top of page

I'm a TREE OF LIFE FOR YOU TO FEED AND TO DRINK OF ME

THE CREATOR—THE TRIUNE GOD

 

The Creator of man is the Triune God—the Father, the Son, and the Spirit. Man’s creation was wrapped up with the Divine Trinity. It was not merely God who created man, but it was the Triune God—the Father, the Son, and the Spirit. This is based upon Genesis 1:26, which says, “God said, Let Us make man in Our image.” Here the plural pronouns Us and Our are used, indicating that the very God who intended to create man is triune—the Father, the Son, and the Spirit. According to Genesis 1:26, it seems that before God came in to create man, the Triune God had a kind of “Godhead conference,” a kind of conference among the Trinity, to make a decision about how to create man in His image and according to His likeness. The decision to create man was made by the Triune God, indicating that the creation of man was for the purpose of the Triune God. The trinity of the Godhead is not for theological doctrine but for the dispensing of God Himself into man according to His divine economy. Thus, at the very beginning when God intended to create man, God decided to do so in His Trinity. This is why He said, “Let Us make man in Our image.” God’s intention in creating man was to carry out His economy for His dispensing of Himself into man.

II. IN GOD’S IMAGE

 

The Tree of Life 

Then the LORD God said, “Behold, the man has become like one of Us, knowing good and evil; and now, lest he stretch out his hand, and take also from the tree of life, and eat, and live forever” — therefore the LORD God sent him out from the garden of Eden, to cultivate the ground from which he was taken (Genesis 3:22- 23). As previously shown, God planted the Tree of Life and the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil in the center of the Garden of Eden, at the site of Jerusalem. When Adam and Eve ate from the Tree of Knowledge in disobedience to God, they became spiritually separated from Him. As a result, God barred access to the Tree of Life, which endowed the partaker with eternal life. So we see that one tree was the source of eternal life and the other tree became a source of spiritual death and separation from God because of man’s sin. The choice between obedience to God that leads to eternal life with Him, and disobedience that leads to spiritual death and eternal separation from Him, was placed before Adam and Eve, as it is for each and every human being.

 As the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil is associated with humanity’s sin and need for salvation, the Tree of Life is associated with humanity’s redemption and spiritual restoration to God, as we will show in this and the following chapters. ADAM AND EVE LOST ACCESS TO THE TREE OF LIFE BECAUSE OF SIN After Adam and Eve disobeyed the one commandment not to eat of the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil, God sent them out of the Garden of Eden, and placed cherubim to prevent access to the Tree of Life: Then the LORD God said, “Behold, the man has become like one of Us, knowing good and evil; and now, lest he stretch out his hand, and take also from the tree of life, and eat, and live forever” — therefore the LORD God sent him out from the garden of Eden, to cultivate the ground from which he was taken. So He drove the man out; and at the east of the garden of Eden He stationed the cherubim, and the flaming sword which turned every direction, to guard the way to the tree of life (Genesis 3:22-24). Note that God refers to Himself in the plural “Us”, revealing the triune nature of God the Father, God the Son, and God the Holy Spirit. As a result of their disobedience, Adam and Eve could no longer be in the direct presence of God. But God made the one and only way of salvation through His Son, Messiah Yeshua, for them and all humanity to be restored spiritually and to have eternal life with Him (Genesis 3:15; John 3:16). When Yeshua came into the world, He fulfilled the prophecy of the Suffering Servant of Isaiah 53, a detailed description of the crucifixion. In this and the following chapters, we will show how the fulfillment of this prophecy may link to the Tree of Life and a branch from it, referred to by various names: Aaron’s rod, Moses’ rod, and the rod of God.

THE TEMPLE MENORAH LINK TO THE ALMOND TREE AND TREE OF LIFE As explained in the previous chapter, the Tabernacle and its furnishings were made according to the specific pattern God showed to Moses: “According to all that I [the LORD] am going to show you, as the pattern of the tabernacle and the pattern of all its furniture, just so you shall construct it” (Exodus 25:9, emphasis added). This includes the Menorah: “Then you shall make a lampstand [menorah] of pure gold. The lampstand and its base and its shaft are to be made of hammered work; its cups, its bulbs and its flowers shall be of one piece with it. And six branches shall go out from its sides; three branches of the lampstand from its one side, and three branches of the lampstand from its other side. Three cups shall be shaped like almond blossoms in the one branch, a bulb and a flower, and three cups shaped like almond blossoms in the other branch, a bulb and a flower — so for six branches going out from the lampstand; and in the lampstand four cups shaped like almond blossoms, its bulbs and its flowers. And a bulb shall be under the first pair of branches coming out of it, and a bulb under the second pair of branches coming out of it, and a bulb under the third pair of branches coming out of it, for the six branches coming out of the lampstand. Their bulbs and their branches shall be of one piece with it; all of it shall be one piece of hammered work of pure gold. Then you shall make its lamps seven in number; and they shall mount its lamps so as to shed light on the space in front of it. And its snuffers and their trays shall be of pure gold. It shall be made from a talent of pure gold, with all these utensils. And see that you make them after the pattern for them, which was shown to you on the mountain” (Exodus 25:31-40, emphasis added). The Menorah is a seven-branched candelabrum. The Number Seven occurs throughout the Word of God and represents spiritual perfection and completion. It is seven, therefore, that stamps with perfection and completeness that in  connection with which it is used. Of time, it tells of the Sabbath, and marks off the week of seven days. … In the creative works of God, seven completes the colours of the spectrum and rainbow, and satisfies in music the notes of the scale.2 There are seven days in the week, the seventh day being the Sabbath day; seven years in the Sabbatical cycle, the seventh year for the land to rest; seven days in the Feast of Unleavened Bread; seven days in the Feast of Tabernacles (Sukkot); Seven Churches, Seven Seals, Seven Trumpets, and Seven Bowls in the Book of Revelation; and Seven Branches of the Menorah. This pattern of seven repeating in Creation and God’s Master Plan of Redemption reveals the Hand of the Creator, His prophetic pattern and design. With regard to the Menorah, the understanding that it symbolizes the Tree of Life also has great prophetic significance. 3 More than a mere symbolic meaning, it may be that the Menorah, placed in the Holy Place of the Tabernacle and later in the Temple on Mount Moriah, represents the actual Tree of Life that once existed in the same place – the one and only unique place God chose as His dwelling place on Earth. If the Menorah does indeed represent the Tree of Life, then the pattern God gave to Moses of the Menorah possessing features of the almond tree reveals that the Tree of Life was an almond tree. We will show more evidence that supports this understanding. AARON’S ROD – A BRANCH FROM AN ALMOND TREE When Korah led the rebellion against the authority of Moses, and Aaron as high priest, the Lord commanded each Tribe of Israel to bring the rod (staff – symbol of authority) of its leader, to be placed in front of the Ark of the Covenant (“the testimony” – Numbers 17:4). God said that He would give a sign to show and confirm the leader He chose by having his rod supernaturally sprout: “And it will come about that the rod of the man whom I choose will sprout. Thus I shall lessen from upon Myself the grumblings of the sons of Israel, who are grumbling against you” (Numbers 17:5, emphasis added). CLICK ME TO READ 

.

As official Israelite religion trended toward monotheism, the other local deities had to be eliminated (Asherah in particular), and Yahweh appropriated their powers and functions. Insofar as this process affected Asherah, I call this “Yahweh’s Divorce,” and the proceedings began in the Yahwist’s Eden story.

Before the rise of Israel, Asherah was the wife of El, the head god of the Canaanite pantheon. According to the archeological evidence, the people who became Israelites were mostly native Canaanites who settled in the hills of what is now the West Bank, while it seems that small but influential groups also migrated there from the south in the Midian (in and around the Araba Valley in Sinai). As the Bible itself testifies, that is where Yahweh veneration appears to have originated, and, in a process that in this respect resonates with the Moses story, the migrants introduced Yahweh to the native Canaanites who were becoming Israelites. Over time, El declined and merged into Yahweh. As part of that process, Yahweh inherited Asherah from El as his wife.

The Hebrew Bible refers to Asherah directly or indirectly some 40 times, always in negative terms (so she must have been a challenge). Most references are indirect, to the asherah poles that symbolized her, but a number of them clearly enough refer directly to the goddess Asherah (e.g., Judges 3:7; 1 Kings 15:13; 1 Kings 18:19; 2 Kings 21:7; 2 Kings 23:4-7; 2 Chron. 15:16). Evidently she was part of traditional official Israelite religion, for an asherah pole even stood in front of Solomon’s Temple for most of its existence, as well as in Yahweh’s sanctuary in Samaria. There is also much extra-biblical evidence of Asherah in Israel from the time of the judges right through monarchical times, including in paintings/drawings, pendants, plaques, pottery, (possibly) clay “pillar” figurines, cult stands, and in inscriptions. Several inscriptions specifically refer to “Yahweh and his Asherah [or asherah].” (It is not entirely certain whether the goddess herself or the asherah pole symbolizing her is being referenced here, but either way ultimately the goddess is meant, and she is being linked with Yahweh.)

The Yahwist and the other biblical writers could not accept the presence of this goddess as a deity in Israel, much less as the wife of Yahweh, who they specifically depicted in non-sexual terms. So they declared war on her, in part by mentioning her existence sparingly in the Bible, by referring to her and asherahs negatively when they did mention her, and by waging a polemic against her by allusions that would have been clear to the Yahwist audience. These tactics are apparent in the Eden story, from the kinds of symbols used and the trajectory of the narrative. These symbols include the garden sanctuary itself, the sacred trees, the serpent, and Eve, herself a goddess figure. In ancient Near Eastern myth and iconography, sacred trees, goddesses, and serpents often form a kind of “trinity,” because they have substantially overlapping and interchangeable symbolism and are often depicted together. Let’s examine each of these symbols briefly.

The Garden. Originally in the ancient Near East, the Goddess was associated with and had jurisdiction over vegetation and life, which she generated herself. People partook of the first crops (including fruit) as her bounty – indeed her body and her divinity – and set up her sanctuary with garden of crops for this purpose. Such a sacred garden sanctuary was “estate” over which she exercised jurisdiction. Examples include Siduri’s vineyard with a sacred tree in the Gilgamesh epic, Inanna’s garden precinct with sacred tree in Summer, Calypso’s vineyard sanctuary in Homer’s Odyssey, and Hera’s Garden of the Hesperides. Garden sanctuaries of gods and kings evolved later, when religion became more patriarchal, sky gods came to dominate, and goddesses were substantially devalued. In the Eden story, Yahweh’s both creating the garden (i.e., life) and being in charge of it can be viewed as part of this process: There the Goddess (here Asherah) was eliminated from the garden sanctuary and from her functions there.

Sacred trees were thought to connect with the divine realms of both the netherworld and the heavens, and therefore were considered conduits for communicating with and experiencing the divine and themselves are charged with the divine force (thought of as “serpent power”; see below). In harmony with the seasons, trees embody the life energy and symbolize the generation, regeneration and renewal of life. Therefore, they are associated with the source of life, the Earth/Mother Goddess. Accordingly, sacred trees were venerated in Palestine in sacred sanctuaries known as “high places,” as means of accessing and experiencing divinity, principally the goddess Asherah. (Similarly, the divinity of the male deity was accessed through vertical stone pillars, e.g., the one set up by Jacob at Bethel.) In the Eden story, the two sacred trees of knowledge of good and evil and of life allude to this traditional role of sacred trees, but the meaning is turned upside down. In the story, Yahweh even creates the trees. In ordering Adam not to partake of the tree of knowledge of good and evil, by implication Yahweh was telling the audience not to venerate sacred trees in the traditional fashion. And in any event, the heretofore divine knowledge of good and evil that was acquired through eating the fruit is linked with Yahweh, not any goddess. And at the end of the story the tree of life is clearly designated as Yahweh’s, being guarded by his trademark symbols, the paired cherubim.

Serpents. In the ancient Near East, serpents had both positive and negative connotations, and in the Eden story the Yahwist played on each. In its positive aspect, the serpent represented the divine force itself, responsible for creation, life, and rebirth, as symbolized by its constant shedding of its skin. This and the fact that it lives within the earth (the netherworld) made for a natural association with the Mother Earth Goddess. As a result, the serpent was venerated as having divine powers and was used in rituals, including in marriage (to secure conception of children) and to maintain health. Serpents were also considered wise and sources of knowledge, and thus were used in divination. (The Hebrew noun for serpent (nāḥāš) connotes divination; the verb nāḥaš means to practice divination, and observe omens/signs.) Hence the serpent’s connection with transmission of the knowledge of good and evil in the Eden story. This “good” serpent was typically depicted in an upright or erect form, as in the case of the Egyptian erect cobra (in the illustration above), Moses’ bronze serpent on a pole, and the serpent on Asclepius’ staff (now the symbol of our medical profession).

But the serpent also was represented negatively as unrestrained divine power, which produces chaos, which is evil. Therefore, in creation myths the serpent/dragon represents the primordial chaos that must be overcome in order to establish the created cosmos (known as the “dragon fight” motif). This primordial chaos serpent is most often a serpent/dragon goddess (e.g., Tiamat in the Babylonian Enuma Elish) or her proxy (Typhon was the creation of Gaia). The serpent in this “evil” aspect is most often depicted horizontally. In the Eden story our author used this negative aspect, while parodying the traditional positive associations, which Yahweh appropriated. Thus, in the story, the serpent connoted chaos and symbolized the chaos in Eve’s heart as she deliberated. At the end of the story, Yahweh cursed the serpent and flattened its posture (compared with the upright/erect posture it had when talking with Eve). As a result, Yahweh was victorious over the serpent and chaos and, by implication the Goddess, in a mini version of the above-mentioned dragon fight motif.

The Goddess. As noted by numerous biblical scholars, the Goddess is also seen in the figure of Eve herself, the last figure in our trinity of tree-serpent-Goddess. In the Eden story she is given the epithet “the mother of all living,” an epithet like those given to various ancient near Eastern goddesses including Siduri, Ninti, and Mami in Mesopotamia and Asherah in Syria-Palestine. Eve’s actual name in Hebrew (ḥawwâ), besides meaning life (for which goddesses were traditionally responsible), is also likely wordplay on an old Canaanite word for serpent (ḥeva). The name of the goddess Tannit (the Phoenician version of Asherah) means “serpent lady,” and she had the epithet “Lady Ḥawat” (meaning “Lady of Life”), which is derived from the same Canaanite word as Eve’s name (ḥawwâ). At the end of the story, Eve is punished by having to give birth in pain, whereas goddesses in the ancient Near East gave birth painlessly. Further, in Genesis 4:1, Eve needs Yahweh’s help in order to become fertile and conceive, a reversal of the Goddess’ power and function. (Indeed, Eve is even created from Adam!) Adam’s only fault was “listening” to Eve in order to attain divine qualities. Here the Yahwist may be alluding to Goddess veneration, saying not to worship her. This seems to be one reason for the punishment consisting of woman’s subjugation to man in Genesis 3:16.

As a result of these events, by the end of the story Yahweh is supreme and in control of all divine powers and functions formerly in the hands of the Goddess, and Canaanite religion in general has been discredited. Yahweh is in charge of the garden (formerly the Goddess’ province), from which chaos has been removed. Sacred tree veneration has been prohibited and discredited, while Yahweh appropriates and identifies himself with the Tree of Life (see also Hosea 14:8, where Yahweh claims, “I am like an evergreen cypress, from me comes your fruit.”). The serpent has been vanquished, flattened, and deprived of divine qualities, and thus is not worthy of veneration, and enmity has been established between snakes and humans. The Goddess has been discredited, rendered powerless, and is eliminated from the picture and sent into oblivion. Yahweh’s divorce from her has been made final, at least in the author’s mind. But in fact she persisted, and her equivalents in the psyche inevitably have persisted to this day, as they must.

https://vepimg.b8cdn.com/.../16541035867-seals-new...

Yahweh/Yeshua AKA Martyn Nathan - Holy Spirit = Dua = Love - Lipa = Beautiful

MR&MRS, UNIVERSAL Genesis

https://martynkenney3.wixsite.com/website-1

1. Seven Great Truths About Matthew 24 - Pastor Stephen Bohr - Matthew 24

Study notes to this series (Link below) https://secretsunsealed.org/matthew-2... If you have ever wondered what the future holds, you will not want to miss this extraordinary, in-depth series of Matthew 24. Pastor Bohr covers the parallels between the destruction of Jerusalem and the transpiring events before the second coming of Jesus. Pastor Bohr, shows how this chapter applies especially to Christians living in these end times, while also having a foundational application to the history of the destruction of the Jewish temple in 70 A.D. and the persecutions of Christians in the first centuries. Take Jesus' warnings in Matthew 24 and be prepared for what is soon to come upon this world as an overwhelming surprise to most people. This series will be a valuable tool in building our house on the solid Rock of truth in Christ Jesus.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=krVCAPbAwwM

God is UBIQUITOUS": https://martynkenney3.wixsite.com/website-2

God did say, `You must not eat fruit from the tree that is in the middle of the garden, and you must not touch it, or you will die. "You will not surely die," the serpent said to the woman. "For God knows that when you eat of it your eyes will be opened, and you will be like God, knowing good and evil."

Who told you that you were naked?” the LORD God asked. “Have you eaten from the tree whose fruit I commanded you not to eat?” Genesis chapter 3 verse 11 ~ And Now Through Yeshua is tHE only way back INTO tHE GARDEN Amen

John 6:51-58

[yehōshu'a said,] EAT ME ~ “I am the living bread that came down from heaven. Whoever eats of this bread will live forever, and the bread that I will give for the life of the world is my flesh.”

The Jews then disputed among themselves, saying, “How can this man give us his flesh to eat?”

So Jesus said to them, “Very truly, I tell you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood, you have no life in you. Those who eat my flesh and drink my blood have eternal life, and I will raise them up on the last day; for my flesh is true food and my blood is true drink. Those who eat my flesh and drink my blood abide in me, and I in them. Just as the living Father sent me, and I live because of the Father, so whoever eats me will live because of me. This is the bread that came down from heaven, not like that which your ancestors ate, and they died. But the one who eats this bread will live forever.” AMEN ADAMANDEVEGODSFIRSTCHURCH.ORG LOVE YESHUA X

HOME =

https://www.adamandevegodsfirstchurch.org/

Exodus 12

New International Version

The Passover and the Festival of Unleavened Bread

12 The Lord said to Moses and Aaron in Egypt, 2 “This month is to be for you the first month, the first month of your year. 3 Tell the whole community of Israel that on the tenth day of this month each man is to take a lamb[a] for his family, one for each household. 4 If any household is too small for a whole lamb, they must share one with their nearest neighbor, having taken into account the number of people there are. You are to determine the amount of lamb needed in accordance with what each person will eat. 5 The animals you choose must be year-old males without defect, and you may take them from the sheep or the goats. 6 Take care of them until the fourteenth day of the month, when all the members of the community of Israel must slaughter them at twilight. 7 Then they are to take some of the blood and put it on the sides and tops of the doorframes of the houses where they eat the lambs. 8 That same night they are to eat the meat roasted over the fire, along with bitter herbs, and bread made without yeast. 9 Do not eat the meat raw or boiled in water, but roast it over a fire—with the head, legs and internal organs. 10 Do not leave any of it till morning; if some is left till morning, you must burn it. 11 This is how you are to eat it: with your cloak tucked into your belt, your sandals on your feet and your staff in your hand. Eat it in haste; it is the Lord’s Passover.

12 “On that same night I will pass through Egypt and strike down every firstborn of both people and animals, and I will bring judgment on all the gods of Egypt. I am the Lord. 13 The blood will be a sign for you on the houses where you are, and when I see the blood, I will pass over you. No destructive plague will touch you when I strike Egypt.

14 “This is a day you are to commemorate; for the generations to come you shall celebrate it as a festival to the Lord—a lasting ordinance. 15 For seven days you are to eat bread made without yeast. On the first day remove the yeast from your houses, for whoever eats anything with yeast in it from the first day through the seventh must be cut off from Israel. 16 On the first day hold a sacred assembly, and another one on the seventh day. Do no work at all on these days, except to prepare food for everyone to eat; that is all you may do.

17 “Celebrate the Festival of Unleavened Bread, because it was on this very day that I brought your divisions out of Egypt. Celebrate this day as a lasting ordinance for the generations to come. 18 In the first month you are to eat bread made without yeast, from the evening of the fourteenth day until the evening of the twenty-first day. 19 For seven days no yeast is to be found in your houses. And anyone, whether foreigner or native-born, who eats anything with yeast in it must be cut off from the community of Israel. 20 Eat nothing made with yeast. Wherever you live, you must eat unleavened bread.”

21 Then Moses summoned all the elders of Israel and said to them, “Go at once and select the animals for your families and slaughter the Passover lamb. 22 Take a bunch of hyssop, dip it into the blood in the basin and put some of the blood on the top and on both sides of the doorframe. None of you shall go out of the door of your house until morning. 23 When the Lord goes through the land to strike down the Egyptians, he will see the blood on the top and sides of the doorframe and will pass over that doorway, and he will not permit the destroyer to enter your houses and strike you down.

24 “Obey these instructions as a lasting ordinance for you and your descendants. 25 When you enter the land that the Lord will give you as he promised, observe this ceremony. 26 And when your children ask you, ‘What does this ceremony mean to you?’ 27 then tell them, ‘It is the Passover sacrifice to the Lord, who passed over the houses of the Israelites in Egypt and spared our homes when he struck down the Egyptians.’” Then the people bowed down and worshiped. 28 The Israelites did just what the Lord commanded Moses and Aaron.

29 At midnight the Lord struck down all the firstborn in Egypt, from the firstborn of Pharaoh, who sat on the throne, to the firstborn of the prisoner, who was in the dungeon, and the firstborn of all the livestock as well. 30 Pharaoh and all his officials and all the Egyptians got up during the night, and there was loud wailing in Egypt, for there was not a house without someone dead.

The Exodus

31 During the night Pharaoh summoned Moses and Aaron and said, “Up! Leave my people, you and the Israelites! Go, worship the Lord as you have requested. 32 Take your flocks and herds, as you have said, and go. And also bless me.”

33 The Egyptians urged the people to hurry and leave the country. “For otherwise,” they said, “we will all die!” 34 So the people took their dough before the yeast was added, and carried it on their shoulders in kneading troughs wrapped in clothing. 35 The Israelites did as Moses instructed and asked the Egyptians for articles of silver and gold and for clothing. 36 The Lord had made the Egyptians favorably disposed toward the people, and they gave them what they asked for; so they plundered the Egyptians.

37 The Israelites journeyed from Rameses to Sukkoth. There were about six hundred thousand men on foot, besides women and children. 38 Many other people went up with them, and also large droves of livestock, both flocks and herds. 39 With the dough the Israelites had brought from Egypt, they baked loaves of unleavened bread. The dough was without yeast because they had been driven out of Egypt and did not have time to prepare food for themselves.

40 Now the length of time the Israelite people lived in Egypt[b] was 430 years. 41 At the end of the 430 years, to the very day, all the Lord’s divisions left Egypt. 42 Because the Lord kept vigil that night to bring them out of Egypt, on this night all the Israelites are to keep vigil to honor the Lord for the generations to come.

Passover Restrictions

43 The Lord said to Moses and Aaron, “These are the regulations for the Passover meal:

“No foreigner may eat it. 44 Any slave you have bought may eat it after you have circumcised him, 45 but a temporary resident or a hired worker may not eat it.

46 “It must be eaten inside the house; take none of the meat outside the house. Do not break any of the bones. 47 The whole community of Israel must celebrate it.

48 “A foreigner residing among you who wants to celebrate the Lord’s Passover must have all the males in his household circumcised; then he may take part like one born in the land. No uncircumcised male may eat it. 49 The same law applies both to the native-born and to the foreigner residing among you.”

50 All the Israelites did just what the Lord had commanded Moses and Aaron. 51 And on that very day the Lord brought the Israelites out of Egypt by their divisions.

 

 

NAME—The word “Bible” from the Greek word “Biblos” means “Book.” Christians reverently call it “Holy Bible.” Our Lord called it “The Scriptures,” Matthew 22:29. Paul called it the “Holy Scriptures,” Romans 1:2, also “The Word of God,” 2 Corinthians 4:2. The word “Testament” means “Covenant,” so we have the Old Testament which contains the Covenant and its outworkings, which God gave to Israel, and the New Testament which contains the Covenant of Grace which came through Jesus Christ. The Old Testament was written mostly in Hebrew, and the New Testament wholly in Greek.

 

WRITERS—At least 40 (from the time of Moses 1500 B. C. to John the Apostle 97 A. D.) and the authorship is wonderful. It was written by kings and emperors, princes and 2 Lesson No. 1—The Bible. poets, sages and philosophers, fishermen and statesmen. By men learned in the wisdom of Egypt, educated in the schools of Babylon, trained at the feet of rabbis in Jerusalem. It was written by men in exile, in the desert, and in shepherds’ tents, amid green pastures and beside still waters. The man who wrote one book had no communication with the men who wrote the other books. How did these men, writing independently, produce such a book. 2 Peter 1:21. Other books get out of date in fifty years. Why does this book live on through the ages and keep abreast of mightiest thought?Mark 13:31.

 

PURPOSE OF THE BIBLE: To record the divine religion which God gave to man. Particularly to reveal the sinfulness of man, the holiness and love of God and the supreme revelation of that love in Jesus Christ. Also to reveal the eternal doom that awaits the wicked and the everlasting state of glory that awaits the redeemed.

 

GREAT FACTS:— 1 Books. 2 Inspiration. 3 Plan all through the Bible.

Great Fact I. The Books of the Bible. There are 39 books in the O. T. and 27 in the N. T., 66 in all. These books are not arranged in chronological order in the Bible, but the very order in which they appear has been divinely overruled. The O. T. has the following divisions:

1 The Pentateuch, Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus and Deuteronomy—5 books.

2 Historical—Joshua, Judges, Ruth, 1 & 2 Samuel, 1 & 2 Kings, 1 & 2 Chronicles, Ezra, Nehemiah, Esther—12 books.

3 Poetical—Job, Psalm, Proverbs, Ecclesiastes, Songs of Solomon (known as Song throughout)—5 books.

4 Major prophets—Isaiah, Jeremiah, Lamentations, Ezekiel, Daniel—5 books.

5 Minor prophets—Hosea, Joel, Amos, Obadiah, Jonah, Micah, Nahum, Habakkuk, Zechariah, Haggai, Zechariah, Malachi—12 books.

 

Lesson No. 1—The Bible. The N. T. has the following divisions: 1 Biographical, Matthew, Mark, Luke, John—4 books.

2 Historical, Acts—1 book. 3 Paul’s Epistles, Romans, 1 & 2 Corinthians, Galatians, Ephesians, Philippians, Colossians, 1 & 2 Thessalonians, 1 & 2 Timothy, Titus, Philemon—13 books.

4 General Epistles, Hebrews, James, 1 & 2 Peter, 1 & 2 & 3 John, Jude—8 books.

5 Prophetical, Revelation—1 book There are fourteen books, called the Apocrypha, which are sometimes bound in the covers of the Bible. Some of them contain excellent Jewish history, but they have never had a place in the Canon, or inspired and sacred list of the books of the Bible. “The Scriptures have by their own weight crushed all rivals out of existence.”

 

Great Fact II. The Inspiration of the Bible. The Bible was not actually written by the hand of God, but Jesus and Paul taught that the scriptures were in the fullest sense inspired. Matthew 22:29; 2 Timothy 3:16. The spirit of the inspiration breathes in every page and illuminates every word. “Behind and beneath the Bible, above and beyond the Bible is the God of the Bible.” The Spirit of God so influenced the minds of the writers that they recorded without error a progressive revelation from God to man. That the Bible is fully inspired, and therefore divine, is seen from the following facts:

1 Hundreds of tablets and ancient records unearthed in Bible lands testify to the accuracy of Bible history.

2 No other sacred writings give such a satisfying scheme of redemption, and such a scientific account of creation. In the words “God hangeth the world upon nothing,” Job 26:7; scripture teaches that this earth is a planet, floating in space, whereas in the writings of the Hindus they claim that the earth rests upon the backs of four huge elephants, and they upon the backs of four huge turtles, and they upon the backs of four huge snakes, so it is when either of these shake themselves that we get earthquakes! Many similar illustrations could be given!

3 Scripture is a testimony to itself. Isaiah 8:20. That the very words of the original Greek or Hebrew were inspired, is asserted again and again. 2 Peter 1:21; 2 Timothy 3:16; Matthew 5:18. Also there are no less than 333 prophecies in the O. T. concerning the earthly life of Christ. These were written centuries before they were fulfilled. What 4 Lesson No. 1—The Bible. a ridiculous display of human ignorance they would have revealed if they had not been inspired!As a contrast, take the many predictions as to the end of the age, made in recent years. 4 The testimony of Christ. He spent the whole of his ministry expounding the O. T. scriptures. That He believed them to be inspired and without error is seen from Matthew 5:18; John 10:35. Furthermore, it is generally admitted that no set of men could have written such a wonderful life in the Gospels of an imaginary Christ. He must have lived and been all that the Bible pictures Him to be. But if He did live, then the Bible is true for Christ and the Bible stand or fall together! Great Fact III. The Plan all through the Bible. (Following Collett.) 1 The Bible begins, as we would expect it to, with God, Genesis 1:1, but it ends with man, the last of God’s creations. Revelation 22:21. But in the middle verse of the Bible, Psalm 118:8, God and man separated by sin so far apart, are brought together. This indicates that the purpose of the written Word, is the same as that of the Living Word (Christ), to bring God and man together. 2 The Old Testament begins with God, Genesis 1:1. The New Testament begins with Christ, Matthew 1:1. 3 In the Old Testament we have chiefly a revelation of God the Father. In the Gospels, of God the Son; in the Acts, of God the Holy Spirit; and in the Epistles, of the full Trinity, Father, Son and Holy Spirit. 4 The History of the Bible takes us back into what would otherwise be the unknown past. The prophecies take us forward into what would otherwise be the unknown future. The spiritual teaching of the Bible leads us into what would otherwise be an unknown salvation and character. 5 From Adam to Abraham we have the history of the human race, from Abraham to Christ, the history of the chosen race; but from Christ on, we have the history of neither the human race, nor the chosen race, but of the churches of the living God. 6 In Eden we had one law given to man,—but it was broken. At Sinai the whole law was given to man-but was broken. However, the God-man came to earth and perfectly kept the law for man, so that at the judgement it should not be a witness against him. 5 Lesson No. 1—The Bible. 7 The Old Testament deals chiefly with the law, yet it nevertheless contains much of grace Isaiah 53. The New Testament deals chiefly with grace, yet it establishes the Law. Romans 3:31. 8 The law came by Moses, but grace came by Jesus Christ. John 1:17. In keeping with this first miracle of Moses was the turning of the water into blood, a type of death. Exodus 7:19. While the first miracle of Christ was the turning of the water into wine. John 2:1-11, a type of life and strength. 9 There is a distinct plan in the individual books of the Bible, for example:—In Genesis we have the sacrifice for the individual—Abel. In Exodus, for the household—the Passover. In Leviticus, for the nation. In John, for the world. 10 There is progress also in the teachings of the gospels, for Matthew closes with the Resurrection, Mark with the Ascension, Luke with the promise of the Spirit, and John speaks of His Second Coming. 11 There is a divine order in the epistles, for James is the epistle of WORKS. Paul’s of FAITH, Peter’s of HOPE, and John’s of LOVE! 12 Comparing the beginning of the Bible with the end, we have:— —In the beginning:— • God created the heavens and the earth. • End—New heavens and new earth. • Beginning—Satan enters to deceive. • End—Satan cast out that he may deceive the nations no more. • Beginning—Sin, pain, sorrow, death. • End—no more death, neither sorrow nor crying. • Beginning—Tree of life, and man driven away from it. • End—Tree of life, and the leaves of the tree for the healing of the nations. • Beginning—Woman taken from man’s side. • End—Church taken from Christ’s side.

Beginning—Earth purged by water. • End—Earth purged by fire. • Beginning—Paradise lost. • End—Paradise regained. LESSON—The wonderful inspiration and plan, running through all the 66 books and 1600 years Of the Bible should so impress us with its divine origin, that we should receive it with personal faith, appropriate its messages to ourselves, and put our own names in every promise. Only, as we read it, believe it, and practice it, shall we be wise, safe and Holy AND BECOME GODS AND GODDESSES! Love Yahweh {lion} aka Martyn - Yeshua {lamb} aka Dua = love Lipa = beautiful MANIFESTATIONS NUMBER SEVEN FINAL COMPLETENESS AND PERFECTION T0 LEAD WITH THE HoLY SPIIT TO GUIDE US AND THOSe CALLED OUT INTO ETERNITY as it is written = AMEN AWOMAN AFAMILY AS ONE Yeshua and His Bride and WIFE as the  temple church ministries etcetera come as GOD - ess from heaven to cover our world -  universe

 

🎺 🌳 🎺 🌳 NOW PLEASE LISTEN TO THOSE WITH AN EAR TO HEAR>God Jesus tHE Holy Ghost are Spiritual tHE Tree Of Life> IS   godstruechurch.org   

With regard to the Menorah, the understanding that it symbolizes the Tree of Life also has great prophetic significance. More than a mere symbolic meaning, it may be that the Menorah, placed in the Holy Place of the Tabernacle and later in the Temple on Mount Moriah, represents the actual Tree ofLife>godstruechurch.org that once existed in the same place Spiritual and tHE NEW Jerusalem> The Garden Of Edon – the one and only unique place tHE GodHead chose as His Being ONE> dwelling place on Earth.godstruechurch.org within The Tree Of Life where Jesus dwells aMEN 

 

The Tree of life then the LORD God said, “Behold, the man has become like one of Us, knowing good and evil; and now, lest he stretches out his hand, and take also from the tree of life, and eat, and live forever” — therefore the LORD God sent him out from the garden of Eden, to cultivate the ground from which he was taken (Genesis 3:22-23). As previously shown, God planted the Tree of Life and the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil in the centre of the Garden of Eden, at the site of Jerusalem. When Adam and Eve ate from the tree of Knowledge in disobedience to God, they became spiritually separated from Him. As a result, God barred access to the Tree of Life, which endowed the partaker with eternal life. So we see that one tree was the source of eternal life and the other tree became a source of spiritual death and separation from God because of man’s sin. The choice between obedience to God which leads to eternal life with Him, and disobedience which leads to spiritual death and eternal separation from Him, was placed before Adam and Eve, as it is for each and every human being.

 

As the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil is associated with humanity’s sin and need for salvation, the Tree of Life is associated with humanity’s redemption and spiritual restoration to God,

 

ADAM AND EVE LOST ACCESS TO THE TREE OF LIFE BECAUSE OF SIN

After Adam and Eve disobeyed the one commandment not to eat of the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil, God sent them out of the Garden of Eden, and placed cherubim to prevent access to the Tree of Life: Then the LORD God said, “Behold, the man has become like one of Us, knowing good and evil; and now, lest he stretches out his hand, and take also from the tree of life, and eat, and live forever” — therefore the LORD God sent him out from the garden of Eden, to cultivate the ground from which he was taken. So He drove the man out; and at the east of the garden of Eden, He stationed the cherubim, and the flaming sword which turned every direction, to guard the way to the tree of life (Genesis 3:22-24). Note that God refers to Himself in the plural “Us”, revealing the triune nature of God the Father, God the Son, and God the Holy Spirit. As a result of their disobedience, Adam and Eve could no longer be in the direct presence of God. But God made the one and only way of salvation through His Son, Messiah Yeshua, for them and all humanity to be restored spiritually and to have eternal life with Him (Genesis 3:15; John 3:16). When Yeshua came into the world, He fulfilled the prophecy of the suffering servant of Isaiah 53, a detailed description of the crucifixion. In this and the following chapters, we will show how the fulfilment of this prophecy may link to the Tree of Life and a branch from it, referred to by various names: Aaron’s rod, Moses’ rod, and the rod of God.

 

THE TEMPLE MENORAH LINK TO THE ALMOND TREE AND TREE OF LIFE The Tabernacle and its furnishings were made according to the specific pattern God showed to Moses: “According to all that I [the LORD] am going to show you, as the pattern of the tabernacle and the pattern of all its furniture, just so you shall construct it” (Exodus 25:9, emphasis added). This includes the Menorah: “Then you shall make a lampstand [menorah] of pure gold. The lampstand and its base and its shaft are to be made of hammered work; its cups, its bulbs and its flowers shall be of one piece with it. And six branches shall go out from its sides; three branches of the lampstand from its one side, and three branches of the lampstand from its other side. Three cups shall be shaped like almond blossoms in the one branch, a bulb and a flower, and three cups shaped like almond blossoms in the other branch, a bulb and a flower — so for six branches going out from the lampstand; and in the lampstand four cups shaped like almond blossoms, its bulbs and its flowers. And a bulb shall be under the first pair of branches coming out of it, and a bulb under the second pair of branches coming out of it, and a bulb under the third pair of branches coming out of it, for the six branches coming out of the lampstand. Their bulbs and their branches shall be of one piece with it; all of it shall be one piece of hammered work of pure gold. Then you shall make its lamps seven in number, and they shall mount its lamps so as to shed light on the space in front of it. And its snuffers and their trays shall be of pure gold. It shall be made from a talent of pure gold, with all these utensils. And see that you make them after the pattern for them, which was shown to you on the mountain” (Exodus 25:31-40, emphasis added).

 

The Menorah is a seven-branched candelabrum. The Number Seven occurs throughout the Word of God and represents spiritual perfection and completion.It is seven, therefore, that stamps with perfection and completeness that in connection with which it is used. Of time, it tells of the Sabbath and marks off the week of seven days. …In the creative works of God, seven completes the colours of the spectrum and rainbow and satisfies in music the notes of the scale.There are seven days in the week, the seventh day being the Sabbath day; seven years in the sabbatical cycle, the seventh year for the land to rest; seven days in the Feast of unleavened bread; seven days in the Feast of Tabernacles (Sukkot); Seven Churches, Seven Seals, SevenTrumpets, and Seven Bowls in the Book of Revelation; and Seven Branches of the Menorah.This pattern of seven repeating in Creation and God’s Master Plan of Redemption reveals theHand of the Creator, His prophetic pattern and design. With regard to the Menorah, the understanding that it symbolizes the Tree of Life also has great prophetic significance. More than a mere symbolic meaning, it may be that the Menorah, placed in the Holy Place of the Tabernacle and later in the Temple on Mount Moriah, represents the actual Tree ofLife>godstruechurch.org that once existed in the same place – the one and only unique place God chose as His dwelling place on Earth.If the Menorah does indeed represent the Tree of Life, then the pattern God gave to Moses of the Menorah possessing features of the almond tree reveals that the Tree of Life was an almond tree.We will show more evidence that supports this understanding.AARON’S ROD – A BRANCH FROM AN ALMOND TREE When Korah led the rebellion against the authority of Moses, and Aaron as high priest, the Lord commanded each Tribe of Israel to bring the rod (staff – symbol of authority) of its leader, to be placed in front of the Ark of the Covenant (“the testimony” – Numbers 17:4). God said that He would give a sign to show and confirm the leader He chose by having his rod supernaturally sprout: “And it will come about that the rod of the man whom I choose will sprout. Thus I shall lessen from upon Myself the grumblings of the sons of Israel, who are grumbling against you” (Numbers 17:5, emphasis added). It's Supernatural Design and Spiritual Significance, p. 168. 3 Ellen Frankel and Betsy Platkin Teutsch, The Encyclopedia of Jewish Symbols, p. 106.6 Now it came about on the next day that Moses went into the tent of the testimony, and behold, the rod of Aaron for the house of Levi had sprouted and put forth buds and produced blossoms, and it bore ripe almonds. …But the LORD said to Moses, “Put back the rod of Aaron before the testimony [Ark of the Covenant] to be kept as a sign against the rebels, that you may put an end to their grumblings against Me so that they should not die.” Thus Moses did; just as the LORD had commanded him, so he did (Numbers 17:8, 10-11, emphasis added). God confirmed that He gave His authority to Moses and Aaron by having Aaron’s rod supernaturally sprout buds, blossoms, and ripe almonds. God then commanded Moses to place Aaron's rod before the Ark of the Covenant as a sign:… it was then placed before the Ark in the Holy of Holies to be preserved as a witness against all who might rebel against his [Aaron’s] authority (cf. Heb 9:4).4 Very tellingly, Aaron’s rod produced almond buds, almond blossoms, and ripe almonds, showing that it was a branch from an almond tree.This was a very special almond rod, the same rod that belonged to Moses also called the rod of God: The rod referred to is very likely the same shepherd’s rod that Moses was carrying at the time of his call (Exod 4:2 RSV), and when turned into a serpent, became a sign to Moses and Aaron, to Israel and to Pharaoh, of the divine mission and authority of Moses (v. 17). It is twice called “the rod of God” (4:20; 17:9), but usually either Moses’ rod (e.g. 4:17) or Aaron’s rod (e.g. 7:14-20). …All of these expressions are natural in view of the significance of the rod. It was called the “rod of God,” for it was the symbol of His authority; it was Moses’ rod because it belonged to him; it was also Aaron’s rod because Aaron at times spoke and acted for Moses. Merrill C. Tenney (General Editor), The Zondervan Pictorial Encyclopedia of the Bible, Vol. 1, p. 5. 5 The Zondervan Pictorial Encyclopedia of the Bible, Vol. 1, p 5.7 God worked many supernatural signs through this unique almond rod, showing His power, authority, protection, provision, and redemption: And the LORD said to him [Moses], “What is that in your hand?” And he said, “A staff.” Then He said, “Throw it on the ground.” So he threw it on the ground, and it became a serpent, and Moses fled from it. But the LORD said to Moses,“Stretch out your hand and grasp it by its tail” — so he stretched out his hand and caught it, and it became a staff in his hand — that they may believe that the LORD, the God of their fathers, the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob, has appeared to you” (Exodus 4:2-5, emphasis added).“And you shall take in your hand this staff, with which you shall perform the signs” (Exodus 4:17, emphasis added).“When Pharaoh speaks to you, saying, ‘Work a miracle,’ then you shall say to Aaron, ‘Take your staff and throw it down before Pharaoh, that it may become a serpent.’” So Moses and Aaron came to Pharaoh, and thus they did just as the LORD had commanded, and Aaron threw his staff down before Pharaoh and his servants, and it became a serpent. Then Pharaoh also called for the wise men and the sorcerers, and they also, the magicians [sorcerers with real demonic power] of Egypt, did the same with their secret arts. For each one threw down his staff and they turned into serpents. But Aaron’s staff swallowed up their staffs (Exodus 7:9-12, emphasis added).But Moses said to the people, “Do not fear! Stand by and see the salvation of the LORD which He will accomplish for you today; for the Egyptians, whom you have seen today, you will never see them again forever. “The LORD will fight for you while you keep silent.”

 

Then the LORD said to Moses, “Why are you crying out to Me? Tell the sons of Israel to go forward. “And as for you, lift up your staff and stretch out your hand over the sea and divide it, and the sons of Israel shall go through the midst of the sea on dry land” (Exodus 14:13-16, emphasis added). Then the LORD said to Moses, “Pass before the people and take with you some of the elders of Israel; and take in your hand your staff with which you struck the Nile, and go. “Behold, I will stand before you there on the rock at Horeb, and you shall strike the rock, and water will come out of it, that the people may drink.” And Moses did so in the sight of the elders of Israel(Exodus 17:5-6, emphasis added). So Moses said to Joshua, “Choose men for us and go out, fight against Amalek. Tomorrow I will station myself on the top of the hill with the staff of God in my hand.” And Joshua did as Moses told him, and fought against Amalek; and Moses, Aaron, and Hur went up to the top of the hill. So it came about when Moses held his hand up, that Israel prevailed, and when he let his hand down, Amalek prevailed. But Moses’ hands were heavy. Then they took a stone and put it under him, and he sat on it; and Aaron and Hur supported his hands, one on one side and one on the other. Thus his hands were steady until the sunset. So Joshua overwhelmed Amalek and his people with the edge of the sword(Exodus 17:9-13, emphasis added). Aaron’s rod was clearly a branch from an almond tree. Interestingly, there is a legend that Moses's rod, another name for Aaron’s rod, came from the Tree of Life.

 

In the following chapter, we show how it might be possible to trace Aaron’s rod back through the generations ofGod’s people to Adam, showing that this special and unique almond rod may in fact be a branch from the Tree of Life. With this understanding, it is prophetically significant and meaningful that God instructed Moses to place Aaron’s rod before the Ark of the Covenant in the Holy of Holies of the Tabernacle as a sign. When the Temple on Mount Moriah replaced the Tabernacle, Aaron’s rod remained before the Ark of the Covenant in the Holy of Holies, the place God dwelled> godstruechurch.org – the same place where the tree of life existed in the Garden of Eden on Mount Moriah. J

 

JEREMIAH’S VISION OF THE ROD OF AN ALMOND TREE God revealed the New Covenant that would be made by Messiah Yeshua to the prophet Jeremiah: Alan Unterman, Dictionary of Jewish Lore and Legend, p. 201. Legends – oral traditions passed down over the generations – often contain key historical facts. For example, Heinrich Schliemann used the oral traditions recorded in the Iliad to find the ancient city of Troy. “Behold, days are coming,” declares the LORD, “when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah, not like the covenant which I made with their fathers in the day I took them by the hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt, My covenant which they broke, although I was a husband to them,” declares the LORD. But this is the covenant which I will make with the house of Israel after those days,” declares the LORD, “I will put my law within them, and on their heart, I will write it; and I will be their God, and they shall be My people” (Jeremiah 31:31-33, emphasis added).

 

Jeremiah was also given a vision of the “rod of an almond tree”: And the word of the LORD came to me saying, “What do you see, Jeremiah?”And I said, “I see a rod of an almond tree.” Then the LORD said to me, “You have seen well, for I am watching over My word to perform it.” (Jeremiah 1:11-12, emphasis added). Again, we see a reference to a branch or rod from an almond tree. With regard to this particular rod of an almond tree, the Lord says something of the greatest prophetic significance: “I am watching over My word to perform it.”In Chapter 6 “The Rod of God”, we show how the almond rod that Jeremiah saw may be connected to the tree upon which Messiah Yeshua was crucified, a tree that may have grown from Aaron’s rod. If so, just as Aaron’s rod had been used as an instrument of God’s redemption for the Israelites during the Exodus and wilderness period, Aaron’s rod may have also been used as an instrument of God’s ultimate and final redemption in the crucifixion of Messiah Yeshua. THE TREE OF LIFE, AARON’S ROD, AND THE CRUCIFIXION TREE As explained in the previous chapters, the prophetic pattern shows that the Tree of Life existed in the place where God fellowshipped with Adam and Eve in the centre of the the the Garden of Eden, on Mount Moriah. This is the place God not only chose to dwell with Adam and Eve but also the place He chose to dwell in the Temple> godstruechurch.org And this will be the place where Messiah Yeshua establishes His Throne during the Millennial Kingdom (Revelation 20:4). Inside the Holy Place of the Temple was the Menorah, decorated with almond buds and blossoms, showing a connection to the almond tree. As previously mentioned, the Menorah symbolizes the Tree of Life. Here we have a connection to the Tree of Life that existed on Mount Moriah, where God fellowshipped with Adam and Eve. Aaron’s rod sprouted almond buds and blossoms, and ripe almonds, clearly showing that it was a branch from an almond tree. God instructed Moses to place Aaron’s rod before the Ark of the Covenant in the Holy of Holies of the Tabernacle. When the Temple on Mount Moriah replaced the Tabernacle, Aaron’s rod remained before the Ark of the Covenant in the Holy of Holies, the place God dwelled. We believe that this shows a connection of Aaron’s rod to the Tree of Life. Why did God choose to have the Temple Menorah decorated with almond buds and blossoms if not to show the special significance of the almond tree? God commanded that Aaron’s rod, a branch from an almond tree, be placed in front of the Ark of the Covenant also seems to show and confirm this special significance of the almond tree. We believe that this shows that the Tree of Life was an almond tree and that Aaron’s rod was a branch from it. Significantly, Aaron’s rod was the instrument of God’s redemption during the Israelites’ Exodus from Egypt. Jeremiah’s vision of a rod from an almond tree connects to Aaron’s rod and also has special significance in the fulfilment of God’s Master Plan of Redemption, for the Lord said: “Iam watching over my word to perform it” (Jeremiah 1:11).“My word” refers to The Word, Messiah Yeshua (John 1:1-4). Father God was watching over the almond rod and His Son, Messiah Yeshua, to perform it, meaning to perform the act of redemption necessary to save humanity from its sins – the crucifixion. Psalm 22 is a prophetic picture of the crucifixion and ends with the words “He has performed it”, referring to Messiah Yeshua (Psalm 22:31). This is what Yeshua meant when He said: “It is finished!” (John 19:30).

 

When Yeshua was crucified, He cried out: “My God, My God, why has Thou forsaken me?”(Matthew 27:46; Mark 15:34). By stating the first words of Psalm 22, He was directing the attention of those who saw Him being crucified to Psalm 22, a detailed prophetic picture of the crucifixion. Yeshua’s last words before He died also came from Psalm 22 (the last words of the Psalm), showing prophetic fulfilment not only of Psalm 22 but also the fulfilment of what God showed Jeremiah. In the following chapters, we will show how the almond rod in Jeremiah’s vision may link to Aaron’s rod, and to the tree upon which Messiah Yeshua was crucified. From one man, Adam, sin and death came into the world; from one man, Yeshua, the Son of God(and fully God with the Father), came redemption, the forgiveness of sin and eternal life: Therefore, just as through one man sin entered into the world, and death through sin, and so death spread to all men because all sinned … Nevertheless death reigned from Adam until Moses, even over those who had not sinned in the likeness of the offence of Adam, who is a type of Him who was to come. But the free gift is not like the transgression. For if by the transgressions of the one the many died, much more did the grace of God and the gift by the grace of the one Man, Jesus [Yeshua] Christ [Messiah], abound to the many. And the gift is not like that which came through the one who sinned; for on the one hand the judgment arose from one transgression resulting in condemnation, but on the other hand, the free gift arose from many transgressions resulting in justification. For if by the transgression of the one, death reigned through the one, much more those who receive the abundance of grace and of the gift of righteousness will reign in life through the One, Jesus [Yeshua] Christ[Messiah]. So then through one transgression there resulted in condemnation to all men, even so through one act of righteousness there resulted in the justification of life to all men. For as through the one man’s disobedience [Adam] the many were made sinners, even so through the obedience of the One[Messiah Yeshua] the many will be made righteous (Romans 5:12, 14-19, emphasis added). For since by a man [Adam] came death, by a man [Yeshua] also came the resurrection of the dead. For as in Adam all die, so also in Christ[Messiah] all shall be made alive (1 Corinthians 15:21-22, emphasis added). According to the same type of prophetic pattern, from one tree, the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil came sin and death; from another tree, the Tree of Life, came redemption, the forgiveness of sin, and eternal life with God. THE TREE OF LIFE IN THE NEW JERUSALEM godstruechurch.org Spiritual> The Word of God does not tell us what happened to the Tree of Life in the Garden of  Eden. However, being God's Spiritual church, therefore, being Spiritual will always exist.  Also, there is a Tree of Life in the New Jerusalem, as described in the Book of Revelation: Then the angel showed me the river of the water of life, as clear as crystal, flowing from the throne of God and of the Lamb down the middle of the great street of the city. On each side of the river stood the tree of life, bearing twelve crops of fruit, yielding its fruit every month. And the leaves of the tree are for the healing of the nations. No longer will there be any curse. The throne of God and of the Lamb will be in the city, and his servants will serve him. They will see his face and his name will be on their foreheads. There will be no more night. They will not need the light of a lamp or the light of the sun, for the Lord God will give them light. And they will reign forever and ever (Revelation 22:1-5, NIV, emphasis added).

 

The New Jerusalem is the Heavenly Jerusalem, the pattern for the Earthly Jerusalem. At the centre of the New Jerusalem is the Throne of God and the Lamb of God, Messiah Yeshua. This corresponds to the Temple on Mount Moriah, and as we have shown, the Tree of Life on Mount Moriah in the Garden of Eden. In Heavenly Jerusalem, the Tree of Life is also associated with the Throne of God. The Tree of Life in New Jerusalem produces fruit every month for twelve months, and the leaves of the tree are for the healing of the nations. It is also being godstruechurch.org turning from Spiritual to Visible for ALL to worship Our Lord. In the Word of God, the Number Twelve: is a perfect number, signifying perfection of government, or of governmental perfection. It is found as a multiple in all that has to do with rules. The sun which“rules” the day, and the moon and stars which “govern” the night, do so by their passage through the twelve signs of the [Biblical] Zodiac which completes the great circle of the heavens of 360 (12 x 30) degrees or divisions, and thus govern the year. Twelve is the product of 3 (the perfectly Divine and heavenly number) and 4 (the earthly, the number of what is material and organic). …When we come to the New Testament we find the same great principle pervading the Apostolic government as we see in the Patriarchal and National, for we have: The twelve Apostles. The twelve foundations in the heavenly Jerusalem.The twelve gates.The twelve pearls. The twelve angels. From the Throne of God in the Heavenly Jerusalem flows “the river of the water of life”, corresponding to the Gihon Spring in Jerusalem. The prophet Ezekiel describes water flowing from the ground on the south side of the altar of the future Third Temple (Ezekiel’s Temple), the throne of the Lamb of God, Messiah Yeshua (Ezekiel 47:1 -12 – “house” refers to God’s House, the church and Temple). This water likely comes from the Gihon Spring, and its emergence at the surface by the Temple probably results from the major earthquake that will split the Mount of Olives at Yeshua's Second Coming (Zechariah 14:4). The trees growing along this river, from water flowing from the Temple of God on Mount Moriah, will bear food every month; their fruit for food and their leaves for healing, like the Tree of Life in the New Jerusalem of Eternity.“And by the river on its bank, on one side and on the other, will grow all kinds of trees for food. Their leaves will not wither, and their fruit will not fail. They will bear every month because their water flows from the sanctuary, and their fruit will be for food and their leaves for healing” (Ezekiel 47:12, emphasis added). To all those who trust in Messiah Yeshua for salvation, He gives “the right to the tree of life” and to drink from the “water of life”, eternal life with God: "Behold, I am coming soon! My reward is with me, and I will give to everyone according to what he has done. I am the Alpha [Aleph] and the Omega [Tav], tHE First and the Last, the Beginning and tHE End. "Blessed are those who wash their robes, that they may have the right to the tree of life and may go through the gates into the city. … “I, Jesus [Yeshua], have sent my angel to give you this testimony for the churches. I am the Root and the Offspring of David, and the bright Morning Star.” The Spirit and the bride say, “Come!”And let him who hears say, “Come!” Whoever is thirsty, let him come; Buand whoever wishes, let him take the free gift of the water of life”(Revelation 22:12-14, 16-17, NIV, emphasis added). aMEN

Ubiquitous.jpg

HELP US TO SPREAD OUR
LOVE AND FAITH AND TO GLORIFY OUR LORD

                                                 SayHEth tHE LORD. ‘Do not I fill heaven and earth Whilst SEEING ALL?’ declares tHE LORD.”

                 

                                                                                    "UBIQUITOUS":

🎺  God  ( JESUS ) did say, `You must not eat fruit from the tree that is in the middle of the garden, and you must not touch it, or you will die. "You will not surely die," the serpent said to the woman. "For God knows that when you eat of it your eyes will be opened, and you will be like God, knowing good and evil."  

Who told you that you were naked?” the LORD God asked. “Have you eaten from the tree whose fruit I commanded you not to eat?” Genesis chapter 3 verse 11 ~ And Now Through Yeshua is tHE only way back INTO tHE GARDEN Amen

 

John 6:51-58

[yehōshu'a said,] EAT ME ~ “I am the living bread that came down from heaven. Whoever eats of this bread will live forever, and the bread that I will give for the life of the world is my flesh.”

The Jews then disputed among themselves, saying, “How can this man give us his flesh to eat?”

So Jesus said to them, “Very truly, I tell you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood, you have no life in you. Those who eat my flesh and drink my blood have eternal life, and I will raise them up on the last day; for my flesh is true food and my blood is true drink. Those who eat my flesh and drink my blood abide in me, and I in them. Just as the living Father sent me, and I live because of the Father, so whoever eats me will live because of me. This is the bread that came down from heaven, not like that which your ancestors ate, and they died. But the one who eats this bread will live forever.” AMEN

adam-eve-and-the-serpent.jpg
Garden of Paradise_edited.jpg

Fall of Adam and Eve

Overview

In the Garden of Eden, God commanded, “Of every tree of the garden thou mayest freely eat, but of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it, nevertheless, thou mayest choose for thyself, for it is given unto thee; but remember that I forbid it, for in the day thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die” (Moses 3:16–17). Because Adam and Eve transgressed this command and partook of the fruit of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, they were cast out from the presence of the Lord (see Doctrine and Covenants 29:40–41). In other words, they experienced spiritual death. They also became mortal—subject to physical death. This spiritual and physical death is called the Fall.

Our Fallen Condition

As descendants of Adam and Eve, we inherit a fallen condition during mortality (see Alma 42:5–9, 14). We are separated from the presence of the Lord and subject to physical death. We are also placed in a state of opposition, in which we are tested by the difficulties of life and the temptations of the adversary (see 2 Nephi 2:11–14Doctrine and Covenants 29:39Moses 6:48–49).

In this fallen condition, we have a conflict within us. We are spirit children of God, with the potential to be “partakers of the divine nature” (2 Peter 1:4). However, “we are unworthy before [God]; because of the fall our natures have become evil continually” (Ether 3:2). We need to strive continually to overcome unrighteous passions and desires.

Repeating the words of an angel, King Benjamin said, “The natural man is an enemy to God, and has been from the fall of Adam.” King Benjamin warned that in this natural, or fallen, state, each person will be an enemy to God forever “unless he yields to the enticings of the Holy Spirit, and putteth off the natural man and becometh a saint through the atonement of Christ the Lord, and becometh as a child, submissive, meek, humble, patient, full of love, willing to submit to all things which the Lord seeth fit to inflict upon him, even as a child doth submit to his father” (Mosiah 3:19).

Benefits of the Fall

The Fall is an integral part of Heavenly Father’s plan of salvation (see 2 Nephi 2:15–169:6). It has a twofold direction—downward yet forward. In addition to introducing physical and spiritual death, it gave us the opportunity to be born on the earth and to learn and progress. Through our righteous exercise of agency and our sincere repentance when we sin, we can come unto Christ and, through His Atonement, prepare to receive the gift of eternal life. The prophet Lehi taught:

“If Adam had not transgressed he would not have fallen, but he would have remained in the garden of Eden. And all things which were created must have remained in the same state in which they were after they were created; and they must have remained forever, and had no end.

“And [Adam and Eve] would have had no children; wherefore they would have remained in a state of innocence, having no joy, for they knew no misery; doing no good, for they knew no sin.

“But behold, all things have been done in the wisdom of him who knoweth all things.

“Adam fell that men might be; and men are, that they might have joy.

“And the Messiah cometh in the fulness of time, that he may redeem the children of men from the fall” (2 Nephi 2:22–26; see also 2 Nephi 2:19–21, 27).

Adam and Eve expressed their gratitude for the blessings that came as a result of the Fall:

“Adam blessed God and was filled, and began to prophesy concerning all the families of the earth, saying: Blessed be the name of God, for because of my transgression my eyes are opened, and in this life I shall have joy, and again in the flesh I shall see God.

“And Eve, his wife, heard all these things and was glad, saying: Were it not for our transgression we never should have had seed, and never should have known good and evil, and the joy of our redemption, and the eternal life which God giveth unto all the obedient” (Moses 5:10–11).

Redemption from the Fall

Because of our fallen, mortal nature and our individual sins, our only hope is in Jesus Christ and the plan of redemption.

Through the Atonement of Jesus Christ, everyone will be redeemed from the effects of the Fall. We will be resurrected, and we will be brought back into the presence of the Lord to be judged (see 2 Nephi 2:5–10Alma 11:42–45Helaman 14:15–17).

In addition to redeeming us from the universal effects of the Fall, the Savior can redeem us from our own sins. In our fallen state, we sin and distance ourselves from the Lord, bringing spiritual death upon ourselves. As the Apostle Paul said, “All have sinned, and come short of the glory of God” (Romans 3:23). If we remain in our sins, we cannot dwell in the presence of God, for “no unclean thing can dwell … in his presence” (Moses 6:57). Thankfully, the Atonement “bringeth to pass the condition of repentance” (Helaman 14:18), making it possible for us to receive forgiveness for our sins and dwell in the presence of God forever. Alma taught, “There was a space granted unto man in which he might repent; therefore this life became a probationary state; a time to prepare to meet God; a time to prepare for that endless state which has been spoken of by us, which is after the resurrection of the dead” (Alma 12:24).

Gratitude for the Savior’s Atoning Sacrifice

Just as we do not really desire food until we are hungry, we will not fully desire eternal salvation until we recognize our need for the Savior. This recognition comes as we grow in our understanding of the Fall. As the prophet Lehi taught, “All mankind were in a lost and in a fallen state, and ever would be save they should rely on this Redeemer” (1 Nephi 10:6).


 

 

 

 

 

THE GARDEN OF EDEN AS GOD'S FIRST SANCTUARY BEING> GODSTRUEcHURCH.ORiGinal A Visualization can be a powerful tool for understanding the Bible. Many people relate to the Bible as a book to be read, so that the fact that for most of its history the Bible was heard, rather than read, often comes as a surprise. Engaging with the Bible aurally relies on the listener's ability to visualize the heard words – to concretely see the pictures behind the words. These visual images, without words, convey many of the Bible's important ideas. When I applied visualization to reading the Garden of Eden story, a dra-matic and nuanced picture emerged. Attention to the story's visual setting and details described in the Bible made me aware of specific visual, concrete im-agery. The new layers of meaning that emerged, some of them alluded to in later biblical texts and some in midrashim, are mostly ignored by mainstream Jewish interpretations of the Eden story. Most of us, when asked to describe the setting of the Garden of Eden, pic-ture the tree, the snake and the woman, sometimes with the man in the back-ground, and little more. This changes after we pay specific attention to the visual setting. The Lord God planted a garden in Eden, in the east, and placed there the man whom He had formed. And from the ground the Lord God caused to grow every tree that was pleasing to the sight and good for food, with the tree of life in the middle of the garden, and the tree of knowledge of good and bad. A river issues from Eden to water the garden, and it then divides and becomes four branches . . . The Lord God took the man and placed him in the garden of Eden, to till and tend it (Gen: 2:8-10, 15). They heard the sound of the Lord God moving about in the garden . . . and the man and his wife hid from the Lord God among the trees of the garden . . . So the Lord God banished him from the garden of Eden, to till the soil from which he was taken. He drove the man out, and stationed east of the garden of Eden the cherubim and the fiery ever-turning sword, to guard the way to the tree of life (Gen: 3:8, 23-24).LIFSA SCHACHTER JEWISH BIBLE QUARTERLY 74 Putting the story's visual clues together leads to placing Eden on a moun-tain top, because the rivers flow downward from there. It is an enclosed space with only one entrance, for otherwise the cherubim could not have success-fully guarded access to the tree in the centre of the Garden. The Garden is oriented eastward. And finally, included in the picture of the Garden are cherubim and a fiery ever-turning sword. As each detail builds on the previous one, a complex scene emerges. Eden is not only a lush garden but also a sacred space, sharing characteristics with other mountain-top shrines found throughout the ancient Near East. The par-allels between the Garden of Eden, the desert Tabernacle and the later Holy Temple in Jerusalem and other Near Eastern sanctuaries are striking. The wonder is why this connection is generally not apparent to the average reader of the Bible. When visualization first led me to these parallels, I was not aware that scholars have written about the Garden of Eden as a sacred sanctuary. Their articles are based on studies of ancient languages, exploration of archeologi-cal sites and intensive comparative textual study.1Amazingly, any reader can also arrive at this same understanding through the simple process of visualiz-ing the text. That Eden was originally understood as a sanctuary can be confirmed by examining the Bible for supporting evidence. A partial listing includes the description of the Tabernacle as God's dwelling place: And let them make Me a sanctuary that I may dwell among them (Ex. 25:8). Implicit in the Garden story is the idea that Eden was God's dwelling place, where He dwelt in close proximity to the first man and woman. In Deuteronomy the Temple is called God's habitation (12:4). While this is not the precise language used in Gene-sis, the Garden is portrayed as the place where God's presence abided. When They heard the sound of the Lord God moving about in the garden at the breezy time of day, they recognized Him (implicitly from other encounters), and Adam and his wife hid from the Lord God among the trees of the garden(Gen. 3:8). This point is reinforced by linguistic parallels. The Hebrew mith-allekh is precisely the verb used to describe both God's "walking about" in the Garden and His moving about to protect the Israelites in the desert, where they are instructed to keep their camp holy (Deut. 23:15). THE GARDEN OF EDEN AS GOD'S FIRST SANCTUARY BEING>GODSTRUEcHURCH.ORiGinal> Like the Tabernacle, the Garden is oriented eastward: And those who were to pitch before the Mishkan eastward, before the Tent of Meeting toward the sunrise (Ex. 27:16, Num. 3:38). The cherubim appear only in the context of both sanctuaries – the Tabernacle and Temple – and the Garden of Eden. The cherubim are to be placed above the ark, the space between them is the meet-ing place with God (Ex. 25: 17-22), and they guard the way to Eden (Gen. 3:24). In both contexts they are the guardians of the "Tree of Life": the actual tree in the Garden of Eden and the tablets, the figurative "Tree of Life", in the ark.2 Fire is a significant element in Eden, where the fiery ever-turning sword guards the entrance (Gen. 3:24). Fire also represents God in the desert (Ex. 12:9) and is ever present in the sanctuary (Ex. 27:20-21). Adam's role in the Garden also alludes to the sanctuary. His task in the Garden is to work it and guard it (Gen. 2:15). These two verbs are precisely the ones used to describe the work of the Levites in caring for the Tabernacle, suggesting a priest-like role for Adam (Num. 3:7-8). After Adam and his wife sin, they are thrust out of Eden, anticipating puri-fication rites in the sanctuary. That a sanctuary >GODSTRUEcHURCH.ORiGinal>must be cleansed of sin and sinners is a major theme of Leviticus: Thus he shall purge the Shrine of the uncleanness and transgression of the Israelites (Lev. 16:16). Moreover, references to the Temple are filled with garden imagery: But I am like a thriving olive tree in God's house (Ps. 52:10); The righteous bloom like a date-palm; they thrive like a cedar in Lebanon; planted in the house of the Lord (Ps. 92:13-14). The Menorah, the Temple's lampstand, is described as having seven branches and it is adorned with petals, almond blossoms and other botanical elements (Ex. 25:31-40). The two trees in the Garden, the tree of life and the tree of knowledge of good and evil, call to mind Jachin and Boaz, the tree-like pillars that flanked the entrance to the Temple, decorated with pomegranates and topped with a lily design (I Kgs. 7: 13-22). This selection of biblical texts makes it clear that, throughout the period of the Bible, Eden was commonly perceived as an archetype of the Temple. The Book of Psalms, as we have seen earlier, and the later prophets refer both directly and indirectly to Eden as a garden of the Lord. LIFSA SCHACHTER JEWISH BIBLE QUARTERLY >Truly the Lord has comforted Zion, comforted all her ruins: He has made her wilderness like Eden, her desert like the Garden of the Lord (Isa. 51:3). You were in Eden, the garden of God (Ezek. 28:13). Cedars in the garden of God could not compare with it; Cypresses could not match its boughs, and plain trees could not vie with its branches; No tree in the garden of God was its peer in beauty (Ezek. 31:8). The correspondence between Temple and Eden is found in both Talmud and Midrash. One example is a midrash that makes this point explicitly when commenting on the verse, The Lord God banished him from the garden of Eden, to till the soil (Gen. 3:23). This midrash comments: "He took him from the Garden of Eden and placed him on Mount Moriah to serve God until the day of his death" (Midrash ha-Gadol, Bereshit, 3:23). Why has this image of Eden as a sanctuary all but disappeared from Jewish exegesis in favour of Eden's transformation into a celestial paradise, the eternal abode of the righteous? My intuitive assumption is that this took place be-cause the bearers of Jewish tradition wanted to distance themselves from the Christian view of Jesus as a reincarnation of Adam, the original priest, with Eden as his sanctuary>GODSTRUEcHURCH.ORiGinal>It might be argued that since the correspondence of Eden and Temple is downplayed in traditional Jewish exegesis, its recovery is of little value. There is, however, something to be gained from recovering this practically lost understanding, since it helps us focus on the positive image of Eden as God's first dwelling, a place anchored in close contact and communion be-tween God and human beings, which prompts us to think of what is needed to restore that relationship. A visual reading of the Eden story leads to dramatic new understandings, but it has an inherent value apart from its relationship to any given story, es-pecially for the reader who has difficulty relating to grand ideas through a verbal message alone. Visualization allows readers to connect more easily and intimately with the Hebrew Bible, facilitating direct access to the Bible's deeper themes without reliance on scholarship, whether traditional or aca-demic. With the insights gained through visualization, readers come to appre-(THE GARDEN OF EDEN AS GOD'S FIRST SANCTUARY GODSTRUEcHURCH.ORiGinal)>ciate that the Bible is more complex and multilayered than previously real-ized, and they become more open to rabbinic and subsequent commentary. NOTES 1. Lea Mazor, "The Correlation between the Garden of Eden and the Temple," Shnaton: An Annual for Biblical and Ancient Near Eastern Studies,13 (2002), pp. 5-42 [Hebrew]; G. K. Beale, The Temple and the Church's Mission: A Biblical Theology of the Dwelling Place of God(Downers Grove, IL: Appollos; Intervarsity Press, 2004); J. Berman, The Temple: Its Symbolism and Meaning Then and Now (Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson, 1995); Lawrence E. Stager, "Jeru-salem as Eden," BAR 26:03 (May/June 2000), pp. 36-47, 64; John H. Walton, Ancient Near Eastern Thought and the Old Testament (Grand Rapids, Michigan: Baker Academic, 2006), pp.197-9. 2.Commentary of Rabbi S. R. Hirsch to Genesis 3:24. 3. B. Pizzalato, "Adam, High Priest of Humanity": http://www.catholicnewsagency.com/resource. php?n=703

Holy Bible out of Me_edited.png

Isaiah 53 explained 

New International Version

53 Who has believed our message

and to whom has the arm of the Lord been revealed?

2 He grew up before him like a tender shoot,

and like a root out of dry ground.

He had no beauty or majesty to attract us to him,

nothing in his appearance that we should desire him.

3 He was despised and rejected by mankind,

a man of suffering, and familiar with pain.

Like one from whom people hide their faces

he was despised, and we held him in low esteem.

4 Surely he took up our pain

and bore our suffering,

yet we considered him punished by God,

stricken by him, and afflicted.

5 But he was pierced for our transgressions,

he was crushed for our iniquities;

the punishment that brought us peace was on him,

and by his wounds we are healed.

6 We all, like sheep, have gone astray,

each of us has turned to our own way;

and the Lord has laid on him

the iniquity of us all.

7 He was oppressed and afflicted,

yet he did not open his mouth;

he was led like a lamb to the slaughter,

and as a sheep before its shearers is silent,

so he did not open his mouth.

8 By oppression[a] and judgment he was taken away.

Yet who of his generation protested?

For he was cut off from the land of the living;

for the transgression of my people he was punished.[b]

9 He was assigned a grave with the wicked,

and with the rich in his death,

though he had done no violence,

nor was any deceit in his mouth.

10 Yet it was the Lord’s will to crush him and cause him to suffer,

and though the Lord makes[c] his life an offering for sin,

he will see his offspring and prolong his days,

and the will of the Lord will prosper in his hand.

11 After he has suffered,

he will see the light of life[d] and be satisfied[e];

by his knowledge[f] my righteous servant will justify many,

and he will bear their iniquities.

12 Therefore I will give him a portion among the great,[g]

and he will divide the spoils with the strong,[h]

because he poured out his life unto death,

and was numbered with the transgressors.

For he bore the sin of many,

and made intercession for the transgressors.

Shalom

A Good morning ALL_edited.jpg

  MOSES IN CUSH: DEVELOPMENT OF THE LEGEND

 

Numbers 12

New International Version

Miriam and Aaron Oppose Moses

12 Miriam and Aaron began to talk against Moses because of his Cushite wife, for he had married a Cushite. 2 “Has the Lord spoken only through Moses?” they asked. “Hasn’t he also spoken through us?” And the Lord heard this.

3 (Now Moses was a very humble man, more humble than anyone else on the face of the earth.)

4 At once the Lord said to Moses, Aaron and Miriam, “Come out to the tent of meeting, all three of you.” So the three of them went out. 5 Then the Lord came down in a pillar of cloud; he stood at the entrance to the tent and summoned Aaron and Miriam. When the two of them stepped forward, 6 he said, “Listen to my words:

“When there is a prophet among you,
   I, the Lord, reveal myself to them in visions,
   I speak to them in dreams.
7 But this is not true of my servant Moses;
   he is faithful in all my house.
8 With him I speak face to face,
   clearly and not in riddles;
   he sees the form of the Lord.
Why then were you not afraid
   to speak against my servant Moses?”

9 The anger of the Lord burned against them, and he left them.

10 When the cloud lifted from above the tent, Miriam’s skin was leprous[a]—it became as white as snow. Aaron turned toward her and saw that she had a defiling skin disease,

11 and he said to Moses, “Please, my lord, I ask you not to hold against us the sin we have so foolishly committed. 12 Do not let her be like a stillborn infant coming from its mother’s womb with its flesh half eaten away.”

13 So Moses cried out to the Lord, “Please, God, heal her!”

14 The Lord replied to Moses, “If her father had spit in her face, would she not have been in disgrace for seven days? Confine her outside the camp for seven days; after that she can be brought back.”

15 So Miriam was confined outside the camp for seven days, and the people did not move on till she was brought back.

16 After that, the people left Hazeroth and encamped in the Desert of Paran.

 

 

Numbers 12 presents us with a personal crisis that Moses experienced relat-ing to his wife: And Miriam and Aaron spoke against Moses because of the Cushite woman whom he had married; for he had married a Cushite woman(Num. 12:1). The text does not elaborate on who this Cushite woman was. The simple meaning of a Cushite woman is one who comes from Cush. In Biblical times this referred to the entire Nile Valley south of Egypt, which included Nubia (Sudan) and Abyssinia (Eritrea, Ethiopia). This would seem to rule out identifying Zipporah with the Cushite woman, as she was from Midian, not Cush. Still, the traditional rabbinic interpretation does in fact identify Zipporah with the Cushite. The term “Cushite” is interpreted as a term for beautiful, as found in Sifre 99, “all who see her admit that she is beautiful”, her beauty is as obvious as the dark skin of a Cushite. This is the view followed in Onkelos, who translates “Cushite” as shapirta, “beautiful”. This identification of the Cushite woman with Zipporah follows the general midrashic approach that Biblical characters for whom little or no information is given are identified with other Biblical figures. It also serves to limit the amount of women that Moses married to only Zipporah. Even commentators who try to stick to the simple meaning of the text find ways of identifying the Cushite woman with Zipporah. For example, Ibn Ezra explains that since the Midianites dwell in tents in a hot sunny climate, they become dark skinned like Cushites. However, as noted by Rashbam and Hizkuni, the simple understanding is that the Cushite woman was in fact an-other wife who came from Cush. It is possible to understand that Moses divorced Zipporah, and then later took another woman, the Cushite. Reinforcement for this view comes from the biblical text: And Jethro, Moses’ father-in-law, took Zipporah, Moses’ wife, after he had sent her away (Ex. 18:2). In biblical Hebrew, to be ‘sent away,’means todivorce: that he writeth her a bill of divorcement, and giveth it in her hand, and sendeth her out of his house (Deut. 24:1). Also, we find a parallel in the Book of Jeremiah: If a man put (send) away his wife, and she STANLEY SCHNEIDERJEWISH BIBLE QUARTERLY114go from him, and become another man’s, shall he return unto her again? (Jer.3:1). Mechiltah, Exodus 18:2, 1, explicitly states that Moses divorced Zipporah when he left Midian for Egypt. Based on all this, it is reasonable to understand that the Cushite woman was another woman whom Moses had married after Zipporah. But there is another possibility found in the early literature: Moses may have married a Cushite woman prior to his marriage to Zipporah. The story of Moses’ journey to the Land of Cush and his marriage to the queen there, is told in full detail by the first century Jewish historian, Flavius Josephus.1 Jo-sephus’ sources are, in part, probably Artapanus of Alexandria2 (a Greek his-torian of Jewish origin, 2nd century B.C.E.) and Alexander Polyhistor3 (a Greek scholar who was enslaved by the Romans, 1st century BCE). Other important sources for us are the later works Chronicle of Moses (Divrei HaYamim shel Mosheh)4, Sefer HaYashar5 and Yalkut Shimoni (Ex. 2, sec-tion 168-169).6 These are included in later midrash anthologies.7 Josephus based much of his historiographical work on the Greek historians and the Septuagint translation of the Bible, the Alexandrian version. Accord-ing to Swete (1894/1968), Josephus "possessed a copy of the sacred books which Titus granted him from the spoils of the Temple" (p.371, fn. 1).8 When Queen Alexandra ascended the throne after Alexander Janneus, she took the Pharisees under her protection. Josephus, "a member of the sect of the Phari-sees,"9 then received status as an important Greek historian.10 Note that alt-hough Artapanus was of Jewish origin, "there is no doubt that Artapanus was influenced by the anti-Jewish historiography of Egyptian writers...and Jose-phus was dependent on Artapanus." 11 The Moses in Cush story is generally not found in the early midrashim or the classic commentators. One exception is the Targum Pseudo-Jonathan with a brief mention of Moses having taken a Cushite Queen when he ran away from Pharaoh, and he separated from her (Num. 12:1). Another excep-tion is Rashbam (to Num. 12:1) who remarks that Moses "was a King in the land of Cush for forty years, and took a Queen, but did not sleep with her." This approach was accepted by Hizkuni. So our earliest sources for this story are Artapanus of Alexandria (as retold by Eusebius of Caesarea) and Jose-phus. Before continuing, it is important to note that the Greeks related to Mo-ses as not only the greatest of all prophets (Deut. 34:10), but they attached MOSES IN CUSH: DEVELOPMENT OF THE LEGENDVol. 47, No. 2, 2019 115many qualities and fantasies of grandeur to him. This led to the development of many myths and fables.12 These early sources are important because they try to mitigate any lowering of the profile of Moses. Moses remains a great person, above and beyond other mortals: Now the man Moses was very humble, above all the men that were upon the face of the earth (Num. 12:3). The Cush narrative is used to enhance his status, making Moses a general, and even king of Cush.13 Artapanus describes the story of Moses (as related by Eusebius):Merris was betrothed to Chenephres, King of the regions above Mem-phis...and she being barren, took a suppositious {illegitimate} child from one of the Jews and called him Mouses {Moses}... this Moses when grown up taught mankind many useful things...But when Chenephres perceived the excellence of Moses, he envied him, and sought to slay him on some plausi-ble pretext. And so when the Aethopians14 invaded Egypt, Chenephres sup-posed that he had found a convenient opportunity, and sent Moses in com-mand of a force against them...supposing that ...he would easily be de-stroyed by the enemy... this war went on for ten years...Then the Aethiopi-ans, although they were enemies, became fond of Moses... But when the war ended, Chenephres pretended to welcome him {Moses}, but in reality, contin-ued to plot against him...Then Aaron, the brother of Moses, having learned about the plot, advised his brother to flee into Arabia...He {Moses} made his escape into Arabia and lived with Raguel, the ruler of the district, having married his daughter... Seven fair maidens I see...and Zipporah replies of dark-sk inned Aethiops... This is the earliest mention of Moses being involved with Cush. Here Zippo-ra is identified as the Biblical Cushite woman, and Moses, although admired by the Ethiopians, was only involved with them in the context of a long war. Josephus relates a similar story, but with important differences from the version related by Artapanus. Most significantly, Josephus has Moses marry-ing the daughter of the Ethiopian King and consummating the marriage, and the Cushite woman is not understood to be Zipporah.Moses...came to the age of maturity...and showed that he was born for the bringing them {the Egyptians} down, and raising the Israelites...The Ethio-pians, who are next neighbours to the Egyptians, made an inroad into their country, which they seized upon...they went on to subdue the rest {of STANLEY SCHNEIDERJEWISH BIBLE QUARTERLY116Egypt}...and proceeded as far as Memphis...The Egyptians decided... to make use of Moses the Hebrew, and take his assistance...The King com-manded his daughter to produce him so that he might be the general of their army...Moses cheerfully undertook the business ...{Everyone} was glad: The Egyptians because Moses would overcome their enemies {the Ethiopi-ans} and Moses would be slain. The Hebrews because Moses would be their general and then they would escape from the Egyptians. But Moses prevent-ed the enemies {from harming him}...He gave a wonderful demonstration of his sagacity...He came upon the Ethiopians before they expected to  him...he beat them...and made a great slaughter of these Ethiopians. The Egyptian army did not slacken their diligence... Then this accident happened. Tharbis was the daughter of the King of the Ethiopians. She happened to see Moses as he led the army with great courage...She fell deeply in love with him, and upon the prevalence of that passion, sent to him the most faithful of all her servants to discourse with him upon their marriage. He thereupon accepted the offer on condition she would procure the delivery up of the city and gave her the assurance of an oath to take her to his wife, and that once he had taken possession of the city, he would not break his oath to her...When Mo-ses had cut off the Ethiopians, he gave thanks to God and consummated his marriage and led the Egyptians back to their own land.16Afterwards, Josephus continues with Moses fleeing Egypt and marrying Zip-porah, a Midianite woman, who he does not associate with being a Cushite at all. Rajak explains Josephus’s ‘borrowing’ textual ideas: “Josephus, we have supposed, took the story from a literary source. But this source and Artapanus probably drew on a common fund of oral material (as well as, possibly, on lit erature): that is the best way of explaining their complex relationship, and the rich, inventive detail found in both.”17 Shinan similarly comments: “Alt-hough Josephus’ account is certainly longer and more detailed than that of Artapanus, it appears to be but an expansion of the tradition reflected in Artapanus’ writings.”18 Josephus often elaborates on stories and metaphors which are not found in any Greek sources and “of which no trace is found in rabbinic literature.”19 Feldman, a classics scholar and prolific writer, has advanced four major theories regarding Josephus’s source for the Moses in Cush story: 20MOSES IN CUSH: DEVELOPMENT OF THE LEGENDVol. 47, No. 2, 2019 1171.Josephus derived it from a midrash now lost, the fact that a parallel for Moses’ marriage with the Ethiopian princess is not found in Artapanus but appears only in later midrashim would argue for this explanation.2.Josephus had an Alexandrian Jewish source. This source is usually identified as Artapanus, but Artapanus omits the crucial story of Moses’ mar-riage with the Ethiopian princess.3.Josephus modelled the story on one or more popular stories drawn from mythology or legend.4.Josephus invented it himself. Another version is given in a later midrash, Yalkut Shimoni, where there are major differences between the versions of Artapanus and Josephus.War was waging between Cush and Bnei Kedem. Kukanus, King of Cush, went to war with Aram and Bnai Kedem, and he left Balaam and his sons to guard the city . . . Balaam advised the people remaining in the city to rebel against the King . . . When the King returned he saw that Balaam and his sons had made the city impregnable . . . At the time of this siege, Moses had run away from Egypt {to Ethiopia} and met the soldiers of the King Kukanus who were unable to enter their city. The King and all the officers and soldiers were enamoured with Moses because he looked as strong as a lion and his face shone like the sun, and they made him an advisor to them. After 9 years {re-maining on the outskirts of the city} the King became ill and died . . . The officers and soldiers asked Moses to lead them. And he was made King and was to be given the Lady Cushite, the wife of the late King Kukanus, as his a wife. Moses was 27 years old when he became King of Cush...and sat upon the throne, put on the crown and took the lady Cushite as his wife. But Moses was fearful of the God of his forefathers, and he did not consummate the marriage with the lady Cushite.Moses remembered the oath that Abraham made his servant Eliezer take when he told him not to take a wife for his son from the daughters of Canaan. And Isaac did the same thing when Jacob ran away from Esau, and he told him not to marry the children of Ham...and Moses was afraid of his God and acted in truth with all his heart and did not stray from the path that Abraham, Isaac and Jacob followed. And Moses ruled the people of Cush for forty years. And he was successful because the God of his fathers was with him. In the fortieth year of his reign, one day he was sitting on the throne next to Lady Cushite, and she mentioned STANLEY SCHNEIDERJEWISH BIBLE QUARTERLY118the following to the Ministers and to the Nation: ‘Forty years this King is ruling Cush, and he has not been intimate with me, and has never worshipped our Cush gods.’ She asked the Ministers to appoint her son Munhas to be King, rather than the foreigner Moses. And that’s what happened. Moses was 67 years old when he left Cush. He couldn’t return to Egypt, from where he had run away. He ran off to Midian, to Re’uel . . . and he received Zipporah the Midianite as his wife...21Yalkut Shimoni explains that Moses married Cushite royalty, a queen, be-fore his marriage to Zipporah, an idea similar to the story in Josephus, where Moses marries a Cushite princess. But significantly, in the Yalkut Shimoniversion, there is an emphasis on the fact that Moses did not consummate the marriage. In this manner, the midrash gets all the benefits of the Moses in Cush narrative, such as filling in a long gap in the timeline of the life of Mo-ses, portraying Moses as someone with great leadership skills, and explaining that the Cushite woman in Numbers 12:1 was in fact Cushite, without any negative associations of having relations with an alien woman. This is the version of the story referenced by the rabbinic commentator's  Rashbam and Hizkuni, who explicitly note that Moses never slept with her. In this manner, a legendary story of Moses ruling Cush and marrying Cush-ite royalty was incorporated into the midrashic corpus and became the basis for the interpretation of the pashtanim, those exegeses who endeavour to stick to the simple meaning of the text.

SACRED TEXT>THE CHRONICLES OF MOSES.

In the 130th year after the Israelites had gone down to Egypt, Pharaoh dreamt a dream. While he was sitting on the throne of his kingdom he lifted up his eyes, and beheld an old man standing before him. In his hand he held a pair of scales as used by merchants. The old man then took the scales and, holding them up before Pharaoh, he laid hold of all the elders of Egypt and its princes, together with all its great men, and, having bound them together, placed them in one pan of the scales. After that he took a milch goat, and, placing it in the other pan, it outweighed all the others. Pharaoh then awoke, and it was a dream.

Rising early next morning, he called all his servants, and told them the dream. They were sorely frightened by it, and one of the king's eunuchs said, 'This is nothing else than the foreboding of a great evil about to fall upon Egypt.' On hearing this the king said to the eunuch, 'What will it be?' And the eunuch replied, 'A child will be born in Israel, who will destroy all the land of Egypt.

If it is pleasing to the king, let the royal command go forth in all the land of Egypt that every male born among the Hebrews should be slain, so that this evil be averted from the land of Egypt.

The king did so, and accordingly sent for the Hebrew midwives, one of whom was named Shifrah, and another Puah, and said to them, 'When the Hebrew women give birth, and ye see upon the stools that it is a son, ye slay it; but if a daughter, then let it live.' But the midwives feared God, and did not act according to the king's word, but let the males live. The king, therefore, summoned the midwives, and said to them, 'Why have ye done this thing, and kept the males alive?' And the midwives answered Pharaoh, saying, 'The Hebrew women are not like the Egyptian women, for they are like the free animals of the field which do not require midwives; before the midwives come to them the children are born.'

When Pharaoh saw that he could not do anything with them, he commanded all his people, saying, 'Every male that is born ye shall cast into the river; but all the females ye shall keep alive.' When the Israelites heard this command of Pharaoh to cast their males into the river, some of the people separated from their wives, while others remained with them. It came to pass, about the time of childbirth, that the women went out into the field, and the Lord, who swore to their ancestors that He would multiply them, sent them an angel, one of his ministers, who was appointed over childbirth, to wash it, and rub it with salt; and the angel bound it in swaddling clothes, and placed in the child's hand two smooth stones, from the one of which it sucked milk, and from the other honey. God also caused its hair to grow down to its knees, so as to be well covered by it; and the angel rocked it caressingly.

And when God had compassion upon them and sought to increase them upon the face of the whole land, He commanded the earth to swallow the children up, and protect them until they grew up, after which time it should open its mouth and let them go forth so that they should sprout as the grass of the field, and as the young trees of the forest. Then they would return to their families, and to the house of their fathers, where they would remain. (6) Accordingly, it happened that after the earth had swallowed up, through the mercy of God, the males born of the house of Jacob, that the Egyptians went out into the field to plough with teams of oxen and with the ploughshare. They worked (ploughed) upon them as the spoiler in time of the harvest. But although they ploughed never so hard they were unable to injure them, and thus they increased abundantly.

[Another Version.—It came to pass at the time of birth that they left their children in the field, and the Lord, who swore to their ancestors that He would cause them to inherit the land, tamed for them the beasts of the field, and sustained and reared them, as it is said, 'And the beasts of the field were at peace with thee.' When the Egyptians saw that they (the Israelites) left their sons in the field, and that the wild beasts helped them, and led them in the forests until they had grown to manhood, they said, 'These have surely reared them in the caverns and vaults of the earth,' and each of them brought their ploughshare and their plough, and ploughed above them, etc.]

There was a Levite in the land of Egypt whose name was Amram, the son of Qehath, the son of Levi, the son of Jacob. This man betrothed Jochebed, the daughter of Levi, the sister of his father, and she conceived and bare a daughter, and called her name Miriam (the bitter), because in those days people began to embitter the lives of the Israelites. She conceived again and bare a son, whose name she called Aaron (pregnancy), because during the time of her pregnancy Pharaoh began to shed the blood of their males upon the ground, and to cast them into the river of Egypt. When, however, the word of the king and his decree became known respecting the casting of their males into the river, many of God's people separated from their wives, as did Amram from his wife.

After the lapse of three years the Spirit of God came upon Miriam, so that she went forth and prophesied in the house, saying, 'Behold, a son shall be born to my mother and father, and he shall rescue the Israelites from the hands of the Egyptians.' When Amram heard his young daughter's prophecy he took back his wife, from whom he had separated in consequence of Pharaoh's decree to destroy all the male line of the house of Jacob. After three years of separation he went to her and she conceived. And it came to pass at the end of six months from the time of her conception that she bare a son. The whole house was at that moment filled with a great light, as the light of the sun and the moon in their splendour. The woman saw that the child was good and beautiful to behold, so she hid him in an inner room for three months.

At that time the Egyptian women took secret counsel together to destroy the Hebrew women; they, therefore, went to the land of Goshen, where the Israelites were carrying their little children who could not speak upon their shoulders. The Hebrew women then hid their children from the Egyptians, so that their existence might not become known to them, in order to preserve them from destruction and annihilation. The Egyptian women came thus to Goshen with their children who could not speak, and when one of them came into the house of the Hebrew she made her own child chatter in the child's language, and the hidden child, hearing it, replied in the same manner. The Egyptian women thereupon went to Pharaoh's house to tell him of it, and Pharaoh sent his officers to slay those children.

After that child (Moses) had been hidden now for three months and it thus became known to Pharaoh, the mother took the child and placed it in a little ark of bulrushes, which she daubed with slime and with pitch. She then hurriedly placed the child among the flags by the river's brink, while his sister stood at a distance to wit what would be done to him.

God then sent drought and great heat in the land of Egypt, so that it burnt one's very flesh upon him just as when the sun is in its strength. The Egyptians were therefore sorely troubled. Pharaoh's daughter went down by the river-side to bathe, as did all the Egyptian women, on account of the heat and the drought. Her handmaids and all Pharaoh's concubines went with her. While thus occupied, she beheld the ark floating on the water, and sent her handmaid to fetch it. On opening the box, she discovered the child. It began to cry, and she had pity upon it, and said, 'This is one of the Hebrew children.' (6) At this the Egyptian women by the river came up for the purpose of suckling it, but it refused to take them. God wished to return it to the breast of its mother. The child's sister Miriam then said to Pharaoh's daughter, 'Shall I go and call a Hebrew nurse to suckle the child?' 'Yes,' said she. And she forthwith called the child's own mother. Then said Pharaoh's daughter, 'Take this child and suckle it for me, and I will give thee as a reward a monthly wage of two pieces of silver;' so the woman took the child and nursed.

After two years she brought it to Pharaoh's daughter, who adopted it, and she called its name Moses, 'for from the waters I drew him.' But his father called him 'Ḥeber,' because for his sake he joined his wife again from whom he had separated himself; while his mother called him 'Yequtiel,' because 'I placed my hope in God the Almighty,' and He returned him to her. His sister called him 'Yered,' because she went down to the river after him to know what his end would be; while his brother called him 'Abi Zanoaḥ,' saying, My father separated from my mother, but returned to her on account of this child.' Kehath, his grandfather, named him 'Abigedor,' because for his sake God closed up the breach of the house of Jacob, so that they no more cast the children into the water. His nurse called him 'Abi Sokho,' saying that he was hidden in a tent (or box) for three months out of fear of the descendants of Ham; and all Israel called him 'Ben Nethanel,' because in his days God heard their groaning.

In the third year of Moses’ birth, when Pharaoh was sitting at his meal, with his mistress on his right hand, hisdaughter on his left, and the child in her lap, and all the princes of the kingdom sitting round the table, it happened that the child stretched out his hand, and, taking the crown from the king's head, placed it upon his own. The king and the princes, on seeing this, were confused and exceedingly astonished. (9) Then Balaam, the enchanter, one of the king's eunuchs, said, 'Rememberest thou, my lord the king, the dream which thou didst dream and the interpretation thy servant gave it? Now, is this not one of the children of the Hebrews in whom the spirit of God is? By his wisdom he has done this and has chosen for himself the kingdom of Egypt. Thus did Abraham, who weakened the power of Nimrod, the King of the Chaldeans, and Abimelech, King of Gerar, and inherited the land of the children of Ḥeth and all the kingdoms of Canaan. He also went down to Egypt, and said of his wife, "She is my sister," for the purpose of placing a stumbling-block in the way of the Egyptians and their king. Isaac did the same in Philistia when he sojourned in Gerar. He grew stronger than all the Philistines. Their king he also wished to lead astray when he said of his wife, "She is my sister." Jacob also went stealthily and took away his only brother's birthright and his blessing withal. He then went to Padan Aram, to the house of Laban, his maternal uncle, and by his cunning obtained his daughters, his cattle, and all that he had. He then fled to the land of Canaan. (10) His sons again sold Joseph into Egypt, where he was put in prison for two years, until the Pharaoh before thee dreamt dreams. He was then taken from prison and appointed over the princes of Egypt, on account of the interpretation of these dreams. When God brought a famine upon the land he brought his father and his brothers to Egypt. He maintained them without paying for it, and us he bought for slaves. If, now, it seems good to the king, let us shed the blood of this child, lest, when he grows up, he take the kingdom from thy hands, and Egypt perish.'

God at that moment sent one of his angels, named Gabriel, who assumed the form of one of them. 'If it pleaseth the king,' said the angel, 'let onyx stones and live-coals be brought and placed before the child, and it shall come to pass, if he stretches forth his hand to the coals, then know that he has not done this by his wisdom, and let him live.' This thing being good in the eyes of the king and the princes, they acted according to the word of the angel, and they brought him the onyx and the coals. The angel then placed the child's hand near the coal so that his fingers touched it. He lifted it to his mouth and burnt his lips and his tongue, so that he became heavy of speech. The king and the princes then desisted from killing the child. (12) He lived for fifteen years afterwards in the king's palace, clothed in .garments of purple, for he was reared together with the king's sons. When he was in his eighteenth year the lad longed for his parents, and consequently went to them. He went out to his brethren in the field and looked upon their burdens. He there saw an Egyptian smite one of his Hebrew brethren. When the man that was beaten saw Moses he ran to him for help, for Moses was a greatly-honoured man in Pharaoh's house. He said to him, 'O my Lord, this Egyptian came into my house in the night and, binding me with cords, went to my wife in my very presence, and he now seeks my life.' When Moses heard this evil deed he was exceedingly angry, and, turning this way and that to see that nobody was looking, he smote the Egyptian and hid him in the sand. He thus saved the Hebrew from the hand of the Egyptian. (13) Moses then returned to the palace, and the Hebrew to his house. When the man returned to his house he told his wife that he wished to divorce her, because it was not right for one of the house of Jacob to lie with his wife after she had been defiled. So the woman went out and told her brothers, who thereupon sought to kill him, but he fled into his house, and thus escaped.

On the next day Moses went out to his brethren, and, seeing that some were quarrelling, he said to the wicked one, 'Why dost thou beat thy neighbour?' But one of them retorted, 'Who made thee to be a prince and judge over us? Wilt thou slay us as thou didst slay the Egyptian?' Moses by this perceived that the thing was already known. (15) Pharaoh immediately got to hear of it, and ordered Moses to be slain. But God sent Michael, the captain of His heavenly host, in the likeness of the chief butcher (slayer). He then took his sword and severed the head of the chief butcher, for his face was changed to the exact likeness of Moses. The angel then took hold of Moses’ hand, and, bringing him forth from Egypt, placed him outside its border, a distance of forty days’ journey. But Aaron yet remained in Egypt, who prophesied to the Israelites in the midst of the Egyptians, saying, 'Cast away from you the abominations of the Egyptians, and do not defile yourselves with their idols.' But the Israelites rebelled and would not listen. The Lord then said that He would have destroyed them, were it not that He remembered the covenant He had made with Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. But the hand of Pharaoh was constantly becoming heavier upon the Israelites, so that he persecuted and oppressed them until God sent forth His word and redeemed them.

At that time a war broke out between Cush on the one side and the people of Qedem (East) and Syria on the other; for these rebelled against the King of Cush. Qinqanos, King of Cush, then went out to war against the other two nations, and smote Syria and the East. He took many captives and made them submit to Cush. (2) When Qinqanos went out to war against Syria and the people of the East he left behind Bala‘am the enchanter, i.e., Laban the Aramean, who came from Caphtor, together with his two sons, Janis and Jambris, to guard the city and the poor people. But Bala‘am counselled the people to rebel against Qinqanos, so that he should not be able to come into the city. The people, listening to him, swore to act accordingly. Him they made king over them, and his two sons they appointed as captains of the host of the people. On two sides of the city they raised very high walls, while on the third side they dug an innumerable number of pits between the city and the river that surrounds the whole land of Cush, and from there the people drew into them the waters of the river. On the fourth side they collected by their wiles and witchcraft an immense number of serpents, so that no one could approach them.

When the king and all the captains of the army returned from the war and saw the very high walls of the city they were greatly astonished, and said, 'Behold, while we have been detained at war, they have built walls to the city and strengthened themselves to prevent the Canaanitish kings from waging war against them.' But when they came near the city and discovered that the gates were closed, they shouted to the keepers, 'Open the gates for us, that we may enter the city.' But they refused to open them, just as Bala‘am the enchanter had ordered them, and would not allow them to enter the city. They therefore drew up their line of battle opposite the gate, and fought so that on that day there fell 130 men of Qinqanos's army. On the second day they fought on the side of the river. But when thirty cavalrymen tried to cross they sank into the pits and were drowned. The king then commanded them to hew some wood, which they were to use as rafts upon which to cross, and they did so. When, however, they came to the walls, the rafts rolled from under them like a mill, and on that day 200 men that had gone upon ten rafts were sunk in the wells. On the third day they went on that side of the city where the serpents lay, but they dared not approach. After 170 men had been killed by these serpents they ceased fighting against Cush. They besieged it for nine years, so that no one went out or entered the city.

During this siege Moses, having fled from Egypt, came to the camp of Qinqanos, the King of Cush. He was then but eighteen years old. This young man entered their ranks, and was much beloved by the king, the princes, and all the army, because he was mighty and beautiful.

His height was like the cedar and his face like the rising sun, and his strength like that of a lion. He was therefore made the king's counsellor. It came to pass after nine years that the Cushite king was seized with an illness by which he died, so that after seven days Qinqanos departed this life. His servants embalmed him, and buried him opposite the gate of the city looking towards Egypt. There they erected a beautiful building and a very high temple, and engraved upon the stones his arms and the record of his mighty deeds.

When they had completed the building, they said to each other, 'What shall we now do? If we try to get into the city and fight there will be many more of us slain than before. If we give up the siege, then all the Syrian kings and those of the East, having heard of the death of our king, will come upon us suddenly, and none of us will be left. Now, let us appoint a king over us, and we shall then continue the siege until the city falls into our hands.' They then hastily stripped themselves of their garments, and, casting them upon the ground, they made a large platform, upon which they placed Moses. They then blew the trumpets, and exclaimed, 'Long live the king!' And all the princes and all the people took the oath of obedience to him, and gave him a Cushite wife, the widow of Qinqanos. They then crowned him King of Cush. He was twenty-seven years old when he was made king.

On the second day of his reign they all assembled before the king, and said, 'If it is pleasing to the king, give us advice what to do. For these last nine years we have not seen our wives nor our sons, but have remained in the siege.' The king then answered the people, saying, 'Be certain that the city will be delivered into our hands if you hearken to my advice. Now, if we fight with them, many of us will fall as at first, and if we determine to cross the water we shall fare similarly. Now, go to the forest, and let each one bring a young stork, which he shall keep until it has grown up and be taught to hunt just as the hawk.' The people immediately hastened to the forest, and, climbing the fir-trees, they each brought the young (of the stork) in their hands according to the king's word.

When the young storks had grown up, the king commanded them to starve them for two days, and on the third day he said to them, 'Let each man put on his armour and harness the horses and mules to the chariots; and when each man has taken his stork in his hand, let us rise and war against the city on the side where the serpents are lying.' This they did. When they approached the place, the king said, 'Let each send forth his young stork.' As soon as they did so the storks flew upon the serpents and devoured them, thus ridding the place of them.

When the king and the people saw that the serpents had disappeared they raised a great shout, fought against the city, and captured it, so that each man went to his own house, to his own wife, and to his goods. On that day 1,100 inhabitants were killed, but of the besiegers not one. When Bala‘am the enchanter saw that the city was taken, opening the gate, he and his two sons fled away upon their horses to Egypt, to Pharaoh, King of Egypt. These were the magicians and the wizards, as it is written in the 'Sefer Hayashar' (Book of the Just = Bible), that counselled Pharaoh to wipe out the name of Jacob from off the face of the earth.

And it came to pass when Pharaoh reigned over Egypt that he changed the statutes of the first kings and their laws, and made the yoke heavy upon all the inhabitants of his land, and also upon the house of Jacob he had no pity, through the counsel of Bala‘am the enchanter and his two sons, for they were then the king's counsellors. The king then took counsel with his three advisers—one of whom was named Reuel the Midianite, the second Job, and the third Bala‘am of Petor—and said, 'Behold, the Israelites are becoming more numerous, and mightier than we. Come, let us be wise, lest they grow too numerous, and in the event of a war breaking out they will assemble against us and fight us, and go up from the land.'

Then Reuel the Midianite exclaimed, 'Long live the king! If it pleases the king, do not stretch forth thy hand against them, because God has selected them of old and taken them from all nations of the earth to be His inheritance. For whoever of all the kings of the earth stretches forth his hand against them their God will take vengeance upon him. When Abraham went down to Egypt, and Pharaoh ordered his wife Sarah to be brought to him, did not the Lord their God send great plagues upon him and upon his house until he restored Abraham's wife, and only through Abraham's prayer was he healed? Also in the case of Abimelech in Gerar. As a punishment all his house was struck with barrenness, even unto the animals. In a vision Abimelech learned the cause, and that he must restore Abraham's wife whom he had taken. After Isaac prayed for him and his household, and entreated God on their behalf, they were healed. (3) When Isaac was separated from his wife all their fountains were dried up, and their fruit-bearing trees did not yield their produce, and the breasts of their wives and cows were dried up. Then Abimelech went to him from Gerar, his pasturage, and Phichol, the captain of his host. They prostrated themselves, and asked him to entreat God for them and pray to Him. When he besought God they were healed. Jacob was a simple man dwelling in tents; by his integrity he was delivered from Esau, and Laban the Aramean, and from all the kings of Canaan. Who can stretch forth his hand against them without being punished? Was it not thy father that promoted Joseph over all the princes of Egypt, for through his wisdom he rescued all the inhabitants from famine, and commanded Jacob and his sons to go down to Egypt that the land of Egypt be saved from further evil through their piety? Now, if it seems good to thee, cease destroying them, and if thou dost not wish to allow them to dwell in Egypt, send them hence, and they will go to the land of Canaan.'

Pharaoh was exceedingly angry with Reuel, so he left the kingdom and went to Midian. He took Jacob's staff with him. The king then said to Job, 'Give thy counsel. What shall be done with these people?' But Job briefly replied, 'Are not all the inhabitants of thy country in thy hand? Do thou what is pleasing in thine eyes.' Then spake Bala‘am of Petor to the king, 'If thou thinkest to diminish them by fire, has not their God delivered Abraham from the furnace of the Chaldeans? And if thou thinkest to destroy them by the sword, has not Isaac been tested thereby, and a rain been given in his stead? Now, my lord the king, if thou seekest to blot out their name, order their babes to be thrown into the sea, because not one of them has yet been put to this test.'

This advice pleasing the king, he issued a decree all over Egypt, saying that every male born to the Hebrews should be cast into the water. And it came to pass when the males of the house of Jacob were cast into the river that Moses was one of them. The Lord thereupon sent an angel to deliver them, and thus he also was saved through the daughter of Pharaoh. When Moses grew up in the king's palace Pharaoh's daughter adopted him as her son, and the whole of Pharaoh's household was afraid of him.

One day it was reported to Bala‘am that the son of Bityah (Pharaoh's daughter) wished to take his life. Bala‘am the enchanter and his two sons therefore fled for their lives and escaped to the land of Cush. And when Qinqanos waged war with the peoples of the East and Syria, Bala‘am revolted against him and did not allow him to enter the city. Cush was therefore besieged for nine years, and during the siege Qinqanos died. The people then crowned Moses the Levite as their king. (7) By his wisdom Moses captured the city, and was placed upon the throne of the kingdom with the crown upon his head. They also gave him to wife the Cushite wife of the late monarch. But Moses, fearing the God of his fathers, did not approach her, for he remembered the oath which Abraham made Eleazar his servant swear, saying, 'Thou shalt not take a wife of the daughters of Canaan for my sons.' Isaac said likewise to Jacob when he fled on account of Esau. 'Thou shalt not intermarry,' said he, 'with the children of Ham, for remember that Noah said, "The children of Ham should be servants to the children of Shem and Jafeth."' Therefore Moses feared the Lord, and walked before Him in truth with all his heart. Nor did he deviate from the path wherein his ancestors Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob walked. The kingdom of Cush was firmly established through him, and, going to war with Edom, the East of Palestine, and Syria, he conquered them, and made them submit to Cush. The number of years during which he sat upon the throne was forty, and in all his battles he was successful, because the Lord God of his fathers was with him.

In the fortieth year of his reign, when he was sitting upon the throne with his queen by his side, the queen said to the princes in the presence of the people, 'Behold now, during the whole of the forty years that this king has reigned he has not once approached me, nor has he worshipped the gods of Cush. Now, hearken ye unto me, O sons of Cush, do not allow this man to reign over you any longer, but let my son Mobros (###) reign over you, for it is better that you serve the son of your master than a stranger, a servant of the King of Egypt.' The people discussed the matter until the evening. They then rose up early next morning and crowned Mobros (###), the son of Qinqanos, king over them. But the Cushites feared to lay hands on Moses, for they remembered the oath they took to him. So they gave him valuable gifts and sent him away with great honour. Moses accordingly went forth thence, and his reign over Cush thus came to an end.

Moses was sixty-seven years of age when he went out of Cush; for the thing came from God, as the time had arrived which had been fixed from olden times when the Israelites were to be freed from the children of Ham. Moses then went to Midian, for he feared to return to Egypt through fear of Pharaoh, and stayed by a well of water. When the seven daughters of Reuel the Midianite came out to feed the sheep of their father, they came to the well to draw the water for the sheep. But the Midianite shepherds drove them away, and Moses rose up and assisted them in watering the sheep. Returning to their father, they told him what the man had done for them. Reuel (i.e., Jethro the Kenite) then invited him into the house to take a meal with him. Moses then related to him that he hailed from Egypt, and that he had reigned over Cush; that they had wrested the kingdom from him and had sent him away. When Reuel heard this, he said to himself, 'I shall put this man in prison, by which I shall please the Cushites from whom he fled.' Accordingly he put him in prison, where he remained for ten years. But Zipporah, the daughter of Reuel, had pity upon him, and fed him with bread and water.

(10) At the end of the ten years she said to her father, 'Nobody seeks or inquires after this Hebrew whom thou hast imprisoned these ten years. Now, if it seemeth good to thee, my father, let us send and see whether he is dead or alive.' Her father did not know that she had supplied him with food. Reuel then answered and said, 'Is it possible for a man to be imprisoned twelve (?) years without food and yet live?' But Zipporah replied, 'Hast thou not heard, O my lord, that the God of the Hebrews is great and powerful, and that He works wonders at all times? That he delivered Abraham from the furnace of the Chaldeans, Isaac from the sword, and Jacob from the angel with whom he wrestled by the brook of Jabbok? That even for this man He has done many wonders; that He delivered him from the river of Egypt and from the sword of Pharaoh? He will also be able to deliver him from this place.' (11) This word pleased Reuel, and lie acted as she had asked. He therefore sent to the pit to see what had become of him, and found him alive, standing erect, and praying to the God of his ancestors. Having brought him forth from the pit, he shaved him, changed his prison garments, and gave him to eat. The man then went to the garden of Reuel at the back of the palace, and prayed to his God, who had done so many wonders for him. While he was praying, he suddenly beheld a staff made of  sapphire fixed in the ground in the midst of the garden. When he approached it, he found engraved thereon the name of the Lord of Hosts, the ineffable name. He read that name, and pulled up the staff as lightly as a branch is lifted up in a thickly-wooded forest, and it was a rod in his hand.Taken originally from tHE TREE OF LIFE> godstruechurch.org

This was the same staff that was created in the world among the works of God after He created the heavens and the earth and all their hosts, the seas, rivers, and all the fishes thereof. When Adam was driven from the garden of Eden he took the staff with him and tilled the ground from which he was taken. It then came into the hands of Noah (son of Lamek), who handed it down to Shem and his descendants until it reached Abraham the Hebrew. He then handed over all his possessions to Isaac, including the staff of wonders, which Isaac also inherited. When Jacob fled to Padan Aram he took it with him, and when he came to his father in Beersheba he did not leave it behind. When he went down to Egypt he handed it over to Joseph as a separate gift above that which he gave to his other sons. After Joseph's death the princes of Egypt dwelt in his house, and the staff came into the hand of Reuel the Midianite, who, when he left Egypt, took it away with him and planted it in his own garden. All the mighty men of King Qinqanos (###) who wished to wed his daughter Zipporah tried to uproot it, but without avail, so that it remained there in the garden until Moses, to whom it rightly belonged, came and took it away. When Reuel saw the staff in Moses’ hand he was astonished (and knew that he was the redeemer of Israel). Reuel then gave Zipporah his daughter to Moses.

Moses was seventy-seven years old when he came out of prison, and took Zipporah the Midianite to wife. And Zipporah went the ways of the women of Israel; she did not even in the smallest thing fall short of the righteousness of Sarah, Rebecca, Rachel, and Leah, the pinnacles of the world. She conceived and bare a son, whom she called Gershon, for he (Moses) said: 'I was a

wanderer in a strange land '; but by the order of Reuel his father-in-law the child was not circumcised. After the lapse of three years she conceived again and bare another son. After his circumcision Moses called his name Eleazar, because (he said) 'The God of my father is my help, and He delivered me from the sword of Pharaoh.'

At that time Moses used to tend the flocks of Reuel the Midianite behind the wilderness of Sin, with his staff in his hand. But the Lord was zealous for His people and His inheritance, and, hearing their cry, said He would rescue them from the descendants of Ham, and give them the land of Canaan. He appeared to Moses, His servant, in Horeb, in a burning bush; but the fire did not consume the bush. Then God called him from the midst of the bush, and commanded him to go down to Egypt to Pharaoh, King of Egypt, and to ask him to send away His chosen people as free men. He showed him signs and wonders to perform in Egypt that they might believe that the Lord had sent him. God gave him confidence by saying, 'Go, and return to Egypt, for those that sought thy life are now dead, and they have no power to do thee harm.' (2) Moses then returned to Midian, and related to his father-in-law all that had happened. 'Go in peace,' said he. So Moses arose and went away with his wife and sons. They lodged at a certain place, and an angel came down and attacked him for his transgression of the covenant which God made with Abraham His servant, in that he did not circumcise his eldest son, and he wanted to slay him. Zipporah then immediately took one of the sharp flint stones which she found there and circumcised her son, and she rescued her husband from the power of the angel.

As Aaron the Levite was walking in Egypt by the river God appeared to him, and said, 'Go now, and meet thy brother Moses in the wilderness.' He accordingly went and met him on the mountain of God, and kissed him. On beholding the woman and her children, he said to Moses, 'Who are these?' 'These are,' said he, 'my wife and sons whom God gave me in Midian.' But Aaron was displeased, and he told him to send the woman and her sons back to her father's house. This Moses did. And Zipporah and her sons remained in the house of Reuel, her father, until the Lord visited His people, and delivered them from Egypt from the hand of Pharaoh. (4) Moses and Aaron then went alone to Egypt to the Israelites, whom they told all that the Lord had spoken. Thereat the people exceedingly rejoiced. The next morning they rose up early and went to Pharaoh's house, taking the staff of God with them.

When they came to the gate of the king's palace they saw there two young lions bound in iron chains. No one could enter or pass out from within unless the king commanded it. The keepers on seeing them loosened the chains, and by charms set the lions free to pounce upon them; but Moses hastily waved his wand upon them, and Moses and Aaron entered the king's palace, followed by the young lions playing round them as a dog plays on seeing its master coming home from the field. When Pharaoh saw this he was greatly astonished, and still more confused on account of these men, whose appearance was like that of the children of God. The king then said to them, 'What do you wish?' And Moses said, 'The Lord God of the Hebrews has sent us to thee, saying, "Send out My people, that they may serve Me."' Pharaoh was greatly afraid of them, and told them to go away and come again to-morrow, which they did.

When they were gone Pharaoh ordered Bala‘am the enchanter, and Janis (###) and Jambris (###), his sons, the wizards, and all the magicians of Egypt to be summoned before him. He then related to them what these men had spoken. The magicians then asked, 'How did these men pass the lions that were chained at the gate of the palace?' 'They waved their staves upon the lions,' said the king, 'and they let them loose, and they followed them just as dogs who were pleased to meet them.' 'They are nothing else than wizards like ourselves,' said Bala‘am. 'Send now After them and let them come, and we shall try them.' The king acted accordingly

Taking the staff, they came before the king, and repeated the words which they had spoken at first. 'But how can one believe,' said Pharaoh, 'that you are messengers of God, and that by His word you have come here? Give us a sign and we shall believe you.' Aaron then threw his staff upon the ground, and it was immediately changed into a serpent. The magicians, seeing this, did the same by their incantations, and the staff of each one of them became a serpent; but Aaron's serpent at that moment lifted its head, and, opening its mouth, swallowed up the serpents of Pharaoh's magicians. Bala‘am the wizard, seeing this, said, 'This has been done from time immemorial, that one serpent should swallow up his neighbour just as the fish swallow each other. But change it back to a staff as we shall do, and then if thy staff is able to swallow ours we shall thereby know that the Spirit of the Lord is with thee; but if it cannot swallow them, then thou art a wizard as we are.' Aaron then hastily took hold of the serpent by its tail, and it became a stick again. This the magicians likewise did. Then Aaron, as previously, cast his staff upon the ground, and it swallowed up those of the magicians.

Pharaoh then ordered the Book of Chronicles of the Kings of Egypt to be brought to him; therein were contained the names of all the gods of Egypt. When the list was read over to Pharaoh, he said, 'I do not find your God written in this book, nor do I know Him.' 'The Lord God of gods is His name,' replied they (Moses and Aaron). But who is the Lord,' added Pharaoh, 'that I should listen to His voice and send Israel forth? I do not know Him, and shall not allow the Israelites to go.' 'From the days of our forefathers He has been called "The God of the Hebrews." Now give us permission to go a journey of three days in the wilderness to sacrifice unto the Lord, for ever since we came down to Egypt He has not received from our hands a burnt offering, meal offering, or sacrifice.

If, however, thou wilt not let us go forth, the Lord will assuredly wax angry and smite the land of Egypt with pestilence or with the sword.''Tell us something of His might and power,' said Pharaoh. 'He created the heavens and all their host; the earth and all it contains; the seas with all their fishes. He it was who formed the light and who created the darkness; who caused the rain to fall upon the earth to irrigate it. He caused the young plants and the grass to spring forth. He created man, animals, the beasts in the forest, the birds in the heavens, and the fish in the seas. Through Him they live, through Him they die. Did He not create thee in the womb of thy mother, and give thee the spirit of life? did He not make thee grow up, and place thee on the royal throne of Egypt? He shall also take away thy spirit and thy soul, and return thee to the dust from which thou wast taken.' The anger of Pharaoh was kindled, and he said, 'Who is there among all the gods of the people that can do this? Behold, I it was who created the river, and who created myself.' He then drove them out of his presence, and from that day he made the slavery more oppressive than heretofore.

The Lord rose in His strength and smote Pharaoh and his people with many great and terrible plagues, and turned all their rivers to blood, so that whenever an Egyptian came to the river to draw water, as soon as he looked into his pitcher, he found it turned to blood. Whether for drinking or for kneading the dough, or for boiling, it always looked like blood.

After this all their waters brought forth frogs, so that whenever an Egyptian drank of them, his stomach became full of frogs, which croaked about in his entrails just as they did in the river. Whether they kneaded or whether they boiled, the water was filled with frogs. Even when they lay down upon their beds, their very perspiration was turned into frogs. (3) He then smote their dust so that it became lice two cubits high; on their very bodies they lay a handbreadth, as well on the king and queen as on the

people. Following this, the Lord sent against them the wild beasts of the field to destroy them; serpents, vipers and scorpions to injure them; mice, weasels, lizards, and noxious reptiles; flies, hornets, and other insects to fly into their eyes and ears; fleas, ants, and every species of winged insect to torture them; they filled the innermost recesses of their houses. When the Egyptians tried to hide themselves in order to shut out and to escape the wild beasts, the Lord ordered the sea-monster (octopus? ###) to ascend to Egypt. It has arms ten cubits in length, according to the cubit of man. Rising to the roof, it uncovered the roof and exposed the rafters; and it then slid its arm inside the house; it wrenched off the bolt and lock, and thus forced open the houses of the Egyptians. In this manner the hordes of wild beasts got into the palace of Pharaoh and his servants, and they worried them greatly.

And God sent a pestilence among the horses, asses, camels, cattle and sheep. When the Egyptian rose early in the morning and went out to his pasture, he found his animals lying about dead, there remaining alive but one in ten. (5) The Lord next sent a plague of fever among the Egyptians, which afterwards broke out into severe boils, which covered them from the sole of the foot to the crown of the head. They broke, and their flesh was running with streams of matter, until they wasted away and rotted, and (6) the hail devastated all their vines and trees so that not even the bark or the leaves were left: all their produce was dried up, and a burning fiery flame played in the midst of it. Even the men and animals found abroad were slain by the flame, and all the libraries (houses of books) were overthrown. (7) Various kinds of locust devoured everything left by the hail; what one species left, the other destroyed. The Egyptians, however, were glad to hunt them and salt them for food. The Lord then raised a very strong wind, which carried them all, including the salted ones, into the Red Sea, so that not a solitary one remained in the whole of Egypt. (8) Darkness then covered the

earth for three days, so that one could not see his own hand before his eyes. During this period of darkness many Hebrews who had rebelled against their Creator, rebelled also against Moses and Aaron, saying: 'We shall not go forth lest we die in the desolate wilderness by famine.' God smote them by a plague, and they were buried during these three days, lest the Egyptians should see them and rejoice at their downfall. (9) All the firstborn of the Egyptians were then slain from man to animal, even the likeness of their firstborn engraved on the walls of their houses was effaced and thrown to the ground. The bones of their firstborn that were buried in their houses the dogs of Egypt dragged away, and, breaking them to pieces, devoured them before the very eyes of the people, so that their descendants cried out in anguish. The people of Egypt then hastened to accompany the servants of God, whom they sent away with much riches and many gifts, according to the oath which God sware at the Covenant between the pieces.

Moses went to Shiḥor (the Nile), and drawing up the coffin of Joseph, took it away with him. The heads of the tribes of Israel also assisted in bringing up each one the coffins of his forefathers. Many of the heathen joined them in their departure from Egypt and in their journey of three days in the wilderness. (11) On the third day, however, they said to one another, 'Did not Moses and Aaron tell Pharaoh that they wished to go a journey of three days in the wilderness in order to sacrifice to the Lord their God? now let us rise early to-morrow morning and see if they return to Egypt to our lord; we shall thereby know that they are to be believed, but if not, we shall go to war against them and bring them back by main force.' On the fourth day they accordingly rose early, and found Moses and Aaron eating and drinking, and celebrating a festival to their God. The rabble said to them, 'Why do you not return to your master?' Moses replied: 'Because the Lord has warned us, saying, "Ye shall no more return to Egypt, but ye shall go to a land flowing with milk and honey, as I have sworn to your fathers.

As soon as the rabble saw that they refused to return, they went to war against the Israelites; but the Israelites prevailed against them, causing great slaughter. The remainder fled to Egypt to inform Pharaoh that the people had fled. And the heart of Pharaoh and of his servants was forthwith turned against them, so that they pursued after them to bring them back to their burdens; for the Egyptians repented after they had sent them away. Pursuing them hastily, they at length overtook them while they were encamping by the Red Sea. There the Lord wrought many miracles for the Hebrews through Moses, His chosen servant, who stretched his staff upon the sea, when the waters were immediately divided into twelve rents (for the twelve tribes), through which they all passed over dryshod, just as one passes along the highway. After them came all the Egyptians. But they were all drowned except Pharaoh, King of Egypt, who thereupon offered a thanksgiving offering to the living God, and believed that He was the living God. God then commanded Michael, Gabriel, and Uriel, the heavenly princes, to bring him up from the sea. So they brought him to the land of Nineveh, where he remained for 500 years.

The Israelites then journeyed into the wilderness, and Amaleq, the son of Eliphaz, the son of Esau, went to war against them. With him there came an innumerable army of wizards and enchanters. But the Lord delivered them into the hand of Moses His servant and Joshua the son of Nun, the Ephrathite, who put them to the edge of the sword. Reuel the Midianite, Moses’ father-in-law, then came out into the wilderness to Moses, where he was encamping by the mountain of God with Zipporah and his sons, and dwelt with them among the Israelites. Moses next fought against Sihon and Og, and captured their land. He then fought against Midian and slew Evi, Reqem, Ṣur, Ḥur and Reb‘a, the five kings of Midian. (14) He put Bala‘am the enchanter and his two sons to the edge of the sword.

When Bala‘am the enchanter saw Eleazar, the son of Aaron the priest, and Pineḥas his son, captains of the host of Israel, following him for the purpose of slaying him, by means of witchcraft he flew in the air, just as an eagle is seen to fly heavenward. But, uttering the ineffable, revered name of God, they brought him down to the earth, and, capturing him, slew him with the rest of the princes of Midian. The Canaanites who dwelt in the mountains also descended with the Amaleqites to fight against Israel, but the Lord delivered them into the hand of Moses and the Israelites, who smote them utterly. (15) Moses was eighty years old when he stood before Pharaoh, King of Egypt. Through him the Lord redeemed Israel from Egypt. He reigned over them in the wilderness forty years, during which time the Lord maintained them by His mercy with the bread of the mighty and the fowl of the heaven, and from the flinty rock He brought forth fountains of water for them. The cloud of the Lord gently guided them by day like children, and a pillar of fire by night, and during the whole time of their travels in the wilderness neither their garments nor their shoes wore out, and no goodness lacked them there. (16) After travelling through the wilderness of Sin, they arrived at Mount Sinai on the third day of the third month after their departure from Egypt. The word of the Lord then came to Moses the Levite, saying, 'Come up to the mountain, and I will give thee the tablets of stone, the Law and the Commandments which I have written to teach the Israelites.' Moses accordingly told the people to sanctify themselves for three days, and on the third day, that is, on the sixth day of the third month, he ascended the mount. The Lord then gave the Israelites through Moses the 613 precepts refined as silver and tried as gold, accompanied by the sound of the trumpet, by thunders and lightnings. They next erected a tabernacle, with its vessels, for ministering to God, and the ark for the two tablets and for the scroll of the Law. They also prepared burnt-offerings, sacrifices, incense, frankincense, oil for the consecration and for anointing therewith the tabernacle

with its vessels and the priests of God, viz., Aaron and his sons, who ministered before God and offered sacrifices and incense for the congregation. They also made for them garments of honour, and appointed the sons of Levi to guard the tabernacle of the Lord, to minister to their fellow-priests, and to sing hymns during the sacrifice. They also offered frankincense within to avert the anger and punishment of the Lord.

(17) In the fortieth year of their wanderings, Miriam the prophetess died, on the tenth day of the first month, and was buried in the wilderness of Ṣin, which is Qadesh. In the same year, on the first day of the fifth month, Aaron the priest died, and was buried on Mount Hor, and Eleazar and Ithamar were appointed to minister in the place of their father. The priesthood has remained in that family as an inheritance throughout all generations. (18) In that same year on the seventh day of the twelfth month—i.e., Adar—Moses, the servant of the Lord, died, 120 years old, and was buried in the valley at the nethermost part of the Mount of Ebarim, and Joshua the son of Nun, the Ephrathite, was appointed leader of the people. The rest of the words of Moses relating to his power, his military deeds, his entreaties and prayers on behalf of his people, are they not written in the 'Sefer Hayashar,' which is the Law of our God? Joshua the son of Nun rose up after him. He led the Israelites across the Jordan and divided the land by lots according to the word of God.

YOU will find between these covers all the ecclesiastical writings of early Christian authorities that are known to exist, and yet were omitted from the authorized New Testament. They are published here as a matter of record. Whether they are canonical or not, at least these writings are of very great antiquity. Origins are noted in paragraphs at the front of each book. This will enable the reader to form his own conclusions as to the genuineness of the writings. These writings are a vivid picture of the minds of men in the post-Apostolic period of the Church. Discount the statements from the historical viewpoint as you will—there remains in these gospels and epistles an earnestness of purpose, and zeal to express a message, similar to that of our authorized Bible. An interesting question naturally arises as to why these writings were cast out in the selection of the material that has come down to us in the authorized version. The compilation of the Bible was not an act of any definite occurrence. It was a matter complicated and abstruse. It was an evolution at the hands of Churchmen of various beliefs and purposes. In the formulation of early church doctrines there was dissension, personal jealousy, intolerance, persecution, bigotry. That out of this welter should have arisen the Bible, with its fine inspiration, would seem to present a plausible basis for belief in its Divine origin. But who can deny that under such vicious and human circumstances much writing of as pure purpose and as profound sincerity as other that is included in the authorized Bible, must have been omitted? The story of the first council of Nice, when Arius was commanded by the Bishop of Alexandria to quit his beliefs or be declared a heretic, and his writings were ordered destroyed, is eloquent of many things that happened. Good men were engaged on both sides of the ecclesiastical controversies. About two-thirds of this volume is occupied with epistles. Beginning on page 91 you will discover otherwise generally unknown letters of Paul; and the illuminating letters of Clement and others, concluding with correspondence and reports of Herod, Pontius Pilate, and Tiberius Cæsar. Concerning these epistles Archbishop of Canterbury Wake, who translated them from the originals, says that here is a full and perfect collection of "all the genuine writings that remain to us of the Apostolic Fathers, and carry on the antiquity of the Church from the time of the Holy Scriptures of the New Testament to about a hundred and fifty years after Christ; that except the Holy Scriptures, there is nothing remaining of the truly genuine Christian antiquity more early; that they contain all that can with any certainty be depended upon of the most Primitive Fathers, who had not only the advantage of living in the apostolical times, of hearing the Holy Apostles, and conversing with them, but were most of them persons of a very eminent character in the church, too: that we cannot with any reasonable doubt of what they deliver to us as the Gospel of Christ, but ought to receive it, if not with equal veneration, yet but a little less respect than we do 

Moses-10 commandments.png

The Garden of Eden as a Primordial Temple or Sacred Space for Humankind This journal article considers ways in which the Garden of Eden functioned as a primordial temple for humankind. An examination of the creation narrative points to Eden as the earliest-occurring sacred space. Because it is a prototype and archetype of future temples, Eden provides a conceptual framework for understanding and appreciating their purpose. Moreover, an analysis of the biblical data indicates that God intended Adam and Eve to serve as His sacerdotal vice-regents in the garden. Indeed, Eden is regarded as the starting point for fellowship between God and redeemed humanity.

The tree of life is one of the most crucial symbols in the Bible, mainly appearing in the second and last chapters of the Bible. Its significance, however, spans the divine revelation of the entire Scriptures. In Genesis 2the tree of life is in the midst of the garden of Eden; in revelation 22 the tree of life is in the centre of the holy city, New Jerusalem. Between these two ends of the Bible, we see the growth and enlargement of the tree of life.This article seeks to examine the significance of the tree of life, especially in the reopening of the way to the tree of life through redemption after the fall of man, the growth of the tree of life, and its ultimate consummation in the New Jerusalem.The Significance of the Tree of Life in GenesisThe Bible employs many symbols to signify divine and mystical realities. One of the first and most striking sym-bols is the tree of life in the Garden of Eden (Gen. 2:9). The two parts of the expression, tree and life, are signifi-cant by themselves, and the entire phrase tree of life has additional significance.A tree signifies a life created by God with outstanding characteristics displayed in its growth, reproduction, and longevity. “Trees reveal a remarkable power of annual or periodic renewal and persistent revivification which may appear to be of almost endless duration” (James 247).1The Bible often draws attention to the features of the tree life. The growth and expansion of trees are more striking than that of animals (e.g., a vine branching out over obstacles, Gen. 49:22). Trees can grow again after being cut down (Job 14:7); parts of some trees can be grafted into other trees (Rom. 11:16-17, 24); and the fruit and seeds of trees (and of plants in general) must fall into the ground (and die) in order to reproduce themselves, even in a prolific manner. Such characteris-tics of trees testify to the reality of the resurrection of life(cf. John 12:24). The evergreen tree symbolizes God in His unchangeableness and eternal newness (Hosea 14:8). Life signifies the divine, uncreated, incorruptible, inde-structible, immortal, eternal life of God (1 Tim. 6:16;Heb. 7:16; John 3:16). This is indicated by the fact that the tree of life has the property of bestowing eternal or everlasting life. Access to the tree of life was forbidden after Adam and the woman partook of the tree of knowl-edge lest they eat of the tree of life and live forever (Gen.3:22-24). The Hebrew word for life, Ýayyim, is an abstract plural noun which generally refers to the physical life(e.g., referring to the days of someone’s life) as well as to a blessed, happy, or spiritual life. Occasionally, Ýayyimoccurs in conjunction with the words forever and eternal(Psa. 133:3; Dan. 12:2). God is considered as the source of the fountain of life (Psa. 36:9) as well as a being of life (as indicated by numerous occurrences of the expression as the Lord lives, using the adjective form Ýay). Septuagint translators mainly translated Ýayyimwith the Greek word who, which is used in the New Testament to refer to the eternal, divine life of God (occurring at least forty-three times with the word aijwvnio", eternal). New Testament reveals that Christ is the embodiment of this life to dispense this life to humanity (Col. 2:9; John1:4; 11:25; 14:6; 10:10). The tree of life can be viewed as signifying the joining or mingling of something created (a tree) with the uncreated, divine, immortal life of God. Human beings could never partake of the life of God by themselves. God dwells in unapproachable light (1 Tim. 6:16). However, because this life has been made available to human beings, being mediated in the form of the tree of life, the life of God can be received by human beings. This sym-bolic mingling of the life of the Creator with His creation anticipates God’s economy and His plan to dispense and mingle Himself as life with humanity. When God then placed human beings before the tree, He confirmed His purpose that humans partake of the divine life and become constituted with it to become mingled with Himself as life. The very act of eating causes the elements of what is eaten to be assimilated into or mingled with the being of the eaters. The eaters become what they eat, at least in the constitution. Hence, the goal of the partaking of the tree of life is that the partakers would become parts of the enlarged tree of life consisting of divinity mingled with humanity. This notion is developed in John15 and consummated in Revelation 22.Due to the fall of man, which resulted from eating of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, the tree of death,2humanity became corrupted, mingled with the sinful nature of Satan; they have constituted sinners, and death was the issue (Rom. 5:19; 6:23). As a result, the way to the tree of life was closed. This precluded the possibility of the mingling of divinity with humanity, apart from redemption.Israel as a TreeIsrael is depicted as a vine (Psa. 80:8-16; Isa. 5:1-7; 27:2-6; Jer. 2:21; 5:10; 6:9; 8:13; Ezek. 15:6; 17:6-8; 19:10;Hosea 10:1; 14:7; Joel 1:7; cf. Matt. 21:33-46), a fig tree(Hosea 9:10; Joel 1:7; Matt. 21:19; cf. 24:32), and an olive-tree (Hosea 14:6; Rom. 11:17-24), which failed to pro-duce the proper fruit. The law given at Sinai was unable to give life (Gal. 3:21, lit., to make alive or produce life), so all Israel brought forth was thorns and thistles (Isa. 5:6;Ezek. 2:6). As a result of its failures, Israel was cut down(Psa. 80:16). This is the destiny of every tree that does not produce good fruit (Matt. 3:10; 7:19). The devastation of Israel by the empires of Assyria, Babylon, and Rome cut Israel down to the ground (Hosea 9:16; cf. Jer. 5:10; Ezek.17:9; Rom. 11:17-19). However, a tree is able to grow again after severe pruning or cutting down. Job 14:7-9states, “There is hope for a tree: / If it is cut down, it will sprout again, / And its tender shoot will not cease. / Thoughts root grows old in the earth, / And its trunk dies inthe dirt, / At the scent of water it will bud / And will produce branches like a new plant.” The return from exile was considered as sprouting forth (2 Kings 19:30; Isa. 27:6;60:21; Ezek. 17:23; Matt.24:32; Rom. 11:17-19). However, the returnees also failed to produce proper fruit, and it was left to a descendant of David from whom the proper fruit-bearing vine would come.Although the royal family of David was devastated, God promised that a descendant of David, as the Messiah or Christ, would come as the shoot (Heb. ÝoÞer)sprouting forth or branching (Heb. nëýer) out of the tree from the root or stump (Heb. gëza‘) of the Davidic royal line (Isa. 11:1). Christ is the root (Heb. ÿoreÿ) of Jesse(v. 10; Rom. 15:12; cf. Isa. 53:2) and root (Rev. 5:5;22:16) and branch or shoot (Heb. ýemaÝ—Jer. 23:5;33:15; cf. Isa. 4:2; Zech. 3:8; 6:12) of David. The sprout-ing forth of Christ can be considered as the sprouting forth of the true vine, which has been enlarged in John 15to include the believers in Christ.3Redemption and the Tree of LifeThe reopening of the way to the tree of life required redemption with the termination of the sinful nature.

In the compound term tree of life, tree signifies Christ’s death on the tree (the cross) and life signifies His becoming the life-giving Spirit through His Resurrection accomplishment of redemption required the incarnation and death of Christ. Through the incarnation, the divine life was mingled with the human life to produce the first God-man. He joined Himself to humanity in the likeness of the flesh of sin, but without sin (Rom. 8:3; 2 Cor. 5:21;1 John 3:5). Through His death on the cross He con-demned sin in the flesh (Rom. 8:3), the issue of the mingling of the satanic element with the human element that had shut the way to the tree of life. His death was accomplished by crucifixion, by hanging on a tree (Acts5:30; 10:39; 13:29; 1 Pet. 2:24; cf. Gal. 3:13; Deut.21:23). The tree of the cross opens the way to the tree of life. We could even say, along with early Christian tradi-tion, that the tree of life is the cross,4although (perhaps it is more accurate to say) the crucified Christ is the tree of life (cf. John 15:1). His death on the cross, which dealt with our sinful nature, opened the way to the tree of life. In His resurrection, He became the life-giving Spirit. In the compound term tree of life, tree signifies Christ’s death on the tree (the cross) and life signifies His becoming the life-giving Spirit through His resurrection.The connection between the tree of life and the cross is also reinforced by the use of the same Greek word xuvlon for the tree of life and the tree (cross). There are two different Greek words used for tree, xuvlonand devndron.Devndronrefers to a living tree(cf. the English word rhodo-dendron,i.e., rose tree); whereas xuvlon refers to both living tree and wood from a tree (cf. the English word xylophone,i.e., wood sound),with the meaning of wood for xuvlon much more common than treein classical Greek. This distinction is preserved in the New Testament, where xuvlon almost always refers to wood or timber. It is used nine times to refer to vari-ous objects of wood, five times to the cross (as a tree—Acts 5:30; 10:39; 13:29; Gal. 3:13; 1 Pet. 2:24). Itis used five times to refer to the tree of life (Rev. 2:7; 22:2[twice], 14, 19). The only other time xuvlonrefers to atree is when it is applied figuratively to Christ comparing himself to the Jewish people before His crucifixion(Luke 23:31).5Otherwise, devndronis always used when living trees are mentioned (e.g., Matt. 3:10; 7:17; Luke13:19; 21:29; Rev. 7:3). The Septuagint translators also used the word xuvlon rather than devndronto refer to the tree of life in Genesis.6Access to the tree of life comes from being united to the crucified and resurrected Christ, the life-giving Spirit, who is the tree of life. By believing and being baptized into Him, a human being is united with Him and has access to the tree of life.

The Vine in John 15 The vine in John 15 is the most striking presentation of the tree of life in terms of what the believers become through their incorporation in Christ. The Lord Jesus declared that He is life (1:4; 11:25; 14:6), and in particular, He revealed Himself as the vine tree and the believers as the branches in the vine (15:1, 5). Hence, He is the tree of life, and the believers as the branches are His enlargement. Christ as the vine and the believers as the branches mutually indwell each other by virtue of their organic union. The vine signifies Christ as the cen-ter of God’s economy, the organism of the Triune God,a divine-human incorporation, the Father’s house, the Body of Christ, and a sign of Christ’s universal spreading(Kangas 21-23). The emphasis in John 15 is on the increase and multiplication of life through fruit-bearing.Fruit-bearing is the goal of the pruning (or cleansing—the Greek words are related v. 2); it is the goal and issue of the mutual abiding (vv. 4-5); it glorifies the Father(v. 8), and it is the purpose for setting the believers as branches in the vine—that they would go forth and bear fruit and that this fruit would remain or abide (the same Geek word means used for both English words, v. 16). This vine is the true vine, bringing forth the proper fruit.This is in contrast to Israel, which failed to produce the proper fruit. Through bearing fruit, the vine is enlarged and expanded.The Lampstand(s) in RevelationAn additional symbol of the tree of life is the golden lampstand or menorah.Observers were struck by the resemblance of this piece of furniture to a tree. This can be seen in a number of representations of menorahs in ancient synagogues that more closely resemble a tree than stylized menorahs in today’s synagogues.7While the golden lampstand was not organic in nature, being made out of gold, it was organic in design, with branches, calyx-es, buds, and blossoms, etc. (Exo. 25:31-40). This description even gives the idea of growth. “Blossomingindicates growth....The lampstand is a growing tree”(Lee, Exodus1082).What then is the significance of the lampstand as it relates to the tree of life? The lampstand is made out of gold, which signifies the unchangeable, incorrupt-ible nature of God. This gold is embodied in the shape of a tree, which typifies Christ who is the embodiment of God (Col. 2:9). The blossoming of this tree is actually shining the light from the lamps that are shaped as almond blossoms. The seven lamps signify the Spirit or the seven Spirits (Zech. 4:1-10; Rev. 4:5). Just as the tree of life is the embodiment of the life of God in Christ, who is expressed as the life-giving Spirit, so alsothe lampstand signifies the Triune God embodied in Christ and expressed as the Spirit. In Revelation 1 there are seven golden lampstands (v. 12). One lampstand has been reproduced and multiplied into seven. These lamp-stands signify the seven local churches in Asia (v. 20). Eventually, the many local churches as golden lamp-stands consummate in universal, eternal, aggregate lamps and—the New Jerusalem. The nature of the New Jerusalem is pure gold, just like the lampstand, and it shines forth the light of God (22:5) through the lamp of the Lamb (21:23), which is diffused through the jasper wall of the city to the whole inhabited earth.The Tree of Life in RevelationThe verses that mention the tree of life in Revelationunderscore both the aspect of supply and what those who are supplied by its fruit become. The overcomers are rewarded by being able to eat the tree of life in the Paradise of God being GODSTRUEcHURCH>orgduring the millennial kingdom (2:7). The tree of life is unveiled in Revelation 22:2 as the consum-mation of the vine of John 15 in the New Jerusalem. The tree of life grows on both sides of the river (like a vine).Now the vine tree is an integral part of the holy city, the mutual habitation of God and humanity. This enlarged divine tree includes all the believers. Not only does it rep-resent God mingled with humanity in Christ but the enlargement of that mingling in His believers.The tree of life growing alongside the river of life in the city of God is the ultimate consummation of a number of references in which individuals are likened to trees, either beside water (Jer. 17:7-8; cf. Isa. 44:4; Ezek.47:7, 12) or planted in the house of God; e.g., the right-eous man who is like a palm tree and like a cedar planted in the house of Jehovah (Psa. 92:12-14), and one who trusts in God is likened to a flourishing olive tree in the house of God (52:8). The tree of life bears twelve kinds of fruit for each month of the year, signifying its richness in variety and newness.Its fruit signifies God as the supply to His redeemed and regenerated elect for eternity. Its leaves are for the heal-ing of the nations (Rev. 22:2; cf. Ezek. 47:12; Exo. 15:25), signifying the deeds of Christ guiding and regulating the nations outwardly so that they may live a proper human lifeforever.Access to the tree is the right of those who have washed their robes (Rev. 22:14). The washing of robes refers to the believers’ acceptance through Christ’s judicial redemption by the shedding of His blood. The right to the tree of life refers to the enjoyment of the divine lifein Christ’s organic salvation. The believers’ having theright to partake of the tree is in keeping with their being part of the vine tree, the tree of life. The notion of partaking of and being a part of the tree of life is con-firmed by the use of the Greek word mevro"in verse 19. The word mevro"means a part or portion due or assigned to one, as well as a constituent part of the whole. The word is a strong confirmation of the believers’ twofoldstatus regarding the tree of life. It refers both to the share and portion that the believers have in enjoying the fruit of the tree of life as well as their participation as a constituent part of the tree of life. The tree of life along with the holy city constitutes the believers’ eternal bless-ing.ConclusionThe placing of human beings before the tree of life at the centre of the garden signifies God’s intention for man to take off and be constituted with Him as life. The par-takers of the life of God become the same as He is in life and nature but not in the Godhead (2 Pet. 1:4; 1 Cor.12:12, 27; Rom. 12:5; John 15:5). The symbol of the tree is used in conjunction with the notion of life to indicate God’s purpose to dispense Himself as life to be mingled with His creatures. The characteristics of a tree convey this notion—it produces an edible fruit for man to partake of, and it is a growing organ-ism that spreads, increases, and multiplies through its fruit-bearing activity. As a result of the divine dispens-ing, the believers, the partakers of God’s divine life and nature, become the mem-bers of the Body of Christ—branches of the universal vine, which encompasses the entire earth.In Genesis human beings fell by partaking in the tree of death, human nature was corrupted, and God closed the way to the tree of life. Eventually, through the incarnation, He came in the form of a man and crucified the fallen sinful nature of man on a tree, the cross. Through His death and resurrection as the life-giving Spirit, He made the life of God available to mankind. By enjoying Him as the tree of life, human beings are brought back to the Triune God to partake of Him. These issues in their becoming parts of the corporate tree of life, branches of the true vine, and members of the Body of Christ. This organism consum-mates in the New Jerusalem as the ultimate consummation of the tree of life, which eternally supplies to the believers the divine life and which constitutes them the organic parts of the tree of life, through their organic union with Christ.by Roger GoodThe placing of human beings before the tree of life at the centre of the garden signifies God’s intention for man to partake of and be constituted with Him as life.Notes1James goes on to say, with reference to the tree of life,“When the secret of life was sought in nature the Sacred Tree was the perfect symbol of its mystery, with its leaves and blos-soms and fruit; either shedding its verdure in the autumn only to bring forth afresh its shoots and buds in the spring or if remaining evergreen to typify life everlasting” (268).2See James: “The potency of the Tree of Knowledge was such that to partake of its fruit had fatal consequences, death being the result of eating thereof. Therefore, it was virtually a tree of death” (221).3The same imagery of the cutting down of a tree to its root and stump and its restoration is also applied to Nebuchadnezzar and his kingdom (Dan. 4:14-15, 20-23; cf. Ezek. 31:3-14, refer-ring to Assyria as a cedar tree).4Christian tradition has long associated the cross with the tree of life, as can be seen in early Christian art.5Some commentators even understand this use of xuvlonas“wood,” with Jesus referring to the Jewish people as dry wood and Himself as sappy wood, which is not so easily burned as dry(cf. J. Schneider 38).6It is interesting to note that inthe four places in the Old Testa-ment outside of Genesis wherethe tree of life is mentioned in the Old Testament (Prov. 3:18;11:30; 13:12; 15:4), the Septua-gint translator uses xuvlonfor the first occurrence, which refers toWisdom, which in certain por-tions of Proverbs is personified.“This personification of God’swisdom is the second of the Trinity, the Son of God. Christ isthe personified wisdom of God” 

 

GODSTRUEcHURCH IS SPIRITUAL EDEN

 HEre IS-An example of how I like to teach. I source MY material if not hand written by me. I then read, spell check - check tHE grammar and announce for example some books are very owd and were written in owd English etcetera.then publish as an introduction if not tHE full story. IF Biblical announce tHE fact 100 % inspired - if NOT will say so. All can be called inspired because I have read all or a part of each of the works presented - and in many cases are others works which are not officially 100% inspired but of great importance the year and era it was written, tHE connection to tHE subject it refers to and tHE influence it had over its audience also popularity. I will not take tHE joy of FREE WILL away from you and you will be very intelligent {after my training!} In addition you will be fully capable of judgement for yourselves. If all agree on everything, what is left to discuss or talk about? Coffee and lunch breaks would be so boring and painful no one would even want eternal life etcetera 

 

I never publish anything I haven't read or part read - so therefore I suppose all MY published works are inspired. It doesn't have to just be in tHE Bible to be 100% inspired there are many books, plays, films, songs, groups, sports players etcetera that have all been inspired. They say Messi was born with his skills, what riff raff Ha HA HA LOL!  Anyway below is an example and pointing you to where the book can be found: example on which WEbsite displayed or a link - should you find my introduction intriguing which is normally copied from whatever tHE article in question.

 

I publish all my works in English as - Online language tool Babbel reports that English is the most spoken language in the world, with a number of speakers totaling more than 1.4 billion, according to Statistic & Data. This combines both native and non-native speakers. Should you require another language you will need to source for yourselves either online country of origin libraries etcetera.

 

Mysteries of Genesis - To Continue -Mysteries Of Genesis GO to MY Website ... 

https://martynkenney3.wixsite.com/holyspirit

 

THE BOOK OF GENESIS is the key to the Bible. In the New Testament it is quoted twenty-seven times literally and thirty-eight times substantially. It tells in a very few words how God first imaged man and the universe and then turned the development over to Jehovah, who has been in a process of manifestation for ages and aeons. The "Five Books of Moses," of which Genesis is the first, have always been credited to Moses, but that he was the author seems doubtful in the face of the many stories of creation found in the legends and hieroglyphs of ancient Egypt, Chaldea, and other nations that are almost identical with those of Genesis. It would thus seem that Moses edited the legends of the ages and compiled them into an allegorical history of creation. As printed in English translations there is little to reconcile Genesis with creation as revealed by modern geology. It is said that Hugh Miller, the brilliant Scottish geologist, went insane in his efforts to reconcile Genesis with the geological record. However, more accurate translations of the Hebrew show that the literal reading of the English is often not warranted by the original text. For example, the English Bible reads, "In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth." Fentons translation renders it thus: "By periods God created that which produced the Suns; then that which produced the Earth." When we realize that God is mind (Spirit-mind), we see that this latter rendition is correct. God creates the ideas that form the things. Here we have the key that unlocks not only the mysteries of Genesis but the whole Bible. God's creations are always spiritual. This includes the spiritual man, called Jehovah, through whom all things, including personal man, Adam, are brought into manifestation. We ask our readers to dwell on this initial proposition until its truth is established in consciousness, because it is repeated over and over in both the Old and the New Testament. Jesus said, "I speak not from myself: but the Father abiding in me doeth his works." Jesus was here referring both to His personality, the external I, and to the inner spiritual entity that He named the Father, in Genesis called Jehovah.

 

Hebrew words are composite; they contain a variety of meanings, to be determined by the context. For example the Hebrew word yom, translated "day" in the English Bible, means "to be hot"; that is, with reference to the heat of the day as compared with the cool of the night. The word yom was also used to represent a period of time, an age. It will readily be seen that the translator had a rich field of ideas from which to choose and that he could make his text historical or symbolic according to his consciousness. If he thought the original story was a statement of facts his translation would be to that end. The Pharisees of Jesus' time were condemned by Him for teaching the letter of the Scriptures and neglecting the spirit. The same charge can be brought today against those who study the Bible as history rather than as parable and idealistic illustration of the spiritual unfoldment of man. The Bible veils in its history the march of man from innocence and ignorance to a measure of sophistication and understanding. Over all hovers the divine idea of man, the perfect-man pattern, the Lord, who is a perpetual source of inspiration and power for every man. Those who seek to know this Lord and His manifestation, Jesus Christ, receive a certain spiritual quickening that opens the inner eye of the soul and they see beyond the land of shadows into the world of Spirit. The truths in this book will be revealed to you through your own spiritual unfoldment. Spiritual things are spiritually discerned. The spiritual revelations that you seem to get from books and teachers already exist as submerged experiences in your own soul. The essential truths have been worked out in this or previous incarnations, and when you were reminded of the buried idea it blazed forth as a light from without. So all that you are or ever will be must come from your own spiritual achievements. "Seek, and ye shall find; knock, and it shall be opened unto you."

 

CHAPTER 1. SPIRITUAL MAN, GENESIS 1 

THE WORD genesis means "source" or "origin." It points to new birth and to the perfection of man in the regeneration. The law of generation is undoubtedly one of the mysteries in human consciousness. Men have probed with more or less success nearly every secret of nature, but of the origin of life they know comparatively nothing. In the matter of life we discover that the clues given us by our own experience point to intelligence as well as force. In other words, life falls short of its mission if it is not balanced by intelligence. Man is constantly seeking to know the origin of both the universe and himself. But nearly all his research of a scientific nature has been on the material plane. As a rule, he has ascribed the beginning to matter, to atoms and cells, but much has eluded his grasp because their action is invisible to the eye of sense. Now we are beginning in the realm of mind a scientific search for the origin of all things. We say "scientific" because the discoveries that come from a right understanding of mind and its potentialities can be arranged in an orderly way and because they prove themselves by the application of their laws. What is stated in the Book of Genesis in the form of allegory can be reduced to ideas, and these ideas can be worked out by the guidance of mental laws. Thus a right understanding of mind, and especially of Divine Mind, is the one and only logical key to an understanding of the beginnings of man and the universe. In this book we have many symbols explained and their meaning interpreted, so that anyone who sets himself the task can understand and also apply to his own development the rules and laws by which ideas are related to one another and discover how they are incorporated into man's consciousness, thus giving him the key to the unfoldment of the primal ideas implanted in him from the beginning. It is found that what is true in the creation of the universe (as allegorically stated in Genesis) is equally true in the unfoldment of man's mind and body, because man is the microcosmic copy of the "Grand Man" of the universe.

 

The Bible is the history of man. In its sixty-six books it describes in allegory, prophecy, epistle, parable, and poem, man's generation, degeneration, and regeneration. It has been preserved and prized beyond all other books because it teaches man how to develop the highest principle of his being, the spirit. As man is a threefold being, spirit, soul, and body, so the Bible is a trinity in unity. It is body as a book of history; soul as a teacher of morals; and spirit as a teacher of the mysteries of being. The student of history finds the Bible interesting if not wholly accurate; the faithful good man finds in it that which strengthens his righteousness, and the overcomer with Christ finds it to be the greatest of all books as a guide to his spiritual unfoldment. But it must be read in the spirit if the reader is to get the lesson it teaches. The key to its spiritual meaning is that the back of every mentioned thing is an idea. The Bible will be more readily understood if the fact is kept in mind that the words used have both an inner and an outer significance. Studied historically and intellectually, the external only is discerned and the living inner reality is overlooked. In these lessons we shall seek to understand and to reveal the within, and trace the lawful and orderly connection between the within and the without. Genesis, historically considered, falls into three parts: first, the period from the creation to the Flood; secondly, the period from the Flood to the call of Abraham; and thirdly, the period from the call of Abraham to the death of Joseph. The 1st chapter describes creation as accomplished in six days, and refers to a seventh day of rest. There is no reason to believe that these days were twenty-four hours in length. "One day is with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day." They simply represent periods of development or degrees of mind unfoldment. Numbers are used throughout the Bible in connection with faculties or ideas in Divine Mind. There are twelve divine faculties. They are symbolized in the Old Testament by the twelve sons of Jacob and in the New Testament by the twelve apostles of Jesus. All of these have a threefold character: first, as absolute ideas in Divine Mind; secondly, as thoughts, which are ideas in expression but not manifest; and thirdly, as manifestations of thoughts, which we call things. In man this threefold character is known as spirit, soul, and body. Therefore in studying man as the offspring of God it is necessary to distinguish between the faculties as they exist in the body. We find heaven to be the orderly arrangement of divine ideas within man's true being. Earth is the outer manifestation of those ideas, this manifestation being man's body. In the 1st chapter of Genesis it is the great creative Mind that is at work. The record portrays just how divine ideas were brought into expression. As man must have an idea before he can bring an idea into manifestation, so it is with the creations of God. When a man builds a house he builds it first in his mind. He has the idea of a house, he completes the plan in his mind, and then he works it out in manifestation. Thus God created the universe. The 1st chapter of Genesis describes the ideal creation. The 1st chapter shows two parts of the Trinity: mind, and idea in mind. In the 2d chapter we have the third part, manifestation. In this illustration all theological mystery about the Trinity is cleared away, for we see that it is simply mind, idea in mind, and manifestation of idea. Since man is the offspring of God, made in the image and likeness of the Divine Mind, he must express himself under the laws of this great creative Mind. The law of manifestation for man is the law of thought. God ideates: man thinks. One is the completion of the other in mind. The man that God created in His own image and likeness and pronounced good and very good is spiritual man. This man is the direct offspring of Divine Mind, God's idea of perfect man. This is the onlybegotten Son, the Christ, the Lord God, the Jehovah, the I AM. In the 2d chapter this Jehovah or divine idea of perfect man forms the manifest man and calls his name Adam. The whole of the 1st chapter is a supplemental statement of the ideas on which evolution is based. Mind projects its ideas into universal substance, and evolution is the manifestation of the ideas thus projected. The whole Genesiac record is an allegory explaining just what takes place in the mind of each individual in his unfoldment from the idea to the manifest. God, the great universal Mind, brought forth an idea, a man, perfect like Himself, and that perfect man is potentially in every individual, working himself into manifestation in compliance with law.

 

Gen. 1:1-5. In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth. And the earth was waste and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep: and the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters. And God said, Let there be light: and there was light. And God saw the light, that it was good: and God divided the light from the darkness. And God called the light Day, and the darkness he called Night. And there was evening and there was morning, one day. To understand the creation of the universe by God, we must know something of the character of God. Jesus said, "God is Spirit." The works of God, He said, were done in Him (Jesus) and through Him. "The Father abiding in me doeth his works." That God is an intelligent force always present and always active is the virtual conclusion of all philosophers, thus corroborating the statements of Jesus. God is eternally in His creation and never separate from it. Wherever there is evidence of creative action, there God is. God is mind, and He created through His word or idea, and this is the universal creative vehicle. It is plainly stated in this 1st chapter of Genesis that "God said." Jesus corroborated this creative power of the word or idea again and again. He said that His words were so powerful that if we let them abide in us we might ask whatsoever we would and it should be done to us. God is a mind force carrying forward creation under mental law. That law may be known to anyone who will follow the example of Jesus. Jesus said, "Be perfect, as your heavenly Father is perfect." This means that we should strive for the perfection that God is. We are the image and likeness of this great creative Mind, and being in a certain aspect of our mind just like it, we can through mental adjustment attain the same conscious unity that Jesus did. God creates through the action of His mind, and all things rest on ideas. The idea behind the flower is beauty. The idea behind music is harmony. The idea back in the day is light or the dispensation of intelligence. This whole chapter is a statement of the creative ideas involved in the universe. It deals with involution. Evolution is the working out in manifestation of what the mind has involved. Whatever mind commands to be brought forth will be brought forth by and through the law of evolution inherent in being. This applies to the great and the small. In mind there is but one. The first step in creation is the awakening of man to spiritual consciousness, the dawning of light in his mind, his perception of Truth through the quickening of his spirit. Light is wisdom; and the first day's work is the calling of light or wisdom into expression. Light represents intelligence, and darkness represents undeveloped capacity. Symbolically these are "day" and "night." The word God in this instance stands for Elohim, which is God in His capacity as creative power, including within Himself all the potentialities of being. The "beginning" indicates the first concept of Divine Mind. "Created" means ideated. The "heavens" is the realm of ideas, and the "earth" represents ideas in expression. Heaven is the idea and earth the mental picture. A comparison is found in the activity of our own mind: we have an idea and then think out a plan before we bring it forth. Ferrar Fenton, the well-known student of Hebrew and Greek, says that the first verse should read: "By periods God created that which produced the Suns; then that which produced the Earth. But the Earth was unorganized and empty; and darkness covered its convulsed surface; but the breath of God vibrated over its fluid face." From this we are to understand that God created not the earth as it appears but that which produced the earth. Elohim, Spirit, creates the spiritual idea, which is afterward made manifest through Jehovah God. The earthly thought was not yet clear. Harmony of form had not yet come into expression. "The deep" represents the capacity of the earth idea to bring forth. "The face of the deep" represents its intelligence. Understanding has not yet come into expression, and there is no apparent action. "The Spirit of God" or divine intelligence moved upon "the face of the waters." "Waters" here represents unexpressed capacities, the mental element out of which all is produced. Man is conscious of unexpressed capacities within himself, but only as he moves upon mind substance with intelligence are his inherent spiritual qualities molded into forms. "Light" is intelligence, a spiritual quality. It corresponds to understanding and should precede all activity. At the beginning of any of our creations we should declare for light. Our declarations of Truth are instantly fulfilled in Spirit. James says in his Epistle, "Every good gift and every perfect gift is from above, coming down from the Father of lights." The Evangelist John speaks of "the true light . . . which lighteth every man, coming into the world." All that emanates from God is good. In the process of bringing forth our ideas we need a certain degree of understanding in order properly to regulate our thoughts. The light must be divided from the darkness, as in Divine Mind the light was separated from the darkness. "Day" represents the state of mind in which intelligence dominates. "Night" represents the realm of thoughts that are not yet illuminated by the Spirit of God. Gen. 1:6-8. And God said, Let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters, and let it divide the waters from the waters. And God made the firmament, and divided the waters which were under the firmament from the waters which were above the firmament: and it was so. And God called the firmament Heaven. And there was evening and there was morning, a second day. The second step in creation is the development of faith or the "firmament." The "waters" represent the unestablished elements of the mind. The second day's creation is the second movement of the Divine Mind. The central idea in this day's creation is the establishment of a firmament in the "midst of the waters" dividing the "waters from the waters." "Waters" represents unexpressed possibilities in mind. There must be a "firm" starting point or foundation established. This foundation or "firmament" is faith "moving upon" the unformed capacities of Spirit consciousness. The divine Logos--God's creative power--gives forth the edict "Let there be a firmament." The first step or "day" in creation involves "light" or understanding, and the second step, faith in the knowing quality of mind. 

 

The word is instantly fulfilled in Spirit. "And God made the firmament." This does not refer to the visible realm of forms but to the mental image in Divine Mind, which deals only with ideas. In every mental state we have an "above" and a "below." Above the firmament are the unexpressed capacities ("waters") of the conscious mind resting in faith in the Divine Mind. Below the firmament are the unexpressed capacities ("waters") of the subconscious mind. The word "Heaven" is capitalized in this passage because it relates directly to Divine Mind. Faith ("firmament") established in consciousness is a state of perfect harmony, therefore "Heaven." Another degree of mind unfoldment has been attained. "And there was evening and there was morning, a second day." "Evening" represents completion, and the "morning" following represents activity of ideas. Gen. 1:9-13. And God said, Let the waters under the heavens be gathered together unto one place, and let the dry land appear: and it was so. And God called the dry land Earth; and the gathering together of the waters called the Seas: and God saw that it was good. And God said, Let the earth put forth grass, herbs yielding seed, and fruit-trees bearing fruit after their kind, wherein is the seed thereof, upon the earth: and it was so. And the earth brought forth grass, herbs yielding seed after their kind, and trees bearing fruit, wherein is the seed thereof, after their kind: and God saw that it was good. And there was evening and there was morning, a third day. The third step in creation is the beginning of the formative activity of the mind called imagination. This gathers "the waters . . . together unto one place" so that the "dry land" appears. Then the imagination begins a great multiplication of forms and shapes in the mind. The first day's creation reveals the light or inspiration of Spirit. The second day establishes faith in our possibilities to bring forth the invisible. The third day's creation or third movement of the Divine Mind pictures the activity of ideas in mind. This is called expression. The formative power of mind is the imagination, whose work is represented by the dry land. There is much unformed thought in mind ("the heavens") that must be separated from the formed. 

 

In this proclamation "earth" is the mental image of formed thought and does not refer to the manifest world. God is Divine Mind and deals directly with ideas. "Seas" represents the unformed state of mind. We say that a man is "at sea" when he is in doubt in his mental processes. In other words he has not established his thoughts in line with the principle involved. The sea is capable of production, but must come under the dominion of the imagination. Divine Mind images its ideas definitely and in every detail. The idea precedes the fulfillment. "Let there be" represents the perfect confidence necessary to demonstrate. Ideas are productive and bring forth their kind. They express themselves under the law of divine imagery. The seed is within the thought and is reproduced through thought activity until thought habits are formed. Thoughts become fixed in the earth or formed consciousness. In the Divine Mind all is good. Again a definite degree of mind unfoldment has been attained. Man, in forming his world, goes through the same mental process, working under divine law. Jesus said, "The seed is the word of God." Gen. 1:14-19. And God said, Let there be lights in the firmament of heaven to divide the day from the night; and let them be for signs, and for seasons, and for days and years: and let them be for lights in the firmament of heaven to give light upon the earth: and it was so. And God made the two great lights; the greater light to rule the day, and the lesser light to rule the night: he made the stars also. And God set them in the firmament of heaven to give light upon the earth, and to rule over the day and over the night, and to divide the light from the darkness: and God saw that it was good. And there was evening and there was morning, a fourth day. The fourth step in creation is the development of the "two great lights," the will and the understanding, or the sun (the spiritual I AM) and the moon (the intellect). These are but reflectors of the true light; for God had said, "Let there be light: and there was light"--before the sun and the moon were created.

 

The "firmament of heaven" is the consciousness of Truth that has been formulated and established. In the second day's creation a firmament was established in heaven (realm of divine ideas). This firmament divides the day (illumined consciousness) from the night (unillumined consciousness). Through faith the "lights" are established; that is, understanding begins to unfold. The "signs," "seasons," and "days and years" represent different stages of unfoldment. We gain understanding by degrees. The "earth" represents the more external processes through which an idea passes, and corresponds to the activity of an idea in mind. In man the "earth" is the body consciousness, which in its real nature is a harmonious expression of ideas established in faith-substance. "And it was so"; that is, an idea from divine consciousness is instantly fulfilled. The "greater light," in mind, is understanding and the "lesser light" is the will. The greater light rules "the day," that realm of consciousness which has been illumined by Spirit. The lesser light rules "the night," that is, the will; which has no illumination ("light" or "day") but whose office is to execute the demands of understanding. The will does not reason, but in its harmonious relation acts easily and naturally upon the inspiration of Spirit. Divine will express itself as the I AM in man. The "stars" represent man's perceptive faculties, including his ability to perceive weight, size, color, sound, and the like. Through concentrating any of the faculties ("stars' ') at its focalizing point one may come into an understanding of its action. Divine Mind first images the idea, then perceives its fulfillment. Man, acting in co-operation with Divine Mind, places himself under this same creative law and thus brings his ideas into manifestation. The idea is the directing and controlling power. Every idea has a specific function to perform. When our ideas are constructive and harmonious we see that they are good and realize that their power to rule is dominant in consciousness. "Evening" stands for the fulfillment of an idea and marks another "day" or step or degree of unfoldment in consciousness.

 

Again referring to Fenton's translation of the 1st chapter of Genesis, "By periods God created that which produced the solar systems; then that which produced the earth," we see that God did not create the worlds directly; He created that which produced or evolved them. Then God said, "Let there be light." The Hebrew word for light is owr, meaning "luminosity" either literally or metaphysically. On the fourth day God said, "Let reflectors appear in the expanse of the heavens." Then God made two large "luminaries." The Hebrew word here used to express light is maowr, "a luminous body." The author of Genesis made a distinction between the source of light and how it was to be bodily manifested. But both were concepts in Divine Mind. Our modern dynamos produce luminosity out of the ether equal to sunlight. The earth whirling on its axis generates electricity. Modern scientists are accepting analogy then, holding that bodies in motion generate energy that under certain conditions becomes luminous, and the conclusion is that the primal force that produces light existed before its manifestation through matter. This conclusion is in harmony with the symbolic story of creation as found in Genesis. Modern critics have questioned the accuracy of Scripture on these points. Robert Ingersoll in his book "Some Mistakes of Moses" calls attention to the creation of light before the sources of light, the sun and the stars, were created, as evidence of the ignorance and inaccuracy of Moses. But scientific research and study of the original Hebrew reveals their harmony. Gen. 1:20-23. And God said, Let the waters swarm with swarms of living creatures, and let birds fly above the earth in the open firmament of heaven. And God created the great sea-monsters, and every living creature that moveth, wherewith the waters swarmed, after their kind, and every winged bird after its kind: and God saw that it was good. And God blessed them, saying, Be fruitful, and multiply, and fill the waters in the seas, and let birds multiply on the earth. And there was evening and there was morning, a fifth day.

 

The fifth step in creation is the bringing forth of sensation and discrimination. The "creatures" are thoughts. The "birds . . . in the open firmament of heaven" are ideas approaching spiritual understanding. "Water" represents the unformed substance of life, always present as a fecundating element in which ideas ("living creatures") increase and multiply, just as the earth produces a crop when sown with seed. The "birds" represent the liberated thoughts or ideas of mind (heavens). In connection with the body, "water" represents the fluids of the organism. The "sea-monsters" are life ideas that swarm in these fluids. Here is pictured Divine Mind creating the original body idea, as imaged in the 20th verse. In the 2d chapter of Genesis we shall read of the manifestation of this idea. Idea, expression, and manifestation are the steps involved in bringing anything forth under divine law. The stamp of good is placed upon divine ideas and their activity in substance. In the fifth day's creation ideas of discrimination and judgment are developed. The fishes and fowls represent ideas of life working in mind, but they must be properly related to the unformed (seas) and the formed (earth) worlds of mind. When an individual is well balanced in mind and body, there is an equalizing force flowing in the consciousness, and harmony is in evidence. Another orderly degree of mind unfoldment is fulfilled. Another step in spiritual growth is worked out in consciousness when the individual enters into the quickening of his judgment and seeks to conform his ideas to those of the Divine Mind. Gen. 1:24-31. And God said, Let the earth bring forth living creatures after their kind, cattle, and creeping things, and beasts of the earth after their kind: and it was so. And God made the beasts of the earth after their kind, and the cattle after their kind, and everything that creepeth upon the ground after its kind: and God saw that it was good. And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the birds of the heavens, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth. And God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them. And God blessed them: and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it; and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the birds of the heavens, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth. And God said, Behold, I have given you every herb yielding seed, which is upon the face of all the earth, and every tree, in which is the fruit of a tree yielding seed; to you it shall be for food: and to every beast of the earth, and to every bird of the heavens, and to everything that creepeth upon the earth, wherein there is life, I have given every green herb for food: and it was so. And God saw everything that he had made, and behold, it was very good. And there was evening and there was morning, the sixth day. The sixth step in creation is the bringing forth of ideas after their kind. When man approaches the creative level in his thought, he is getting close to God in his consciousness, and then the realization that he is the very image and likeness of his Creator dawns on him. This is the consciousness in man of Christ. On the sixth day of creation ideas of life are set into activity. "Cattle '' represent ideas of strength established in substance. "Creeping things" represent ideas of life that are more subtle in their expression, approaching closer to the realm of sense. They are the micro-organisms. The "beasts" stand for the free energies of life that relate themselves to sensation. Divine ideas are always instantly set into activity: "and it was so." Underlying all these ideas related to sensation, which in their original purity are simply ideas of life functioning in substance, is the divine idea of life. When life is expressed in divine order it is pronounced good. What is termed "sense consciousness" in man is not to be condemned but lifted up to its rightful place. "As Moses lifted up the serpent in the wilderness, even so must the Son of man be lifted up; that whosoever believeth may in him have eternal life." When the ideas of life are properly related to love and wisdom, man will find in them eternal satisfaction instead of sense pleasure. Wisdom and love are the two qualities of Being that, communing together, declare, "Let us make man in our image, after our likeness." This is the mental image of man that in Truth we call Christ. The Christ man has dominion over every idea emanating from Divine Mind. The creation described in these six days or six "steps" or stages of GodMind is wholly spiritual and should not be confused with the manifestation that is described in the succeeding chapters. God is mind, and all His works are created in mind as perfect ideas. This statement of man's creation, "And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness," has always been a puzzle to people who read the Scriptures literally. The apparent man is so at variance with the description that they cannot reconcile them. Theologians began first to admit that the Garden of Eden story was an allegory, and now they are including the whole of Genesis. But this is more than an allegory; it is a description of the ideal creation. In their calculations engineers often use mathematical symbols, like the letters x, y, and z, to represent quantities not yet given precise determination but carried along for development at the proper time. Involved in these symbols are ideas that are to be brought out in their proper order and made visible when the engineer's plans are objectified. So man plans in his mind that which he proposes to build. First the idea, then the visible. This is the process through which all creation passes. God makes all things in His mind first, which is involution; then they are made into form and shape, and this is evolution. In some such way then we can think of man as represented by an x in God's plan or calculations. God is carrying man along in His mind as an ideal quantity, the image-and-likeness man of His creation, and His divine plan is dependent for its success on the manifestation by man of this idea. The divine plan is furthered by the constant idealism that keeps man moving forward to higher and higher achievements. The image-and-likeness man pours into "mankind" a perpetual stream of ideas that the individual man arranges as thoughts and forms as substance and life. While this evolutionary process is going on there seem to be two men, one ideal and spiritual and the other intellectual and material, which are united at the consummation, the ideal man, Christ. When the mind attains an understanding of certain creative facts, of man's creative powers, it has established a directive, intelligent center that harmonizes these two men (ideal and spiritual vs. intellectual and material). This directive center may be named the I AM. It is something more than the human I. Yet when this human I has made union with the image-and-likeness I, the true I AM comes into action, and this is the Christ Jesus, the Son of God, evolved and made visible in creation according to divine law. God ideated two universal planes of consciousness, "the heavens and the earth." One is the realm of pure ideas, the other of thought forms. God does not create the visible universe directly, as a man makes a concrete pavement, but He creates the ideas that are used by His intelligent "image and likeness" to make the universe. Thus God's creations are always spiritual. Man's creations are both material and spiritual, according to his understanding. Mental activity in the Divine Mind represents two phases: first, conception of the idea; and secondly, expression of the idea. In every idea conceived in mind there is first the quickening spirit of life, followed by the increase of the idea in substance. Wisdom is the "male" or expressive side of Being, while love is the "female" or receptive side of Being. Wisdom is the father quality of God and love is the mother quality. In every idea there exist these two qualities of mind, which unite in order to increase and bring forth under divine law. The Divine Mind blessed the union of wisdom and love and pronounced on them the increase of Spirit. When wisdom and love are unified in the individual consciousness, man is a master of ideas and brings forth under the original creative law. "Seed" represents fundamental ideas having within themselves reproductive capacity. Every idea is a seed that, sown in the substance of mind, becomes the real food on which man is nourished. Man has access to the seed ideas of Divine Mind, and through prayer and meditation he quickens and appropriates the substance of those ideas, which were originally planted in his I AM by the parent mind. Provision is made for the sustenance of all the ideas emanating from Divine Mind. The primitive forms of life are fed on "herbs"; they have a sustaining force that is food to them, even as the appropriation of divine ideas is food to man. Divine Mind, being All-Good itself, sees only its own creation as good. As man co-operates more fully with Divine Mind, imaging only that which is good, he too beholds his production with the "single" eye, sees them only as good. The sixth step in creation is the concentration, in man, of all the ideas of the Divine Mind. Man is given authority and dominion over all ideas. Thus is completed another step in mind unfoldment. In the six mental steps or "mind movements," called days, Elohim God creates the spiritual universe and spiritual man. He then rests. He has created the ideas or patterns of the formed universe that is to follow. In the next chapter we shall find Jehovah God executing what Elohim God created or ideated. In Hebrew the name Jehovah means "I am." We identify Jehovah as the I AM, the spiritual man, the image and likeness of Elohim God. But Jehovah, spiritual man, must be made manifest, so He forms a man called Adam.

Manifest the Divine within you Truth is the mother; Wisdom is the farther; Righteousness is the brother; Compassion the friend; Peace is the wife; forbearance the son; These six are men's true relations. IN THIS phenomenal world, the physical body has parents who are physical and impermanent. When this is viewed from the spiritual standpoint, the true relations for the real and permanent human spirit are indicated in the opening verse. "Sathyam maatha" (Truth is the mother). Truth is changing. It is the same over all the three categories of time past, present and the future. Such truth is one's real and lasting mother. "Jnaanam pithaa" (Wisdom is the father). What is this wisdom? Does it pertain to the physical world, the mundane existence, the scriptures or science? No. true wisdom is: “Adhvaitha dharshanam Jnaanam" (perception of oneness is true spiritual wisdom). The wisdom that makes one aware of unity alone is wisdom. Such wisdom is one's true father. "Dharma bhraatha" (Righteousness is the brother). we have brothers. Between them there are differences of opinion. But righteousness which is unvarying and ever the same is one's true everlasting brother. Righteousness is Divine. The sages hailed Raama as the very embodiment of righteousness. "Dhaya sakhaa" (Compassion is friend). There is no greater quality than compassion. It is compassion, which redeems human life. Whether one is a deity or a demon, compassion alone can ennoble him. Hence, one's true friend is compassion. "Shaanthih pathni" (Peace is wife). One cannot have a greater wife than peace. Peace is the greatest blessing. Today because there is no peace in the minds of people, the world is plunged in conflict. Peace verily is divine. "Kshama Puthraah" (Forbearance is the son). People believe that the son will help them in this world. But it is not a son who redeems a person. God is the only redeemer. Forbearance is a divine quality Whoever possesses it has a worthy son. Everything is Brahman God is adored as mother, father, kith and kin, friend, wealth and everything else in the world. God is immanent in every atom of the universe. All that you see, the mountains, trees, insects, birds and beasts, the food you cat, the air you breathe are all manifestations of the divine. There is a Thelugu song which proclaims, "All is Brahman-- the stars, the sun, the moon, the heaven, the Lord's abode "Vaikuntha", the mother and father, the words in a speech, the discussions in a debate, the life itself, the birth, growth and death, the wife, the time that passes, the body, the whole of nature, the love you bear to others--all is Brahman. This assemblage is Brahman and this Sai who proclaims this is verily Brahman. What more can I tell you, oh, good people gathered here?" God is omnipotent. Nature is reflection of that omnipotence. All the powers present in the Nature are present in every human being. Hence it should be recognised that God, Nature and the individual are all equally divine. God and the individual are not different from each other. The cosmos and the Lord of the cosmos are not separate from each other. "Sarvam Vishnumayam Jagath." This cosmos is permeated by the Divine. Vishnu is the cause. Nature is the effect. The Divine is the embodiment of Cause and Effect. Hence there is no need to go in quest of God. Man is the repository of all divine potencies. They are all latent in him, remaining incognito like the Paandavas during the last years of their twelveyear term of exile. Not realising this truth, man considers himself ignorant and weak. Energy is Brahman Scientists, after long investigations, have discovered that the whole universe is made up of atoms. The Vedhaanthins (spiritualists) on their part, declared that everything is permeated by the Divine. The terms used are different but the meaning is the same. Energy is Brahman and Brahman is energy. The cosmos is filled with energy. All that you, see and all that you do are energy. You observe an object. You see an individual. Both the object and the individual are manifestations of energy. What the scientists call 'matter' is nothing but energy. An object appears as matter. But it turns into energy later on. Likewise, one may appear to you as. a Jeevi (Individual), but even he becomes energy in due course. Hence, all the forms and names you see are manifestations of energy. What is this energy? It is something, which you cannot see or conceive in the mind. Energy is energy alone. It is Divine. Every physical object has a base. There is electrical energy in man. Likewise, there is radiation energy in man. There must be a basis for all these energies. You see that in the world every object is based on some other object. God is the base for all the energies in the cosmos. The Vedhaanthins called this energy as Atheetha Shakthi (Transcendental Energy). Scientists have termed it "Super power." The names used may vary, but the substance is one and the same. In every man there is numerous latent potencies of which. He is not aware. The scientists have given different names to the different energies such as "psychotronic energy" and "bio-plasmic energy." Vedhaanthins have described it by the compendious term "Transcendental Energy." How is the presence of this energy to be recognized? The Vedhaanthins described the process of recognition as involving maanasika shakthi (will power), dhaarana shakthi (concentration), jnaana shakthi (meditation) and samaadhi (deep awareness). By these four processes, one can experience Aathma shakthi (power of the Spirit). This means that in the final analysis, every individual, every object and every form of energy becomes one with the Divine. Eight potencies of divinity In this context one has to understand the implications of oneness with the Divine. One desires to merge in God and achieve Moksha (liberation). How is this to be secured? God is formless. He is the source of all energy. He is effulgent. Eight kinds of potencies have been attributed to God. He is the source of all sound, all motion, all light, all speech, all bliss, all excellence, all illusion and all prosperity. How is one to realise such an omnipotent Divinity? Water can integrate with water. Air can combine with air. Fire can merge with fire. As God is formless, to become one with God, we have to become formless. What does this imply? It means that we have to get rid of the attachment to the body. This is achieved through dhyaana (meditation). While retaining attachment to the body one cannot hope to achieve oneness with God merely by praying for it. You have to become formless to realise the formless Divine. As God is the embodiment of effulgence, you have to make your life effulgent to experience God. You have to realise that the light of your life has come from that Param-Jyothi (supreme source of all light). This individual flame should merge in the Supreme Divine effulgence from which all other lights have emanated. Meditating on the Param-Jyothi, the individual has to merge his individual effulgence in the Supreme Effulgence. Move from dualism to oneness with God There is one other matter, which you should consider in this context. You are performing bhajans, japa, dhyaana, yaaga, yajna, or other spiritual exercises. All these are external forms of worship which do not serve to promote Nivritthi-maarga (the exploration of internal spirit). They are good acts in themselves. But they are unrelated to spirituality. Spirituality implies relationship of Aathma to Aathma. (Spirit to Spirit). All actions have appropriate consequences. Every act results in its own reward. Good acts yield good results. But they do not contribute to spiritual progress. Hence the good acts should be stepping stones for the spiritual journey You should not remain content with performing rituals and acts of worship--sath-karmas. When will you embark on the real spiritual adventure? You should go forward from Dhvaitha to Adhvaitha (dualism to non-dualism). You become a jnaani only when you have the adhvaithik consciousness (the experience of oneness with the Divine). Magnetism of Divine Love Man possesses within himself the constituents' needed for generating electrical energy, radiation and telecommunication. The whole world is filled with electromagnetic energy. The world is governed by the principle of mutual attraction. Green grass attracts the cow. The child attracts the mother. The law of universal attraction is related to this magnetic power. Raama is the supreme symbol of riffs power of attraction. "Ramayathe ithi Raama" (Because of his powers to please everyone he is called Raama). This Raama is not the son of Dhasharatha but the spiritual Raama who is Aathma-Raama (Indweller in every heart). The Aathma is universal magnet which attracts everything. Today if so many people from all over the world is drawn to this place, it is due to the power of attraction. When you keep a flower here, bees are attracted from afar. They are drawn to the flower because of the sweet honey in it. Not a single bee will be attracted by a plastic flower. The sweetness that attracts people is Prema (love). This love may be manifested in many forms---maternal love, filial love, fraternal affection, marital love, friendly love and so on. Divine Love is the basis of all these forms of attraction. It is a powerful magnet. It is present everywhere including every human being. Every child bears the imprint of its parents. As all human beings have come from God, they should carry the marks of the Creator. Man has taken birth to manifest the Divine in him. Every being and every, object in the world is divine energy. It cannot be destroyed. But it can be changed from one form of energy to another. For instance, magnetic energy can be converted into electricity From electricity you can get light or atomic energy In this manner energy can be converted to different forms, but it cannot be destroyed. This indestructible character is divine. Hence there is no place or object in the cosmos which is not permeated by the Divine. There is divinity in every particle and every cell. The sages therefore declared: “That which is subtler than the subtlest and vaster than the vastest and which is present everywhere as the eternal witness is the Aathma." The Aathma is atom and the atom is Aathma. All the three terms--- Brahman, Aathma and atom--represent one and the same thing. Prahlaadha proclaimed omnipresence of divinity It took the scientists one thousand years to discover that what was present in the whole universe was made up of atoms. But many aeons earlier, in the Kritha Yuga itself, this truth was recognized by Prahlaadha. He told his father that there was no place in the cosmos where the Divine could not be found if searched for. Long ago Prahlaadha confidently proclaimed that the Divine principle was omnipresent. Because he was aware of this transcendental unity of the Divine in the universe, he could overcome every ordeal, discard the body-consciousness and realise the Divine. Immersed in God-consciousness, he fearlessly faced every, ordeal and survived all the tortures to which he was subjected. With the name of Naaraayana on his lips he came out unscathed when he was pushed from a cliff. Likewise he faced ordeals like trampling by elephants or attacks by snakes. He was utterly free from body consciousness. Ever contemplating on God he had no fear at all. (Svaami recited a Thelugu poem describing how Prahlaadha faced cheerfully all the ordeals to which he was subjected by the demonic agents of his father). The one who is immersed in the body consciousness is a prey to all kinds of troubles and worries. It should be realised that the body is only an instrument and is bound to perish some time or other. When death is bound to follow birth why worry about it? The state of no-mind The Gopikas realised that Krishna was beyond the reach of the mind because of His cosmic subtlety and immensity, but they experienced His divinity in their hearts because of their devotion. There is in every human being this divine energy which grows when it is properly used. The water in the well rises as more and more of it is drawn. Likewise, the more you share your wealth and joy, they will multiply. Hence, share your endowments with others. Strive to manifest the latent potencies in you. To realise God., practices like repetition of the name of God are of little avail. What is essential is Amanaska (stilling the mind). The waking state and the dreaming state are the two kinds of dream states. The only reality is the consciousness that is present in both the states. This unifying awareness is the real-it), To experience God you have to proceed from meditation to concentration and then to the amanaska state where the mind is virtually non-existent and one is free from attachment to the bode: In that state one experiences samaadhi. Samaadhi has two meanings. One is equal mindedness in all situations--whether of pain or pleasure, loss or gain. You should not feel distressed by a calamity or elated by a happy event. This state of mind is conducive to the development of extraordinary powers. Certain activities have to be carried on in the day-to-day world. But the teachings of some Gurus in regard to these activities lead to dehumanisation. The term Guru means one who dispels the darkness of ignorance. Gu means one who is beyond gunas (attributes). Ru implies one who is beyond rupas (forms). This refers only to God. That is why the Guru is hailed as Brahma, Vishnu or Shiva. Only God is the true Guru. All others are merely teachers, like the teachers of different subjects in a college. Guru is the one who reveals the guri (target) to the disciple. Guri here refers to Aathmik Principle. Qualities of a true Guru The true Guru is one who has understood his own Self. Emperor Bali promised to give Vaamana----Vishnu who had come in the form of a short Brahmin lad--whatever he wanted. Bali's Guru Shukraachaarya, warned Bali against honouring his promise on the ground that it would prove disastrous, for him. But Bali stood by his promise despite his preceptor's warning and intervention. Bali esteemed God as greater than his preceptor. He declared that there could be no greater sin than breaking one's promise. A Guru who advises his disciple to go back on his plighted word is no Guru at all. In the Mahaabhaaratha, Dhronaachaarya, the teacher in archery for Arjuna, turned away Ekalavya from being his disciple because he had agreed to teach no one else all the arts he had taught' to Arjuna. Ekalavya, however, learnt more than what Arjuna had been taught, by merely worshipping an image of Dhronaachaarya. When Dhronaachaarya came to know about this from Arjuna, he demanded from Ekalvya his right thumb as Guru Dhakshina (offerings to one's preceptor) so as to incapacitate Ekalavya from making use of his proficiency in archery. Ekalavya readily offered his thumb out of his devotion to Dhronaachaarya, whom he regarded as his preceptor. This conduct on the part of Dhronaachaarya in response to a demand from Arjuna, who was envious of Ekalavya's superiority in archery was unworthy of a true Guru. Gurus who are governed by selfish considerations or narrow loyal-tics cause great harm to the cause of spiritual enlightenment. They are worldly teachers, not spiritual preceptors. Place trust in God who is true Guru You may learn from anyone, but dedicate all your knowledge to God. That is true spirituality. That is true devotion. Today is celebrated as Vyaasa Puurnima--the full moon day dedicated to the sage Vyaasa, who codified the Vedhas, and presented them to the world on a full moon day This is the day.when people should seek to make their minds as pure and bright as the full moon. The day should be celebrated by purifying the mind and understanding the mystery of the universe. (Svaami recited a song of Raamadhas in which he describes human life as consisting of seven forts---vices--in the heart of which dwells the Lord, who is very difficult to reach). Place your entire trust in God and not in self-seeking Gurus. Before performing any act utter a prayer offering it to God. Try to understand the sacred teaching in all the Vedhic and other scriptures. Embodiments of love! Realise that God is not separate from you. Strive to strengthen this sense of oneness with the Divine. This was the way Meera experienced the presence of Krishna in her heart, when her husband, the Mahaaraana, expelled her from the Krishna temple built by Him. The light of the Divine is within you. Why go seeking for it elsewhere ? This is the light of love and of bliss. Never forget God, whatever may happen to you. (Thelugu poem). There is no greater form of meditation than constant remembrance of God at all places and on all occasions. God is the indweller in the heart. When you experience this you will lack nothing and will be ever blissful. You will commit no wrong and will fear none. Your conscience will be your guide. Love all. You can see God only through the Jnaana-chakshu (the eye of wisdom). Realising that God dwells within you, you must treat God as the universal Guru, as the preceptor for mankind, irrespective of differences in names. Discourse in Sai Kulvanth Hall on 20-7-1997. Youth is the stage in life when the slightest turn towards wrong will spell disaster. Thoughts shape the career. You plan to earn much wealth, because you imagine that rich people are very happy. The rich have plenty to eat, but hey have no appetite. The rich wield power over others but they are held down by disease. The rich can have many servants but they cannot live in peace. So, plan to be rich in virtue, in devotion and dedication to good causes. Be rich in sovereign character. --Baba

God of the Hebrew Bible

The Episcopal Church has decided to revise its 1979 prayer book, so that God is no longer referred to by masculine pronouns.

The prayer book, first published in 1549 and now in its fourth edition, is the symbol of unity for the Anglican Communion. The Anglican Communion is the third largest Christian communion founded in 1867. While there is no clear timeline for the changes, religious leaders at the denomination’s recent triennial conference in Austin have agreed to a demand to replace the masculine terms for God such as “He” and “King” and “Father.”

Indeed, early Christian writings and texts all refer to God in feminine terms.

As a scholar of Christian origins and gender theory, I’ve studied the early references to God.

In Genesis, for example, women and men are created in the “Imago Dei,” image of God, which suggests that God transcends socially constructed notions of gender. Furthermore, Deuteronomy, the fifth book of the Hebrew Bible written in the seventh century B.C., states that God gave birth to Israel.

In the oracles of the eighth century prophet Isaiah, God is described as a woman in labor and a mother comforting her children.

And the Book of Proverbs maintains that the feminine figure of Holy Wisdom, Sophia, assisted God during the creation of the world.

Indeed, The Church Fathers and Mothers understood Sophia to be the “Logos,” or Word of God. Additionally, Jewish rabbis equated the Torah, the law of God, with Sophia, which means that feminine wisdom was with God from the very beginning of time.

Perhaps one of the most remarkable things ever said about God in the Hebrew Bible occurs in Exodus 3 when Moses first encounters the deity and asks for its name. In verse 14, God responds, “I am who I am,” which is simply a mixture of “to be” verbs in Hebrew without any specific reference to gender. If anything, the book of Exodus is clear that God is simply “being,” which echoes later Christian doctrine that God is spirit.

In fact, the personal name of God, Yahweh, which is revealed to Moses in Exodus 3, is a remarkable combination of both female and male grammatical endings. The first part of God’s name in Hebrew, “Yah,” is feminine, and the last part, “weh,” is masculine. In light of Exodus 3, the feminist theologian Mary Daly asks, “Why must ‘God’ be a noun? Why not a verb – the most active and dynamic of all.”

God in the New Testament

In the New Testament, Jesus also presents himself in feminine language. In Matthew’s Gospel, Jesus stands over Jerusalem and weeps, saying, “Jerusalem, Jerusalem, you who kill the prophets and stone those sent to you, how often I have longed to gather your children together, as a hen gathers her chicks under her wings, and you were not willing.”

Furthermore, the author of Matthew equates Jesus with the feminine Sophia (wisdom), when he writes, “Yet wisdom is vindicated by her deeds.” In Matthew’s mind, it seems that Jesus is the feminine Wisdom of Proverbs, who was with God from the beginning of creation. In my opinion, I think it is very likely that Matthew is suggesting that there is a spark of the feminine in Jesus’ nature.

Additionally, in his letter to the Galatians, written around 54 or 55 A.D., Paul says that he will continue “in the pain of childbirth until Christ is formed in you.”

Clearly, feminine imagery was acceptable among the first followers of Jesus.

The church fathers

This trend continues with the writings of the Church fathers. In his book “Salvation to the Rich Man,” Clement, the bishop of Alexandria who lived around 150-215 A.D., states, “In his ineffable essence he is father; in his compassion to us he became mother. The father by loving becomes feminine.” It’s important to remember that Alexandria was one of the most important Christian cities in the second and third centuries along with Rome and Jerusalem. It was also the hub for Christian intellectual activity.

Additionally, in another book, “Christ the Educator,” he writes, “The Word [Christ] is everything to his little ones, both father and mother.” Augustine, the fourth-century bishop of Hippo in North Africa, uses the image of God as mother to demonstrate that God nurses and cares for the faithful. He writes, “He who has promised us heavenly food has nourished us on milk, having recourse to a mother’s tenderness.”

And, Gregory, the bishop of Nyssa, one of the early Greek church fathers who lived from 335-395 A.D., speaks of God’s unknowable essence – God’s transcendence – in feminine terms. He says,

“The divine power, though exalted far above our nature and inaccessible to all approach, like a tender mother who joins in the inarticulate utterances of her babe, gives to our human nature what it is capable of receiving.”

What is God’s gender?

Modern followers of Jesus live in a world where images risk becoming socially, politically or morally inadequate. When this happens, as the feminist theologian Judith Plaskow notes, “Instead of pointing to and evoking the reality of God, [our images] block the possibility of religious experience.” In other words, limiting God to masculine pronouns and imagery limits the countless religious experiences of billions of Christians throughout the world.

It is probably best, then, for modern day Christians to heed the words and warning of bishop Augustine, who once said, “si comprehendis non est Deus.” If you have understood, then what you have understood is not God.

The Queen of Heaven Loren Spendlove, PhD One of my favorite hymns growing up spoke not only of a father in heaven, but also of a mother in heaven. The final lines of that hymn teach this unique Christian doctrine that we also have a heavenly mother: In the heav'ns are parents single? No, the thought makes reason stare! Truth is reason; truth eternal Tells me I've a mother there. When I leave this frail existence, When I lay this mortal by, Father, Mother, may I meet you In your royal courts on high? Then, at length, when I've completed All you sent me forth to do, With your mutual approbation Let me come and dwell with you1 [bolding mine]. Sixty years after this poem was set to music, Susa Gates, a leader of the women’s organization of my church, wrote that our divine Mother is enthroned side by side with our divine Father2 Even though this belief in a mother in heaven is in sharp contrast with mainstream Christian beliefs, it has always felt right to me; in modern parlance I could say that it speaks to my soul. Although this doctrine was not frequently taught in my Sunday school classes, every now and then it would surface in a lesson, and every time it did I would experience a sense of completeness knowing that I had two divine parents and not just one unknowable and impersonal creator. In this paper I present and synthesize the ideas of Margaret Barker3 – who I believe to be a modern Christian Kabbalistic theologian – along with the observations of other scholars 1 Snow, Eliza R., Times and Seasons, 20 (1845): 1039. Snow’s poem was originally published under the title My Father in Heaven, in October 1845 in an Illinois newspaper called The Times and Seasons. The words of the poem were later set to previously scored music by James McGranahan. In 1856 the poem was republished in a book of Snow’s poetry and renamed Invocation, or The Eternal Father and Mother. 2 Gates, Susa Y., “The Vision Beautiful,” Improvement Era 23, 6 (1920): 542. 3 A Methodist theologian and biblical scholar, Margaret Barker was awarded the Lambeth degree of Doctor of Divinity by the Archbishop of Canterbury “in recognition of her work on the Jerusalem Temple and the origins of Christian Liturgy.” relative to the Queen of heaven. The Queen of heaven has many names, including the Lady, the Shekhinah, and Wisdom, but Barker appears to prefer Ashratah, a name which is etymologically related to, but should not be confused with, Asherah. Gesenius asserts that Asherah (הָרֵשֲׁא (is derived from the word ashar (רַשָׁא(, which means: 1. To be straight, right, especially used of a straight way, hence also of what is upright, erect, whence comes the signification of firmness and strength, in the Talmud. 2. to guide, or lead straight. 3. to pronounce happy, or fortunate4 [bolding mine]. Although Barker does not provide the Hebrew spelling for Ashratah, she maintains that it is derived from Athirat, a Ugaritic word. Like ashar, “the name meant ‘the one who makes happy’ or ‘the one who keeps you on a straight path’.”5 However, Barker claims that the Deuteronomist editors of the bible replaced Ashratah with Asherah, and that “with its Canaanite associations, [this] was a way for later scribes to denigrate the Lady of Jerusalem.”6 The temple priests “called the temple tree that Josiah removed an Asherah, but all the Hebrew inscriptions with a similar name have it as Ashratah.”7 Even though they were able to change Her name in the biblical text, they were unable to change physical inscriptions which still bear the original name. The Queen of Heaven and the Shekhinah Barker connects the Queen of heaven, or the Lady of the temple, with the Divine Presence, the Shekhinah that is mentioned in the Sefer HaBahir, an early Kabbalistic work.8 Of the ten attributes or emanations of Ein Sof (Endless or Infinite), called Sefirot, the last 4 Gesenius’s Hebrew and Chaldee Lexicon to the Old Testament Scriptures, (Samuel Bagster & Sons, Limited, London, 1857), LXXXVIII, s.v. רַשָׁא. 5 Barker, M., Wisdom. The Lady of the Temple in a Lead Book from Jordan (2017), 5. Retrieved from: http:// www.margaretbarker.com/Papers/default.htm 6 Barker, M., The Lady known to Isaiah (2013), 7. Retrieved from: http://www.margaretbarker.com/Papers/default.htm 7 Barker, M., Restoring Solomon’s Temple (2012), 5. Retrieved from: http://www.margaretbarker.com/Papers/ default.htm 8 The Sefer HaBahir (also known as the Book of Illumination) is attributed to Rabbi Nehunia ben haKana. In this paper I use an English translation by Aryeh Kaplan. 1 (Malkhut) is identified with the Shekhinah. Regarding the means of communication between heaven and the material world, Barker writes: “The third power collects and transmits the powers of the upper three powers to the seven lower powers, and the tenth power [Shekhinah] transmits all the seven powers into the material world.”9 As such, in kabbalistic tradition the Shekhinah becomes the point of contact between God and this lower world. One the cherubim in Isaiah’s vision called out: “Holy, holy, holy is the LORD of hosts; the whole earth is full of his glory” (Isa 6:3). In the Sefer HaBahir we read: What is the meaning of, “the whole earth is filled with His glory”? This is the earth that was created on the first day. It is on high, filled with God’s glory and paralleling the Land of Israel. And what is [this glory]? It is Wisdom, as it is written (Proverbs 3:35), “The wise shall inherit glory”10 [bolding mine]. Likewise, the Shekhinah is connected with Wisdom and with the Lady of the temple. The Lady is the mediator between God and His creations on earth; She bridges the chasm between heaven and earth. As Devine explains: “The ‘lower’ Shekhinah [Malkhut] absorbs the emanations and channels them to earth; she is ‘mediator’ between God and humanity, the heavenly and corporeal worlds.”11 This mediating role of the Shekhinah has its “deepest roots in traditions that surface in the Sefer HaBahir – traditions concerning Wisdom, the Queen of heaven, and the lost Lady of the temple,” a role which many Christians also ascribe to Mary, the mother of Jesus.12 However, the idea that the presence of God, or Shekhinah, is a feminine emanation or creation is unique to Jewish kabbalah. Scholem informs us that: In talmudic literature the Shekhinah is never a symbol of the feminine;… The Shekhinah, in talmudic literature, is always simply God himself, that is, God insofar 9 Barker, M., “The Images of Mary in the Litany of Loreto,” Usus Antiquior, 1, 2 (2010), 129. 10 Kaplan, A., Sefer HaBahir, chapter 130. 11 Devine, L., “How Shekhinah Became the God(dess) of Jewish Feminism,” Feminist Theology, 23, 1 (2014): 76. 12 Barker, M., “The Images of Mary in the Litany of Loreto,” Usus Antiquior, 1, 2 (2010), 130. 2 as he is present in a particular place or at a particular event…. The noun is used only to signify God's "dwelling," his presence, and never that of any created being. Nowhere is it separated from God himself.13 In other words, the sages of the Talmud did not consider the Shekhinah to be a separate entity from God; the Shekhinah was not a uniquely created being, nor was the term considered feminine in nature. The fact that the word was a feminine noun was considered as merely a grammatical coincidence. The word Shekhinah (שכינה (is not found in the Masoretic text of the Bible; rather, it is first encountered in the writings of the talmudic sages. It is only from the kabbalistic conception of the Shekhinah that we can conceptualize a distinct separation between God and his Shekhinah. In kabbalistic literature the Shekhinah took on the female roles of queen, wife, lady, lover, mother, and daughter. Through this literature we are able to link specific feminine aspects of God – the Queen and the Lady – with the Shekhinah. Barker asserts that in ancient Jewish sources the Shekhinah, or Lady of the temple, had a central role in ancient temple worship: Several passages in later Jewish mystical texts, the Merkavah texts, have suggested to scholars that drawing the LORD or the Shekinah down into the temple was a major element of the temple service. Moshe Idel concluded: ‘We can seriously consider the possibility that temple service was conceived as inducing the presence of the Shekinah in the Holy of Holies’.14 Josiah’s Reforms According to Barker, Israelite temple worship underwent a significant and destructive “cultural revolution” during the reign of king Josiah, just a few decades prior to the sacking 13 Scholem, G., Origins of the Kabbalah, (The Jewish Publication Society, Princeton, 1987), 163. 14 Barker, M., The Temple Roots of the Liturgy (2000), 5. Retrieved from: http://www.margaretbarker.com/Papers/default.htm 3 of the first temple.15 In fact, she makes the bold assertion that “before the Babylonians looted and destroyed the temple buildings in about 600 BCE, Josiah had destroyed the first temple cult.”16 How did Josiah accomplish that? In 623 BCE Josiah “began a series of violent purges to rid his kingdom of the older ways, which he regarded as impure (2 Kings 22-23).”17 Many of the original furnishings of the temple were removed, including the “golden chariot of cherubim”18 (c.f. 1 Chronicles 28:18), and “all traces of a female figure, represented by a great tree, which he burned by the sacred spring and had its ashes beaten to dust and scattered.”19 This temple revolution was not new to Josiah’s time: “From the end of the eighth century BCE, the time of the prophets Hosea and Isaiah, there had been pressures building in Jerusalem to change the ways of the temple.”20 However, “the obvious moment for the final and decisive rejection of Wisdom was Josiah’s purge.”21 Weinfeld wrote of the sacred marriage, or hieros gamos – “the union of the bride (the Shekhinah) with the Holy One” – and of the Asherah, the sacred tree. “Both these phenomena [the sacred marriage and the sacred tree] stand at the centre of Jewish mysticism (the socalled Kabbalah) and have been brought to full expression in the texts of this movement.”22 He added: “The moment we move to the First Temple Period, the evidence about hieros gamos [sacred marriage] and the Sacred Tree becomes more tangible and concrete.”23 15 Barker, M., “The Images of Mary in the Litany of Loreto,” Usus Antiquior, 1, 2 (2010), 120. 16 Barker, M., First Temple Symbolism in the Fourth Gospel. Who Were the Jews? (2012), 1. Retrieved from: http://www.margaretbarker.com/Papers/default.htm 17 Barker, M., Restoring Solomon’s Temple (2012), 2. Retrieved from: http://www.margaretbarker.com/Papers/ default.htm 18 Barker, M., Restoring Solomon’s Temple (2012), 4. Retrieved from: http://www.margaretbarker.com/Papers/ default.htm 19 Barker, M., Restoring Solomon’s Temple (2012), 2. Retrieved from: http://www.margaretbarker.com/Papers/ default.htm 20 Barker, M., Restoring Solomon’s Temple (2012), 1-2. Retrieved from: http://www.margaretbarker.com/Papers/default.htm 21 Barker, M., Wisdom and the Other Tree: A Temple Theology Reading of the Genesis Eden Story (2012), 2. Retrieved from: http://www.margaretbarker.com/Papers/default.htm 22 Weinfeld, M., “Feminine Features in the Imagery of God in Israel: The Sacred Marriage and the Sacred Tree,” Vetus Testamentum, 46, 4 (1996): 515. 23 Weinfeld, M., “Feminine Features in the Imagery of God in Israel: The Sacred Marriage and the Sacred Tree,” Vetus Testamentum, 46, 4 (1996): 522. 4 Weinfeld argued that it is at this point, during the first temple period, that we can witness the adoration of the Queen of heaven. The biblical account (2 Kings 24:1-4) informs us that the destruction of the temple in 586 BCE occurred because of Judah’s wicked kings, Manasseh in particular. There is an inference in these verses that the kings had allowed and encouraged corrupt practices to flourish in the temple. However, a non-biblical account (1 Enoch 93:9) “says that this was a period when the temple priests lost their spiritual vision and abandoned Wisdom, and so the temple was burned and the people were scattered.”24 The Wisdom that the temple priests had abandoned was the Queen of heaven, or Ashratah. Barker asserts that She was always part of the temple worship from the days of Solomon, and that “the monotheism that we now assume as the religion of Israel was in fact a development introduced and imposed by the Deuteronomists as part of Josiah’s purges.”25 Patai agrees that “the worship of Asherah as the consort of Yahweh (‘his Asherah’!) was an integral element of religious life in ancient Israel prior to the reforms introduced by King Joshiah in 621 B.C.E.”26 While Josiah claimed to be purging Canaanite cultic idols from the temple27 – more specifically, the worship of Asherah – he was actually removing “the religion of the patriarchs as described in Genesis.”28 God appeared to Abraham at the “oak of Moreh” where he also built an altar to the Lord (Gen 12:6-7). Likewise, his grandson Jacob had a dream in Bethel in which he also saw God, “and he took the stone which he had put under his head and set it up for a pillar and poured oil on the top of it” (Gen 28:18). Judging by today’s religious paradigm, these acts of Abraham and Jacob could possibly be considered as idolatrous. 24 Barker, M., Restoring Solomon’s Temple (2012), 1-2. Retrieved from: http://www.margaretbarker.com/Papers/default.htm 25 Barker, M., First Temple Symbolism in the Fourth Gospel. Who Were the Jews? (2012), 5. Retrieved from: http://www.margaretbarker.com/Papers/default.htm 26 Patai, R., The Hebrew Goddess, (Wayne State University Press, Detroit, 1990), 53. 27 Barker, M., Restoring Solomon’s Temple (2012), 5. Retrieved from: http://www.margaretbarker.com/Papers/ default.htm 28 Barker, M., Restoring Solomon’s Temple (2012), 2. Retrieved from: http://www.margaretbarker.com/Papers/ default.htm 5 In 2 Kings 22 we are told that a “book of the law” was found while Josiah was remodeling the temple. In chapter 23 we read that after reading this book, Josiah “brought out the Asherah from the house of the LORD” and had it burned in the Kidron valley (verse 6). This is when “the law” was enthroned in the place of Wisdom, or as Barker explained, “the symbol of the Lady was dragged from the temple and burned, and the Law of Moses replaced whatever she had been.”29 The Deuteronomists wrote: “Keep them [the laws] and do them; for that will be your wisdom and your understanding” (Deut 4:6). Barker makes a direct connection between this rejection of Ashratah, or Wisdom, and the destruction of Jerusalem a few decades later. In the first chapter of Proverbs we are told that “Wisdom cries aloud” for her people to hear her in the streets, in the markets, and at the city gates, but they “refused to listen” and have “ignored” all her counsel. Wisdom then warns of the impending calamities that will come upon the people, “for the simple are killed by their turning away, and the complacence of fools destroys them” (verses 20-32). The Effects of Josiah’s Purges Barker believes that due to the influence of Josiah’s reforms during the first temple period, “in the second temple period, texts were changed: the praise of Wisdom became the praise of the Law.”30 For example, she cites a text from the book of Baruch as being an obvious reworking of another from Proverbs: Baruch 4:1 Proverbs 3:18 She is the book of the commandments of God, and the law that endures for ever. All who hold her fast will live, and those who forsake her will die. [Wisdom] is a tree of life to those who lay hold of her; those who hold her fast are called happy. In the verse from Proverbs we are told that Wisdom is a tree of life and that all who “hold her fast” are happy. We saw similar wording to this when we defined the word ashar – 29 Barker, M., Wisdom and the Other Tree: A Temple Theology Reading of the Genesis Eden Story (2012), 2. Retrieved from: http://www.margaretbarker.com/Papers/default.htm 30 Barker, M., Wisdom and the Other Tree: A Temple Theology Reading of the Genesis Eden Story (2012), 7. Retrieved from: http://www.margaretbarker.com/Papers/default.htm 6 to pronounce happy, or fortunate. It becomes even more obvious that Baruch 4:1 was reworked when we read the next three verses in the book of Baruch: Turn, O Jacob, and take her; walk toward the shining of her light. Do not give your glory to another, or your advantages to an alien people. Happy are we, O Israel, for we know what is pleasing to God (Baruch 4:2-4). In these three verses we find descriptors that apply much more to Wisdom, the tree of life, than to the law. For example: “take her” in verse 2 is nearly the same as “lay hold of her” in the verse from Proverbs. The references to the shining light and glory are also symbols of Wisdom, not of the law. Finally, “happy are we” and “called happy” are synonymous phrases. This point is especially driven home when we read chapter 4 in context. The first word, She, cannot be talking about the “book of the commandments” because book (ספר (in Hebrew is a masculine noun. However, in Baruk chapter 3 She is clearly identified as Wisdom: “they perished because they had no Wisdom, they perished through their folly. Who has gone up into heaven, and taken her, and brought her down from the clouds?” (Bar 3:28-29) Finally, as contrasted with the law, 42 times in the Hebrew bible we read that “mercy endures forever” (c.f. 1 Chron 16:34, Psa 106:1, Jer 33:1), but nowhere are we told that “the law endures forever.” More than likely Baruch 4:1 originally read something like this: Wisdom She is the book of the commandments of God, and the law that endures for ever. All who hold her fast will live, and those who forsake her will die. Barker added that “the practice of changing older Hebrew texts has long been recognised, but described as ‘restorations of the scribes’. The scribes removed what later generations perceived as blasphemies. “In other words, the religion changed and so the holy texts had to change too.”31 The scribes had two distinct objectives when making revisions to 31 Barker, M., Restoring Solomon’s Temple (2012), 5-6. Retrieved from: http://www.margaretbarker.com/Papers/default.htm 7 the biblical text: to purge any mention of the Lady; and, to remove all references to the “sons of God.” Barker continued: So sensitive was the matter of the sons of God – the angels – that when the Hebrew text clearly said ‘sons of God’ it was forbidden to translate it that way. Thus R Simeon b. Yohai, in the mid-second century CE, said the words had to be translated ‘sons of noblemen’, and he cursed anyone who translated the words as ‘sons of God’.32 Barker also outlines another possible change in the Hebrew text, this time with the vowels, that she believes directly affects one of the names of the Queen of heaven – Qudshu, or the Holy One. In 1 Kings 14:23-24 we read: “They built for themselves high places and pillars and Asherim on every high hill and under every green tree, and there was also a male prostitute [שֵׁדָקqadesh] in the land.” Barker comments: This sounds suspicious – one male prostitute – but if the word is read with different vowels, it is the name Qudshu, one of the many names of the Lady. It means ‘Holy One’. The same thing happened in the account of Josiah’s purges; he removed many male prostitutes from the temple, but with different vowels, they become holy ones, angels (2 Kings 23.7). Underneath the account of Josiah and the temple purges there may once have been the Lady and her angels who were driven out.33 According to Barker, Ezekiel saw the time when the Queen Mother would be removed from Jerusalem (Ezek 19:10-14). “The tree, which represented the Mother of the anointed kings of Jerusalem, had been uprooted and taken to the wilderness, just as the woman clothed with the sun had fled to the wilderness.”34 32 Barker, M., Restoring Solomon’s Temple (2012), 5-6. Retrieved from: http://www.margaretbarker.com/Papers/default.htm 33 Barker, M., Restoring Solomon’s Temple (2012), 5. Retrieved from: http://www.margaretbarker.com/Papers/ default.htm 34 Barker, M., Some Lead Books Found in Jordan (2017), 10. Retrieved from: http://www.margaretbarker.com/ Papers/default.htm 8 Isaiah described a time when the wicked men would “drag out the symbol of the Lady from her hidden place in the holy of holies.”35 Those men would say: “Let him make haste, let him speed his work that we may see it; let the plan of the Holy One of Israel draw near, and let it come, that we may know it” (Isa.5.19). Here Barker says that there is wordplay with the words plan and tree. Plan (הָצֵעetsa) and tree (ץֵעets) are visually similar, and plan could be perceived as the feminine form of tree. “This taunt – ‘Let the plan of the Holy One of Israel draw near, let it come, that we may know it’ – could also be: ‘Let the tree of the Holy One [that is, the Lady] draw near, let her come that we may know her’, where ‘know’ has the sexual meaning.”36 Isaiah’s prediction also came with a word of warning – if you remove Wisdom from among you there will be consequences. The people “would hear but not understand, they would see and not perceive, and their minds would be unable to comprehend. In other words, they would be living without the gifts of Wisdom”37 (c.f. Isa 6:9). But even if the people removed the Lady from her place, Isaiah prophesied that “there shall come forth a shoot from the stump of Jesse, and a branch shall grow out of his roots” (Isa 11:1). “In the old temple, the Lady Wisdom was the Mother of the Messiah, and her children were called the branches of her tree. One of the titles for the Messiah was the Branch or the Shoot (e.g. Jeremiah 23.5- 6; Zechariah 5.12), and this is why Isaiah said that a new branch would grow up from the stump of the tree.”38 Two Trees in the Garden The story of the garden of Eden is really a temple story, and a story of parallels. In the biblical account we are told that there were many trees in the garden, but two received special 35 Barker, M., The Lady known to Isaiah (2013), 8. Retrieved from: http://www.margaretbarker.com/Papers/default.htm 36 Barker, M., The Lady known to Isaiah (2013), 8. Retrieved from: http://www.margaretbarker.com/Papers/default.htm 37 Barker, M., Wisdom and the Other Tree: A Temple Theology Reading of the Genesis Eden Story (2012), 3. Retrieved from: http://www.margaretbarker.com/Papers/default.htm 38 Barker, M., Wisdom. The Lady of the Temple in a Lead Book from Jordan (2017), 11. Retrieved from: http:// www.margaretbarker.com/Papers/default.htm 9 attention – the Tree of Life and the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil (c.f. Gen 2:9). Barker weaves a compelling narrative around these two trees. The Tree of Life represented Wisdom, the Lady of the temple (since Eden was the first temple), and She offered eternal life to all who ate of Her fruit. Adam and Eve were allowed to eat from that tree freely (Gen 2:16). “Eden was their temple, and the Lady’s tree of life fed them with her wise teaching.”39 The other tree, the one that offered knowledge of good and evil, was forbidden because it brought only death (Gen 2:17). “All the LORD God could do was warn his Adam against it, knowing that it would lead to death.”40 “Both were in Eden so both were in the temple.”41 This is where the story gets interesting. If the first tree represented Wisdom and eternal life, the second tree must represent its opposite. “The other tree, which the LORD God had warned against and forbidden, must have represented the alternative to wisdom which had been established in the temple. It was the Law,”42 and it brought only death to Adam and Eve. Similar to their choosing the second tree (the Tree of Law) over the Tree of Life, Josiah and his priests chose the law over the Lady of the Temple. Both choices lead to disastrous results; Adam and Eve were expelled from the garden and the Israelites were exiled from Jerusalem, and their temple was destroyed. “Nobody knows the origin of the law book in the temple, and nobody knows the origin of the second tree in Eden,”43 but we all know how the two stories ended. Barker added: “It is not the Lady’s wisdom that now rules our world, but the knowledge of good and evil that the snake, the great deceiver, offered to Adam and Eve as something better. They lost everything.”44 39 Barker, M., Wisdom. The Lady of the Temple in a Lead Book from Jordan (2017), 7-8. Retrieved from: http://www.margaretbarker.com/Papers/default.htm 40 Barker, M., Wisdom and the Other Tree: A Temple Theology Reading of the Genesis Eden Story (2012), 4. Retrieved from: http://www.margaretbarker.com/Papers/default.htm 41 Barker, M., Wisdom and the Other Tree: A Temple Theology Reading of the Genesis Eden Story (2012), 7. Retrieved from: http://www.margaretbarker.com/Papers/default.htm 42 Barker, M., Wisdom and the Other Tree: A Temple Theology Reading of the Genesis Eden Story (2012), 7. Retrieved from: http://www.margaretbarker.com/Papers/default.htm 43 Barker, M., Wisdom and the Other Tree: A Temple Theology Reading of the Genesis Eden Story (2012), 7. Retrieved from: http://www.margaretbarker.com/Papers/default.htm 44 Barker, M., Wisdom. The Lady of the Temple in a Lead Book from Jordan (2017), 22. Retrieved from: http:// www.margaretbarker.com/Papers/default.htm 10 Jeremiah and the Refugees According to Barker, “the second temple was very different in both form and theology from its predecessor, and many heirs of the ancient Hebrews never accepted it as a legitimate temple.”45 After Jerusalem was taken captive at the end of the first temple period, Jeremiah was speaking to the Judean refugees in Egypt and told them that they needed to repent of their evil ways, and especially their idolatry. But the people responded: We will not listen to you. But we will do everything that we have vowed, burn incense to the queen of heaven and pour out libations to her, as we did, both we and our fathers, our kings and our princes, in the cities of Judah and in the streets of Jerusalem; for then we had plenty of food, and prospered, and saw no evil. But since we left off burning incense to the queen of heaven and pouring out libations to her, we have lacked everything and have been consumed by the sword and by famine (Jer 44:16-18). The refugees were convinced that the cause of their difficulties was something other than what Jeremiah had described. This remnant of Judah “recognized that the calamity that had overtaken them was a divine punishment for religious sin, but a sin which, they felt, they had committed against the Queen of heaven, and not against Yahweh.”46 Jeremiah’s responses to the refugees’ claims are somewhat enigmatic. First he asked: “did not the LORD remember it? Did it not come into his mind?” (verse 21). This seems to infer some type of divine approval, that the Lord had seen and remembered their offerings. However, his second response appears to contradict that interpretation: “The LORD could no longer bear your evil doings and the abominations which you committed.… It is because you burned incense, and because you sinned against the LORD and did not obey the voice of the LORD or walk in his law and in his statutes and in his testimonies, that this evil has befallen you, as at this day" 45 Barker, M., Belonging to the Temple (2007), 2. Retrieved from: http://www.margaretbarker.com/Papers/default.htm 46 Patai, R., The Hebrew Goddess, (Wayne State University Press, Detroit, 1990), 63. 11 (verses 22-23). His final words to the people add to the confusion; basically, he told them that if they were intent on still offering incense and libations to the Queen of heaven to go ahead and do it (verse 25). But, are we to understand this as sarcastic condemnation of the people’s stubbornness or as an affirmation of their acts? Cakes for the Queen of Heaven In the 7th chapter of Jeremiah we are given the instructions that came to the prophet “from the Lord” concerning the people of Judah: As for you, do not pray for this people, or lift up cry or prayer for them, and do not intercede with me, for I do not hear you. Do you not see what they are doing in the cities of Judah and in the streets of Jerusalem? The children gather wood, the fathers kindle fire, and the women knead dough, to make cakes for the queen of heaven; and they pour out drink offerings to other gods, to provoke me to anger (Jer 7:16-18). Unlike the verses in Jeremiah 44 cited above, in this chapter we can clearly discern a strong condemnation of the worship of the Queen of heaven and “other gods.” The Hebrew word for cakes (יםִנָוַּכּkavvanim) is used only twice in the bible; it is used here (Jer 7:18) and again in Jer 44:19, where we read: And the women said, "When we burned incense to the queen of heaven and poured out libations to her, was it without our husbands' approval that we made cakes for her bearing her image and poured out libations to her?" From these verses we can also observe several of the elements of established ritual worship of the Queen of heaven. These include: 1. The children gathered wood; 2. The men kindled fire; 3. The women kneaded dough; 4. They made cakes for the Queen of heaven which bore Her image; 5. They burned incense to Her; 6. They poured out libations to Her, all done with their husbands’ approval. 12 We can plainly see from these tasks that the worship of the Queen was a family affair involving the children, the men, and the women; it was not just a practice relegated to the women in Judah, although they appear to be the major participants. These “cakes” were different from other baked goods made in Judah, as noted by Mandel: Not only are [the women] physically baking and offering cakes; they have created these cakes "in the likeness" of a deity. Within the context of a religious system that ultimately bans the creation of any divine likeness …, the power implied by images/offerings created by women would be seen as a threat.47 The unique feature of these cakes is that they bore the image of a deity, the Queen of heaven, a practice that appears to be clearly forbidden in the ten commandments (see Exodus 20:4). Mandel also identified the offering of these cakes by women as a threat, but what kind of threat? According to her, the ritual offering of food on the altar was the “privilege of the men,” and that any offerings by women were suspect. The implication is that this may be a gender-based prohibition. However, Mandel also states that “Jewish women never stopped the task of ritual baking. Special foods for festival observances are traditionally made by women in home kitchens. Challah baked for Shabbat tables is often understood as a replacement for sacrificial offerings.”48 So, in Mandel’s opinion, challah (הָלַָּח(, the typically braided bread made for Shabbat meals, can be seen as a substitution for the cakes made for the Queen of heaven by the women of Judah. Barker argues that the Queen of heaven, or Wisdom, is the original provider of the divine bread.49 In Ben Sira we read: Whoever fears the Lord will do this; whoever is practiced in the Law will come to Wisdom. She will meet him like a mother; 47 Mandel, N., “Spirituality, Baking, and the Queen of Heaven,” Nashim: A Journal of Jewish Women's Studies & Gender Issues, 5 (2002): 49. 48 Mandel, N., “Spirituality, Baking, and the Queen of Heaven,” Nashim: A Journal of Jewish Women's Studies & Gender Issues, 5 (2002): 49-50. 49 Barker, M., The Temple Roots of the Liturgy (2000), 11. Retrieved from: http://www.margaretbarker.com/Papers/default.htm 13 like a young bride she will receive him, She will feed him with the bread of learning, and give him the water of understanding to drink.50 Elijah and the Prophets of Baal During Ahab’s reign as the king of Israel, the northern kingdom, Elijah spoke to him saying: “gather all Israel to me at Mount Carmel, and the four hundred and fifty prophets of Baal and the four hundred prophets of Asherah, who eat at Jezebel's table."51 Once the people had gathered, Elijah told them that they had to choose between YHWH and Baal, they could not serve both. Elijah then proposed a competition – the prophets of Baal would make an offering to their god and Elijah would make one to YHWH. Whichever sacrifice was consumed by fire would be the winner. The story ended in utter failure for the prophets of Baal as their god refused to light their sacrifice. On the other hand, fire came down from heaven and consumed completely the sacrifice and the altar that Elijah had built. In the people’s eyes this was a resounding victory for Elijah, the prophet of YHWH. Following this success the people clamored “YHWH, he is the God; YHWH, he is the God,"52 and the prophets of Baal were massacred at Elijah’s command. Interestingly, Elijah had told Ahaz to invite three separate groups to the competition: 1. the people of Israel; 2. the prophets of Baal; and 3. the prophets of Asherah. We are informed that Ahab agreed and “sent to all the people of Israel, and gathered the prophets together at Mount Carmel.”53 However, once everyone was assembled, the gathering came down to only a competition between Baal and Yahweh; as with the people of Israel, the prophets of Asherah seem to have been invited as mere spectators. The prophets of Asherah were not invited to sacrifice, and it appears that they were not taken “down to the brook Kishon” and killed, as were the prophets of Baal. Patai commented: 50 Ben Sira 15:1-3 51 1 Kings 18:19 52 1 Kings 18:39 53 1 Kings 18:20 14 The inference must be that, not being part of the contest, no harm befell them. If so, they must have continued unhindered to serve their goddess. Nor was "the Asherah" which Ahab had "made" and set up in Samaria removed or in any way harmed either as a result of Elijah's victory over the prophets of the Baal or during the remaining years of Ahab's reign.54 So, what can we understand from this turn of events? Did Elijah consider the worship of Asherah a sanctioned practice, or was it that her cult was not considered to be a danger equal to Baal worship? Patai concludes that “evidently, the Phoenician Baal was the real rival of Yahweh, not the goddess Asherah.”55 A parallel can be made with other Israelite prophets as well. Hosea and Zephaniah were strong critics of the cult of Baal (c.f. Hos 2:13, 2:17, 13:1, Zeph 1:4), yet they did not speak out against Asherah. With the cult of Baal eliminated it appears that any threat to the worship of YHWH was neutralized, even if the cult of Asherah continued. El, Asherah and Yahweh The god El (𐎛𐎍 in Ugaritic and אלin Hebrew) was the principle god in the Canaanite collection of gods. Cross noted that among the Canaanite gods, El was the “father of the gods ('abu bani 'ilima), head of the pantheon.”56 He also observed that “the Old Testament God of the Fathers was a family god as tradition had it, and that his proper name was 'ēl šadday [El Shaddai].”57 Peterson added: El was probably also the original god of Israel. In the earliest Israelite conception, father El had a divine son named Jehovah or Yahweh. Gradually, however, the Israelite conception of Yahweh absorbed the functions of El and, by the 10th century B.C., King Solomon’s day, had come to be identified with him. Asherah was the chief 54 Patai, R., “The Goddess Asherah,” Journal of Near Eastern Studies, 24, 1/2 (1965): 46. 55 Patai, R., “The Goddess Asherah,” Journal of Near Eastern Studies, 24, 1/2 (1965): 46. 56 Cross, F., “Yahweh and the God of the Patriarchs,” The Harvard Theological Review, 55, 4 (1962): 234. 57 Cross, F., “Yahweh and the God of the Patriarchs,” The Harvard Theological Review, 55, 4 (1962): 229. 15 goddess of the Canaanites. She was El’s wife and the mother and wet nurse of the other gods.58 So, according to this premise, in the beginning there was a divine family unit consisting of El, the husband, Asherah (or Ashratah as Barker calls her), his wife, and Yahweh, one of their sons. We learn from the Bible that El Shaddai was the name of the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, the Hebrew patriarchs (c.f. Gen 17:1, 28:3, 35:11, and 48:3). However, as Peterson observed above, the functions of El, or El Shaddai, eventually merged with those of YHWH.59 As a result, YHWH assumed the role of the principle Hebrew deity. During the mid-1970s, Kuntillet Arjud in the eastern Sinai peninsula, close to the border with Israel, was excavated. Found at this site were broken pottery storage jars with drawings and ancient writing inscribed on them from approximately the 9th century BCE. Two of the shards displayed anthropomorphic figures along with the phrases “Yahweh of Samaria and his Asherah” and “YHWH of Têmān and his Asherah,” in early Hebrew script.60 Figure 1 displays the anthropomorphic figures found on one of the jars from Kuntillet Arjud, and Figure 2 shows a tree of life drawn on the opposite side of the same jar, symbolic of Asherah, or the Queen of heaven. Dever believes that the "Lady of 'Ajrûd," the seated female figure in Figure 1, is not merely a depiction of a goddess, but that she is a specifically a representation of Asherah. “Her appearance, both seated on a throne and mentioned in a text coupling her with Yahweh and named as an agent of blessing, strongly suggests that she was revered as the consort of Yahweh in some circles in ancient Israel.”61 58 Peterson, D., “Nephi and His Asherah,” Journal of Book of Mormon Studies 9/2 (2000): 18-19. 59 Except in Exodus 6:3, any mention of El Shaddai outside of the book of Genesis, the “El” is dropped from the name in the Masoretic text and we are left with only “Shaddai,” an indication that El Shaddai may have suffered a loss in prestige or honor among the redactors of the bible following the age of the patriarchs. 60 Mandell, A., “’I Bless You to YHWH and His Asherah’—Writing and Performativity at Kuntillet ʿAjrud,” MAARAV, A Journal for the Study of the Northwest Semitic Languages and Literatures, 19, 1–2 (2012): 131- 162. 61 Dever, W., “Asherah, Consort of Yahweh? New Evidence from Kuntillet ʿAjrûd,” Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research, 255 (1984): 30. 16 Figure 1 Figure 2 Sperling writes that “for most Israelites, Asherah and her pillar, the 'asherah, became legitimate components of the cult of Yahweh, as shown by the new inscriptional finds.”62 However, in contrast to the Masoretic text that has survived, “nowhere in the extant biblical texts do the writers allow that Asherah or the 'asherah might be a legitimate component of the cult of Yahweh.”63 Even though Asherah was worshiped by the Israelites from the conquest of Canaan in the 12th century to the Babylonian exile in the early 6th century, she also was Asherah was basically eliminated from the history of Israel and subsequent Judaism. In the text of the Bible as we now read it, filtered and reshaped as it appears to have been by the reforming Deuteronomist priests around 600 B.C., hints of the goddess remain, but little survives that gives us a detailed understanding of her character or nature.64 Jordanian Lead Books Beginning in 2005, dozens of small lead books, or codices, were discovered in Jordan. These books are small, made of ancient lead material, and are written using a mix of Hebrew and Greek letters. Brought to the attention of the Jordanian Department of Antiquities (DoA) in 2011, the DoA has claimed that “the codices are a kind of ‘professional’ forgery that was 62 Sperling, S., “Olyan's ‘Asherah and the Cult of Yahweh in Israel’,” The Jewish Quarterly Review, 81, 1/2 (1990): 207. 63 Sperling, S., “Olyan's ‘Asherah and the Cult of Yahweh in Israel’,” The Jewish Quarterly Review, 81, 1/2 (1990): 207. 64 Peterson, D., “Nephi and His Asherah,” Journal of Book of Mormon Studies 9/2 (2000): 20. 17 executed skillfully.”65 However, other than their assertion that the codices are fakes, the DoA has not provided any evidence to support their claims. On the contrary, scientists with the British Ion Beam Centre (IBC) “have reported that the codex did not demonstrate the radioactivity arising from atmospheric polonium that is typical of modern lead samples, indicating that the lead of the codex was smelted over a century ago, and is not a product of modern-day manufacturing.”66 Matthew Hood, who has been studying these codices since 2009, added: The level of corrosion exhibited in some of the artefacts [British spelling] within the original collection, in particular the visible formation of mineral crystals as the metal reverts to organic compounds, provides strong evidence of the great age of some of these artefacts. While there may be variations in decay and corrosion that depend upon the environmental conditions in which the objects were stored or hidden, there is a strong underlying theme of decay from within the metal. It is oxidising and breaking down at atomic level to revert to its natural state. This is not witnessed in lead objects that are several centuries old and is not possible to produce by artificial acceleration (e.g. through heating). This provides very strong evidence that the objects are of great age, consistent with the studies of the text and designs that suggest an age of around 2000 years.67 Why all the interest in these codices, and why does the Jordanian DoA appear anxious to prove them fraudulent? It may be a religiopolitical issue; the lead books, which were cast rather than inscribed, are purported to contain the name of Jesus and possible images of him. If so, they would be the earliest Christian Hebrew language documents ever found. But this 65 Mustafa, A. (2018, April 7). ‘Jordan Codices’ proven fake – DoA. The Jordanian Times. Retrieved from: http://www.jordantimes.com/news/local/jordan-codices%E2%80%99-proven-fake-%E2%80%94-doa 66 Jordan Times. (2016, December 1). Jordan Lead Codices not modern forgeries – British experts. The Jordanian Times. Retrieved from: http://www.jordantimes.com/news/local/jordan-lead-codices-not-modernforgeries-%E2%80%94-british-experts 67 Archaeology News Network. (2016, Dec 9). Jordan Lead Codices Not Modern Forgeries. Retrieved from: https://archaeologynewsnetwork.blogspot.com/2016/12/jordan-lead-codices-not-modernforgeries.html#8uW2RDsPlGd1JgzA.97 18 aspect of the codices is not what interests us here. Other scholars, including Margaret Barker, are curious about different details found on the codices. The lead books are reported to demonstrate strong kabbalistic leanings, to contain multiple references to the Queen and the Lady, and to display many visual depictions of the temple menorah and the tree of life, symbols of the Queen of heaven.68 Figure 3 is a line drawing from one of the lead codices. Barker describes it as containing two unique features that she has never seen before: the sprouting leaves at the base of the menorah, and the 70 small circles that give the menorah its shape. The sprouting Figure 3 Figure 4 menorah is a clear indicator that it represented a living plant, often interpreted as the tree of life. Barker states that the “sprouting menorah was a symbol of the Lady of the first temple.”69 Figure 4 is a photo of one of the Jordanian lead books. In 2015, the Economist magazine heralded the creation of a new organization – The Centre for the Study of the Jordanian Lead Books (http://www.leadbookcentre.com/) – headed by “a heavyweight team” that includes religionists, scientists, politicians, and academics from several leading universities.70 According to its website, the Centre’s purpose is to promote awareness of the 68 Zinner, S., Son of the Star: Bar Kokhba and the Jordanian Lead Books. (2017). Retrieved from: https://www.academia.edu/33512415/Son_of_the_Star_Bar_Kokhba_and_the_Jordanian_Lead_Books._Ov erview_Assessment_Interpretation._A_Free_Online_Educational_Report_By_Samuel_Zinner 69 Barker, M., Some Lead Books Found in Jordan (2017), 9. Retrieved from: http://www.margaretbarker.com/ Papers/default.htm 70 Erasmus. (2015, March 18). A chink of light. The Economist. Retrieved from: https://www.economist.com/erasmus/2015/03/18/a-chink-of-light 19 lead codices and to support scholarly research of the same. If these codices are eventually proven authentic, it is believed that they could provide unique insights into early kabbalistic thought as well as a greater understanding of the role of the Queen of heaven in ancient Israelite temple worship. El Shaddai In Exodus 6:3 we read: “I appeared to Abraham, to Isaac, and to Jacob, as God Almighty [יָדַּשׁלֵאEl Shaddai], but by my name the LORD [הָהוְיYahweh] I did not make myself known to them.” Biale tells us that “with the exception of the tetragrammaton YHWH, no divine name has generated so much controversy as El Shaddai or Shaddai.”71 Translated as Almighty in the KJV, Shaddai (שדי (has been conjectured to have other interpretations. For example, a midrashic interpretation renders it as shedai (שדי(, or “that which is enough” or “that which is sufficient.”72 Following this line of interpretation, El Shaddai would then become the “God who is self-sufficient.” Others have linked the word שדיwith a similar Hebrew word, shad (שד (meaning breast. According to Biale, “the scholarly consensus is that the name [shaddai] must be a derivative of the Akkadian shadu, meaning mountain…. Albright argued that the original meaning of shadu was probably "breast" (shadwi in Old Akkadian).”73 Cross argues that based on its Akkadian etymology El Shaddai “seems to mean ‘the mountain one’.”74 In agreement with Albright’s interpretation, Barker argues for “God with breasts.” She describes El Shaddai as: A name with many possible meanings, one of which is ‘God with breasts’. The Judaean pillar figurines, which were widely used in Judah and Jerusalem until the time of Josiah and were originally identified as dolls, were images of this God with breasts. The figurines also had huge eyes, because the Lady had given sight, and those 71 Biale, D., “The God with Breasts: El Shaddai in the Bible,” History of Religions, 20 (1982): 240. 72 Emunah, N. (2014, June 14). Shaddai in the Midrash. Retrieved from: https://netzarifaith.org/2014/06/14/shaddai-in-the-midrash/ 73 Biale, D., “The God with Breasts: El Shaddai in the Bible,” History of Religions, 20 (1982): 240-241. 74 Cross, F., “Yahweh and the God of the Patriarchs,” The Harvard Theological Review, 55, 4 (1962): 246. 20 who rejected her lost their spiritual sight. The figurines have been found in almost every site in Judah, most of them broken, but none from the second temple period. They were probably the teraphim which Josiah destroyed.75 Figure 5 Barker’s claim is controversial, but it is based on archaeological discoveries. Thousands of figurines (mostly broken) from the first temple period have been found in and around Jerusalem and Judah. These figurines appear to have represented an object of worship. They picture a woman supporting her breasts with her hands (see Figure 5). Barker believes that the female figurines represented the Lady of the temple, El Shaddai, the God with breasts, and the God of the Patriarchs.76 These figurines are similar in form to the Asherah statues that have been found in ancient Canaanite cities. However, as noted by Peterson: There is one significant difference between the figurines from Israelite sites and those recovered from pagan Canaanite locations: The lower body of the Israelite figurines lacks the explicit detail characteristic of the Canaanite objects; indeed, the area below the waist of the Israelite figurines is typically a simple plain column. Whereas the pagan Canaanite objects depict a highly sexualized goddess of both childbearing and erotic love, in the Israelite figurines the aspect of the dea nutrix, the nourishing or nurturing goddess, comes to the fore.77 It is possible that the plain, pillar-shaped body of the Judean figurines represented a tree trunk, but not just any tree trunk. More than likely it symbolized the tree of life that was 75 Barker, M., Wisdom and the Other Tree: A Temple Theology Reading of the Genesis Eden Story (2012), 3. Retrieved from: http://www.margaretbarker.com/Papers/default.htm 76 Barker, M., Wisdom. The Lady of the Temple in a Lead Book from Jordan (2017), 8. Retrieved from: http:// www.margaretbarker.com/Papers/default.htm 77 Peterson, D., “Nephi and His Asherah,” Journal of Book of Mormon Studies 9/2 (2000): 19. 21 in the garden of Eden. As Smith stated: “The religious symbol of the goddess, the asherah, was in Israel a wooden pole, or perhaps a tree, representing the ‘tree of life’.”78 The Book of Enoch and the Lady Barker asserts that since most references to the Lady have been edited out of our canonical biblical text we must look elsewhere to discover information about the Lady of the temple. One of those sources is 1 Enoch, which she says is “the most important of the Hebrew books that did not become part of the final canon.79 1 Enoch is steeped in temple symbolism and language: Enoch was told by the archangel Michael that after the great judgement, the fragrant and beautiful tree would be restored again to the temple of the LORD, and its fruit would be given to the righteous and holy ones (1 Enoch 24.3-25.7). The menorah, the tree of life, was a symbol of Wisdom (Proverbs 3.18), and restoring the tree to the temple of the LORD represented restoring the Lady to the temple, restoring the socalled Asherah that Josiah had removed and burned.80 Barker asserts that 1 Enoch provides us with a “stylised history” that describes the events that lead up to the destruction of the first temple. In the Apocalypse of Weeks we read that “in the sixth week all who live in it [the temple] shall become blind and the hearts of all of them shall godlessly forsake Wisdom” (1 Enoch 93.8). Barker adds: “Wisdom’s first gift had been the vision which was eternal life, and this loss of vision was remembered as the significant change at the end of the first temple period. Wisdom was forsaken and vision was lost.”81 78 Smith, M., “God Male and Female in the Old Testament: Yahweh and His ‘Asherah’,” Theological Studies, 48, 2 (1987): 334. 79 Barker, M., Belonging to the Temple (2007), 9. Retrieved from: http://www.margaretbarker.com/Papers/default.htm 80 Barker, M., Restoring Solomon’s Temple (2012), 11. Retrieved from: http://www.margaretbarker.com/Papers/default.htm 81 Barker, M., The Temple Roots of the Liturgy (2000), 11. Retrieved from: http://www.margaretbarker.com/Papers/default.htm 22 Isaiah 7:11 and the Great Isaiah Scroll In Isaiah we read: “Again the LORD spoke to Ahaz, ‘Ask a sign of YHWH your God; let it be deep as Sheol or high as heaven.’ But Ahaz said, ‘I will not ask, and I will not put the LORD to the test’.”82 However, the Great Isaiah scroll (GIS) from Qumran can be rendered with an alternate reading: “Isaiah told king Ahaz to ask for a sign from the Mother of YHWH your God.”83 The difference in interpretation comes down to one letter – an aleph (א (vs. an ayin (ע – (which on the GIS are even more similar than they are in modern Hebrew. In Figure 6 I have presented a picture of Isaiah 7:11 from the GIS84: Figure 6 I have added several markings on this image. First, the red brackets indicate the beginning and end of verse 11. Second, the green box identifies the word that interests us. Third, the blue box is an example of the author’s ayin. In addition, since the scroll is ripped and is missing letters from this verse I have added the missing letters to the right of the text to make the verse complete. In the Masoretic Text (MT) the green-boxed word is spelled םִעֵמ (from with), while on the GIS it appears to be אםֵמ)from mother). In order to clearly analyze this scribe’s writing, I created the following comparison: Figure 7 82 Isa 7:10-12 83 Barker, M., Restoring Solomon’s Temple (2012), 9. Retrieved from: http://www.margaretbarker.com/Papers/ default.htm 84 Retrived from: http://dss.collections.imj.org.il/isaiah 23 For convenience, I have labeled the three images in Figure 7 as A, B, and C. Image A is the word in the green box from our verse of Isaiah 7:11. B is the word in the blue box from the same verse. C is from the same page on the GIS, and from the same scribe, but a few verses lower on the page. As shown in the comparison, all three words begin with the letter mem (מ(. The mem in B is followed by an ayin, and the mem in C is followed by an aleph. Consistently throughout the text the scribe joins the aleph with the mem, as shown in C. Also, consistently throughout the text the ayin is separated from the mem. Returning to A, we can clearly see that the mem and the second letter touch each other, consistent with the memaleph combination. If the second letter is actually an aleph rather than an ayin, then the text can definitely be read “from the mother of Yahweh your God.” Barker believes that this may be the correct reading.85 The ramification of this reading, of course, is that Isaiah would then be confirming that Yahweh has a mother. However, many critics have attacked Barker for pouncing on what they believe is merely a scribal error or a run in the ink. In all fairness to those critics, the last two letters of the green-boxed word do seem to be quite poorly written. In addition, critics have also pointed out that the Septuagint has the words: παρὰ κυρίου θεοῦ σου (pará kyríou theoú sou), or “from the Lord your God” with no mention of “mother,” indicating that the Qumran text might be merely a scribal error. Conclusion Compelling arguments can be made for the existence of the Queen of heaven in ancient Israelite religious worship. The Lady of the temple, the Sacred Tree, the Tree of Life, Qudshu, Shekhinah, El Shaddai, and Wisdom may be some of her names. As the wife or consort of El, and possibly the mother of Yahweh, her role in antiquity would have been significant. But the question I need to ask is whether this Queen of heaven, as she has been 85 Barker, M., Restoring Solomon’s Temple (2012), 9. Retrieved from: http://www.margaretbarker.com/Papers/ default.htm 24 described in this paper, is the Mother in heaven from my Sunday school lessons. Perhaps! That is the best answer that I can give right now. Hopefully I will be able to give a more definitive response with additional study and research. Since I began this literary journey with a poem, I end in the same fashion: Book of Love The Book of Love, who wrote it? Amah, Antit, Almah I did, Ashratah, Azariah, Tara, Sansaria, I was the ONE, who wrote it, El Shaddai my truth of it all in a book called Love, I am Eloah. That book, is my Love for you, its been hidden that’s true Who wrote it? I did, I wrote it, its my book of the Sun my auRA we’ll call it, the true Book, its all there, in the Book of Love If I say, that I did…and I did Would you believe it was me? And, would it finally set me free? To be once again in heavens seat, my throne just as I have always been Would you have the Courage to see? The Queen and that Wisdom is my divinity.86

bottom of page