’re going to define a few terms. The Bible interprets the Bible. We have said that literally hundreds of times, and we say that but then we turn, and we make up our own terms and our own definitions. So on the one hand, you can say it but you have to believe it, and you have to do it. So I want to define a few terms. I’ll put a few out, address some things, come back and put a few more. The terms “second and third resurrection” are not in the Bible. If you use them, you’re making them up. You’re making up the story. If God had wanted those terms to be used, He would have put them in there for us to use—they are not there. Jesus being the spokesman is not the Bible. Jesus being the creator, not in the Bible. What’s also not in the Bible, anywhere, which is very important to the context of what I’m addressing today, is that God cannot be in the presence of sin. That is not in scripture. That is the antithesis of scripture. If the whole Bible is God saying, I’m going to dwell with men— men!—and then My children will be with Me, then quite frankly something there is deeply wrong in terms of what had been taught. The word “Zion” in the New King James, where it’s by itself as compared to being combined with some other term, is in the Bible 139 times. It is the City of David, technically and specifically. Zion was a fortress of the Jebusites. David, with his soldiers, conquered it, and so Zion then refers to the City of David, that small part of the enclave, and it’s used also for Jerusalem as a whole. Figuratively, Zion can refer to God’s people or it can refer to the descendants of God’s people. At some point you have to understand what the term Zion at least refers to in its principal way, and again, it refers to specifically where David was—the City of David or specifically Jerusalem, The New Jerusalem Page 4 of 23 because of Zion being on that hill. We need to understand that the Tabernacle was set up in the City of David. When the ark was brought to Jerusalem, it was in the City of David. When Solomon built the temple it was on Mount Moriah. You go up from the City of David to Mount Moriah, that’s where the threshing floor was where David offered the sacrifice and that’s where the temple was built. God told Abraham to offer Isaac on a mountain in the land of Moriah. Don’t you think the odds are pretty high that that type of sacrifice was offered at the place where Christ was going to be offered as well? Moriah is where the temple mount was. So I’m just saying in terms of that area God knew what He was doing. He knew what He was doing long in advance of when these events actually took place. In 2 Samuel 5, let’s just look at a couple of these because I want to show that there are terms in the Bible that are clearly defined so instead of looking where there’s a place with an unclear meaning, let’s look at the place where we do know what it means. Let’s go to 2 Samuel 5:6. 2 Samuel 5:6 And the king and his men went to Jerusalem against the Jebusites, the inhabitants of the land, who spoke to David, saying, “You shall not come in here; but the blind and the lame will repel you,” thinking, “David cannot come in here.” 7) Nevertheless David took the stronghold of Zion (that is, the City of David). (NKJV) There you are, that’s where the term comes from. We have to at least be able to start with that. Go over to 1 Kings 8:1. 1 Kings 8:1 Now Solomon assembled the elders of Israel and all the heads of the tribes, the chief fathers of the children of Israel, to King Solomon in Jerusalem … (NKJV) You’ll notice that it’s Solomon who assembled the elders to King Solomon. Were there two kings named Solomon? Were they twins, with one on the throne and the other just doing the business of assembling the elders? No. When the argument is being made that YHVH on earth called down fire from YHVH in heaven, so there must be two YHVHs—no, I’m sorry, that phrasing is a peculiarity of Hebrew, an example I’ve used before (there are more) and it is strictly the way the structure of the sentence was made. 1 continued) … that they might bring up the ark of the covenant of the LORD from the City of David, which is Zion. 2) Therefore all the men of Israel assembled with King Solomon at the feast in the month of Ethanim, which is the seventh month. 3) So all the elders of Israel came, and the priests took up the ark. 4) Then they brought up the ark of the LORD [YHVH], the tabernacle of meeting, and all the holy furnishings that were in the tabernacle. The priests and the Levites brought them up. (NKJV) The New Jerusalem Page 5 of 23 They are going up from the City of David and it’s to Mount Moriah. Go to Psalm 87, another place where the references are made. Like I said, this is one of the very specific references that are clear, at least to us. Psalm 87:1 His foundation is in the holy mountains. 2) The LORD [YHVH] loves the gates of Zion … (NKJV) The gates of the temple in Jerusalem. 2 continued) … More than all the dwellings of Jacob. 3) Glorious things are spoken of you, O city of God! Selah 5) And of Zion it will be said, “This one and that one were born in her; And the Most High Himself shall establish her.” 6) The LORD will record, When He registers the peoples: “This one was born there.” (NKJV) It’s going to be significant, it’s going to be an important city, it’s going to be a city people look to around the world. It’s like, you were born there? Really, how incredible is that? 7) Both the singers and the players on instruments say, “All my springs are in you.” (NKJV) Much of the symbolism of New Jerusalem and Jerusalem is the springing forth of living water and of God designing the topography and geology of the temple mount area, where the water came up and sprang out and allowed them to offer the sacrifices and have the ability to clean up and channel water down into Jerusalem. There’s a long history of the record of the water sources and the abundance that was there. Take away the water and Jerusalem had no reason to be where it was. There was desert and then you had water in the middle, living water, gushing forth in abundance. God intended it to be so. Mount Zion—we use that name interchangeably with Zion, as if you would take Zion and put it on a hill, so that it becomes Mount Zion. It’s not really used that way in scripture. Mount Zion—and that’s why I mentioned Zion when it’s used by itself—appears in the New King James 21 times. Mount Zion is where God dwells. Whether in heaven or on earth, where God dwells is Mount Zion. That’s where He has placed His throne. He might be in Zion with His throne but it’s still His throne and His dwelling is Mount Zion. If He comes to the city of Spokane, we’re not changing the name, it’s still going to be Spokane, so understand when you look at Zion and Mount Zion, recognize how those terms are actually used in scripture. Let’s go to Isaiah 8:16, what would appear to be a prophecy regarding the collection of God’s writings through His servants and being brought forth through the disciples. Isaiah 8:16 Bind up the testimony, seal the law among my disciples. 17) And I will wait on the LORD, Who hides His face from the house of Jacob; and I will hope in Him. The New Jerusalem Page 6 of 23 18) Here am I and the children whom the LORD has given me! We are for signs and wonders in Israel from the LORD of hosts, Who dwells in Mount Zion. (NKJV) So understand, the Bible clearly says Zion is Jerusalem and Zion is the City of David, which is basically the same representation, very closely, and it clearly says that Mount Zion is where God dwells—so that’s a little bit different. Go to Isaiah 14:12. This changes again; God dwells in Mount Zion and now we’re going to have to put that into more than one context. Isaiah 14:12 “How you are fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! How you are cut down to the ground, you who weakened the nations! 13) For you have said in your heart: ‘I will ascend into heaven, I will exalt my throne above the stars of God; I will also sit on the mount of the congregation on the farthest sides of the north; Lucifer is not talking about having a chance to get to Israel on his vacation. 14) I will ascend above the heights of the clouds, I will be like the Most High. 15) Yet you shall be brought down to Sheol, to the lowest depths of the Pit. (NKJV) He wanted to sit on the mount of the congregation. What mount is that? Mount Zion. Go forward just a little further, to Psalm 48; again, to put a little bit of this together, I guess I’m going back to Psalm 48, back to the early part of the smudge on the side of my Bible. Psalm 48:1 Great is the LORD, and greatly to be praised in the city of our God, in His holy mountain. (NKJV) That would be Mount Zion. 2) Beautiful in elevation, the joy of the whole earth, We’re now talking about the Millennium—the joy of the whole earth—so we’re portraying the time of the Millennium. 2 continued) … is Mount Zion on the sides of the north, the city of the great King. 3) God is in her palaces; He is known as her refuge. (NKJV) Again, here we see there is a physical environment being described so God in heaven is in Mount Zion where His throne is, and when God comes down to the earth to rule with His throne, Mount Zion is portrayed as being down on the earth. 8) As we have heard, so we have seen in the city of the LORD of hosts, In the city of our God: God will establish it forever. (NKJV) The New Jerusalem Page 7 of 23 So those terms are in the Bible. Zion and Mount Zion are sometimes used together, which in this sense, if we understand that it’s not just a repeated phrase—because God writes that way as well, He’ll repeat something and use a little different terminology— Zion and Mount Zion are sometimes used together and they are not the same. Let’s go back to the book of Isaiah, chapter 4 and verse 2. Isaiah 4:2 In that day the Branch of the LORD shall be beautiful and glorious; And the fruit of the earth shall be excellent and appealing for those of Israel who have escaped. 3) And it shall come to pass that he who is left in Zion and remains in Jerusalem [Zion being Jerusalem] will be called holy—everyone who is recorded among the living in Jerusalem. 4) When the LORD has washed away the filth of the daughters of Zion [as I’ve said, sometimes it applies to God’s people or even the descendants of God’s people], and purged the blood of Jerusalem from her midst, by the spirit of judgment and by the spirit of burning, 5) then the LORD will create above every dwelling place of Mount Zion, and above her assemblies, a cloud and smoke by day and the shining of a flaming fire by night. (NKJV) This harkens back to God’s presence in the Old Testament where He was above the tabernacle, and when they moved, Israel followed those signs. So we’re seeing now Mount Zion and then Zion in Jerusalem used in the same passage—they’re different, they’re not the same. That’s an important distinction to understand. Then going on down to Isaiah 24, I want to reinforce this a bit. I don’t think just one passage is going to be enough to confirm. In Isaiah 24:19, picture yourself in the day of the LORD— end-time destruction, God’s correction coming on the earth. Isaiah 24:19 The earth is violently broken, the earth is split open, the earth is shaken exceedingly. 20) The earth shall reel to and fro like a drunkard, and shall totter like a hut; its transgression shall be heavy upon it, and it will fall, and not rise again. 21) It shall come to pass in that day that the LORD will punish on high the host of exalted ones … (NKJV) What we’re talking about is it’s time to punish the spirits, on high, who are in rebellion. 21 continued) … And on the earth the kings of the earth. (NKJV) The demons are going to be put into Tartarus in the same context of the judgment that is going to take place on the earth, when Babylon is being destroyed, so the references here are pretty clear in terms of other passages. 22) They will be gathered together, as prisoners are gathered in the pit, and will be shut up in the prison; after many days they will be punished. (NKJV) The New Jerusalem Page 8 of 23 They’re being judged here, they’re being restricted but they’re not quite yet being punished—Satan’s punishment. Think about that, the wages of sin is death. Satan sinned, therefore the punishment for Satan’s sin—is he going to live forever?—no, it doesn't work that way. Satan is going to be destroyed and the Bible clearly says so. 23) Then the moon will be disgraced and the sun ashamed; for the LORD of hosts will reign on Mount Zion and in Jerusalem. (NKJV) Those are two different things, one is His throne and one is Zion. Basically on Mount Zion and in Zion; in this case it says Jerusalem. Going on then to Micah. It’s amazing how much you can put together if you have four years to prepare a sermon. Micah 4:1, where Zion is used in the same context as Mount Zion and they’re not the same. Micah 4:1 Now it shall come to pass in the latter days that the mountain of the LORD's house [that would be Mount Zion, right?—that’s what the Bible says] shall be established on the top of the mountains, and shall be exalted above the hills; and peoples shall flow to it. 2) Many nations shall come and say, “Come, and let us go up to the mountain of the LORD, to the house of the God of Jacob; (NKJV) In my Father’s house are many dwelling places. You know who’s going to be there? We’re going to be there—I hope—I hope we’re going to be there. 2 continued) … He will teach us His ways, and we shall walk in His paths.” For out of Zion the law shall go forth [out from Jerusalem, Zion is not Mount Zion, they’re not the same], and the word of the LORD from Jerusalem. 3) He shall judge between many peoples, and rebuke strong nations afar off; they shall beat their swords into plowshares, and their spears into pruning hooks; (NKJV) We have said for seventy years, this is the Millennium. We were right, it is; it’s clear, because you are going from a warfare economy to a peacetime economy, and you’re going to take all of those implements and turn them into something useful. 3 continued) … Nation shall not lift up sword against nation, neither shall they learn war anymore. 4) But everyone shall sit under his vine and under his fig tree, and no one shall make them afraid; for the mouth of the LORD of hosts has spoken. 5) For all people walk each in the name of his god … (NKJV) I suppose that could suffer from a little bit of interpretation but the context seems to me to be of a comparison between either following God our Father or the god of your own nation or people, as compared to following us, being gods. I’m just saying in terms of the passage. The New Jerusalem Page 9 of 23 5 repeated) For all people walk each in the name of his god, but we will walk in the name of the LORD our God forever and ever. (NKJV) It’s like Joshua is saying, you might do what you’re going to do, but as for me and my house, we’re going to serve God. I think it’s in that context. God is going to dwell with His children during the Millennium and the period of time for the Millennium is called the new heavens and the new earth. That was my sermon that I addressed. I do appreciate the fact that I didn’t get 10,000 questions after that last sermon, because there are 10,000 questions, but there’s no way to answer all of them except in pieces; I need time to build the puzzle and here’s a piece. This is a piece that will answer some of the questions that individuals had that were left over from before. God is going to dwell with His children during the Millennium. The church of God has a word for that teaching. It’s called heresy. I’ve heard it used rather frequently lately. History has a word for the teaching of the church of God. It’s called Gnosticism—that’s just reality. I told somebody just yesterday, just google Gnosticism, take the first definition at the top of the page. You don’t have to look or search, you don’t have to go any further, take the first one and it will tell you what the answer is. Gnosticism most fundamentally is the teaching that God cannot be in the presence of sin. That’s the most fundamental principle of Gnostic theology. God cannot be in the presence of sin. But not just sin, God cannot be around the physical creation at all. And God the Father was not the creator. The creator was a spirit being but a lesser spirit being than Him. If you know that, you understand the premise behind Gnosticism. Now from there, it’s like anything—it goes out in a thousand rivers, but that’s not our point. The point is, when you’re teaching that God cannot be in the presence of sin, you’re teaching that He is not the creator, that somebody else actually did the creation, and that God by implication can’t even be around His own physical creation. You may not be a Gnostic but you’ve imbibed of the wrong drink—you’re drinking from the wrong glass, so to speak. Why wouldn’t God the Father come down during the Millennium to be with His family, if we’re going to be kings and priests on the earth? Why wouldn’t He do that? Why wouldn’t God the Father bring His children up to be with Him after their birth? Why wouldn’t He do that? Because the Gnostics will have nothing to do with it; it doesn’t fit their theology. The problem is not the record of scripture, the problem is the commandments of men. So just think through this a little bit. Job 38, God laid the foundations of the earth, all the sons of God, all the faithful angels, shouted for joy because the creation was good. They shouted for joy, it was exciting. Then let’s go back to Genesis 1, back to where my smudges begin. Genesis 1:26. Genesis 1:26 Then God said, “Let Us make man in Our image, according to Our likeness; let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, over the birds of the air, The New Jerusalem Page 10 of 23 and over the cattle, over all the earth and over every creeping thing that creeps on the earth.” 27) So God created man in His own image; in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them. 28) Then God blessed them, and God said to them, “Be fruitful and multiply; fill the earth and subdue it; have dominion over the fish of the sea, over the birds of the air, and over every living thing that moves on the earth.” (NKJV) Being created in God’s image and after His likeness, that’s good, right? That’s not bad, that’s a good thing. And the angels were rejoicing at the creation of the earth—the righteous angels. Now God is saying in the record here, when He made man, that was a good thing. Then you go down to Genesis 1:31. Genesis 1:31 Then God saw everything that He had made, and indeed it was very good. (NKJV) This is spectacular, this is what I wanted, and it is here and it’s now ready to go. So God creates Adam and Eve in His own image, according to His own likeness, puts them in a perfect, physical environment that He made, custom-tailored for them, they’re in that environment, and they have not yet sinned, and God still can’t be with them. That goes beyond God not being able to be in the presence of sin, God can’t even be in the presence of His own physical creation, which is very good, where nothing has gone wrong. It’s exactly what He wanted it to be and yet He still can’t be there. That is not a little doctrinal aberration, that is Gnosticism, that is the premise of Gnosticism. It isn’t just sin, it’s that which is physical. When you begin to teach that not only can God not be there in the beginning, He can’t be there in the end, and all that is physical is going to have to go away completely before He can put His littlest finger down in the stream, so to speak, it’s not true, because it’s not what scripture says. Scripture says God desires to dwell with men, and the extension of that is He desires to have His children dwell with Him. Christ said, I’m going to go prepare a place for you to dwell and you’re going to be there; I’m going to the Father and you’re going to be with Me. That’s simply what the record of scripture is. Both God the Father and Jesus Christ are going to dwell with men. There’s no question in our mind in terms of where Christ is going to be during the Millennium. We’ve argued that over time and it’s very clear, so the question is, what is God the Father going to be doing during the Millennium? I’m saving Revelation 21 and 22 for the end—if you have your notes you’ve already looked down and seen that I’m leaving that for last because that’s where we often start. I want to build the argument from the scripture and then I want to show how Revelation 21 and 22 are the conclusion of the argument and not preempt them in some way. I do want to go Revelation 11, because again, an announcement is made at a very specific time and we can all understand it. Verse 15. The New Jerusalem Page 11 of 23 Revelation 11:15 Then the seventh angel sounded: And there were loud voices in heaven, saying, “The kingdoms of this world have become the kingdoms of our Lord and of His Christ, and He [our Lord] shall reign forever and ever!” (NKJV) George Friederich Handel not withstanding, this is a reference to God the Father and Jesus Christ, who are going to reign forever, but the kingdoms of the world, the kingdoms of men, have become the kingdoms of God the Father and of Jesus Christ. Not just Jesus Christ, because that’s what it says. Let’s go back then to Zechariah because so much of this is in the prophecies; that’s why the New Testament was always referring back to the Old, because that was the Bible that they had, that was the scriptural base they were familiar with. In Zechariah 8:1, Zechariah 8:1 Again the word of the LORD of hosts came, saying, 2) “Thus says the LORD of hosts: ‘I am zealous for Zion with great zeal; with great fervor I am zealous for her.’ 3) Thus says the LORD: ‘I will return to Zion, and dwell in the midst of Jerusalem. Jerusalem shall be called the City of Truth, the Mountain of the LORD of hosts, the Holy Mountain.’ (NKJV) In other words Mount Zion and Zion are both going to be in place at the same time. How God does that—you know what? God is going to do that, we’ll see it—I hope we’ll see it. God is going to do that. The holy mountain. 4) “Thus says the LORD of hosts: ‘Old men and old women shall again sit in the streets of Jerusalem … (NKJV) So we’re not talking about a time that is just spirit existence, we’re back again to the Millennium, because that’s when this takes place. 4 repeated) ‘Old men and old women shall again sit in the streets of Jerusalem, each one with his staff in his hand because of great age. 5) The streets of the city shall be full of boys and girls playing in its streets.’ (NKJV) That is a wonderful example of a scripture that we’ve used so many times, but God the Father says He’s going to be dwelling in Jerusalem, in that area. He’ll be coming down; He’ll be on the earth. This is repeated so many times, I started with a master list three times as long as my sermon notes, and I just kept saying, well, I can’t give all of those sermon notes, I can’t give all of those references. I just kept bringing it down, so the fact is, this is everywhere. Go to Ezekiel 33, Ezekiel 43; Ezekiel 40 through 48 is a passage showing that during the Millennium, there’s going to be a physical temple in Jerusalem with a priesthood offering physical sacrifices with people requiring circumcision—it’s there. You can say, how in the world is that? Let’s start with God said so, it’s here, it’s explicit, and then to the degree we can understand it, let’s add that to the record. If we’re going to wait until we decide, first we’ll understand it, before we will The New Jerusalem Page 12 of 23 believe it—I’m sorry, it’s there, it says so. This is a physical temple and they are offering physical sacrifices. Ezekiel 43:1. Ezekiel 43:1 Afterward he brought me to the gate, the gate that faces toward the east. 2) And behold, the glory of the God of Israel came from the way of the east. (NKJV) What’s on the east side of, let’s just say, Zion? Well, the Mount of Olives would be on the east side. It’s interesting that He’s coming from that direction. When the glory of God left the temple, it left out to the east as well. I don’t know, perhaps God has a place He comes and goes from—a portal or something. I don’t know. It’s just consistent, it’s always the same. 2 continued) … His voice was like the sound of many waters; and the earth shone with His glory. 3) It was like the appearance of the vision which I saw—like the vision which I saw when I came to destroy the city. (NKJV) It goes on down and verse 5 says: 5) The Spirit lifted me up and brought me into the inner court; and behold, the glory of the LORD filled the temple. (NKJV) The glory filled the temple. 6) Then I heard Him speaking to me from the temple, while a man stood beside me. 7) And He said to me, “Son of man, this is the place of My throne and the place of the soles of My feet … (NKJV) Isn’t it interesting the ark is God’s footstool? It’s not the throne of God, it’s the footstool of God. The covering of the ark is the covering of atonement, it’s the covering over the law, it’s portraying, God says, heaven is My throne, the earth is my footstool, and when you see the actual representation, God appeared above the ark in the cloud and spoke to Moses so the ark was His footstool. He said, this is the place for the soles of my feet. We’re talking about a time when there’s a physical temple in Jerusalem, and God is using the same portrayal. He’s in Mount Zion but His feet are resting, so to speak, in Jerusalem in the temple. It’s the same analogy that we have from the Old Testament. Well, we’re in the Old Testament but it’s prophetic. 7 continued) … where I will dwell in the midst of the children of Israel forever. No more shall the house of Israel defile My holy name, they nor their kings, by their harlotry or with the carcasses of their kings on their high places. The New Jerusalem Page 13 of 23 8) When they set their threshold by My threshold, and their doorpost by My doorpost, with a wall between them and Me, they defiled My holy name … (NKJV) What difference does it make? It makes a lot of difference. God says you do not defile My name, you do not move in next to Me, you do not bring in your Gnosticism and your paganism and park it at my door and then call Me holy. It’s just not what He wants, obviously. 8 continued) … by the abominations which they committed; therefore I have consumed them in My anger. (NKJV) That’s pretty clear. 9) Now let them put their harlotry and the carcasses of their kings far away from Me, and I will dwell in their midst forever. (NKJV) That’s Ezekiel 43. Go to 48, which is the end of this particular passage. Go on down to the very last verse. It had given all of these measurements and the borders and the descriptions, and I don’t know what to do with all of that, but I have learned one thing, as my wife keeps bringing up—everything is important. She has wondered, why is that there? Eventually you learn why it’s there, maybe, but everything is important. Ezekiel 48:35 All the way around shall be eighteen thousand cubits; and the name of the city from that day shall be: THE LORD IS THERE.” (NKJV) Where’s He going to be? It says right there. He’s going to be there in Jerusalem, ruling from Mount Zion, and there will be a temple in Zion, and God is going to rule both from Mount Zion and in Jerusalem. He’s going to be there and those two are going to be functioning in that very exact way. Our Father is going to dwell in the New Jerusalem along with Jesus Christ on the earth. So, Isaiah 60 now; this is an interesting passage. I’ve used this at funerals so many times because it’s so graphic and encouraging. Isaiah 60:1. Isaiah 60:1 Arise, shine; For your light has come! And the glory of the LORD is risen upon you. (NKJV) Resurrection, to be part of God’s family. Resurrection to dwell with our Father in His mansion, in His house, in one of His rooms, and that’s what’s being represented. 2) For behold, the darkness shall cover the earth, and deep darkness the people; (NKJV) Okay, so there are still spirit beings in existence, there’s still darkness in existence when this takes place. The New Jerusalem Page 14 of 23 2 continued) … But the LORD will arise over you, and His glory will be seen upon you. 3) The Gentiles shall come to your light, and kings to the brightness of your rising. (NKJV) It’s putting together the fact that we’re going to actually be on the earth in a state of spiritual glory with our Father and Jesus Christ, and there are going to be beings coming up to Jerusalem to worship at the temple. Then in verse 7, 7) All the flocks of Kedar shall be gathered together to you, the rams of Nebaioth shall minister to you; they shall ascend with acceptance on My altar [that’s the physical temple], and I will glorify the house of My glory. 8) Who are these who fly like a cloud, and like doves to their roosts? (NKJV) That’s always been an interesting way of describing these people moving around, flying all over the place. These are not physical people. 9) Surely the coastlands shall wait for Me; and the ships of Tarshish will come first, to bring your sons from afar, their silver and their gold with them, to the name of the LORD your God, and to the Holy One of Israel, because He has glorified you. (NKJV) You start putting God the Father with physical human beings, recognizing there’s a physical temple, and then Mount Zion as well, on the earth, and you know what? You’ve got the new heavens and the new earth at the beginning of the Millennium and you have New Jerusalem coming down to be together at that place, at that time, in that way. You can walk around it, you can make the story different, you can ignore some of the scriptures, but that is simply how the record is stated. Verse 13. 13) “The glory of Lebanon shall come to you, the cypress, the pine, and the box tree together, to beautify the place of My sanctuary; and I will make the place of My feet glorious. (NKJV) Talking about the physical temple—God’s feet—the ark being His footstool. 14) Also the sons of those who afflicted you shall come bowing to you, and all those who despised you shall fall prostrate at the soles of your feet; and they shall call you the City of the LORD, Zion of the Holy One of Israel. (NKJV) Again, a very specific use of those terms. What country do Canadians come from? Anybody want to guess? I have Norwegian ancestry, what country do Norwegians come from? It says right here, they’ll call you the City of YHVH, because that’s where you come from. It’s no different—maybe a little different—but the fact is that’s not an unusual way to look at things. Where are you from? He’s an Ephraimite or he’s a Londoner or whatever he is, but we’re actually going to be known for the fact that that is where we come from, and however that is represented, surely it goes beyond even what The New Jerusalem Page 15 of 23 I’ve been able to describe. Revelation 3 makes reference to that very same concept in the New Testament. Revelation 3:11, talking to the church now in Philadelphia, the letter to the church. Revelation 3:11 Behold, I am coming quickly! Hold fast what you have, that no one may take your crown. 12) He who overcomes, I will make him a pillar in the temple of My God, and he shall go out no more. I will write on him the name of My God and the name of the city of My God, the New Jerusalem, which comes down out of heaven from My God. And I will write on him My new name. 13) “He who has an ear, let him hear what the Spirit says to the churches.” (NKJV) Can you see what was just said? He’s going to write on them the name of God; Christ will write on them His new name, but He’s going to write on them, and this is in the resurrection and the Kingdom of God and our ruling on the earth; He is going to write on us the name of the city of Jesus Christ’s God (YHVH)—the New Jerusalem. It’s not because it’s missing in action, it’s because it’s there, immediately present. It’s an important distinction. Back to the definition of terms. “Living waters” obviously comes in very strongly in the symbolism of the temple, of New Jerusalem, of Mount Zion. Living waters are waters that flow and give life. They’re moving water and it’s clean and pure and it gives life. Living water could be used either in a physical or a spiritual way—literal water that is flowing or the analogy of however God works in spirit. People say, physical—that’s just the earth, and then it goes away. I don’t know about that—the earth abides forever, so something is going to continue on. The fact is, the Bible never did tell me what the limits of physical are. We can’t exactly understand the limits of spiritual, so one thing is at least an analogy—the spiritual, but it’s real—and the other is physical, literal, something we can touch and taste and feel. In Ezekiel 47, let’s go back to one of the portrayals of what’s going to take place during the Millennium. We’ll go into the passage about the temple at the very end of the book. Ezekiel 47:1 Then he brought me back to the door of the temple; and there was water, flowing from under the threshold of the temple toward the east, for the front of the temple faced east; the water was flowing from under the right side of the temple, south of the altar. 2) He brought me out by way of the north gate, and led me around on the outside to the outer gateway that faces east; and there was water, running out on the right side. (NKJV) This is literal, physical water, coming out of a literal, physical temple, during the Millennium. Now go to verse 7 and you can just see how physical this is. 7) When I returned, there, along the bank of the river, were very many trees on one side and the other. The New Jerusalem Page 16 of 23 8) Then he said to me: “This water flows toward the eastern region, goes down into the valley, and enters the sea. When it reaches the sea, its waters are healed. (NKJV) That has to be in the Millennium, that can’t be after. This is a process of cleansing and healing of the earth, beginning in Jerusalem. Its waters are healed. 9) And it shall be that every living thing that moves, wherever the rivers go, will live. [That’s living water being portrayed.] There will be a very great multitude of fish, because these waters go there; for they will be healed, and everything will live wherever the river goes. 10) It shall be that fishermen will stand by it from En Gedi to En Eglaim; they will be places for spreading their nets. Their fish will be of the same kinds as the fish of the Great Sea, exceedingly many. 11) But its swamps and marshes will not be healed; they will be given over to salt. (NKJV) God leaves in place some of the devastation that will not be healed, for visual instruction, apparently. There are places, He’s saying, that I’m not going to heal everything; I want you to be able to see what it’s like where it’s not restored. 12) Along the bank of the river, on this side and that, will grow all kinds of trees used for food; their leaves will not wither, and their fruit will not fail. They will bear fruit every month, because their water flows from the sanctuary. Their fruit will be for food, and their leaves for medicine.” (NKJV) This is a physical portrayal with physical details, during the Millennium and during the time when we will be there, with God the Father in His house. Let’s go then to Zechariah 14. A place that we’ve gone many, many times in regard to descriptions of the Millennium and keeping the Feast of Tabernacles and the rejoicing. Zechariah 14:8 And in that day it shall be that living waters shall flow from Jerusalem [it’s the exact same portrayal, but now the phrase “living waters” is used in a specific way], half of them toward the eastern sea and half of them toward the western sea; in both summer and winter it shall occur. 9) And the LORD [YHVH] shall be King over all the earth. (NKJV) That’s what the angel said in Revelation 11. Both God and His Christ are now going to rule over the nations of the earth, and here it is, He will be King over all the earth. 9 continued) … In that day it shall be—“The LORD is one,” and His name one. (NKJV) There is one YHVH—there’s one—that’s all there is, there’s only one. There is more than one Elohim, but there’s only one YHVH. So those all match up. Now let’s look at the spiritual. Again, not being able to describe the spiritual physically but there are The New Jerusalem Page 17 of 23 certain things that are given and at times a measurement, but it’s a portrayal of what God is going to fulfill spiritually, and I want to start that in Jeremiah 2:12. Just a couple of verses here. Jeremiah 2:12 Be astonished, O heavens, at this, and be horribly afraid; be very desolate,” says the LORD. 13) “For My people have committed two evils: they have forsaken Me, the fountain of living waters … (NKJV) Now we’re not talking about God having custody of all physical water on earth, He is the fountain of living water. So there is living water which is moving water that gives life, but then there’s the spiritual side where God the Father gives living water and it comes from Him. He is the fountain. 13 continued) … And hewn themselves cisterns—broken cisterns that can hold no water. (NKJV) No, thank you, we’ve already got the answer, we want to do this our way, we’re going to do it ourselves. God makes the distinction very clear between the living waters and the broken, empty cisterns. Then if we go to the New Testament, in John 7, it is very clear what Jesus Christ is now referring to because it is consistent with the rest of scripture. John 7:37 On the last day, that great day of the feast … (NKJV) We’ve gone back and forth on this. I have gone back and forth on this and the honest answer is, I’m back to where I was before I changed. ((laughs)) I can say that. I believe this is the eighth day, that’s just what I believe. I believe the symbolism of the eighth day is that God and Jesus Christ will reign forever and ever and therefore living waters are going to flow from our Father for eternity, and the whole plan and preparation is to set up to where that can take place, and to give time for judgment, and to give time for accountability, and to give time for opportunity so that those who can be saved, can be saved and respond accordingly. When it’s all in order, for eternity, living water will flow spiritually from our Father. 37 repeated) On the last day, that great day of the feast, Jesus stood and cried out, saying, “If anyone thirsts, let him come to Me and drink. (NKJV) Of course, because it comes through Christ, and God gave Him His spirit to dispense. 38) He who believes in Me, as the Scripture has said, out of his heart will flow rivers of living water.” (NKJV) So you’re not going to have leakage. We’re talking of a spiritual analogy, and yet it matches perfectly with the Old Testament reference. Then Revelation 7, again just showing the consistency. If we take the terms in the most basic sense that are defined The New Jerusalem Page 18 of 23 in the scripture and use them, instead of making up our own names—our terms— making up our own definitions, and frankly making up our own story, then it works. Revelation 7:13 Then one of the elders answered, saying to me, “Who are these arrayed in white robes, and where did they come from?” 14) And I said to him, “Sir, you know.” So he said to me, “These are the ones who come out of the great tribulation, and washed their robes and made them white in the blood of the Lamb. 15) Therefore they are before the throne of God, and serve Him day and night in His temple. And He who sits on the throne will dwell among them. 16) They shall neither hunger anymore nor thirst anymore; the sun shall not strike them, nor any heat; 17) for the Lamb who is in the midst of the throne will shepherd them and lead them to living fountains of waters. And God will wipe away every tear from their eyes.” (NKJV) The fact is, it just means the sorrow is over—these are spirit beings. There are two distinctions. There’s one description of God dwelling with men, there’s another description of God having His children dwell with Him. It just says these fountains of living waters—Christ leads us to that and it comes from His Father. We were all taught that the book of Revelation is in time-order sequence with a couple of insert chapters. So the argument is made that this happened, bang, bang, bang, and it just keeps moving, and you can’t violate that. I’m sorry, there is no scripture that says the book of Revelation is in time-order sequence. That is an interpretation and it’s based on a wrong narrative. It’s partly in sequence and it’s partly not in sequence. Just take an outline of the book someday by chapter. I sat down, it took me a few minutes—Revelation 1 through 3, the messages to the seven churches. Revelation 4 through 11 is the scroll with the seven seals and then the seven trumpets. Revelation 12 through 14 are a variety of subjects, anywhere between three and nine subjects, depending on how you combine them or divide them, so there is literally a collection of things being addressed there in three chapters. Revelation 15 and 16 are the seven last plagues. Revelation 17, the harlot and the beast. Revelation 18, the fall of Babylon the Great. Revelation 19 and 20, the battle of the great day of God Almighty, and the Millennium, and the Great White Throne judgment. Then Revelation 21 and 22 is the new heavens and the new earth and the new Jerusalem. Satan’s rebellion is in there and the conclusion is in there, but in the broad, general sense, the fact is there are pieces of the book of Revelation that are continuous in time order, and then there are things that are inserted and addressed along the way. There is more than an insert chapter or two, it is not written front to end in continuous fashion. It’s just simply not true. Outline the book of Revelation, just by chapter, and you will see. I want to go now to Revelation 21 and 22 because I want to build the record of scripture first, and then we’ll go to those two chapters which are critically important and incredibly helpful. As I did with the new heavens and the new earth, I’m trying to address fundamental points of understanding so that you can have something to kind of pin the The New Jerusalem Page 19 of 23 understanding and the scripture to where it should go. Are there questions? Yes, there are going to be questions. But you know what? God be willing, and, as we used to say, the creek don’t rise, various men will speak and teach, and they will add pieces to this, and we will move forward as God allows. Revelation 21:1. Revelation 21:1 Now I saw a new heaven and a new earth, for the first heaven and the first earth had passed away [we’re now in the millennial frame]. Also there was no more sea. (NKJV) Sea being Satan’s dominion; again, that’s a previous sermon in which I addressed and gave examples of that. It’s not that the water is all gone. The water is going to pour out from the temple and go down to the seas on both sides, so there’s going to be water and there’s going to be some bodies of water, and they’re going to catch fish in them, so that’s not what it means. 2) Then I, John, saw the holy city, New Jerusalem, coming down out of heaven from God, prepared as a bride adorned for her husband. 3) And I heard a loud voice from heaven saying, “Behold, the tabernacle of God is with men … (NKJV) I don’t care what the Gnostics believed, it says here the tabernacle of God is with men. 3 continued) … and He will dwell with them, and they shall be His people. God Himself will be with them and be their God. 4) And God will wipe away every tear from their eyes; there shall be no more death, nor sorrow, nor crying. There shall be no more pain, for the former things have passed away.” (NKJV) There are elements of this that I addressed in my last sermon, that I need to go forward into the more direct parts on New Jerusalem. 5) Then He who sat on the throne said, “Behold, I make all things new.” And He said to me, “Write, for these words are true and faithful.” (NKJV) This is the restoration of all things. It’s going to be made back the way it was when it was new. What God actually intended for it to be to begin with. 6) And He said to me, “It is done! I am the Alpha and the Omega, the Beginning and the End. I will give of the fountain of the water of life freely to him who thirsts. 7) He who overcomes shall inherit all things, and I will be his God and he shall be My son. (NKJV) The Alpha, the Omega, the beginning and the end, is God the Father and we’re going to be His children. That’s what the Bible says. The New Jerusalem Page 20 of 23 8) But the cowardly, unbelieving, abominable, murderers, sexually immoral, sorcerers, idolaters, and all liars shall have their part in the lake which burns with fire and brimstone, which is the second death.” (NKJV) God’s Spirit is being offered. It’s the fountain of the water of life being offered freely to him who thirsts. Sonship is in place. You do not get there apart from being made a spirit being, in the fullest sense. The final judgment, including the second death, is yet to come. I don’t care if it’s in chapter 20. I didn’t write this book, God wrote this book and He laid it out; there are pieces of it in order and there are pieces of it that are inserts. We’re going to have to accept what it records as compared to the story someone made up back in 1915, and laid out in a book, which we then adopted, unfortunately, in its place—in place of the record of scripture itself. Revelation 21:9. 9) Then one of the seven angels who had the seven bowls filled with the seven last plagues … (NKJV) We’re in the context of the day of the Lord, where this has just taken place. So it’s not like we’re looking back at these events from the perspective of the Millennium being over, as if the bowls had been emptied out 1,000 years ago. No, it’s in the context right here, followed by the revealing of the New Jerusalem. 9 repeated) Then one of the seven angels who had the seven bowls filled with the seven last plagues came to me and talked with me, saying, “Come, I will show you the bride, the Lamb's wife.” 10) And he carried me away in the Spirit to a great and high mountain, and showed me the great city, the holy Jerusalem, descending out of heaven from God, 11) having the glory of God. Her light was like a most precious stone, like a jasper stone, clear as crystal. (NKJV) And it goes on and gives some additional descriptions here. This is the New Jerusalem, a holy Jerusalem. This is the dwelling place. When you look up and see the bride, the bride is not the city, the bride is in the city. You’re going to see the bride but the city is coming down. The dwelling is not the bride. The dwelling is where Christ said, I’m going to go prepare a place for you in the dwelling, and then you’ll be the bride and you’ll be in God’s house. Going on down, Revelation 21, because there is a lot of description here that isn’t directly what I can address. Revelation 21:22. 22) But I saw no temple in it, for the Lord God Almighty and the Lamb are its temple. 23) The city had no need of the sun or of the moon to shine in it, for the glory of God illuminated it. The Lamb is its light. (NKJV) And it continues on. The New Jerusalem Page 21 of 23 24) And the nations of those who are saved shall walk in its light, and the kings of the earth bring their glory and honor into it. 25) Its gates shall not be shut at all by day (there shall be no night there). 26) And they shall bring the glory and the honor of the nations into it. (NKJV) That’s what it says. If we just take it for what it says, then at some point we’ll understand it in a clearer fashion. 27) But there shall by no means enter it anything that defiles, or causes an abomination or a lie, but only those who are written in the Lamb's Book of Life. (NKJV) Again, this is the Millennium. God said, I want to dwell with men. Men are physical on the earth, and He said, I want my children also to dwell with Me. We’re in His house; His house is on the earth; His house is Mount Zion, that’s where He rules from, and it’s the heavenly Jerusalem, and that is the promise that Abraham looked for and waited to receive. Going on then to Revelation 22. Revelation 22:1 And he showed me a pure river of water of life … (NKJV) Revelation 21 and 22 do have some descriptions of physical things in them, but this is a spiritual entity. I don’t know what God does with that. You can’t take something that is 1,400 miles square, cubed like the Holy of Holies is a cube, as God’s dwelling. This is His entire dwelling, like the Holy of Holies. You put it on the earth, the earth falls over. So I don’t know what He’s going to do, but He’s going to do it. We’re not talking laws of physics here, we’re talking God’s miraculous power. We’re also using spiritual analogies. When you’re in Zechariah, it’s a physical temple with physical characteristics. When you’re here, it is a spiritual entity—New Jerusalem—a dwelling place for the children of God, for His family, and the descriptions of it then seem to mix a bit. I’ll just say, we have physical, we have spiritual, and at some point we’ll understand the distinctions there better, but we need to at least believe what it says is here. 1 continued) … clear as crystal, proceeding from the throne of God and of the Lamb. 2) In the middle of its street, and on either side of the river, was the tree of life, which bore twelve fruits, each tree yielding its fruit every month. (NKJV) You could say this is exactly the same as in Ezekiel and I would have to say, I think Ezekiel is actually portraying this. This is the real thing, Ezekiel is the portrayal. One is physical. God’s feet are in Jerusalem. His throne is in Mount Zion. That would be the way it worked in the Old Testament, that’s the way it will work here. 2 continued) … The leaves of the tree were for the healing of the nations. 3) And there shall be no more curse, but the throne of God and of the Lamb shall be in it, and His servants shall serve Him. 4) They shall see His face, and His name shall be on their foreheads. The New Jerusalem Page 22 of 23 5) There shall be no night there: They need no lamp nor light of the sun … (NKJV) But the people who are out in the physical earth, who are planting crops and eating them, are going to need the light of the sun to work by day—they’re going to be in a physical environment. This is not a physical environment that’s being portrayed. 5 continued) … for the Lord God gives them light. And they shall reign forever and ever. (NKJV) We need to understand what God’s purpose is. Front to back of the Bible, God says, I want to be with you. God wants to be with people I don’t even want to be with. That’s why I’ve got to be like Him. ((laughs)) I’ve got to get there, gain a little ground on that one. God is going to dwell with His children at the beginning of the Millennium in the new heavens and the new earth, dwelling in the New Jerusalem. We will be with Him. God is going to dwell with His children and God and His children are going to dwell in the midst of men.
Tree of Life in the Old Testament > godstruechurch.org
“Tree of life” symbolism appears throughout the Old Testament. Genesis 2–3 contains three references to the tree of life, and Proverbs contains four references to it. Creation Account In Genesis, the tree of life symbolizes God’s life-giving presence in the garden of Eden, as well as His role as the source of all goodness. Scripture depicts the garden of Eden as God’s sanctuary and cosmic dwelling place. He placed humanity within the garden to serve and protect it and to represent Him in the physical universe (Dalley, “Temple Building,” 239–51; Levenson, “Temple and the World,” 288). The opening verses of Gen 2 describe God’s efforts to provide a sacred space filled with abundant provision, beauty, and harmony for spiritually connected humanity. In addition to raising up “every tree that was pleasant to the sight and good for food” (Gen 2:9 LEB), God caused the “tree of life … along with the tree of the knowledge of good and evil” (LEB) to grow in the garden of Eden. He specified that Adam and Eve could eat from any of the trees except the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, explaining, “In the day that you eat from it you shall surely die” (Gen 2:17 LEB). Adam and Eve’s choice to disobey this command and eat from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil caused their eyes to be “opened” (Gen 3:7) and initiated the process of death and curses (Gen 3:10–19). Adam and Eve were subsequently expelled from the garden of Eden, and God placed the cherubim with a flaming sword to guard the tree of life, “lest he reaches out his hand and take also of the tree of life and eat, and live forever” (Gen 3:22 ESV). Their expulsion was thus both a consequence of disobedience and protection to prevent humanity from eating from the tree of life and living forever in their corrupted state. Bonhoeffer emphasizes the tree of life’s centrality to the creation account by stating, “The whole story moves toward its end in these verses (Gen 3:22–24).… Indeed it becomes plain that the whole story has really been about this tree” Bonhoeffer, Creation and Fall, 141). Genesis 3:23 specifies that God “sent [Adam] out from the Garden of Eden, to till (דֹבֲעַל ,la'avod) the ground from which he was taken” (LEB). This description recalls Gen 2:5, which states that prior to creation, “there was no human being to cultivate the ground” (LEB). In a reversal of God’s twofold responsibilities for Adam in Gen 2:15—“work” (עבד' ,bd) and “keep” (שמר ,ׁshmr) the garden—God now sends away the humans to “work” (‘bd; Gen 3:23) the ground east of the garden and positions angelic beings to “protect” (shmr) the garden (Gen 3:24). Life and Death in the Pentateuch Outside Genesis 2–3 in the Old Testament, the tree of life becomes “a simile for things from which the power of life flows” (Cassuto, Genesis, 109–10). In Hebrew, the term “life” (יַ ח ,chay) can refer to both physical life and quality of life that incorporates the ideas of life, good, and blessing in contrast to death, evil, and a curse. In the creation narrative, the imagery of the tree of life is connected to a life characterized by abundance, fullness, and provision. Moberly, pointing to the use of death and life language in other parts of the Pentateuch (e.g., Deut 30:15–20), argues that the first humans had the choice between the path of life or the path of death, stating: “The linkage of life with prosperity and blessings, and of death with adversity and curses, makes clear that what is envisaged is metaphorical, to do primarily with the kind of life that Israel will live” (Moberly, Theology, 84). The curses listed in Deut 28:15–68 provide further insight into the meaning of death, especially when viewed in contrast to the blessings that precede them. The rest of Scripture moves toward the hope and promise that God will provide the means for humanity to once again gain access to His presence and blessing and the source of life in all its fullness. Wisdom Tradition and the Tree of Life Wisdom texts associate the attainment of wisdom (הָ מְכָ ח ,chokhmah) with the tree of life (Prov 3:13–18; 11:30; 13:12; 15:4). For example, Proverbs 3:18 states, “She [wisdom] is a tree of life for those who seize her; those who take hold of her are considered happy” (LEB). Although consuming the fruit of the tree of knowledge did not provide humans with the hope for wisdom, the effect of the Torah (law) is to make the simple wise, bringing about true wisdom. Wisdom texts emphasize that although knowledge without wisdom produces death, knowledge with wisdom as mediated through the Torah becomes a source of renewal of life and rejoicing of the heart (see also Psa 37:30–31; Ezra 7:25). Thus, in Jewish tradition, the Torah becomes the remedy for the fall (Altmann, “Homo Imago Dei,” 249). Rabbinic tradition has long recognized abidance in the Torah as the restorative promise of the tree of life (Schorsch, “Trees for Life,” 243–44; Schneersohn, The Tree of Life). Proverbs 3:18 provides support for this interpretation by portraying the Torah as embodying wisdom. This correspondence is reaffirmed by the quotation of Prov 3:18 after a public reading of the Torah. Likewise, the seven-branched, tree-shaped menorah is symbolic of the Torah as the tree of life, as well as the light-giving presence of God. In rabbinic expression, heresy and disobedience of the Torah are likened to the destruction of trees (Schorsch, “Trees for Life,” 244; Beale, Revelation, 235). This sense of the sacredness of creation is meant to be a reflection of faith in the Creator: The way a person lives, in reverent honour of God and His creation, is to be a continual affirmation of life, with God as the ultimate source of all life. The tree of life appears elsewhere in Wisdom literature as well:
• Proverbs 11:30 states, “The fruit of the righteous is a tree of life” (ESV). Zevit offers the following paraphrase of this verse: “The acts of a person who acts within the law, are like such a tree” (Zevit, What Really Happened, 255). • Proverbs 15:4 states, “A gentle tongue is a tree of life” (Zevit, What Really Happened, 255). • Psalm 1:3 does not use the phrase “tree of life,” but it incorporates the imagery of a lush, leafy tree as representing a discerning person. The reference to “a tree planted by streams of water, which gives fruit in season, whose leaves do not shrivel” refers to a good and blessed one who eschews evil and takes delight in the law of the Lord. A distinction is sometimes made between references to wisdom and righteousness as “a tree of life” in Proverbs and the tree of life in Gen 2–3. The use of the definite article in Gen 2–3 communicates that the author refers to a specific, miraculous tree known to the readers that endow eternal life. Temple Imagery and the Tree of Life The walls and doors of Solomon’s temple contained images of trees and cherubim reminiscent of the garden of Eden, representing the sacred space of God’s presence with humanity (1 Kgs 6:23–35). Also, as mentioned above, the menorah stands as a metaphor for the tree of life, shedding the light of God. Ezekiel indicates that sacred trees are also present in the future temple (Ezek 41:17–18). Trees do not appear in the holy of holies, where God’s presence is understood to dwell and where God Himself is “the source of all life and blessing” (Lanfer, Remembering Eden, 39). Ezekiel 47:12 recalls the garden of Eden in its description of a river, which flows from the temple and is lined with trees bearing fruit for food and leaves for healing. Revelation 22:2 draws on this passage, reversing the sentence of death in Gen 3 through the cross (tree) of Christ and restoring access to the tree of life and paradise (Rev 2:7; 22:14, 19). Tree of Life in the New Testament The New Testament contains four references to the tree of life, all of which appear in Rev 2 and Rev 22. In this eschatological context, the tree of life functions as a future source of healing and immortality for the faithful. In Revelation 2:7 and 11, the saints who emerge victorious in Christ through testing have promised the tree of life (Rev 2:7) and deliverance from the second death (Rev 2:11). Osborne argues that in this context, the tree of life symbolizes the cross, which makes access to God and eternal life possible (Osborne, Revelation, 124, 563). Similar imagery is attested elsewhere in the New Testament (e.g., Gal 3:13). Tree of life imagery also serves as a polemic against the Greek Artemis fertility cult of Ephesus, where her temple was a “tree shrine” in which she symbolized life (Osborne, Revelation, 124). The final chapter of Revelation ties the tree of life back to the garden of Eden as “a picture of forgiveness and consequent experience of God’s intimate presence.” This chapter uses language and imagery of early Jewish literature (Beale, The Book of Revelation, 234–35). Tree of Life in Ancient Near Eastern Literature and Inscriptions In the ancient Near East, a tree of life is a common motif representing humanity’s quest for immortality. The ancient readers of the book of Genesis would have likely understood the tree of life to be associated with some form of eternal or perpetual life. Seals, artwork, and early Sumerian and Akkadian texts contain frequent depictions of and references to sacred or royal gardens (Lanfer, Remembering Eden, 11; Keel, Goddesses and Trees). Bread, plants, and water are also associated with life in ancient literature (Watson, “The Tree of life,” 232). Although the biblical texts seem to show familiarity with the narratives of the surrounding cultures, Lanfer believes arguments that the Genesis narrative was derived from Mesopotamian or other earlier sources are “less than compelling” (Lanfer, Remembering Eden, 11). The Babylonian Epic of Gilgamesh (second millennium BC) contains the oldest surviving reference to a life-granting plant: “If you yourself can win that plant, you will find [rejuvenation (?)].… I too shall eat [it] and turn into the young man that I once was” (Gilgamesh Tablets XI, 6:7, 15–16; from Dalley, Myths from Mesopotamia, 118–19). The plant in this text rejuvenates but does not offer immortality. It thus differs from the tree in Gen 3:22, whose fruit is said to enable the consumer to “live forever.” When Gilgamesh fails to attain the plant of life, he is encouraged to seek wisdom. In contrast, in the Bible, when Adam and Eve seek to gain illicit knowledge from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, they lose access to the perpetual life offered by the tree of life. In the Gilgamesh epic, the source of life is intended only for the gods, but in the biblical account the tree of life seems freely given to the humans (Vogels, “Like One of Us”). A Babylonian fragment found among the Tell el-Amarna tablets, the Myth of Adapa (second millennium BC), tells of the wisdom god En (An) creating the first man, Adapa. En endowed Adapa with wisdom and intelligence but not immortality. Through apparent trickery, Adapa was deprived of consuming the food and drink of immortality and lived out his life as a mortal man (Heidel, The Babylonian Genesis, 122–27, 147–53). In the Canaanite religion, the goddess of life and fertility, Asherah, is represented by a wooden pole also known as an Asherah. Other ancient Near Eastern goddesses associated with fertility are also associated with a wooden pole or tree. Deuteronomy 12:2 condemns sacred trees such as the Asherah, but these trees nevertheless become interspersed with the worship of Yahweh as various Israelite and Judahite kings began practising pluralistic worship and idolatry (e.g., 2 Kgs 21:7; Isa 1:29). Within Egyptian literature, the deities Hathor and Nut are both recorded as supplying souls of the dead with divine food to sustain them (James, The Tree of life, 41). In New Kingdom Egypt, the goddess Hathor, generally represented by a cow, is described as a tree nourishing the king. Isis was also depicted as a tree providing nourishment to the king. The tree image’s association with a woman, fertility, and life-giving functions bears some resemblances to the imagery of the Genesis trees (Lanfer, Remembering Eden, 35–36). In Assyrian iconography, the sacred tree represents the presence of the deity and also serves as a symbolic source of life. For example, an inscription found in Ashurnasirpal’s palace depicts a tree standing between two winged creatures under a winged disk, with the king picking its fruit. The king bears the title “vice-regent of Aššur” (Lanfer, Remembering Eden 38– 39
Tree of Life in the Intertestamental and Early Christian Literature The intertestamental period contains extensive references to the tree of life, largely as typologic representations of the presence of God and immortality for the faithful (e.g., 1 Enoch 24:3–25:6; 2 Enoch 8:3–7; 2 Esdras [4 Ezra] 2:1–13; 8:50–52; Psalms of Solomon 14:2–3; Apocalypse of Moses 28:2–4; Testament of Levi 18:9–12; Testament of Dan 5:12; see Osborne, Revelation, 122; Beale, The Book of Revelation, 235). In the Greek-speaking Jewish community, the tree of life also seemed to symbolize hope, restoration from exile, and an idealization of Israel (especially Jerusalem) as their sought-after paradise (Lanfer, Remembering Eden, 41–58). Tree of Life in the Septuagint and Targums The Septuagint and Targums occasionally expand the Masoretic Text of the Hebrew Bible by adding Edenic imagery. For example, consider these translations of Isa 65:22: Hebrew Bible Septuagint and Targum Jonathan “For the days of my people shall be as the days of a tree” (LEB). “the days of my people will be like the days of the tree of life.” The Targum Neofiti translation of Genesis, which originated in Palestine between the first and third centuries AD, usually offers a quite literal Aramaic paraphrase of the Hebrew. However, this translation expands considerably on Gen 3:22 by linking Adam to nationhood and linking Torah obedience to the tree of life—so that keeping the Torah is an alternate path to obtaining life (Lanfer, Remembering Eden, 45). Targum Neofiti also expands on Gen 3:24 by placing the Torah rather than the cherubim as a guard over the garden of Eden. The text explains, “Because the Torah is a tree of life to all who study it and [those who] keep its decrees will life. He will stand like a tree of life for the world that is to come. It is as good to study the Torah in this world as the fruit of the Tree of life” (Lanfer, Remembering Eden, 46). This understanding of the Torah as the path of life is reflected elsewhere in the Old Testament. For example, Exodus 18:20 describes it as “the way in which they must walk” (LEB), 2 Chr 6:27 refers to the law as “the good way” (LEB), and Psa 1:6 describes it as “the way of the righteous” (LEB). Targum Jonathan Psalm 1:3 translates the Hebrew phrase “he will be like a tree” into Aramaic as “he will be like a Tree of life.” This translation again equates Torah's righteousness with the tree of life and a route of return to the garden of Eden. Tree of Life in Extrabiblical Literature In early Jewish and Christian literature, the tree of life symbolizes immortality and the presence of God. Intertestamental writings reflect the book of Proverbs in referring to wisdom, righteousness, and obedience to the Torah as “a tree of life.” This association implies that wisdom, righteousness, and Torah obedience serve as alternate, life-giving sources. Other texts from the intertestamental period idealize Israel and describe the promised land and Jerusalem using Edenic imagery. For example, the Letter of Aristeas (ca. 200 BC) describes Jerusalem and the temple using imagery of paradise and the garden of Eden. This text also depicts Israel as an abundant land filled with fruit trees and underground springs, which supply the temple (Letter of Aristeas, 112–17; 88–89
The deuterocanonical book of 2 Esdras uses the tree of life in the sense of a paradise. For example, in 2 Esdras 2:10–12, God declares, “Tell my people that I will give them the kingdom of Jerusalem.… The tree of life shall give them fragrant perfume, and they shall neither toil nor become weary” (NRSV). Second Esdras 8:51–54 associates the tree of life with paradise, plenty, rest, goodness, and perfection in the age to come before stating, “The root of evil is sealed up from you, illness is banished from you, and death is hidden; Hades has fled and corruption has been forgotten; sorrows have passed away, and in the end, the treasure of immortality is made manifest” (NRSV). In the Life of Adam and Eve (or Apocalypse of Moses, first to third century AD), the tree of life is associated with the throne of God (Life of Adam and Eve 22:4). Here, after expelling Adam and Eve from the garden, God promises them they can have resurrection and eternal life through the tree of life if they keep themselves “from every evil” (Lanfer, Remembering Eden, 55, 187n79). This text seems to indicate the belief that Adam and the woman had attained immortality in the garden (see also the midrash of Genesis Rabbah 21:7 and 2 Esdras 2:11: “the man has been like one of us”). Thus the fall is interpreted as humanity abandoning eternal life with God for independent” ‘foolish’ pursuit of wisdom” (Lanfer, Remembering Eden, 99). This is a reversal of the Babylonian Adapa myth. The wisdom of Solomon also communicates the belief that God intended humanity to be immortal. In this text, the serpent, identified as the devil, is held accountable for the entrance of death: “God created man for in corruption and made him in the image of his own eternity, but through the devil’s envy death entered the world, and those who belong to his party experience it” (Wisdom of Solomon 2:24; Ska, “Genesis 2–3,” 19). Many other Jewish and early Christian texts expand on these various themes. Lanfer argues that these texts use sacred tree and garden motifs as “dynamic representations of the temple, the faithful, the future Jerusalem and the presence of God.” He further notes that these texts consistently connect the tree of life to God, “either as the representation of him, an extension of his will or the place where he makes himself present.” He goes on to state, “In this atmosphere of eschatological expectation, the tree of life and the mythology of Eden consistently combine to establish the presence or enthronement of God and the promise of immortality” (Lanfer, “Allusion to and Expansion,” 96–108). Intertestamental literature frequently describes the righteous or faithful as trees of life, similar to Psa 1 (e.g., Psalms of Solomon 14:3; Hodayot from the Dead Sea Scrolls 1QH 14;14– 19; 10:25–26; Odes of Solomon 11:16; Gospel of Truth 36; and the Targum Onqelos to Psa 1:3). Additionally, early Jewish writings contain many references or allusions to the tree of life as representative of God’s presence in the world, divine blessing, hope for Israel, and Torah obedience as the path of life. These writings understand the first Eden as a sanctuary and portray the temple as functioning as the former garden of Eden. Critical Issues Immortality One topic of debate concerning the tree of life is whether God created Adam to be immortal or mortal. Rabbinic writings display the belief that sin is the cause of death, but the righteous can attain immortality and enter paradise without death, as did Enoch and Elijah (Schmid, “Loss of Immortality?” 58–59). 1 Enoch 69:11 and the midrash Pesikta Rabbati 42:1 state that God created Adam to live forever, like the angels. The first canon of the Council of Carthage (ca. AD 418) states that God intended humans to be immortal, but their immortality was cut off due to sin, resulting in death: “If any man says that Adam, the first man, was created mortal, so that whether he sinned or not he would have died, not as the wages of sin, but through the necessity of nature, let him be anathema.” The Protestant position since the Reformation has maintained the same doctrine. However, an examination of the overall structure of Gen 2–3 (especially Gen 2:7) seems to indicate that God intended for humans upon the present earth to be mortal. The substance from which He created the first man, “dust” (Gen 2:7; 3:19), is also connected with morality and transience in Genesis and in the rest of the Old Testament (e.g., Gen 18:27; Job 10:9; 17:16; 21:26; Psa 22:15, 29; Eccl 3:20; 12:7). Genesis 3:22 implies that even though Adam and Eve had committed a transgression, they could still achieve immortality if they could access the tree of life (Schmid, “Loss of Immortality?” 62–62). In Romans 5, Paul writes that access to eternal life is made possible only through Christ, not Adam. In 1 Corinthians 15:47, Paul similarly states that the first man, Adam, was “from the earth” (i.e., dust), implying that he was created to be mortal. He contrasts Adam with the “second man … from heaven,” Christ, who is immortal. Through faith in Christ, humans “of dust” are able to put on immortality and gain victory over death (1 Cor 15:48–54). Gnostic Influence As Gnosticism developed, with its emphasis on the preeminence of knowledge and supremacy of wisdom, the narratives of the two trees in the garden were rewritten and reversed. For example, the Nag Hammadi codices (fourth century AD) and the Apocalypse of Sedrach speak of a ban from eating of the tree of life but portray the tree of knowledge as offering the idealized fruit that leads to wisdom, maturity, and freedom (Lanfer, Remembering Eden, 57–58). In the Apocryphon of John, the tree of life becomes a tree of death and evil, but the tree of knowledge (or tree of gnosis) brings freedom and the light of understanding. Relationship between Tree of Knowledge and Tree of Life In modern times, Gen 2–3 has been interpreted as an Israelite narrative about the achievement of moral discernment and wisdom, which is accomplished by conflating the two trees into one tree in the middle of the garden (Wyatt, “Interpreting the Creation,” 15–17; Krispenz, “Wie viele Bäume” 304). This reasoning derives from Gen 3:1–6, which refers to only the tree of knowledge as standing in the middle of the garden, compared to Gen 2:9, which speaks of both the tree of life and the tree of knowledge. In Zevit’s view, the wisdom traditions fused the two trees in the garden narrative into one through the eisegesis of the waw in Gen 2:9 (as a waw explicative, “that is [to say]”). In other words, conflating the two trees in Gen 2:9 requires interpreting the passage as, “and a Tree of life in the middle of the garden, that is, a Tree of Knowing proper/good and improper/bad” (Zevit, What Really Happened, 254). The Aramaic Targum Neofiti clarifies the predominant Jewish understanding that there were two trees in the middle of the garden by adding to Gen 2:9 that the tree of life was “in the innermost parts of the garden” or “in the midst of the midst.” The Syriac Peshitta also adds this clarification (Lanfer, Remembering Eden, 44, 51).
Adam and Eve
Genesis 2 New International Version
4 This is the account of the heavens and the earth when they were created, when the Lord God made the earth and the heavens.
5 Now no shrub had yet appeared on the earth[a] and no plant had yet sprung up, for the Lord God had not sent rain on the earth and there was no one to work the ground, 6 but streams[b] came up from the earth and watered the whole surface of the ground. 7 Then the Lord God formed a man[c] from the dust of the ground and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life, and the man became a living being.
8 Now the Lord God had planted a garden in the east, in Eden; and there he put the man he had formed. 9 The Lord God made all kinds of trees grow out of the ground—trees that were pleasing to the eye and good for food. In the middle of the garden were the tree of life and the tree of the knowledge of good and evil.
10 A river watering the garden flowed from Eden; from there it was separated into four headwaters. 11 The name of the first is the Pishon; it winds through the entire land of Havilah, where there is gold. 12 (The gold of that land is good; aromatic resin[d] and onyx are also there.) 13 The name of the second river is the Gihon; it winds through the entire land of Cush.[e] 14 The name of the third river is the Tigris; it runs along the east side of Ashur. And the fourth river is the Euphrates.
15 The Lord God took the man and put him in the Garden of Eden to work it and take care of it. 16 And the Lord God commanded the man, “You are free to eat from any tree in the garden; 17 but you must not eat from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, for when you eat from it you will certainly die.”
18 The Lord God said, “It is not good for the man to be alone. I will make a helper suitable for him.”
19 Now the Lord God had formed out of the ground all the wild animals and all the birds in the sky. He brought them to the man to see what he would name them; and whatever the man called each living creature, that was its name. 20 So the man gave names to all the livestock, the birds in the sky and all the wild animals.
But for Adam[f] no suitable helper was found. 21 So the Lord God caused the man to fall into a deep sleep; and while he was sleeping, he took one of the man’s ribs[g] and then closed up the place with flesh. 22 Then the Lord God made a woman from the rib[h] he had taken out of the man, and he brought her to the man.
23 The man said,
“This is now bone of my bones
and flesh of my flesh;
she shall be called ‘woman,’
for she was taken out of man.”
24 That is why a man leaves his father and mother and is united to his wife, and they become one flesh.
25 Adam and his wife were both naked, and they felt no shame.

2 Corinthians 3
New International Version
3 Are we beginning to commend ourselves again? Or do we need, like some people, letters of recommendation to you or from you?
2 You yourselves are our letter, written on our hearts, known and read by everyone.
3 You show that you are a letter from Christ, the result of our ministry, written not with ink but with the Spirit of the living God, not on tablets of stone but on tablets of human hearts.
4 Such confidence we have through Christ before God.
5 Not that we are competent in ourselves to claim anything for ourselves, but our competence comes from God.
6 He has made us competent as ministers of a new covenant—not of the letter but of the Spirit; for the letter kills, but the Spirit gives life.
The Greater Glory of the New Covenant
7 Now if the ministry that brought death, which was engraved in letters on stone, came with glory, so that the Israelites could not look steadily at the face of Moses because of its glory, transitory though it was,
8 will not the ministry of the Spirit be even more glorious?
9 If the ministry that brought condemnation was glorious, how much more glorious is the ministry that brings righteousness!
10 For what was glorious has no glory now in comparison with the surpassing glory.
11 And if what was transitory came with glory, how much greater is the glory of that which lasts!
12 Therefore, since we have such a hope, we are very bold.
13 We are not like Moses, who would put a veil over his face to prevent the Israelites from seeing the end of what was passing away.
14 But their minds were made dull, for to this day the same veil remains when the old covenant is read. It has not been removed, because only in Christ is it taken away.
15 Even to this day when Moses is read, a veil covers their hearts.
16 But whenever anyone turns to the Lord, the veil is taken away.
17 Now the Lord is the Spirit, and where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is freedom.
18 And we all, who with unveiled faces contemplate[a] the Lord’s glory, are being transformed into his image with ever-increasing glory, which comes from the Lord, who is the Spirit.
Dispensational Truth I The Prophetic Word
The Bible is not a systematic treatise on Theology, Morals, History, Science, or any other topic. It is a REVELATION of God, of the Fall of Man, the Way of Salvation, and of God's "Plan and Purpose in the Ages." It treats of
1. Four Persons-God the Father, God the Son, God the Holy Spirit, and Satan.
2. Three Places-Heaven, Earth and Hell.
3. Three Classes of People-The Jew, the Gentile, and the Church of God. The Scriptures were given to us piece-meal, "at sundry times and in divers manners." Holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Spirit, during a period of 1600 years, extending from B.C. 1492 to A. D. 100. The Bible consists of 66 separate books; 39 in the Old Testament, and 27 in the New Testament. These books were written by about 40 different authors. By kings such as David and Solomon; by statesmen, such as Daniel and Nehemiah; by priests, like Ezra; by men learned in the wisdom of Egypt, like Moses; by men learned in Jewish law, as Paul. By a herdsman, Amos; a tax-gatherer, Matthew; fishermen, like Peter, James and John, who were "unlearned and ignorant" men; a physician, Luke; and such mighty "seers" as Isaiah, Ezekiel and Zechariah. It is not an Asiatic book, though it was written in that part of the world. Its pages were penned in the Wilderness of Sinai, the cliffs of Arabia, the hills and towns of Palestine, the courts of the Temple, the schools of the prophets at Bethel and Jericho, in the palace of Shushan in Persia, on the banks of the river Chebar in Babylonia, in the dungeons of Rome, and on the lonely Island of Patmos, in the Aegean Sea. Imagine another book compiled in a similar manner. Suppose, for illustration, that we take 66 medical books written by 40 different physicians and surgeons during a period of 1600 years, of various schools of medicine, such as Allopathy, Homeopathy, Hydropathy, Osteopathy, etc., and bind them all together, and then undertake to doctor a man according to that book, what success would we expect to have, and what accord would there be in such a medical work. While the Bible has been compiled in the manner described, it is not a "heterogeneous jumble" of ancient history, myths, legends, religious speculations and superstitions. There is a progress of revelation and doctrine in it. The judges knew more than the Patriarchs, the Prophets than the judges, and the Apostles than the Prophets. The Old and New Testaments are not separate and distinct books, the New taking the place of the Old they are the two halves of a whole. The New is "enfolded" in the Old, and the Old is "unfolded" in the New. You cannot understand Leviticus without Hebrews, or Daniel without Revelation, or the Passover or Isaiah 53 without the gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke and John.
While the Bible is a revelation from God, it is not written in a superhuman or celestial language. If it were we could not understand it. Its supernatural origin however is seen in the fact that it can be translated into any language and not lose its virility or spiritual life-giving power, and when translated into any language it fixes that language in its purest form. The language however of the Bible is of three kinds. Figurative, Symbolical and Literal. Such expressions as "Harden not your heart, " and "Let the dead bury their dead, " are figurative, and their meaning is made clear by the context. Symbolic language, like the description of Nebuchadnezzar's "Colossus" Daniel’s "Four Wild Beasts" or Christ in the midst of the "Seven Candlesticks, " is explained, either in the same chapter or somewhere else in the Bible. The rest of the language of the Bible is to be interpreted according to the customary rules of grammar and rhetoric. That is, we are to read the Bible as we would read any other book, letting it say what it wants to say, and not allegorize or spiritualize its meaning. It is this false method of interpreting Scripture that has led us to the origin of so many religious sects and denominations. There are three things that we must avoid in the handling of God's Word. 1. The Misinterpretation of Scripture. 2. The Misapplication of Scripture. 3. The Dislocation of Scripture. The trouble is men are not willing to let the Scriptures say what they want to say. This is largely due to their training, environment, prejudice, or desire to make the Scriptures teach some favourite doctrine. Then again we must not overlook the "Parabolic Method" of imparting truth. Jesus did not invent it, though He largely used it, it was employed by the Old Testament prophets. In the New Testament, it is used as a "Mystery Form" of imparting truth. Matt. 13:10-12. A mystery is not something that cannot be known, but something that for the time being is hidden. I hand you a sealed letter. What it contains is a mystery to you. Break the seal and read the letter and it ceases to be a mystery. But you may not be able to read the letter, because it is written in a language with which you are not familiar. Learn the language and the mystery ceases. But perhaps the letter contains technical terms which you do not understand, learn their meaning and all will be plain. That is the way with the Mysteries of the Scriptures, learn to, read them with the help of their author, the Holy Spirit, and they will no longer be mysteries. This brings us to the great question Is The Bible God's Book Or Man's Book? 'That is, did God write it, or is it simply a collection of the writings of men? if it is simply a collection of the writings of men, without any divine guidance, then it is no more reliable than are the writings of men; but if God wrote it, then it must be true, and we can depend upon its statements. It is clear from the character of the Bible that it is not the work of man, for man could not have written it if he would. and would not have written it if he could. It details with scathing and unsparing severity the sins of its greatest men, as Abraham, Jacob, Moses, David and Solomon, charging them with falsehood, treachery, pride, adultery, cowardice, murder and gross licentiousness, and presents the history of the Children of Israel as a humiliating record of ingratitude, idolatry, unbelief and rebellion, and it is safe to say, that the Jews, unguided and undirected by the Holy Spirit, would never have chronicled the sinful history of their nation. How then was the Bible written? The Bible itself gives the answer. "ALL Scripture Is Given By INSPIRATION OF GOD." 2Tim. 3:16. I. What Are We To Understand By the "INSPIRATION" of the Scriptures? We are to understand that God directed men, chosen by Himself, to put into writing such messages, laws, doctrines, historical facts, and revelations, as He wished men to know. All Scripture (the Graphe writing), is given by inspiration (The op-neu-stos), that is, isGOD BREATHED. That is, God Himself or through the Holy Spirit told holy men of old just what to write. The Bible, then, IS the Word of God and does not simply here and there contain it. God is a Person and can both Write and Speak. He wrote the two "Tables of Testimony" on stone. Ex. 31:18; Ex. 32:16, and on the wall of Belshazzar's Palace. Dan. 5:5, Dan. 5:24-26. He talked with Moses on the Mount when He gave him the Specifications for the Tabernacle and its furnishings, and all the Levitical Law and order of service. He spoke at the Baptism of Jesus (Matt. 3:17) and on the Mount of Transfiguration. Matt. 17:5, and one day when Jesus was talking to the multitude. John 12:27-29. But God not only spoke directly to men, but He also spoke to them in the person of Jesus, for Jesus was God Manifest In The Flesh. John 1:1-3, John 1:14. 1Tim. 3:16. Matthew and John's Gospels contain 49 chapters, 1950 verses, 1140 of which, almost three-fifths, were spoken by Jesus, and He claimed that what He spake, He spake not of Himself, but that the Father which sent Him, gave Him commandment What He Should Speak. John 12:49, and John 12:50. We see then that God can both write and speak, and therefore can tell others what to write and speak. II. Does the Inspiration of the Bible Extend to Every Part? Yes. From the dry lists in Chronicles to the very words of God in Exodus, and through Christ. And more, it extends to every sentence, word, mark, point, jot and title in the original parchments. When Jesus said in Matt. 5:17, Matt. 5:18, That not one "jot" or "tittle", should pass from the Law until all be fulfilled, he referred to the smallest letter (jot) and the smallest mark (title), of the Hebrew language, thus indicating that even they were inspired, and where necessary for a complete understanding of God's meaning in His Word. But how about the words of Satan, wicked and uninspired men, the genealogical tables, and the account of the Fall of Man, the Flood and other historical portions of the Bible? They were inspired by Record. That is, the inspired penman or historian was told what historical facts to record and what to omit. To one who has read the Old Testament, and also profane history covering the same period, with its legends and traditions and detailed descriptions, it is very clear that the writers of the Old Testament were divinely inspired to record only those things that would throw light on God's Plan and Purpose in the Ages.
III. HOW Were These Men Inspired to Write the Scriptures? Were they simply thrown into a kind of "spell, " or "ecstasy, " or "trance, " and wrote under its influence whatever came into their mind? or did God through the Holy Spirit, dictate to them the exact words to use? We know that thought can only be expressed in words and those words must express the exact thought of the speaker or writer, otherwise, his exact thought is not expressed. We see then that inerrancy demands that the sacred writer be simply an amanuensis. This we see is what the Scriptures claim for themselves. In 11 Pet. 1:20, Pet. 1:21, we read that-"No prophecy of the Scripture is of any private interpretation." That is, no man has a right to say what the Scriptures, according to his opinion, mean. Why? Because- "The Prophecy came not in old time by the will of man, but holy men of God spake as they were Moved by the HOLY GHOST." And this is confirmed by the fact that much that the Old Testament Prophets wrote they did not themselves understand 1Pet. 1:10, 1Pet. 1:11. They must then have seen mere amanuenses, recoding words that needed an interpreter. That they were mere instruments is shown by the fact that not all of them were good or holy men, such as Balaam (Num. 22:38; Num. 23:26), King Saul (1Sam. 10:10- 1Sam. 10:12; 1Sam. 19:20-22), the Prophet of Bethel (1Kings 13:7-9; 1Kings 20:22; 1Kings 20:26), and Caiaphas, John 11:49-51. That the Old Testament writers spake and wrote the exact words that God gave to them is clear from their own statements. Moses declares that the Lord said unto him-"Now therefore go, and I will be with thy mouth, and teach thee what thou shalt say."- Ex. 4:10-12. The Prophet Jeremiah says-"Then the Lord put forth His hand, and touched my mouth, And the Lord said unto me, Behold, I have put My Words In Thy Mouth." Jer. 1:6-8. Ezekiel, Daniel, and all the prophets make the same claim. The expressions-"The Lord Said, " "The Lord Spake Saying, " "Thus Saith the Lord, " etc., etc., occur 560 times in the Pentateuch, 300 times in the Historical and Prophetical books, 1200 times in the Prophets (24 times in Malachi alone), in all over 2000 times in the Old Testament, thus proving the statement of Peter, those Holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost. But you say-"If this is true how do you account for the difference of the style of the writers; for Isaiah's style is different from Fzekiel's or Daniel's, and Peter's from that of John or Paul? " This is easily explained. On the principle that when we wish a legal document written we choose a lawyer, or a poetical article a poet, etc., so God when He wanted to speak in symbols chose an Ezekiel, a Daniel, a John, or in poetry a David. How are we to explain the fact that sometimes a New Testament writer in quoting from the Old Testament, instead of quoting literally paraphrasing the quotation? For instance, in Amos 9:11 we read: "In that day will I raise up the Tabernacle of David that is fallen, and close up the breaches thereof; and I will raise up his ruins, and I will build it as in the days of old." But when the Apostle James, in the First Church Council at Jerusalem, quotes this passage, he paraphrases it, saying-"After this, I will return, and will build again the Tabernacle of David, which is fallen down; and I will build again the ruins thereof, and I will set it up." Acts 15:16. Why the change in the wording? Simply because the author of both passages was not Amos or James, but the Holy Spirit and an author have a perfect right to change the phraseology of a statement he may make in the first chapter of his book, in the tenth chapter, if by so doing, without contradicting himself, he can make his meaning clearer. That is an illuminating statement in 1Pet. 1:11, where the Apostle tells us that it was the "Spirit of Christ" that testified through the Prophets of His "Sufferings." That is, the "Spirit of Christ" took possession of the Prophets and through them forecast or prophesied his "Sufferings" on the Cross, as in Isa. 53:1-3. The question is often asked, "Is there any difference between Bible Inspiration and the so-called 'inspiration' of Poets, Orators, Preachers, and Writers of today? " In answering the question we must distinguish between "Inspiration, " "Revelation, " and "Illumination." As we have seen "Bible Inspiration" is something totally different and unique from the inspiration of Poets, Writers and Public Speakers. It is an inspiration in which the Exact Words of God Are Imparted to the Speaker or Writer by the Holy Spirit.
Man†A†Trinity†®Spirit¨†Soul¨†Body CLICK ME> "I’m just as excited about this understanding of spirit, soul, and body as to when God first showed it to me over thirty-five years ago. In fact, I’ve seen the Lord set more people free through this one teaching than almost anything else I’ve ever ministered to! What you now hold in your hands has the potential to revolutionize your entire Christian life"!
Man†A†Trinity†®Spirit¨†Soul¨†Body The Christian doctrine of immortality cannot be understood apart from the right conception of the
tripartite nature of men. Many think that man is a physical being only. There is a great danger of any
man thinking thus of himself. In his desire to satisfy the needs of the body there is the tendency on
man’s part to lose sight of the fact that he is immortal. There have been persons who have lived all of
their lives either in ignorance or willful neglect of life after death, but upon their deathbed, they
suddenly realized that they were more than physical beings.
There is an idea also that prevails largely today that man consists of only two component parts:
namely, body and spirit. In the thinking of the writer, this view appears to be one that might create
confusion in the minds of many Christians. While soul and spirit are so closely related that it is
sometimes difficult to distinguish accurately between them, there seems to be only one logical
conclusion: namely, that “soul” and “spirit” are not the same. The Bible does make a distinction.
Man is a triune being because he is created in the image of God. “God said, Let us make man in Our
image” (Genesis 1:26). We know that God is a Trinity. The Holy Trinity is clearly set forth in the
Apostle Paul’s benediction that closed his Second Corinthian Epistle: “The grace of the Lord Jesus
Christ¨†and the love of God, and the communion of the Holy Ghost, be with you all. Amen” (2
Corinthians 13:14). Our Lord Himself said, in what we call “The Great Commission”: “Go ye therefore
and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy
Ghost” (Matthew 28:19). Created in the image of God, man is likewise a trinity. He has a spiritual
nature that is separate and distinct from the body in which it dwells.
The two following passages from the Bible clearly establish the fact that man is a triune being
composed of spirit, soul, and body:
I pray God your whole spirit†and soul†and body†be preserved blameless unto the coming of our Lord
Jesus Christ (1 Thessalonians 5:23).
For the word of God is quick, powerful, and sharper than any two-edged sword, piercing even to
the dividing asunder of soul†and spirit, and of the joints and marrow (body), and is a discerner of the
thoughts and intents of the heart (Hebrews 4:12).
In spite of the erroneous teaching of “Jehovah’s Witnesses” and of other false sects that “no man has
a soul,” the Bible states emphatically that man was created as a trinity of spirit, soul, and body even as
the eternal God is Himself a trinity of Father, Son, and Holy Ghost. The trinity of man is an essential
part of the image relationship between him and God. Life is not ultimately physical and the body is
not the whole man. And we might add that neither the body in itself, nor the soul in itself, nor the spirit
in itself makes up the whole man, but he is “spirit and soul and body.” This must be seriously
considered and definitely agreed to before we can comprehend with any accuracy the subject of life
after death. In this opening chapter, we shall confine our material to the spirit and the soul in as much as
the body will be considered in succeeding chapters on the resurrection.
The word “spirit” when used in the Scriptures has several meanings. Whenever the word “Spirit”
appears used with a capital letter, it has but one meaning. It is the name of the third Person of the
Trinity, the Holy Spirit of God. The word “spirit” spelt with a small letter may have one of several
different meanings. It can have direct reference to the spirit of man which is as much a part of the
tripartite nature of man as the Spirit of the living God is a Person of the Holy Trinity. Or it can indicate
an evil spirit such as any agent of the Devil. We will confine ourselves here to the Biblical usage of the
word only as it relates to the spirit of man, one of the three constituent parts of his being.
The threefold nature of man might be illustrated in several ways. Dr Clarence Larkin uses three
circles (Rightly†Dividing†The†Word¨†). The outer circle stands for the body†of man, the middle
circle for the soul¨†and the inner for the spiritƆAt this point it will be well to quote a portion from Dr.
Larkin’s book:
In the outer circle, the ‘Body’ is shown as touching the Material world through the five senses of
‘Sight,’ ‘Smell,’ ‘Hearing,’ ‘Taste’ and ‘Touch.’
The Gates to the ‘Soul’ are ‘Imagination,’ ‘Conscience,’ ‘Memory,’ ‘Reason’ and the ‘Affections.’
The “Spirit” receives impressions of outward and material things through the soul. The spiritual
faculties of the ‘Spirit’ are ‘Faith,’ ‘Hope,’ ‘Reverence,’ ‘Prayer’ and ‘Worship.’
In his unfallen state the ‘Spirit’ of man was illuminated from Heaven, but when the human race fell in
Adam, sin closed the window of the Spirit, pulled down the curtain, and the chamber of the spirit
became a death chamber and remains so in every unregenerate heart, until the Life and Light giving
power of the Holy Spirit floods that chamber with the Life and Light giving power of the new life in
Christ Jesus.
It develops then that the spirit of man, being the sphere of God-consciousness,
is the inner or private office of man where the work of regeneration takes place. Dr James R. Graham says that the main
theatre of the Holy Spirit’s activity in man, and the part of man’s nature with which He has peculiar
affinity is the spirit†of†manƆThe Apostle Paul gives us the Word of God on this, a passage that is
sadly neglected. Quoting from the sixty-fourth chapter of the book of the Prophet Isaiah, Paul wrote:
But as it is written, Eye hath not seen, nor ear heard, neither have entered into the heart of man, the
things which God hath prepared for them that love Him.
A great many people stop here, content to remain in ignorance. However, Paul continues:
But God hath revealed them unto us by His Spirit; for the Spirit searcheth all things, yea, the deep
things of God.
For what man knoweth the things of a man, save the spirit of man which is in him? Even so the things
of God knoweth no man, but the Spirit of God (1 Corinthians 2:911).
Man in his unregenerate state comes to know the things of man by the operator of “the spirit of man”
which is in him. If I have a will to know certain scientific facts, by my human spirit I am enabled to
investigate, think, and weigh the evidence. If I set myself to the task, I may become a scientist of world-renowned
and of great accomplishments. However, my human spirit is “limited to the things of man.” If I
want to know about the things of God, my dead and dormant spirit is not able to know them.
The natural man receiveth, not the things of the Spirit of God; for they are foolishness unto him;
neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned (1 Corinthians 2:14).
The human spirit requires “the spark of regeneration” before there is an understanding of the things
of God. Man’s spiritual nature must be renewed before there is a true conception of Godliness. Only
one thing stands as a guard at the door of man’s spirit, and that is his own will. When the will is
surrendered, the Holy Spirit takes up His abode in the spirit of man. And when that transaction takes
place we will know it, for, says Paul:
The Spirit Himself (meaning the Holy Spirit) beareth witness with our spirit, that we are children of
God (Romans 8:16 R.V.).
Many people confess that they get nothing out of the Bible even though they attend church and read
their Bibles regularly. Perhaps they do not know that they are not regenerated and that they need to
yield their will to the Spirit of God so that He can renew their human spirits. The deep things of God
never will be understood by the world outside of Jesus Christ. Our Lord warned His disciples,
Give not that which is holy unto the dogs, neither cast ye your pearls before swine (Matthew 7:6).
The spirit of the unregenerate man has no more capacity to appreciate the things of God than a dog
has to appreciate holy things, or a hog a genuine pearl necklace. We read that “The dog is turned to
his own vomit again; and the sow that was washed to her wallowing in the mire” (2 Peter 2:22). This
they did because the dog was a dog and the sow was a sow. No amount of religion or church activity
can change the spirit of the unregenerate man. “Remember,” says Dr G. Campbell Morgan, “if out of
false charity or pity you allow men of material ideals and worldly wisdom to touch holy things, to
handle the pearls of the Kingdom, presently they will turn and rend you. This is the whole history of
Christendom’s ruin, in the measure in which Christendom is ruined. We gave holy things to dogs. We
cast the pearls of the Kingdom before swine.” The ministry of Christ’s Church dare not be entrusted
to any man who has not been born again, for “That which is born of the flesh is flesh; and that which
is born of the Spirit is spirit” (John 3:6).
The Bible says; “There is a spirit in man; and the inspiration of the Almighty giveth them
understanding” (Job 32:8). Here we are told that it is the spirit of man that is given understanding.
The materialist tells us that the spirit of man is the air that he breathes, and that man’s body is all
there is to his personality. Such is not the case. The spirit of man is his personality and it is that which
differentiates him from the lower animal creation. If “spirit” meant merely “breath,” God certainly
would not deal with it as a personality. He is called “The God of the spirits of all flesh”
(Numbers 16:22), and “the Father of spirits” (Hebrews 12:9). It is by his spirit that the Christian both serves and
worships God. Paul testified: “For God is my witness, Whom I serve with my spirit in the Gospel”
(Romans 1:9). Jesus said: “God is a spirit; and they that worship Him must worship Him in spirit and
in truth” (John 4:24).
Man not only has a living soul but he is a living soul. The Bible says: “And the Lord God formed man
of the dust of the ground and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life, and man became a living
soul” (Genesis 2:7). We must be careful not to confound that which is truly spiritual and that which is
merely soulish or psychical. We have seen that the spirit of man is the sphere of activity where the
Holy Spirit operates in regeneration. Just so is the soul the sphere of activity where Satan operates
making his appeal to the affections and emotions of man.
Satan knows full well that he dominates the psychical or the soulish man. Therefore he does not care
if a man goes to a church where the Spirit of God is not in evidence. He knows that his victim is a
creature of emotions, and it matters not if the emotions are stirred to sentimentalism or even to tears,
just so long as man’s spirit does not come in contact with God’s Holy Spirit. I believe that
Satan would rather have a man go to a modernistic church where there is false worship than he would
have him go to a house of prostitution. The soul is the seat of the passions, the feelings, and the
desires of man; and Satan is satisfied if he can master these. F. W. Grant has said that the soul is the
seat of the affections, right or wrong, of love, hate, lusts, and even the appetites of the body.
Hamor said to Jacob, “The soul of my son Shechem longeth for your daughter” (Genesis 34:8). Of
David and Jonathan it is written: “The soul of Jonathan was knit with the soul of David, and Jonathan
loved him as his own soul” (1 Samuel 18:1). These passages show the soul to be the seat of the
affections. But as the soul loves, so it also hates. We read of those “that are hated of David’s soul”
(2 Samuel 5:8).
It is in the soul where fleshly lusts, desires, and appetites arise:
Abstain from fleshly lusts which war against the soul (Peter 2:11).
As cold waters to a thirsty soul, so is good news from a far country (Proverbs 25:25).
It shall be even as when a hungry man dreameth, and behold, he eateth; but he awaketh, and his
the soul is empty; or as when a thirsty man dreameth, and behold, he drinketh; but he awaketh, and
behold, he is faint, and his†soul†hath†appetite†(Isaiah 29:8).
The soul of man, that is, his affections and desires, are never directed Godward until after the spirit
has become regenerated. Man can never love God nor the things of God until he is born from above.
He may have a troubled conscience or be so stirred emotionally that he may weep bitterly, and still
remain dead in trespasses and in sins. We do not feel that we are guilty of judging men when we
state that some who have answered an altar call and shed tears never were born again. Man’s
desires and affections are turned toward God when he realizes his sinful condition and God’s grace
in salvation. When the Spirit of God illuminates the spirit of a man with divine light and life, that man
begins to yield his affections and faculties to God.
The Virgin Mary said; “My soul doth magnify the Lord, And my spirit hath rejoiced in God my Saviour”
(Luke 1:46, 47). She could not extol the Lord in her soul until she had recognized God in her spirit as
her Saviour. The initial triumph is in the spirit when Jesus Christ is acknowledged as personal Saviour.
In tHE immortal classic of the Psalms, David says: “He restoreth my soul” (Psalm 23:3). The Hebrew
word translated “restoreth” is said to mean quite literally “turneth back.” At no time had David lost his
salvation, but there were times when his affections and desires were turned from the Lord, as in the
case of his sin with Bathsheba. Having become one of the Divine Shepherd’s flock, he testified: “The
Lord turneth back my soul.” The Christian who is enjoying unbroken communion with his Lord will
then be able to say, “Bless the Lord, O my soul, and all that is within me, bless His holy name”
(Psalm 103:1).
.


I'm a paragraph. Click here to add your own text and edit me. It's easy.
GODSTRUEcHURCH.ORG
I'm a paragraph. Click here to add your own text and edit me. It's easy.
GODSTRUEcHURCH.ORG
GODSTRUEcHURCH.ORG
GODSTRUEcHURCH.ORG
GODSTRUEcHURCH.ORG
GODSTRUEcHURCH.ORG
GODSTRUEcHURCH.ORG
GODSTRUEcHURCH.ORG
GODSTRUEcHURCH.ORG
GODSTRUEcHURCH.ORG


GODSTRUEcHURCH.ORG
GODSTRUEcHURCH.ORG
GODSTRUEcHURCH.ORG
THE SEVEN GIFTS OF THE HOLY SPIRIT
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seven_gifts_of_the_Holy_Spirit
The seven gifts of the Holy Spirit are wisdom, understanding, counsel, fortitude, knowledge, piety, and fear of the Lord. While some Christans accept these as a definitive list of specific attributes, others understand them merely as examples of the Holy Spirit's work through the faithful. Roman Catholics believe that initiates receive these seven gifts at Baptism, and that they are strengthened at Confirmation so that one can proclaim the truths of the faith.
"The reception of the sacrament of Confirmation is necessary for the completion of baptismal grace."[88] For "by the sacrament of Confirmation, [the baptized] are more perfectly bound to the Church and are enriched with a special strength of the Holy Spirit. Hence they are, as true witnesses of Christ, more strictly obliged to spread and defend the faith by word and deed."[89] (Catechism of the Catholic Church #1285)
List of gifts
The seven gifts are enumerated in Isaiah 11:2-3 and conform to the Latin Vulgate[1], which takes the list from the Septuagint [2]. According to the Catechism of the Catholic Church[1] and descriptions outlined by St. Thomas Aquinas in the Summa Theologica,[2] the seven gifts are as follows:
Wisdom: Also,the gift of wisdom, we see God at work in our lives and in the world. For the wise person, the wonders of nature, historical events, and the ups and downs of our lives take on deeper meaning. The matters of judgment about the truth, and being able to see the whole image of God. We see God as our Father and other people with dignity. Lastly being able to see God in everyone and everything everywhere.
Understanding: In understanding, we comprehend how we need to live as a follower of Christ. A person with understanding is not confused by all the conflicting messages in our culture about the right way to live. The gift of understanding perfects a person's speculative reason in the apprehension of truth. It is the gift whereby self-evident principles are known, Aquinas writes.[3]
Counsel (Right Judgment): With the gift of counsel/right judgment, we know the difference between right and wrong, and we choose to do what is right. A person with right judgment avoids sin and lives out the values taught by Jesus. The gift of truth that allows the person to respond prudently, and happily to believe our Christ the Lord
Fortitude (Courage): With the gift of fortitude/courage, we overcome our fear and are willing to take risks as a follower of Jesus Christ. A person with courage is willing to stand up for what is right in the sight of God, even if it means accepting rejection, verbal abuse, or even physical harm and death. The gift of courage allows people the firmness of mind that is required both in doing good
because it puts our mindset in its correct location with respect to God: we are the finite, dependent creatures, and He is the infinite, all-powerful Creator.THE SEVEN GIFTS OF THE HOLY SPIRIT
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seven_gifts_of_the_Holy_Spirit
The seven gifts of the Holy Spirit are wisdom, understanding, counsel, fortitude, knowledge, piety, and fear of the Lord. While some Christans accept these as a definitive list of specific attributes, others understand them merely as examples of the Holy Spirit's work through the faithful. Roman Catholics believe that initiates receive these seven gifts at Baptism, and that they are strengthened at Confirmation so that one can proclaim the truths of the faith.
"The reception of the sacrament of Confirmation is necessary for the completion of baptismal grace."[88] For "by the sacrament of Confirmation, [the baptized] are more perfectly bound to the Church and are enriched with a special strength of the Holy Spirit. Hence they are, as true witnesses of Christ, more strictly obliged to spread and defend the faith by word and deed."[89] (Catechism of the Catholic Church #1285)
List of gifts
The seven gifts are enumerated in Isaiah 11:2-3 and conform to the Latin Vulgate[1], which takes the list from the Septuagint [2]. According to the Catechism of the Catholic Church[1] and descriptions outlined by St. Thomas Aquinas in the Summa Theologica,[2] the seven gifts are as follows:
Wisdom: Also,the gift of wisdom, we see God at work in our lives and in the world. For the wise person, the wonders of nature, historical events, and the ups and downs of our lives take on deeper meaning. The matters of judgment about the truth, and being able to see the whole image of God. We see God as our Father and other people with dignity. Lastly being able to see God in everyone and everything everywhere.
Understanding: In understanding, we comprehend how we need to live as a follower of Christ. A person with understanding is not confused by all the conflicting messages in our culture about the right way to live. The gift of understanding perfects a person's speculative reason in the apprehension of truth. It is the gift whereby self-evident principles are known, Aquinas writes.[3]
Counsel (Right Judgment): With the gift of counsel/right judgment, we know the difference between right and wrong, and we choose to do what is right. A person with right judgment avoids sin and lives out the values taught by Jesus. The gift of truth that allows the person to respond prudently, and happily to believe our Christ the Lord
Fortitude (Courage): With the gift of fortitude/courage, we overcome our fear and are willing to take risks as a follower of Jesus Christ. A person with courage is willing to stand up for what is right in the sight of God, even if it means accepting rejection, verbal abuse, or even physical harm and death. The gift of courage allows people the firmness of mind that is required both in doing good and in enduring evil, especially with regard to goods or evils that are difficult, just like Joan of Arc did.
Knowledge: With the gift of knowledge, we understand the meaning of God. The gift of knowledge is more than an accumulation of facts.
Piety (Reverence): With the gift of reverence, sometimes called piety, we have a deep sense of respect for God and the church. A person with reverence recognizes our total reliance on God and comes before God with humility, trust, and love. Piety is the gift whereby, at the Holy Spirit's instigation, we pay worship and duty to God as our Father, Aquinas writes.
Fear of the Lord (Wonder and Awe): With the gift of fear of the Lord we are aware of the glory and majesty of God. A person with wonder and awe knows that God is the perfection of all we desire: perfect knowledge, perfect goodness, perfect power, and perfect love. This gift is described by
Aquinas as a fear of separating oneself from God. He describes the gift as a "filial fear," like a child's fear of offending his father, rather than a "servile fear," that is, a fear of punishment. Also known as knowing God is all powerful. Fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom (Prov 1:7)
Confirming the Virtue of Hope:
The gift of the fear of the Lord, Fr. John A. Hardon notes in his Modern Catholic Dictionary, confirms the virtue of hope. We often think of hope and fear as mutually exclusive, but the fear of the Lord is the desire not to offend Him, and the certainty that He will give us the grace necessary to keep from doing so. It is that certainty that gives us hope.
The fear of the Lord is like the respect we have for our parents. We do not wish to offend them, but we also do not live in fear of them, in the sense of being frightened.
What the Fear of the Lord Is Not:
In the same way, Father Hardon notes, "The fear of the Lord is not servile but filial." In other words, it is not a fear of punishment, but a desire not to offend God that parallels our desire not to offend our parents.
Even so, many people misunderstand the fear of the Lord. Recalling the verse that "The fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom," they think that the fear of the Lord is something that is good to have when you first start out as a Christian, but that you should grow beyond it. That is not the case; rather, the fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom because it is one of the foundations of our religious life, just as the desire to do what our parents wish us to do should remain with us our entire lives.
CONFIRMATION AND THE HOLY SPIRIT
by Rev. Thomas Richstatter, O.F.M., S.T.D.
http://www.americancatholic.org/Newsletters/MM/ap0898.asp
At Baptism, we hear of the role of the Holy Spirit in the prayer over the baptismal water:
Father, look now with love on your Church,
and unseal for her the fountain of baptism.
By the power of the Spirit
give to the water of this font
the grace of your Son...
cleanse [those to be baptized] from sin in a new birth of innocence
by water and the Spirit. (Roman Sacramentary)
At Confirmation, we learn the implications of this new life in the Holy Spirit:
All powerful God, Father of our Lord Jesus Christ,
by water and the Holy Spirit
you freed your sons and daughters from sin
And gave them new life.
Send your Holy Spirit upon them
to be their helper and guide.
Give them the spirit of [1] wisdom and [2] understanding,
the spirit of [3] right judgment and [4] courage,
the spirit of [5] knowledge and [6] reverence.
Fill them with the spirit of [7] wonder and awe in your presence. (Rite of Confirmation)
This prayer names the traditional "Seven Gifts of the Holy Spirit."
The biblical origin of these seven gifts is found in
Isaiah (11:1-3) where he is foretelling the qualities of the Messiah.
[The ancient Greek and Latin translations of this passage read "piety" for
"fear of the Lord" in line six; this gives us our traditional seven gifts.]
But a shoot shall sprout from the stump of Jesse,
and from his roots a bud shall blossom.
The spirit of the Lord shall rest upon him:
a spirit of wisdom and of understanding,
a spirit of counsel and of strength,
a spirit of knowledge and of fear of the Lord,
and his delight shall be the fear of the LORD.
These seven gifts are the signs that the Messiah will be guided by the Spirit. The relation of these gifts to the sacrament of Confirmation becomes clear when we remember that the word "Messiah" (Christos in Greek) means "anointed." Jesus was "anointed," filled with the Holy Spirit at his baptism. At Confirmation we are anointed with the Holy Spirit. Throughout the Gospels we see how these seven gifts form Jesus' personality. They are characteristic of his activity. Consider the wisdom expressed in his parables; his understanding of the poor and the sick; his right judgment when tested by the Pharisees; his courage to continue the journey to Jerusalem where he surmised what fate awaited him; his knowledge of God's will; his reverence for his heavenly Father; his awe before the wonders of creation—the lilies of the field, the birds of the air....The seven gifts of the Holy Spirit are the manifestation of the Divine Power active in the life of Jesus of Nazareth.
In Baptism, our sins are washed away and we come up from the water bath to be clothed in a new garment. Putting on the baptismal garment is a visible symbol of the invisible reality of "putting on Christ." When we are anointed with oil in Confirmation, it is a visible symbol of the invisible reality of being anointed with the Spirit, being "Christ-ed" or "messiah-ed." We put on Christ, and the sevenfold gifts of the Spirit become our gifts. We pray that the qualities of the Messiah take root in us and become our qualities so that we may become signs of God's presence in the world.
At the actual anointing during Confirmation we hear the words: "(Name), be sealed with the gift of the Holy Spirit." Here the gift referred to is the Holy Spirit himself. We are sealed with the gift of (that is, the gift which is) the Holy Spirit. The Holy Spirit is God's "first gift to those who believe" (Eucharistic Prayer IV).
and in enduring evil, especially with regard to goods or evils that are difficult, just like Joan of Arc did.
Knowledge: With the gift of knowledge, we understand the meaning of God. The gift of knowledge is more than an accumulation of facts.
Piety (Reverence): With the gift of reverence, sometimes called piety, we have a deep sense of respect for God and the church. A person with reverence recognizes our total reliance on God and comes before God with humility, trust, and love. Piety is the gift whereby, at the Holy Spirit's instigation, we pay worship and duty to God as our Father, Aquinas writes.
Fear of the Lord (Wonder and Awe): With the gift of fear of the Lord we are aware of the glory and majesty of God. A person with wonder and awe knows that God is the perfection of all we desire: perfect knowledge, perfect goodness, perfect power, and perfect love. This gift is described by Aquinas as a fear of separating oneself from God. He describes the gift as a "filial fear," like a child's fear of offending his father, rather than a "servile fear," that is, a fear of punishment. Also known as knowing God is all powerful. Fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom (Prov 1:7)

🎺 Congratulations 🍾 Your life's journey so far has brought you here. This is a place NOT being advertised and $ will NOT buy you a seat at GOD'S Table ~ For by grace you have been saved through faith. And this is not your own doing; it is the gift of God. It is a judgment, covenant made by God and will only be issued on a one-one agreement: Therefore Henceforth Let The HolySpirit be your light to guide you and Choose wisely whom to pass this place on too. Many are called alas few are chosen. Now please read on and if you feel inspired to do so then spread the Gospel good news by directing to HERE! Amen.
🎺 The Visible Vs. The Invisible Church.~ Reformed theologians emphasize that this distinction does not mean that God has two separate churches. Indeed, they assert that Jehovah has founded one church, that Jesus has only one bride, people, church, or body. Our Lord does not have two churches but only one. The terms "invisible" and "visible" are used to describe two distinct aspects of the one church; or, to put it another way, the church is considered from two different perspectives. It is not that there are two separate air-tight categories with one group on heaven and another on earth. On the contrary, there is a great overlap between both categories. All genuine believers are members of the invisible church whether they are living in heaven or on earth, whether they are alive or dead (i.e., have died physically). Not all professing Christians, however, who are members of the visible church, are members of the invisible church. Some people who make a profession of faith and are baptized are hypocrites. Such people do not truly believe in Christ (thus are never truly united to Him by faith) and are not part of the invisible church. This reality will receive further elucidation below.
The term invisible as defined by the Reformed symbols and theologians does not mean that some Christians are invisible like ghosts floating around in the spirit realm. It refers to the fact that the invisible church cannot be fully discovered, distinguished or discerned by the eyes of men, by empirical means. There are a number of reasons why this statement cannot be denied. (a) No one has the ability to look into the human heart and see if a person is truly united to Christ and regenerated by the Holy Spirit. That reality is the reason that, historically, Presbyterian churches have admitted members upon a credible profession of faith. (b) The inward, effectual calling of the Spirit and the application of redemption to the human soul are all spiritual, unseen events. Further, the Holy Spirit gives genuine saving faith only to the elect. The counterfeit faith of unregenerate professors of religion often is indiscernible to mere mortals. We can only perceive outward signs, statements and actions. No person has the ability to determine or observe the whole body of God's elect irrespective of time (i.e., throughout human history prior to the last judgment) or place (i.e., there are many real believers in the world of which we are not aware). It is invisible to us because it has extensions in both time and space. It reaches from one end of the earth to the other, and from the beginning to the end of the age. But it is invisible only to us. It is not invisible to God. He who infallibly discerns the hearts of men knows them that are his. The foundation of God standeth sure, having this seal: 'the Lord knoweth them that are his' (II Tim. 2:19). Jesus prayed for the invisible church the elect present and not yet born in John 17. "Christ is speaking of a special company which had been given to Him. The reference, then, is to the sovereign election of God, whereby He chose a definite number to be His 'peculiar people'—His in a peculiar or special way. These are eternally His: 'chosen in Christ before the foundation of the world' (Eph. 1:4); and by the immutability of His purpose of grace (Rom. 11:29), they are always His."
The visible church is designated "visible" because it is discernable by the senses, by empirical means. It consists of everyone who professes the true religion along with their children. Because men do not have the ability to see into the minds of men and read the human heart, anyone who professes Jesus Christ incredible manner (i.e., he has a knowledge of the gospel, he is orthodox in doctrine, he professes faith in Christ and repentance toward God, he is not as far as anyone is aware committing habitual or scandalous sins) is allowed to join the church along with his children. In the visible church, there are genuine believers who are truly united to Christ and false professors or hypocrites who only taste heavenly gifts but do not really partake of the Savior. Their relationship to Him is only outward. "On this account, the church is compared to a floor, in which there is not only wheat but also chaff (Matt. iii. 12); to a field, where tares, as well as good seed, are sown (Matt. xiii. 24, 25); to a net, which gathers bad fish together with the good (ver. 47); to a great house, in which are vessels of every kind some to honour and some to dishonour,—2 Tim. ii. 20."[5] People who are members of the visible church yet who never truly believe in Christ receive the outward privileges of membership (fellowship, the word, the sacraments and the guidance of church government), but are never regenerated, saved, forgiven, united to Christ and spiritually sanctified. The blood of Jesus never washes away their sins.
The visible church is set apart from the world by profession as well as its external government, discipline, and ordinances (e.g., the preached word and the sacraments). The members of the visible church have obeyed the outward call of the gospel, professing Christ, submitting to baptism and placing themselves under the preaching and authority of the local church. All such persons who obey the outward call of the gospel place themselves in covenant with God. They have separated themselves from the world and at least outwardly enjoy the privileges of being members of the visible church (e.g., the teaching of the word, godly guidance, the fellowship of the saints, etc.). While in a certain sense those who outwardly profess the truth participate in an external covenant with real responsibilities and privileges, it does not mean and theologically cannot mean that they truly participate in the saving merits of Christ. Such persons (for a time) are in the covenant but are never genuinely of the covenant. They participate in the covenant externally as professors of the true religion, but they never participate in the covenant of grace which flows from the eternal covenant of redemption...
It needs to be recognized that although God deals with the visible church as one church, as one people of God, the external administration of the church with the preaching of the word, the ordinances and discipline in the present and in the long run (e.g., after the final judgment, in the eternal state) only truly benefit the invisible church or the elect. While outward professors receive temporary benefits resulting from intellectual insights from the word, pressure to conform to God's law, the outward influence from a society of family-oriented, ethical people, etc., they receive greater damnation on the day of judgment for spurning the great light to which they were exposed under continual gospel preaching.
let us examine a few passages of Scripture that strongly support the traditional view of the church as visible and invisible:
a) 1 John 2:19-20: "They went out from us, but they were not of us; for if they had been of us, they would have continued with us; but they went out that they might be made manifest, that none of them was of us. But you have an anointing from the Holy One, and you know all things." In this passage, John discusses certain persons who at one time had professed apostolic doctrine and were members of the church.
Note the Spirit-inspired analysis of the apostle John regarding this all too common situation. John says, "they were not of us." That is, they were never genuine members of the church. While it is true that they were baptized and professed the true religion, they were never united to Christ or saved. They were chaff on the same floor as wheat (Mt. 3:12), or tares among the wheat (Mt. 13:24-25). They were members of the visible church but never of the invisible church. In this context, John uses the term "us" (emon) in the sense of true Christians.
The apostle makes two observations ...First, he says that true Christians or members of the invisible church cannot apostatize: "for if they were of us [i.e., true believers], they would have continued with us." The fact that these professing Christians departed from the church is empirical proof that they were never true Christians. "They went out that they might be made manifest, that none of them was of us." "The meaning here is that secession proves a want of fundamental union from the rest."[9] Second, John says that true believers have received the Holy Spirit from Christ which secures them against apostasy or desertion: "But you have an anointing from the Holy One, and you know all things." True believers or members of the invisible church cannot fall away because they are baptized with the Holy Spirit and thus permanently abide in Christ (see 1 Jn. 2:27; 5:4). Our Lord concurs: "My sheep hear My voice, and I know them, and they follow Me. And I give them eternal life, and they shall never perish; neither shall anyone snatch them out of My hand" (Jn. 10:27-28).
1 Jn. 2:19-20 teaches: (1) the church is composed of true and false believers; and (2) the doctrine of perseverance. True Christians are united to Christ by the Holy Spirit and can never apostatize while those who are not baptized in the Spirit and not united to the Savior can. "Their presence in the visible church was temporary, for they failed in their perseverance. If they had been members of the invisible church, they would have remained with the body of believers."
b) Matthew 7:21-23: "Not everyone who says to Me, 'Lord, Lord,' shall enter the kingdom of heaven, but he who does the will of My Father in heaven. Many will say to Me in that day, 'Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in Your name, cast out demons in Your name, and done many wonders in Your name?' And then I will declare to them, 'I never knew you; depart from Me, you who practice lawlessness!'" After warning His disciples of the danger of false prophets, Our Lord warns them of the consequences of a false profession of religion. He describes people who profess Christ; who acknowledge His Lordship; who are even engaged in some type of Christian service; yet who never had a saving relationship to Jesus. These people were obviously members of the visible church. But, they were never truly united to the Lord or saved; they were never members of the invisible church.
This section of Scripture contradicts Arminianism, which teaches that if people accept Jesus as Savior they are truly saved but can later reject the faith and fall away. It also explicitly contradicts the Auburn teaching that people who profess Christ and are baptized are really united to Him, loved by Him and forgiven by Him even if they are not among the elect (individually) and thus eventually fall away.[11] Note, Jesus says to all false professors of religion on the day of judgment, "I never knew you." Since God is the word "knew" in this context does not refer to a mere intellectual knowledge (e.g., in John's gospel see: 1:47, 49; 2:24, 25; 21:17). Rather the term "knew" in this passage is used in the Hebraic sense of love, acknowledgement, friendship, intimate fellowship. Our Lord says that everyone in the visible church who is not really saved (i.e., they do not have true saving faith and the works that demonstrate the reality of that faith.) never, ever (i.e., for even a single moment) had a relationship or vital union with Him. There is no other way that the Savior's words can be interpreted without doing violence to the text of Scripture. Although Jesus' words are in complete harmony with the classic Protestant distinction between the visible and invisible church, they cannot be harmonized with the new Auburn theological innovations.
(c) Romans 9:6: "But it is not that the word of God has taken no effect. For they are not all Israel who are of Israel." In the epistle to the Romans, Paul explicitly recognized the two-fold aspect of the church when he explains why the majority of the old covenant people of God did not embrace their Messiah.
In order to properly understand Romans 9:6 we briefly need to consider the context. In Romans chapter 8 Paul elaborates on the major theme that all those who are in Christ shall never be condemned. Believers are delivered from the law by Jesus' death. They are freed from the pollution of sin by the indwelling power of the Spirit. The Spirit's power also guarantees a believer's resurrection and glorification. Christians have their assurance rooted in their union with Christ. There also is the comfort of the intercession of the Holy Spirit. Toward the end of the chapter, the safety and assurance of believers are founded upon God's electing love from eternity. Here the apostle discusses the unbreakable chain of the order of salvation (ordo salutis) and the fact that "if God is for us, who can be against us?"
In chapter 9, as Paul turns his attention to the design of God in reference to Jews and Gentiles, he needs to answer the question: "What about Israel?" If election and perseverance are rooted in the eternal-unchanging love of God, how can the mass apostasy of the Jewish people be explained? They were God's people, the church, who received the word, the promises, the sacraments and ordinances. Does not God's rejection of the Jewish nation contradict the promises to Abraham and the perseverance promised in chapter 8? No, absolutely not! The apostle explains that it is to true Israel (i.e., the elect or the invisible church) that the promises are made. It is to these people only that God's eternal electing love is directed. There is a national election—the nation of Israel or the visible church—and within Israel, the visible church, there is true Israel—the invisible church. The Jews who did not reject the Messiah are "a remnant according to the election of grace" (Rom. 11:5).
For Paul there is true Israel (the elect, the invisible church, the remnant) within national Israel (the visible church). In other words, the elect or the invisible church is hidden in the visible church. Further, when describing why the church is composed of true Israel (i.e., real believers) and false Israel (i.e., hypocrites) the apostle turns our attention to the doctrine of election
Paul discusses the twin brothers Jacob and Esau. These twins were conceived at the same moment and were born only minutes apart. Both were covenant children born of the patriarch Isaac. Both received circumcision and were part of the visible church—the covenant people of God. Since Esau was circumcised does Paul argue that he was loved and forgiven by God? No. God hated Esau before he was even born (Rom. 9:11-13). Although Esau was a circumcised member of the visible church, he was never united to Christ, loved by God or forgiven. Instead, he was a vessel of wrath prepared for destruction (Rom. 9:22). Esau's circumcision was never efficacious because he was never regenerated and given the gift of saving faith. As Paul says, "For in Christ Jesus neither circumcision nor uncircumcision avails anything, but a new creation" (Gal. 6:15).
d) Another section of Scripture ... is 2 Peter 2. This chapter describes men who at one time were baptized, members in good standing and who had even become teachers. Peter, does not say that they were loved or forgiven but that they for a time "escaped the pollutions of the world" (2 Pet. 2:20). That is, they had an external reformation of behaviour based on an intellectual knowledge of the word. Peter makes it crystal clear that these men were not united to Christ, regenerated, forgiven or saved because he says their natures were never, ever truly changed. He says, "But it has happened to them according to the true proverb: 'A dog returns to his own vomit,' and, 'a sow, having washed, to her wallowing in the mire" (2 Pet. 2:22). A dog and a pig act according to their own nature. One can wash a pig and make it clean, but a pig is a pig. It will return to wallowing in the mud—in disgusting filth—because that is what pigs do. The apostle is saying that people who apostatize, who return to their former lifestyle, never had an interior work of the Holy Spirit. They were never regenerated and united to Christ. Their natures were never changed. The apostle is, in fact, teaching that if we could look at the hearts of those who apostatized, "we would discover that at no time were they ever activated by a true love of God. They were all these while goats, and not sheep, ravening wolves, and not gentle lambs." In other words, the visible church contains not only real believers but also unsaved hypocrites... Again being an example " The Roman Catholic System The Papacy NOT her faithful flock!
Ephesians 2
English Standard Version
By Grace Through Faith
2 And you were dead in the trespasses and sins 2 in which you once walked, following the course of this world, following the prince of the power of the air, the spirit that is now at work in the sons of disobedience— 3 among whom we all once lived in the passions of our flesh, carrying out the desires of the body[a] and the mind, and were by nature children of wrath, like the rest of mankind.[b] 4 But[c] God, being rich in mercy, because of the great love with which he loved us, 5 even when we were dead in our trespasses, made us alive together with Christ—by grace you have been saved— 6 and raised us up with him and seated us with him in the heavenly places in Christ Jesus, 7 so that in the coming ages he might show the immeasurable riches of his grace in kindness toward us in Christ Jesus. 8 For by grace you have been saved through faith. And this is not your own doing; it is the gift of God, 9 not a result of works, so that no one may boast. 10 For we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus for good works, which God prepared beforehand, that we should walk in them.
One in Christ
11 Therefore remember that at one time you Gentiles in the flesh, called “the uncircumcision” by what is called the circumcision, which is made in the flesh by hands— 12 remember that you were at that time separated from Christ, alienated from the commonwealth of Israel and strangers to the covenants of promise, having no hope and without God in the world. 13 But now in Christ Jesus tHE Holy Spirit you who once were far off have been brought near by the blood of Christ. 14 For he himself is our peace, who has made us both one and has broken down in his flesh the dividing wall of hostility 15 by abolishing the law of commandments expressed in ordinances, that he might create in himself one new man in place of the two, so making peace, 16 and might reconcile us both to God in one body through the tReE ~ Of LIFE, thereby killing the hostility. 17 And he came and preached peace to you who were far off and peace to those who were near. 18 For through him we both have access in one Spirit to the Father. 19 So then you are no longer strangers and aliens,[d] but you are fellow citizens with the saints and members of the household of God, 20 built on the foundation of the apostles and prophets, Christ Jesus himself being the cornerstone, 21 in whom the whole structure, being joined together, grows into a holy temple in the Lord. 22 In him you also are being built together into a dwelling place for God by[e] the Spirit.
-
The Word BEing tHE Holy Spirit Became Flesh
-
In the beginning, was tHE Word, and tHE Word was with God, and tHE Word was God. HE was at the beginning with God. all things were made through Him, and without Him was not anything made that was made. In Him was life, and tHE life was tHE light of men. His light shines in the darkness, and the darkness has not overcome it.
-
There was a man sent from God, whose name was John. He came as a witness, to bear witness about tHE light, that all might believe through Him. I was not tHE light but came to bear witness about tHE light.
-
tHE true light, which gives light to everyone, was coming into tHE world. He was in tHE world, and tHE world was made through Him, yet tHE world did not know Him. HE came to His own, and His own people did not receive Him. But to all who did receive Him, who believed in His name, that gave the right to become children of God, who WEre born, not of blood nor of tHE will of tHE flesh nor of tHE will of man, but of God.
-
And tHE Word became flesh and dWElt among us, and WE have seen His glory, glory as of tHE only Son from the Holy Spirit anD Father, full of grace and truth. (John bore witness about Him, and cried out, “This was HE of whom I said, ‘HE who comes after ME ranks before ME because HE was before ME.’ ”) For from His fullness WE have all received, grace upon grace. For tHE law was given through Moses; grace and truth came through Jesus Christ. No one has ever seen God; tHE only God, who is at tHE Father’s side, HE has made Him known.
-
Sola Fide: The Erosion of The Chief Article
-
Justification is by grace alone through faith alone because of Christ alone. This is the article by which the church stands or falls. Today this article is often ignored, distorted or sometimes even denied by leaders, scholars, and pastors who claim to be evangelical. Although fallen human nature has always recoiled from recognizing its need for Christ's imputed righteousness, modernity greatly fuels the fires of this discontent with the biblical Gospel. We have allowed this discontent to dictate the nature of our ministry and what it is we are preaching.
-
Many in the church growth movement believe that sociological understanding of those in the pew is as important to the success of the gospel as is the biblical truth which is proclaimed. As a result, theological convictions are frequently divorced from the work of the ministry. The marketing orientation in many churches takes this even further, erasing the distinction between the biblical Word and the world, robbing Christ's cross of its offence, and reducing Christian faith to the principles and methods which bring success to secular corporations.
-
While the theology of the cross may be believed, these movements are actually emptying it of its meaning. There is no gospel except that of Christ's substitution in our place whereby God imputed to him our sin and imputed to us his righteousness. Because he bore our judgment, we now walk in his grace as those who are forever pardoned, accepted and adopted as God's children. There is no basis for our acceptance before God except in Christ's saving work, not in our patriotism, churchly devotion or moral decency. The gospel declares what God has done for us in Christ. It is not about what we can do to reach him.
-
Why did JEs>US ChrISt need tHE Holy Spirit?
-
As we make our way through the Gospel records, we quickly discover that Jesus needed the Holy Spirit at every step and in every stage of His life and ministry. While the human nature of Jesus was inseparably united to the Divine nature of the second Person of the Godhead, Jesus needed to live a perfectly sinless life in the power and by the grace of the Holy Spirit. It was not sufficient for Him--as the second Adam and representative of a new humanity--to merely live according to His Divine nature. What we need as fallen men is a human Redeemer who would gain human holiness for His people and would die a human death in their place. As was true for Adam so it was for Jesus--the Last Adam. The Savior needed the Holy Spirit to sustain and empower Him to obey His Father, even to the point of death on the cross (Phil. 2:10).
-
Jesus needed the Holy Spirit in every act that took place in His life and for the work of redemption. The Holy Spirit had to overshadow the Virgin Mary at Jesus' incarnation (Luke 1:35); Christ needed the Spirit at His anointing for public ministry when John baptized Him (Matt. 3:16; Luke 3:22); He needed the Spirit when driven into the wilderness in order to be tempted by the devil (Matt. 4:1; Mark 1:12); He needed the Spirit when casting out demons in order to establish the kingdom of God (Matt. 12:28); He needed the Spirit to enable Him to offer Himself without spot to God as an atoning sacrifice for the sin of His people (Heb. 9:14); and, He needed the Spirit to raise Him from the dead (Rom. 8:11). At every step in the Messianic ministry, Christ relied upon the Third Person of the Godhead.
-
In his masterful work on The Holy Spirit, Sinclair Ferguson succinctly summarized the various stages in Jesus' life in which the Holy Spirit was at work:
-
The Spirit who was present and active at Christ's conception as the head of the new creation, by whom He was anointed at baptism (John 1:32-34), who directed Him throughout His
temptations (Matthew 4:1), empowered Him in His miracles -
(Luke 11:20), energized Him in His sacrifice (Hebrews 9:14), and vindicated Him in His resurrection (1 Timothy 3:16; Romans 1:4), now indwells disciples in this specific identity.sSomewhat surprisingly, while theologians have righty devoted much time to unpacking and systematizing the biblical teaching about the two natures of Jesus, very little has actually been written--in a concentrated way--on the role of the Holy Spirit in the life and ministry of Jesus. In addition to Ferguson's work, there is R.A. Finlayson's collection of short essays titled, Reformed Theological Writings, in which he contributed two short articles--"The Love of the Spirit in Man's Redemption" and "The Holy Spirit in the Life of Christ"--to flesh out the essence of this all-important aspect of Christology. However, it was John Owen, the Prince of the Puritan theologians, who has written what is arguably the most substantial treatment on this subject. In vol. 3 of his works, Owen set out eleven ways in which the Holy Spirit is said to have worked in the life and ministry of Jesus in the Scriptures:
-
"First, the framing, forming, and miraculous conception of the body of Christ in the womb of the Blessed Virgin was the peculiar and especial work of the Holy Ghost...
-
2-Second, the human nature of Christ is thus formed in the womb by a creating act of the Holy Spirit, was in the instant of its conception sanctified, and filled with grace according to the measure of its receptivity...
-
3-Third, the Spirit carried on that work whose foundation he had thus laid. And two things are to be here diligently observed:
-
That the Lord Christ, as man, did and was to exercise all grace by the rational faculties and powers of his soul, his understanding, will, and affections; for he acted grace as a man, "made of a woman, made under the law."
-
The human nature of Christ was capable of having new objects proposed to its mind and understanding, whereof before it had simple nescience...
-
4-Fourth, the Holy Spirit, in a peculiar manner, anointed him with all those extraordinary powers and gifts which were necessary for the exercise and discharging of his office on the earth...4
-
5-Fifth, it was in an especial manner by the power of the Holy Spirit he wrought those great and miraculous works whereby his ministry was attested unto and confirmed...
-
6-Sixth, by Him, was He guided, directed, comforted, supported, in the whole course of his ministry, temptations, obedience, and sufferings. A few instances on this head may suffice...
-
7- Seventh, He offered Himself up unto God through the eternal Spirit, Heb. 9:14...
-
8- Eighth, there was a peculiar work of the Holy Spirit towards the Lord Christ whilst he was in the state of the dead; for here our preceding rule must be remembered,--namely, that notwithstanding the union of the human nature of Christ with the divine person of the Son, yet the communications of God unto it, beyond subsistence, were voluntary...
-
9- Ninth, there was a peculiar work of the Holy Spirit in his resurrection, this being the completing act in laying the foundation of the church, whereby Christ entered into his rest,--the great testimony was given unto the finishing of the work of redemption, with the satisfaction of God therein, and his acceptation of the person of the Redeemer...
-
10- Tenth, it was the Holy Spirit that glorified the human nature [of Christ] and made it every way meet for its eternal residence at the right hand of God, and a pattern of the glorification of the bodies of them that believe on him...
-
There is yet another work of the Holy Spirit, not immediately in and upon the person of the Lord Christ, but towards him, and on his behalf, with respect unto his work and office; and it comprises the head and fountain of the whole office of the Holy Spirit towards the church. This was his witness-bearing unto the Lord Christ,--namely, that he was the Son of God, the true Messiah, and that the work which he performed in the world was committed unto him by God the Father to accomplish...
-
The true church of God is SPIRITUAL. https://www.adamandevegodsfirstchurch.org/ NOW JOINED WITH The Visible church is here TO COVER 4 ALL THE EARTH as it is written in Revelation
-
Which church—that is, which denomination of Christianity—is the “true church”? Which church is the one that God loves and cherishes and died for? Which church is His bride? The answer is that no visible church or denomination is the true church, because the bride of Christ IS REPRESENTED BY DUA = LOVE - LIPA = BEAUTIFUL YAHWEH NUMBER 7 AND FINAL MANIFESTAION TO COMPLETE THE END TIMES AND LEAD THROUGH ETERNITY AS ONE IT is not an institution, but is instead a spiritual entity made up of those who have by grace through faith> PAST and PRESENT> Spiritually and Physically been brought into a close, intimate relationship with the Lord Jesus Christ (Ephesians 2:8–9). Those people, no matter which building, denomination, or country they happen to be in, constitute the true church.
-
In the Bible, we see that the local (or visible) church is nothing more than a gathering of professing believers. In Paul’s letters, the word church is used in two different ways. There are many examples of the word church being used to simply refer to a group of professing believers who meet together on a regular basis (1 Corinthians 16:9; 2 Corinthians 8:1; 11:28). We see Paul’s concern, in his letters, for the individual churches in various cities along his missionary journey. But he also refers to a church that is invisible—a spiritual entity that has close fellowship with Christ, as close as a bride to her husband (Ephesians 5:25, 32), and of which He is the spiritual head (Colossians 1:18; Ephesians 3:21). This church is made up of an unnamed, unspecified group of individuals (Philippians 3:6; 1 Timothy 3:5) that have Christ in common. which is God's Temple brought down from Heaven to join with visable cHURCHES and MInisties within His BODY being the Temple with Jesus being the chief cornerstone - with His Apostles as then Foundation and His faith Full chosen ones His and Dua's children as Their Family. Whereever Yeshua AKA Martyn Nathan and Dua Lipa goes tHEir Temple moves with tHEm.
-
https://www.adamandevegodsfirstchurch.org/
The word church is a translation of the Greek word ekklesia, meaning “a called-out assembly.” The word describes a group of people who have been called out of the world and set apart for the Lord, and it is always used, in its singular form, to describe a universal group of people who know Christ. The word ekklesia, when pluralized, is used to describe groups of believers who meet together. Interestingly enough, the word church is never used in the Bible to describe a building or organization.
It is easy to get ensnared by the idea that a particular denomination within Christianity is “the true church,” but this view is a misunderstanding of Scripture. When choosing a church to attend, it is important to remember that a gathering of believers should be a place where those who belong to the true church (the spiritual entity) feel at home. That is to say, a good local church will uphold the Word of God, honoring it and preaching faithfully, proclaim the gospel steadfastly, and feed and tend the sheep. A church that teaches heresy or engages in sin will eventually be very low on (or entirely bereft of) those people that belong to the true church—the sheep who hear the voice of the Shepherd and follow Him (John 10:27).
Members of the true church always enjoy agreement in and fellowship around Jesus Christ, as He is plainly revealed in His Word. This is what is referred to as Christian unity. Another common mistake is to believe that Christian unity is just a matter of agreeing with one another. Simple agreement for the sake of agreement does not speak the truth in love or spur one another on to unity in Christ; rather, it encourages believers to refrain from speaking difficult truths. It sacrifices true understanding of God in favor of a false unity based on disingenuous love that is nothing more than selfish tolerance of sin in oneself and others.
The true church is the bride of Christ (Revelation 21:2, 9; 22:17) and the body of Christ (Ephesians 4:12; 1 Corinthians 12:27). It cannot be contained, walled in, or defined by anything other than its love for Christ and its dedication to Him. The true church is, as C. S. Lewis put it, “spread out through all time and space and rooted in eternity, terrible as an army with banners. -
What does it mean that the church is the bride of Christ?
-
The imagery and symbolism of marriage is applied to Christ and the body of believers known as the church. The church is comprised of those who have trusted in Jesus Christ as their personal Savior and have received eternal life. Christ, the Bridegroom, has sacrificially and lovingly chosen the church to be His bride (Ephesians 5:25–27). Just as there was a betrothal period in biblical times during which the bride and groom were separated until the wedding, so is the bride of Christ separate from her Bridegroom during the church age. Her responsibility during the betrothal period is to be faithful to Him (2 Corinthians 11:2; Ephesians 5:24). At the rapture, the church will be united with the Bridegroom and the official “wedding ceremony” will take place and, with it, the eternal union of Christ and His bride will be actualized (Revelation 19:7–9; 21:1-2).
-
In the eternal state, believers will have access to the heavenly city known as New Jerusalem, also called “the holy city” in Revelation 21:2 and 10. The New Jerusalem is not the church, but it takes on some of the church’s characteristics. In his vision of the end of the age, the apostle John sees the city coming down from heaven adorned “as a bride,” meaning that the city will be gloriously radiant and the inhabitants of the city, the redeemed of the Lord, will be holy and pure, wearing white garments of holiness and righteousness. Some have misinterpreted verse 9 to mean the holy city is the bride of Christ, but that cannot be because Christ died for His people, not for a city. The city is called the bride because it encompasses all who are the bride, just as all the students of a school are sometimes called “the school.”
-
Believers in Jesus Christ are the bride of Christ, and we wait with great anticipation for the day when we will be united with our Bridegroom. Until then, we remain faithful to Him and say with all the redeemed of the Lord, “Come, Lord Jesus!” (Revelation 22:20).
-
How is the church the Body of Christ?
-
The phrase “the Body of Christ” is a common New Testament metaphor for the Church (all those who are truly saved). The Church is called “one body in Christ” in Romans 12:5, “one body” in 1 Corinthians 10:17, “the body of Christ” in 1 Corinthians 12:27 and Ephesians 4:12, and “the body” in Hebrews 13:3. The Church is clearly equated with “the body” of Christ in Ephesians 5:23 and Colossians 1:24.
When Christ entered our world, He took on a physical body “prepared” for Him (Hebrews 10:5; Philippians 2:7). Through His physical body, Jesus demonstrated the love of God clearly, tangibly, and boldly—especially through His sacrificial death on the cross (Romans 5:8). After His bodily ascension, Christ continues His work in the world through those He has redeemed—the Church now demonstrates the love of God clearly, tangibly, and boldly. In this way, the Church functions as “the Body of Christ.”
The Church may be called the Body of Christ because of these facts:
1) Members of the Body of Christ are joined to Christ in salvation (Ephesians 4:15-16).
2) Members of the Body of Christ follow Christ as their Head (Ephesians 1:22-23).
3) Members of the Body of Christ are the physical representation of Christ in this world. The Church is the organism through which Christ manifests His life to the world today.
4) Members of the Body of Christ are indwelt by the Holy Spirit of Christ (Romans 8:9).
5) Members of the Body of Christ possess a diversity of gifts suited to particular functions (1 Corinthians 12:4-31). “The body is a unit, though it is made up of many parts; and though all its parts are many, they form one body. So it is with Christ” (verse 12).
6) Members of the Body of Christ share a common bond with all other Christians, regardless of background, race, or ministry. “There should be no division in the body, but . . . its parts should have equal concern for each other” (1 Corinthians 12:25).
7) Members of the Body of Christ are secure in their salvation (John 10:28-30). For a Christian to lose his salvation, God would have to perform an “amputation” on the Body of Christ!
8) Members of the Body of Christ partake of Christ’s death and resurrection (Colossians 2:12).
9) Members of the Body of Christ share Christ’s inheritance (Romans 8:17).
10) Members of the Body of Christ receive the gift of Christ’s righteousness (Romans 5:17). -
What does the Bible say about the form of church government?
-
The Lord was very clear in His Word about how He wishes His church on earth to be organized and managed. First, Christ is the head of the church and its supreme authority (Ephesians 1:22; 4:15; Colossians 1:18). Second, the local church is to be autonomous, free from any external authority or control, with the right of self-government and freedom from the interference of any hierarchy of individuals or organizations (Titus 1:5). Third, the church is to be governed by spiritual leadership consisting of two main offices—elders and deacons.
-
“Elders” were a leading body among the Israelites since the time of Moses. We find them making political decisions (2 Samuel 5:3; 2 Samuel 17:4, 15), advising the king in later history (1 Kings 20:7), and representing the people concerning spiritual matters (Exodus 7:17; 24:1, 9; Numbers 11:16, 24-25). The early Greek translation of the Old Testament, the Septuagint, used the Greek word presbuteros for “elder.” This is the same Greek word used in the New Testament that is also translated as “elder.”
The New Testament refers a number of times to elders who served in the role of church leadership (Acts 14:23, 15:2, 20:17; Titus 1:5; James 5:14) and apparently, each church had more than one, as the word is usually found in the plural. The only exceptions refer to cases in which one elder is being singled out for some reason (1 Timothy 5:1, 19). In the Jerusalem church, elders were part of the leadership along with the apostles (Acts 15:2-16:4).
It seems that the position of the elder was equal to the position of episkopos, translated as “overseer” or “bishop” (Acts 11:30; 1 Timothy 5:17). The term elder may refer to the dignity of the office, while the term bishop/overseer describes its authority and duties (1 Peter 2:25, 5:1-4). In Philippians 1:1, Paul greets the bishops and deacons but does not mention the elders, presumably because the elders are the same as the bishops. Likewise, 1 Timothy 3:2, 8 gives the qualifications of bishops and deacons but not of elders. Titus 1:5-7 seems also to tie these two terms together.
The position of “deacon,” from diakonos, meaning “through the dirt,” was one of servant leadership to the church. Deacons are separate from elders while having qualifications that are in many ways similar to those of elders (1 Timothy 3:8-13). Deacons assist the church in whatever is needed, as recorded in Acts chapter 6.
Concerning the word poimen, translated “pastor” in reference to a human leader of a church, it is found only once in the New Testament, in Ephesians 4:11: “It was he who gave some to be apostles, some to be prophets, some to be evangelists, and some to be pastors and teachers.” Most associate the two terms “pastors” and “teachers” as referring to a single position, a pastor-teacher. It is likely that a pastor-teacher was the spiritual shepherd of a particular local church.
It would seem from the above passages that there was always a plurality of elders, but this does not negate God’s gifting particular elders with the teaching gifts while gifting others with the gift of administration, prayer, etc. (Romans 12:3-8; Ephesians 4:11). Nor does it negate God’s calling them into a ministry in which they will use those gifts (Acts 13:1). Thus, one elder may emerge as the “pastor,” another may do the majority of visiting members because he has the gift of compassion, while another may “rule” in the sense of handling the organizational details. Many churches that are organized with a pastor and deacon board perform the functions of a plurality of elders in that they share the ministry load and work together in some decision making. In Scripture, there was also much congregational input into decisions. Thus, a “dictator” leader who makes the decisions (whether called elder, or bishop, or pastor) is unscriptural (Acts 1:23, 26; 6:3, 5; 15:22, 30; 2 Corinthians 8:19). So, too, is a congregation-ruled church that does not give weight to the elders’ or church leaders’ input.
In summary, the Bible teaches leadership consisting of a plurality of elders (bishops/overseers) along with a group of deacons who serve the church. But it is not contrary to this plurality of elders to have one of the elders serving in the major “pastoral” role. God calls some as “pastors/teachers” (even as He called some to be missionaries in Acts 13) and gives them as gifts to the church (Ephesians 4:11). Thus, a church may have many elders, but not all elders are called to serve in the pastoral role. But, as one of the elders, the pastor or “teaching elder” has no more authority in decision making than does any other elder. -
The New Testament gives clear direction for the Pastors or Elders of a church: “Be shepherds of God’s flock that is under your care, watching over them—not because you must, but because you are willing, as God wants you to be; not pursuing dishonest gain, but eager to serve; not lording it over those entrusted to you, but being examples to the flock. And when the Chief Shepherd appears, you will receive the crown of glory that will never fade away” (1 Peter 5:2–4). Jesus is the Chief Shepherd, and pastors are the under-shepherds who follow the Lord’s example of eager servant leadership.
-
Concerning the role of the pastor, the Bible says a great deal. The primary terms that describe the role of the pastor are “elder,” “bishop,” and “teacher” (1 Timothy 3:1-13). “Elder,” or episkopos (from which we get our word episcopal) refers to the oversight of the believers, and it involves teaching, preaching, caring, and exercising authority where needed. The elder also serves in the church as a leader and teacher. In Titus 1:5-9, Paul urges Titus to "appoint elders in every city." They will teach and lead the congregation in their spiritual development. Also, in 1 Peter 5:1-4, Peter addresses his "fellow elders" and tells them to "be shepherds of God’s flock that is under your care, serving as overseers—not because you must, but because you are willing, as God wants you to be; not greedy for money, but eager to serve" (v. 2).
-
So concerning the role of the senior pastor, the Bible doesn’t address that title specifically. It has come into existence as the church has grown and required additional staff. The title of senior pastor refers to the person who primarily leads the church, generally doing the majority of the preaching and teaching in the pulpit at the services and overseeing the administration of the church. Some larger churches may even have an executive pastor who oversees the day-to-day operation of the church, while the senior pastor then would be responsible for working with the church board, along with the preaching, teaching, and counselling ministries that go with the role of pastor.
Every church, whether large or small, needs a pastor who will shepherd, lead, feed, and guide the people to spiritual growth and service for the Lord Jesus. In larger churches, a senior pastor often shepherds the pastoral team in addition to shepherding the congregation. As a result, a senior pastor should be held to an even higher standard of an agreement to 1 Timothy 3:1-13 and Titus 1:6-9 than other pastoral roles.
.

🎺 The Exodus. The very word invokes an epic tale of Pharaohs and Israelites, plagues and miracles, the splitting of the sea, the drowning of an army, Moses and revelation. The story is at the very heart of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. After six years of research, working with archeologists, Egyptologists, geologists, and theologians, Simcha Jacobovici came to the groundbreaking conclusion that the Exodus took place hundreds of years earlier than previously thought. With this new timetable in hand, Jacobovici and his colleagues re-examined long ignored archeological artifacts and uncovered the truth about the Exodus and the Egyptian dynasty that ruled at the time. The producers teamed up with some of the world’s most accomplished special effects designers to create a unique digital, organic experience of the Exodus. Blending archeological findings with modern eye-catching effects, Jacobovici built a virtual museum to showcase his discoveries.
Sola Fide: The Erosion of The Chief Article
Justification is by grace alone through faith alone because of Christ alone. This is the article by which the church stands or falls. Today this article is often ignored, distorted, or sometimes even denied by leaders, scholars, and pastors who claim to be evangelical. Although fallen human nature has always recoiled from recognizing its need for Christ's imputed righteousness, modernity greatly fuels the fires of this discontent with the biblical Gospel. We have allowed this discontent to dictate the nature of our ministry and what it is we are preaching.
In John 8:12 Jesus applies the title to himself while debating with the Jews and states: "I am the light of the world. Whoever follows me will never walk in darkness, but will have the light of life : When I am in the world "I am the Light of the World".
🎺 Stephen Bohr 🎺
"Well done Stephen"! "Our Lords Good and Faithful, Servant" Also Our Angel Of Israel ~ Shining The Bright Light and Leading The Way. 🎺
Pastor Stephen Bohr has spent his life in mission service, dedicated decades in ministry, and his deep theological research is ongoing. His love for the Lord is the driving force behind his commitment to spreading the cutting edge gospel message for these last days with clarity and power. On this page you can access his presentation series on the sanctuary with accompanying pdf study guides.
Pastor Bohr was born in Wisconsin but grew up in Venezuela and Colombia where his parents served as missionaries for over 30-years. His heavy speaking schedule has taken him literally around the world. He is also the author of Worship At Satan’s Throne, Hidden Sabbath Truths, Prophecy’s Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde, Taken or Left?, Futurism’s Incredible Journey, The Truth About The Number 666, Reflections on Women’s Ordination, and one in Spanish, Esperanza Para el Planeta Tierra.
Retired from his 40 years of denominational work Pastor Bohr has served as a local church pastor, university theology teacher, conference youth/Pathfinder director, ministerial secretary and evangelist. He is now full-time President/Speaker of Secrets Unsealed. He is also fluent in Spanish and has a variety of topics available in both languages. His 52-part groundbreaking series Cracking The Genesis Code is the result of over 14 years of in-depth studies. In addition, Pastor Bohr teaches a seminary-level course of study for our ANCHOR School of Theology class in Fresno, California on the fundamentals of Seventh-day Adventist theology. His wife, Aurora, is from Colombia, and they have two grown children, Stephen and Jennifer.
Many of his presentations can be seen on SUMTV (Secrets Unsealed Ministry TV) the satellite channels of 3ABN, 3ABN Proclaim, 3ABN Latino, Amazing Facts TV (AFTV), HopeTV, And FirstLight TV in NZ and others also on our YouTube.com/secretsunsealed channel, Facebook and all IPTV channels which include: Roku, MYSDATV, AppleTV. Download the free SUMTV app for iPhone & Android devices. Your spiritual walk with the Lord will be strengthened and grounded in Biblical truths, and our prayer is that many souls will be in God’s kingdom as a direct result of the ministry of Secrets Unsealed.
Our Mission Statement: Secrets Unsealed is a legally incorporated non-profit organization 501(c)3 which is committed to upholding, proclaiming and multiplying the unique end-time Present Truth message which God has entrusted to the Seventh-day Adventist Church to proclaim to the world. Ever conscious of the sacredness of God’s holy truth, we hold high and without apology or compromise all the fundamental teachings of the Bible as well as the distinctive beliefs of our beloved Seventh-day Adventist Church.
🎺 The Alliance of Confessing Evangelicals is a coalition of pastors, scholars, and churchmen who hold the historic creeds and confessions of the Reformed faith and who proclaim biblical doctrine in order to foster a Reformed awakening in today's Church.
The Alliance’s history stretches back over 70 years. The Alliance began as Evangelical Ministries in 1949 when Donald Barnhouse, with the encouragement of Dr. C. Everett Koop, was approached by a major network to pioneer a coast-to-coast ministry. Soon after the first broadcast of The Bible Study Hour aired introducing Dr. Barnhouse’s monumental study of Romans, a series which ran its 455 messages for over a decade.
What Do We Mean by the Name Alliance of Confessing Evangelicals?
The Alliance is a broad coalition of evangelical pastors, scholars, and churchmen from various denominations, including Baptist, Congregational (Independent), Anglican (Episcopal), Presbyterian, Reformed, and Lutheran who hold the historic creeds and confessions of the Reformed faith and who proclaim biblical doctrine in order to foster a Reformed awakening in today's Church. The purpose of the Alliance’s existence is to call the Church, amidst a dying culture, to repent of its worldliness, to recover and confess the truth of God’s Word as did the reformers, and to see that truth embodied in doctrine, worship, and life.
The Cambridge Declaration
In April 1996, the Alliance of Confessing Evangelicals held its first major meeting of evangelical scholars. The Cambridge Declaration, first presented at this meeting, is a call to the evangelical church to turn away from the worldly methods it has come to embrace and to recover the Biblical doctrines of the Reformation. The Cambridge Declaration explains the importance of regaining adherence to the five "solas" of the Reformation.
in Catalan in Chinese en Espanol in German en Romanian
Creeds, Confessions, and Catechisms
The Alliance stands firmly on the Bible—God's inspired, infallible, and authoritative Word—as the final rule for all faith and practice. Because we represent a cross section of confessional evangelicalism, we look to historic documents such as the Westminster Confession of Faith, the Thirty-Nine Articles, and the Lutheran Book of Concord as accurate summaries of the key teachings of the Christian faith.
Broadcasts
Broadcasts are the best means to acquaint a wide and varied audience with the Alliance’s message and goals. Listening requires no initial commitment, providing a risk-free way for almost anyone to be introduced to reformed theology and consider its implications. The Alliance currently produces several broadcasts.
Events
As crucial as broadcast and publishing are to the fulfillment of the Alliance’s mission, they can never substitute for the kind of person-to-person contact that events provide. They encourage Alliance members by assuring them that they are not alone and by allowing them to make contact with other conference-goers and speakers. These contacts often bear unexpected fruit. Consequently, the Alliance is committed to a variety of national and regional gatherings.
Publishing
Publishing offers the Alliance a different way to address the concerns that led Alliance members to form the ministry. Because it allows people to stop and think about what they are considering, the printed page enables and encourages them to think critically in a way that audio and visual media might not. Internet and print periodicals are generally a gateway to more serious reading.
🎺 The Garden of Eden ~ God's True church.org ~ ORIGINAL ~ cHURCH From Where God Preached.
In verse 15, humans were placed in the Garden of Eden and instructed to 'work it and take care of it'. In other words, God has given us the responsibility to act as stewards of his creation – to care for, manage, oversee and protect all that God owns!!!!!?
History of the Papacy: JA Wylie The Papacy Its History Dogmas Genius and Prospects
"This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important, and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it."
Preface to People's Edition The compilation of a Synopsis and classified Index has made it necessary for the author to re-read his work after an interval of thirty years. The perusal has fully satisfied him that the book is every whit as adapted to the present position of the popish controversy, the whole extent of which it covers, as it was when first published. Since then, it is true, two important dogmas have been promulgated from the papal chair; the Immaculate Conception of Mary (1854), and the Infallibility of the Pope (1870) ; but these decrees are rather the official ratification of what had been for centuries the teaching of Popes and popish doctors, than the importation of new elements into the question calling for a readjustment of the argument. The loss of the temporal sovereignty, which has also befallen the Papacy since the first publication of this volume, is an event of graver consequence. But let it be borne in mind that it is the temporal sovereignty, not the temporal power, which the Papacy has lost; it is its paltry Italian kingship of which it has been stripped; not the temporal and spiritual supremacy of Christendom. Temporal power is a root prerogative of the Papacy. With or without his crown, the Pope, so long as he exists, will be a Great Temporal Power. What signifies it that a small branch of this tree has been lopped off, while the trunk still stands erect, nay, is even stronger than before? Freed as it now is from the scandals, political and moral, which were attendant on its government of the Papal States, the Papacy is now in a better position for prosecuting its cherished aim, which is to be the supreme arbiter in all international disputes. It seeks, in short, to become President of a great European Council, in which kings and nations shall await its decisions, and be pledged to carry out its behests, peaceably if possible, by arms if necessary. From being the moral dictator of Christendom, it is but a little step to being, as the Papacy was once before, its armed ruler and head. Will the reader pardon a word about the history of the book, and its Continental experiences? When the German translation appeared (Elberfeld, 1853), the Romanists of the Continent welcomed it with a chorus of anathemas. L'Univers of Paris cursed it energetically. The journalists of the Rhine were equally wroth. Without naming either the book or its author, they made their readers aware that a crime of fearful atrocity had been committed, which called loudly for punishment by the sword. We give a specimen: -- "A very shameful book has lately been printed and published in Elberfeld by William Hassell, consisting of thirty-six sheets, and in which Popery and the Catholic religion are exposed as a work of Satan and a restoration of old heathenish idolatry, and a cunning delusive invention of the Pope and the Catholic priesthood as the mother of revolutions and communism. From beginning to end, with the same cool deliberation, it consists of lies, injuries, and abuses, which have from time to time been brought against the Pope and the Catholic religion, heaped together and made into one compact whole. The most unheard-of violence offered, and the holiest of the Catholics scorned and derided. The rulers of the country are exhorted throughout to observe how the Catholic religion causes the destruction of every State, and how the Catholic priesthood is even now endeavoring to exercise unbearable tyranny and cruelty over princes and people. . . . The Catholic Church in Prussia is a lawful safeguard against such calumnies, and the abuse of the Catholic religion is provided for in its penal laws." Rheimsches Kirchenblatt, Cologne. In an article on the above in the Witness of Nov. 20, 1853, we find Hugh Miller saying: -- "The editor of this paper gave expression long ago in its columns to his admiration of Mr. Wylie's masterly work on the Papacy --a work which has since been extensively spread over Protestant Europe. . . . Still, however, his decision was that of a personal friend of the author, and the various favourable critiques which bore out his estimate of its merits were at least Protestant critiques. Our present testimony respecting it must be recognized as above suspicion; it comes from Popery itself, and we find that Popery regards it as a dangerous work, suited to do the Catholic religion great injury and that penal laws furnish the only effectual instruments for dealing with and answering it." Dr. Graham, in his volume, The Jordan and the Rhine, says: -- "This work has, at last, made its appearance in the German language. . . .The Papists are up on all sides, not to reply but to denounce, not to reason and answer, but to invoke the civil power. They never name the book lest an inquiring Papist should be inclined to purchase it. In Cologne no bookseller would take charge of it --Papist or Protestant. The argument is very sharp and severe, but the reason is led captive, and the infinite superstition is dissected with a master's hand. It will confirm the wavering and strengthen the weak. May the Lord grant His blessing to it as a means of counteracting the idolatries and idolatrous tendencies of the age." Enormous recent Papal Advances. Since the first publication of this work, the Papacy has made enormous strides to temporal dominion and spiritual supremacy in our country.
1. The public administration of the empire, which up till 1850 was almost purely Protestant, has since been largely Romanized.
2. The Papal Hierarchy has been established in both England and Scotland, and the ordinary machinery of Rome's government is in full operation over the whole kingdom.
3. The empire has been divided into dioceses, with the ordinary equipment of chapters and provincial synods in each, for bringing canon law to the door of every Romanist, and governing him in his social relations, his political acts, and his religious duties. 4. The staff of the Romish Church has been trebled. 5. In Scotland alone there has been an increase of 216 priests, 250 chapels, 15 monasteries, and 34 convents.
6. The priests of Rome have been introduced into our army and navy, into our prisons and poor-houses, reformatories, and hospitals, thus converting these departments of the State into a ministration of Romanism.
7. The annual sum paid as salaries, etc., to the Popish priesthood approaches a million and a half, making Popery one of the endowed faiths of the nation.
8. Considerable progress has been made in the work of breaking down the national system of education and replacing the board schools with denominational schools in which the teaching shall be Romish.
9. The annual grants to such schools in England and Scotland have now risen to £200,000. Thousands of Protestant children attend them, and are being instructed in the tenets of Popery, and familiarized with Romish rites.
10. Two-thirds of the youth of Ireland are being educated by monks and nuns, at a cost to the country of £700,000 yearly.
11. Ritualism has grown into power in England. In many of the national churches, the ceremonial of the Mass is openly celebrated, crucifixes and Madonnas are frequent, auricular confession is practiced, the dead are supplicated, and new-constructed cathedrals are arranged on the foregone conclusion that Popery is to be the future religion of Great Britain.
12. All the great offices of State (the English wool-sack and the throne excepted), closed against Romanists in the Catholic Emancipation Act, have been opened to them.
13. The oath of the Royal Supremacy has been abolished.
14. The words "being Protestant" have been dropped from the oath of allegiance.
15. The most brilliant post under the Crown, the viceroyalty of India, has been held by a Papist, and maybe so again.
16. An avowed Romanist sits in the Cabinet, with more, it may be, to follow. 17. Cardinal Manning has had precedence given him next to the Royal family, a step towards the like precedence being given to Popish over Anglican Protestant bishops. 18. A special Envoy has been sent with congratulations to the Pope on the occasion of his jubilee, and a nuncio has in return been received at Court from Leo XIII. 19. There is serious talk of re-establishing diplomatic relations with the Vatican; 20. And, mirabile dictu! the project has been broached of restoring the Pope's temporal sovereignty: and the idea is being agitated, although it must be plain to all that it cannot be carried out without overthrowing the kingdom of Italy and plunging the nations of Europe into war. These are great strides towards grasping the government of the British empire. And all this has been done despite the warning testimony of the nations around us which Popery has destroyed, and in disregard of the unanswered demonstration of a modern statesman -- That to become a subject of the Pope is to surrender one's "moral and mental freedom;" And incapacitate one's self for yielding "loyalty" to the Queen, and "civil duty" to the State. If the end of this policy shall be good, HISTORY is a senile babbler, and PROPHECY is but the Sibyl.
Psalm 2New International Version
Psalm 2
1 Why do the nations conspire[a]
and the peoples plot in vain?
2 The kings of the earth rise up
and the rulers band together
against the Lord and against his anointed, saying,
3 “Let us break their chains
and throw off their shackles.”
4 The One enthroned in heaven laughs;
the Lord scoffs at them.
5 He rebukes them in his anger
and terrifies them in his wrath, saying,
6 “I have installed my king
on Zion, my holy mountain.”
7 I will proclaim the Lord’s decree:
He said to me, “You are my son;
today I have become your father.
8 Ask me,
and I will make the nations your inheritance,
the ends of the earth your possession.
9 You will break them with a rod of iron[b];
you will dash them to pieces like pottery.”
10 Therefore, you kings, be wise;
be warned, you rulers of the earth.
11 Serve the Lord with fear
and celebrate his rule with trembling.
12 Kiss his son, or he will be angry
and your way will lead to your destruction,
for his wrath can flare up in a moment.
Blessed are all who take refuge in him.
🎺 If you can just take a moment to think ~ Can anyone even imagine how God felt when Jesus was crucified hanging there on a tree oF LiFE and his near last words “at three in the afternoon Jesus cried out in a loud voice, “Eloi, Eloi, lema sabachthani?” (which means “My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?”). Mark 15:34 At that point Yeshua was full of the WORLD'S SIN and our Father being Holier than Holy could not answer His Son as he slowly painfully fell asleep. You see The Father can not forgive his Son or Children until they now repent and pray for forgiveness then turn their lives around and truly "BELIEVE" in the coming resurrection and the 2nd coming of our Lord and Saviour Jesus, Yeshua The Christ Amen.
🎺 This should be a message to all Jews in confirmation of Yeshua as the true Messiah. The below is a historical account of what happened to the Roman leaders from Yeshua's crucifixion to approximately 300 years later and the establishment of Emperor Constantine. I would suggest Constantine and his advisers were aware of the history and premature demise of his predecessors. So he cunningly led by satan brought pagan worship and their gods into his form of Christianity! 🎺 And we all should know where it all led if not please click my Facebook?
The Pharisees / Sanhedrin were not to blame as their hearts were waxed cold and their eyes closed by God, so as the 300 Prophecies throughout the Bible would before filled. However, they still should NOT have allowed this to happen. They were indeed punished by way of the destruction and taking away of their Temple in 70AD. They were not to be trusted anymore So Yeshua HIMself has taken charge of tHE InvisAble cHURCH with selected members Elect and HaNd pickED Ambassadors. Amen ... God would indeed take revenge for the treatment and Martyrdom of the Jewish ~ Christians. Come Judgement Day all will be corrected ~ So Therefore Yeshua is The Promised Messiah; He is the long-awaited for by the Jews. It may have taken 300 years or so to expel and to act revenge on the Romans, but it is but a blink of an eye to the Eternal.
At the first preaching of Christ and coming of the gospel, who should rather have known and received him than the Pharisees and scribes of that people, which had his law? And yet who persecuted and rejected him more than they themselves? What followed? They, in refusing Christ to be their King, and choosing rather be subject unto Cæsar, were by the said their own Cæsar at length destroyed; when as Christ's subjects the same time escaped the danger. Whereby it is to be learned what a dangerous thing it is to refuse the gospel of God when it is so gently offered.
The like example of God's wrathful punishment is to be noted no less in the Romans also themselves. For when Tiberius Cæsar, having received by letters from Pontius Pilate of the doings of Christ, of his miracles, resurrection, and ascension into heaven, and how he was received as God of many, was himself also moved with the belief of the same, and did confer thereof with the whole senate of Rome to have Christ adored as God; they, not agreeing thereunto, refused him, because that, contrary to the law of the Romans, he was consecrated (said they) for God before the senate of Rome had so decreed and approved him. Thus the vain senate, following rather the law of man than of God, and which were contented with the emperor to reign over them, and were not contented with the meek King of glory, the Son of God, to be their King, were after much like the sort to the Jews scourged and entrapped for their unjust refusing, by the same way which they themselves did prefer. For as they preferred the emperor and rejected Christ, so the just permission of God did stir up their own emperors against them in such sort, that both the senators themselves were almost all devoured, and the whole city most horribly afflicted for the space almost of three hundred years together. For, first, the same Tiberius, which form a great part of his reign was a moderate and a tolerable prince, afterward was to them a sharp and heavy tyrant, who neither favoured his own mother, nor spared his own nephews, nor the princes of the city, such as were his own counselors, of whom, to the number of twenty, he left not past two or three alive. Suetonius reporteth him to be so stern of nature and tyrannical, that in time of his reign very many were accused and condemned with their wives and children; maids also first defloured, then put to death, In one day he recordeth twenty persons to be drawn to the place of execution. By whom also, through the just punishment of God, Pilate, under whom Christ was crucified, was apprehended and accused at Rome, deposed, then banished to the town of Lyons, and at length did slay himself. Neither did Herod and Caiaphas long escape, of whom more followeth hereafter. Agrippa also by him was east into prison; albeit afterward he was restored. In the reign of Tiberius, the Lord Jesus, the Son of God, in the three and thirtieth year of his age, which was the seventeenth of this emperor, by the malice of the Jews suffered his blessed passion for the conquering of sin, death, and Satan, the prince of this world, and rose again the third day. After whose blessed passion and resurrection this foresaid Tiberius Nero lived six years, during which time no persecution was yet stirring in Rome against the Christians, through the commandment of the emperor. In the reign also of this emperor, and the year which was the next after the passion of our Saviour, or somewhat more, St. Paul was converted to the faith. After the death of Tiberius, when he had reigned three and twenty years, succeeded C. Cæsar Caligula, Claudius Nero, and Domitius Nero; which three were likewise such scourges to the senate and people of Rome, that the first not only took other men's wives violently from them, but also defloured three of his own sisters, and afterward banished them. So wicked he was, that he commanded himself to be worshipped as God, and temples to be erected in his name and used to sit in the temple among the gods, requiring his images to be set up in all temples, and also in the temple of Jerusalem, which caused great disturbance among the Jews, and then began the abomination of desolation to be set up in the Holy place, spoken of in the gospel. His cruel conduct, or else displeasure, was such towards the Romans, that he wished that all the people of Rome had but one neck, that he at his pleasure might destroy such a multitude. By this said Caligula, Herod, the murderer of John The Baptist and condemner of Christ, was condemned to perpetual banishment, where he died miserably. Caiaphas also, which wickedly sat upon Christ, was the same time removed from the high priest's room, and Jonathan set in his place. The raging fierceness of this Caligula incensed against the Romans had not thus ceased, had not he been cut off by the hands of a tribune and other gentlemen, which slew him in the fourth year of his reign. After whose death was found in his closet two little labels, one called a sword, the other the dagger; in the which, labels were contained the names of those senators and noblemen of Rome whom he had purposed to put to death. Besides this sword and dagger, there was found also a coffer, wherein divers kinds of poison were kept in glasses and vessels for the purpose to destroy a wonderful number of people; which poisons afterward, being thrown into the sea, destroyed a great number of fish. But that which this Caligula had only conceived, the same did the other two which came after bring to pass; Claudius Nero, who reigned thirteen years with no little cruelty; but especially the third of these Neros, called Domitius Nero, which, succeeding after Claudius, reigned fourteen years with such fury and tyranny, that he slew the most part of the senators, and destroyed the whole order of knighthood in Rome. So prodigious a monster of nature was he, more like a beast, yea, rather a devil, than a man, that he seemed to be born to the destruction of men. Such was his monstrous uncleanness, that he abstained not from his own mother, his natural sister, nor from any degree of kindred. Such was his wretched cruelty, that he caused to be put to death his mother, his brother-in-law, his sister, his wife great with child, all his instructors, Seneca, and Lucan, with divers more of his own kindred and consanguinity. Moreover, he commanded Rome to be set on fire in twelve places, and so continued it five days and six nights in burning, while that he, to see the example of how Troy burned, sung the verses of Homer. And to avoid the infamy thereof, he laid the fault upon the Christian men and caused them to be persecuted. And so continued this miserable emperor in his reign fourteen years, till at last the senate proclaiming him a public enemy unto mankind, condemned him to be drawn through the city, and to be whipped to death. For the fear whereof, he, flying the hands of his enemies, in the night fled to a manor of his servant's in the country, where he was forced to slay himself, complaining that he had then neither friend nor enemy left that would do so much for him. At the latter end of this Domitius Nero, Peter and Paul were put to death for the testimony and faith of Christ.
[Footnote: Some chronologists place the martyrdom of St. Peter and St. Paul two years later, and some even four.]Thus ye see, which is worthy to be marked, how the just scourge and heavy indignation of God from time to time ever followeth there, and how all things there go to ruin, neither doth any thing well prosper, where Christ Jesus, the Son of God, is contemned and not received, as by these examples may appear, both of Romans, which not only were thus consumed and plagued by their own emperors, but also by civil wars, whereof three happened in two years at Rome, after the death of Nero, and other casualties, (as in Sueton. is testified,) so that in the days of Tiberius aforesaid five thousand Romans were hurt and slain at one time by the fall of a theatre. And also most especially by the destruction of the Jews, which about this same time, in the year threescore and ten, and nearly forty years after the passion of Christ, and the third year after the suffering of St. Peter and Paul, were destroyed by Titus and Vespasian his father (who succeeded after Nero in the empire) to the number of eleven hundred thousand, besides them which Vespasian slew in subduing the country of Galilee, over and beside them also which were sold and sent into Egypt and other provinces to vile slavery, to the number of seventeen thousand. Two thousand were brought with Titus in his triumph; of which, part he gave to be devoured of the wild beasts, part otherwise most cruelly were slain. By whose case all nations and realms may take an example, what it is to reject the visitation of God's verity being sent, and much more to persecute them which be sent of God for their salvation. And as this wrathful vengeance of God thus hath been showed upon this rebellious people, both of the Jews and of the Romans, for their contempt of Christ, whom God so punished by their own emperors; so neither the emperors themselves, for persecuting Christ in his members, escaped without their just reward. For among so many emperors which put so many Christian martyrs to death, during the space of these first three hundred years, few or none of them scaped either not slain themselves, or by some miserable end or other worthily avenged. First, of the poisoning of Tiberius, and of the slaughter of the other three Neros after him, sufficiently is declared before. After Nero, Domitius Galba within seven months was slain by Otho. And so did Otho afterward slay himself, being overcome by Vitellus. And was not Vitellus shortly after drawn through the city of Rome, and after he was tormented was thrown into the Tiber? Titus, a good emperor, is thought to be poisoned by Domitian, his brother. The said Domitian after he had been a persecutor of the Christians, was slain in his chamber, not without the consent of his wife. Likewise, Commodus was murdered by Narcissus. The like end was of Pertinax and Julianus. Moreover, after that Severus was slain here in England, (and lieth at York,) did not his son Bassianus slay his brother Geta, and he after slain of Martialis? Macrinus with his son Diadumenus were both slain of their own soldiers. After whom Heliogabalus, that monstrous belly- paunch, was of his own people slain, and drawn through the city and cast into the Tiber. Alexander Severus, that worthy and learned emperor, which said he would not feed his servants doing anything with the bowels of the commonwealth, although in life and virtues he was much unlike other emperors, yet proved the like end, being slain at Mentz, with his godly mother Mammea, by Maximinus, whom the emperor before of a muleteer had advanced to great dignities. The which Maximinus also after three years was slain himself of his soldiers. What should I speak of Maximus and Balbinus in like sort both slain in Rome? of Gordian slain by Philip? of Philip, the first christened emperor, slain, or rather martyred, for the same cause? of wicked Decius drowned, and his son slain the same time in battle? of Gallus and Volusianus his son, emperors after Decius, both slain by a conspiracy of Æmilianus, who rose against them both in war and within three months after was slain himself? Next to Æmilianus succeeded Valerianus, and Gallienus his son; of whom Valerianus (who was a persecutor of the Christians) was taken prisoner of the Persians, and there made a riding fool of Sapores their king, who used him for a stool to leap upon his horse; while his son Gallienus, sleeping at Rome, either would not or could not once proffer to revenge his father's ignominy. For after the taking of Valerian, so many emperors rose up as were provinces in the Roman monarchy. At length, Gallienus also was killed by Aureolus which warred against him. It was too long here to speak of Aurelianus, another persecutor, slain of his secretary; of Tacitus and Florinus his brother, of whom the first reigned five months, and was slain at Pontus; the other reigned two months, and was murdered at Tarsis: of Probus, who, although a good civil emperor, yet was he destroyed by his soldiers. After whom Carus, the next emperor was slain by lightning. Next to Carus followed the impious and wicked persecutor Dioclesian, with his fellows Maximian, Valerius, Maximinus, Maxentius, and Licinius, under whom, all at one time, (during the time of Dioclesian,) the greatest and most grievous persecution was moved against the Christians ten years together. After which, Dioclesian and Maximian deposed themselves from the empire. Galerius, the chiefest minister of the persecution, after his terrible persecutions, fell into a wonderful sickness, having such a sore risen in the nether part of his body, which consumed his members, and so did swarm with worms, that being curable neither by surgery nor physic, he confessed that it happened for his cruelty towards the Christians, and so-called in his proclamations against them. Notwithstanding, he is not able to sustain (as some say) his sore, slew himself. Maximinus in his war, being tormented with pain in his guts, there died, Maxentius was vanquished by Constantine and drowned in the Tiber. Licinius likewise, being overcome by the said Constantine the Great, was deposed from his empire, and afterward slain of his soldiers. But, on the other side, after the time of Constantine, when the faith of Christ was received into the imperial seat, we read of no emperor after the like sort destroyed or molested, except it was Julianus, or Basilius, (which expelled one Zeno, and was afterward expelled himself,) or Valens. Besides these, we read of no emperor to come to ruin and decay, like the others before mentioned. And thus have we in brief sum collected out of the chronicles the unquiet and miserable state of the emperors of Rome, until the time of Christian Constantine, with the examples, no less terrible than manifest, of God's severe justice upon them for their contemptuous, refusing and persecuting the faith and name of Christ their Lord.
The Filthy RAGS of The Papacy did not fair any better 🎺🎺 For this is written metaphorically and with respect from the blood of the Saints and the Martyrs SCREAMING! ~ lest we forget. Amen 🎺 👼
🎺 "And the King shall answer and say unto them, Verily I say unto you, Inasmuch as ye have done it unto one of the least of these my brethren, ye have done it unto me". Amen 🎺 👼
🎺 foot note: I am of the humble opinion that God could NOT answer his Son on the cross but that Jesus's spirit being the Arch Angel Michael was there watching over Him. AMEN🎺 👼

A Paradigm of Earth and Biological Origins by Intelligent Design - 3rd Edition
The ground is shifting. New research programs, and new discoveries, are constantly changing the landscape of our knowledge of “how it all began.” And for those considering these matters from a position of biblical faith, there are new and promising frontiers to explore.
Many of those remarkable recent changes are addressed in this fully updated third edition of this landmark work, now in its twentieth year of publication. With additional contributions from joint author Arthur Chadwick, Faith, Reason, and Earth History presents Leonard Brand’s continuing argument for constructive thinking about origins and earth history in the context of Scripture, showing readers how to analyze available scientific data and approach unsolved problems. Faith does not need to fear the data but can contribute to progress in understanding earth history within the context of God’s Word while still being honest about unanswered questions. Faith, Reason, and Earth History presents Leonard Brand's argument for constructive thinking about origins and earth history in the context of Scripture, showing readers how to analyze available scientific data and approach unsolved problems. Faith does not need to fear the data but can contribute to progress in understanding earth within the context of God's Word while still being honest about unanswered questions. In this patient explanation of the mission of science, the author models his conviction that above all, it is essential that we treat each other with respect, even if we disagree on fundamental issues, The original editions of the work (1997) was one of the first books on this topic written from the point of view of an experienced research scientist. A career biologist, paleontologist, and teacher, Brand brings to this well-illustrated book a rich assortment of practical scientific examples. This thoughtful and rigorous presentation makes Brand's landmark work highly useful both as a college-level text and as an easily accessible treatment for the educated layperson.
In this patient explanation of the mission of science and its application to questions about origins and earth history, the authors model their conviction that “above all, it is essential that we treat each other with respect, even if we disagree on fundamental issues.”
The original edition of this work (1997) was one of the first books on this topic written from the point of view of experienced research scientists. Brand and Chadwick, career researchers and teachers in biology and paleontology, bring to this well-illustrated book a rich assortment of practical scientific examples.
This thoughtful, rigorous, and thoroughly up-to-date presentation makes this classic work highly useful both as a college-level text and as an easily accessible treatment for the educated layperson.
Leonard Brand (Ph.D., Cornell) is a professor of biology and paleontology at Loma Linda University and has been teaching at the university level for four decades. An active researcher, he is well-published in professional scientific journals in the fields of paleontology, animal behavior, and ecology.
Arthur Chadwick (Ph.D., University of Miami) is a research professor of biology and geology at Southwestern Adventist University. Chadwick began his professional career by retraining in geology and paleontology at the University of California (Riverside) and accepting a visiting professorship at the University of Oklahoma in geology and geophysics before taking his current position. His research and publication profile spans these disciplines.
"For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life. ... Whoever believes in him is not condemned, but whoever does not believe stands condemned already because he has not believed in the name of God's one and only Son".
🎺 What Is the Difference between God's Manifest Presence and Omnipresence, Ubiquitous? The UBIQUITOUS or omnipresence of God explains how He is everywhere all at once, while the manifest presence of God is His presence made clear. The omnipresence of God can exist without our awareness, but the manifest presence cannot, for the point manifest presence of the Lord is that our awareness of Him is awakened to reality as defined by Him. NASA is dedicated primarily to one mission: to explore the created universe. They can go to the very ends of the earth and our surrounding galaxies, but they cannot hope to exhaust the God of the Bible. The God of the Bible cannot be contained by space (Psalm 147:5). When we compare NASA to the Lord, the Lord has zero spatial limitations, while NASA is limited by finances and technological advancements. The Lord also is infinite, majestic, holy, and everywhere present and all-knowing unconstrained by either time or space, along with having complete knowledge of everything at all times and places. Jeremiah 23:24 is one text among many that reveal the Creator’s everywhere present nature.“‘Who can hide in secret places so that I cannot see them?’ declares the LORD. ‘Do not I fill heaven and earth While SEEING ALL?’ declares the LORD" UBIQUITOUS":
3 Jesus answered and said unto him, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man gbe born ||hagain, he cannot see the kingdom of God.
4 Nicodemus saith unto him, hhHow can a man be born when he is old? can he enter the second time into his mother’s womb, and be born?
5 Jesus answered, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born of ijwater and of jthe Spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God.
6 kThat which is born of the flesh is flesh; and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit.
7 kkMarvel not that I said unto thee, Ye must be born ||again.
8 lThe wind bloweth where it listeth, and thou hearest the sound thereof, but canst not tell whence it cometh, and whither it goeth: so is every one that is born of the Spirit.
9 Nicodemus answered and said unto him, mHow can these things be?
10 Jesus answered and said unto him, Art thou na master of Israel, and knowest not these things?
11 Verily, verily, I say unto thee, We speak that we do know, and otestify that we have seen; oand ye receive not our witness.
12 pIf I have told you earthly things, and ye believe not, how shall ye believe, if I tell you of heavenly things?
13 And qno man hath ascended up to heaven, but rhe that came down from heaven, even the Son of man swhich is in heaven.
14 And tas Moses lifted up the serpent in the wilderness, even so umust the Son of man wbe lifted up:
15 That xwhosoever believeth in him should not perish, but yhave eternal life.
16 For zGod so loved the world, that he agave his bonly begotten Son, that xwhosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.
17 For bbGod sent not his Son into the world cto condemn the world; dbut that the world through him might be saved.
18 eHe that believeth on him is not condemned: fbut he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the bonly begotten Son of God.
19 And this is the condemnation, that glight is come into the world, and men loved hdarkness irather than light, iibecause their deeds were evil.
20 For jevery one that kdoeth evil hateth the light, neither cometh to the light, lest his deeds should be ||lreproved.
21 But he that kdoeth truth cometh to the light, that his deeds may be made manifest, that they are wrought in God.
22 After these things came Jesus and mhis disciples into nthe land of Judaea; and there he tarried with them, and obaptized.
23 And John also was baptizing in pÆnon near to pSalim, because there was much water there: qand they came, and were baptized.
24 For rJohn was not yet cast into prison.
25 Then there arose a question between some of John’s disciples and the Jews about spurifying.
26 And they came unto John, and said unto him, tRabbi, he that was with thee ubeyond Jordan, xto whom thou barest witness, behold, the same baptizeth, and all men come to him.
27 John answered and said, A man can ||yreceive nothing, except zit be given him from heaven.
28 Ye yourselves bear me witness, that I said, aI am not the Christ, but bthat I am sent before him.
29 He that hath the bride is cthe bridegroom: but dthe friend of the bridegroom, which standeth and heareth him, erejoiceth greatly because of fthe bridegroom’s voice: this my joy therefore is fulfilled.
30 gHe must increase, but I must decrease.
31 hHe that cometh ifrom above kis above all: lhe that is of the earth is earthly, and speaketh of the earth: hhe that cometh lfrom heaven kis above all.
32 And what he hath mseen and nheard, that he testifieth; and ono man receiveth his testimony. 33 He that hath received his testimony phath set to his seal that qGod is true.
34 rFor he whom God hath sent speaketh the words of God: for God giveth not the Spirit sby measure unto him.
35 tThe Father loveth the Son, and uhath given all things into his hand.
36 xHe that believeth on the Son hath everlasting life: and he that believeth not the Son shall not see life; but the wrath of God abideth on him.
St. Peter proclaims Jesus as the cornerstone, without which there could be no Church (Acts 4:11, 1 Pet. 2:6-7).
The reference to Jesus as the cornerstone comes from Old Testament passages like Psalm 118:22 and Isaiah 8:4, and refers to the sanctuary or Temple of God where the Israelite people worshipped. In other words, Jesus is the new Temple of a New Covenant form of worship (John 2:18-22), who was sadly rejected by many. Without Jesus, there could be no fulfillment of Israel, including a new form of worship centered on Jesus and his Sacrifice of Calvary and its sacramental re-presentation in the celebration of the Mass (Luke 22:19-20), vs. the Old Covenant sacrifices offered at the Temple in Jerusalem that could not provide eternal salvation.
And so there could be no Church, which is the fulfilment of Israel, without Jesus as the cornerstone of the New Covenant and its salvific worship. And yet Jesus chooses Peter as the rock (Aramaic: kepha) upon which to build his Church (Matt. 16:18-19).

In the great political divisions of Italy, every district presents some epoch in its history, more prominent than the rest, which the natives refer to with exultation, and strangers peruse with interest or advantage. Every section, however limited in extent, has its annals —every community some emphatic page—in which the strife of faction or struggles for independence have developed, in their course, the passions and energies of the human mind. But of all nations or provinces, where the noblest virtues have been called into action, and where love of country and zeal for religion have alternately endured the most grievous calamities, or led to the most glorious results, these Valleys of Piedmont—a spot scarcely noticed in the maps of Europe—stand forth in brilliant distinction. From the magnanimous traits, heroic sacrifices, and startling incidents which their history presents, it has all the character of an ancient epic, all the materials and variety of a tragic drama, but of a drama stamped with the seal of truth. As a distinct people, the Waldenses became first known in history at the commencement of the ninth century, during the life of Claudius, bishop of Turin—the Wickliffe of his day, and the strenuous advocate of primitive Christianity. By tradition, however, carefully handed down through a long INTRODUCTORY SKETCH. B 2 THE WALDENSES. line of ancestors, they trace their origin to the first dawn of revelation, and, in the present day, profess the same doctrines which they imbibed from the apostles.*
• St. Paul and St. James are supposed to have been the first messengers of glad tidings in these Valleys,