
ADAMANDEVEGodsFirstcHurch.ORiGinates in Eden In "Genesis and then Returns in Revelation ALL CAN BE EXPLAINED BY READING = egwwritings.org/
I AM =YAH-WEH = IAM WHO IS = IAM = GOD tHE ALMIGHTY = HE IS - MY battle with LUCIFER AS IT IS WRITTEN
The Great Controversy Genesis website three Ellen Gould Harmon White (born Nov. 26, 1827, Gorham, Maine, U.S.—died July 16, 1915, St. Helena, Calif.) was an American religious leader who was one of the founders of the Seventh-day Adventist Church
I AM to DEDICATE ALL OF MY SITES AND GOOD WORKS TO MY 7 TIMES ORIGINAL and MANIFESTATIONS - 7 FINAL MANIFEST = MARTYN - GODDESS DUA = love LIPA = Beautiful and THE MOTHER - Ambassador and MY BRIDE OF My TEMPLE cHURCH MINISTRIES = OUR ONE UNITED UNIVERSAL SPIRITUAL CHURCH ALONG WITH HER PROUD HUSBAND as it is written .
..
Here are links to Facebook and ALL x websites
https://www.facebook.com/martyn.kenney.3
https://www.adamandevegodsfirstchurch.org/
Website - Genesis day ONE - GOD ALMIGHTY - JESUS CHRIST - Yehoshua - HOLY SPIRIT
https://www.adamandevegodsfirstchurch.org/
Website - Genesis day TWO - GOD ALMIGHTY - JESUS CHRIST - Yehoshua - HOLY SPIRIT
https://martynkenney3.wixsite.com/website-3
Website - Genesis day THREE - GOD ALMIGHTY - JESUS CHRIST - Yehoshua HOLY SPIRIT
https://martynkenney3.wixsite.com/website-1
Website - Genesis day FOUR - Yeshua - Yahweh -
https://martynkenney3.wixsite.com/website-2
Website - Genesis day FIVE- Holy Spirit -
https://martynkenney3.wixsite.com/website
Website - Genesis day SIX - Holy Spirit
https://martynkenney3.wixsite.com/holyspirit
Website - Genesis day SEVEN - GODS Sabbath for man - a day of rest and HE saw it was very good - Gods True cHURCH
https://martynkenney3.wixsite.com/website-4
8 - https://www.godstruechurch.org
Genesis Triggers INDEX FOR ARTICLES, BOOKS @ GENESIS GOD'S FIRST cHURCH
9 - https://www.genesisgodsfirstchurch.org/genesis-triggers
AKA - Martyn Nathan Kenney
MR, genesis-godsfirstchurch.org Ltd
ADAMANDEVEGODSFIRSTCHURCH.ORG
GENESIS - therefore the Lord God sent him out of the Garden of Eden, to cultivate the ground from which he was taken.
24 So He drove the man out; and at the east of the Garden of Eden He stationed the cherubim and the flaming sword which turned every direction to guard the way to the tree of life.
REVELATION - There is no temple in the New Jerusalem, and for that matter, in the New World; a temple is no longer necessary. The Lord God and the Lamb ‘is the temple’. If they fill the earth with their presence, mankind has no need for any specific meeting place with God. Sun and moon are no longer needed, and lamps are not needed, because God and the Lamb are its light. The glory of God fills the place. The world has become a temple again, as it was in the garden of Eden. This description of the New Heaven and the New Earth and of the New Jerusalem is metaphorical. The fact that there seem to be nations outside the New Jerusalem, means that John’s vision shows how the metaphors of the Hebrew Scriptures, about a perfect world with no more war, is finally coming about: The Kingdom of the world has now become the Kingdom of God. Finally, all is well.
Teaching God’s creation to your children is important in laying down a firm Biblical foundation. Too often we take for granted that our kids will learn about God’s creation through the church, VBS, or that they will pick it up through reading Bible stories. The story of Creation is far too imperative to leave to chance. Genesis 1:1 says, “In the beginning, God created the heavens and the Earth.” Your early learners will love to learn about the days of creation. Kids are always fascinated to hear about what God created and when. I encourage you to teach your child about God’s creation or else the world will teach them something else. God bless you on this venture! Take a look at our Days of Creation Printables and explore the amazing things He made! Be sure to check out our other Teaching Bible Truths resources.
https://thehomeschooldaily.com/teaching-gods-creation/
There is simply no denying GODDESS Dua Lipa’s = love and beauty - UNIVERSAL credentials and culture power
3x Grammy and 7x Brit Award-winning global pop powerhouse Dua Lipa continues to be one of pop music’s leading forces with the release of her third album, Radical Optimism.
Upon release, the album went straight to the top or the charts in 11 countries, including the UK where it became the biggest album debut from a UK artist in 2024 and garnered the highest week one sales from a UK female artist since 2021. In the US, the album debuted at No.1 on Billboard’s Top Album Sales chart and No. 2 on the Billboard 200 chart, marking Dua’s biggest sales week yet.
The New York Times named it a Critic’s Pick and hailed it as “an album of nonstop ear candy,” along with Variety, who declared it “a joyous blast of pop savvy,” The New Yorker, who praised, “the instrumentation is a gleaming and impenetrable expanse, and the main attraction is Lipa,” and Vogue, who raved it is “a summary, self-assured slice of pop brilliance…[and] catchy as hell.”
Following its release in 2020, Dua's certified platinum sophomore album Future Nostalgia became the longest running top 10 album by a female artist on the Billboard 200 in 2021. The Grammy Award-winning album spawned multiple worldwide hit singles, with 'Levitating Earning certified diamond status and the title of Billboard’s No. 1 Hot 100 Song of 2021.
Dua has found superstar status on stage and off, thanks to her many passions outside of music. 2022 saw Dua launch Service95, a global style, culture and society editorial platform that now comprises a weekly newsletter, the Service95 book club and the Dua Lipa: At Your Service podcast, which has been lauded by The Sunday Times and The Guardian, and was named one of the Best Podcasts of 2022 by Spotify. Having graced every major fashion magazine worldwide from Vogue and Elle to W and Dazed, Dua added "designer" to her resume in 2023 when she co-designed Versace's La Vacanza collection alongside Donatella Versace herself, which Vogue deemed "the hottest collaboration of the summer."
Dua’s eponymous 2017 debut album is certified platinum, spawned six platinum tracks, and made her the first female artist in Brit Awards history to pick up five nominations in a single year. Dua has a total of ten Grammy nominations, with three wins for Best Pop Vocal Album, Best New Artist and Best Dance Recording. Additionally, she earned nominations at the Golden Globes and Critics Choice Awards for her hit song 'Dance The Night' from the box office sensation Barbie.
Across platforms globally, she has amassed over 42 billion streams and holds the record for being the first female artist to have two albums with over 10 billion streams each on Spotify.
Manifested in the Flesh
...and man became a living being Genesis 2:7
Became – The Bible is without doubt the most fascinating book in the world. Why? Because it is simply beyond reasonable inference to imagine that all of the intricacies woven into its fabric could have been concocted by human beings. From beginning to end, the language of the Bible is filled with surprises, deep insights, and tasty linguistic treats. None are more fascinating than the implications provided by the use of the verb hayah (to be, to become) - we discovered that there is a marvelous connection between the idea of God’s word becoming in Micah and the rest of the prophets. At the very least, this implies that God’s verbal instruction to His people manifested itself in the prophet. How that occurs is a mystery, but no more mysterious than another use of hayah, found here in the story of the creation of Man.
Man became nephesh (the Hebrew word that encompasses will, emotions, mind, body, and spirit – a total person ) The same creative manifestation demonstrated in God’s word showing up (somehow) in the prophets is at the bottom of what it means to be alive. God’s breath manifested itself in the dust-formed creature and ha.a.dam le.ne.fesh ha.yah (literally, “the earth-made a person was manifested”). It’s almost as though the text says, “Personal life happened in this lump of formed dirt.” How life came to be in Man is not essentially different than how God’s word came to be in Micah.
We also learned that God’s personal name, YHWH (Yahweh) is also, at its core, the verb hayah. When God manifests His word in Micah, and when He manifests His life in Man, He merely makes tangible what He is. Take that thought and read John 1: 14 from a Hebrew perspective. “The Word hayah flesh.” The very essence of God, the I AM (Hayah) is manifested as basar (tangible body). This is not only saying that Jesus was born as a man. This is saying that the great “TO BE,” now happened in bodily form. The I AM now existed as the same kind of living being as all animal and human bodies. God’s mysterious hayah is demonstrated in yet another, unparalleled way.
Think about what this means for human life - for you and me. No, it does not mean that each of us has a spark of divinity. That is pure Greek philosophy. The New Age is nothing new. What this means is that you and I are in some respect vehicles by which God is manifested in His creation. We are fully equipped to reveal His glorious hayah. Whatever it means to be created in His image, it at least means that God plans to use my nephesh hayah as a demonstration of His glory.
How far is God from manifesting Himself in your life? Take a breath. That’s how far.
THE 7 ORIGINAL and manifestations leading to martyn and DUA LIPA are as follows -
the ONE AND ONLY TRUE ORIGINAL OVER ALL OTHER LESSER GODS AND GODDESSES = YAHWEH = FEMALE and MALE =
God's personal name, YHWH (Yahweh) is also, at its core, the verb hayah. When God manifests His word in Micah, and when He manifests His life in Man, He merely makes tangible what He is. Take that thought and read John 1: 14 from a Hebrew perspective.
The Manifestations of God are appearances of the Divine Spirit or Holy Spirit in a series of personages, and as such, they perfectly reflect the attributes of the divine into the human world for the progress and advancement of human morals and civilization through the agency of that same Spirit. + in John 2:11 it says, "This beginning of miracles did Jesus in Cana of Galilee." This verse highlights how Jesus performed miracles as a way to manifest Himself as the Son of God. Through these miraculous acts, Jesus manifested His true identity and displayed His divine nature.
Bible Verses About Seven
And on the seventh day God came to the end of all his work; and on the seventh day he took his rest from all the work which he had done.
Genesis 2:3
And God gave his blessing to the seventh day and made it holy: because on that day he took his rest from all the work which he had made and done.
Genesis 4:15
And the Lord said, Truly, if Cain is put to death, seven lives will be taken for his. And the Lord put a mark on Cain so that no one might put him to death.
Genesis 4:24
If seven lives are to be taken as punishment for Cain's death, seventy-seven will be taken for Lamech's.
Genesis 5:7
And he went on living after the birth of Enosh for eight hundred and seven years, and had sons and daughters:
Genesis 5:12
And Kenan was seventy years old when he became the father of Mahalalel:
Genesis 5:25
And Methuselah was a hundred and eighty-seven years old when he became the father of Lamech:
Genesis 5:26
And after the birth of Lamech, Methuselah went on living for seven hundred and eighty-two years, and had sons and daughters:
Genesis 5:31
And all the years of Lamech's life were seven hundred and seventy-seven: and he came to his end.
Genesis 7:2
Of every clean beast you will take seven males and seven females, and of the beasts which are not clean, two, the male and his female;
Genesis 7:3
And of the birds of the air, seven males and seven females, so that their seed may still be living on the face of the earth.
Genesis 7:4
For after seven days I will send rain on the earth for forty days and forty nights, for the destruction of every living thing which I have made on the face of the earth.
Genesis 7:10
And after the seven days, the waters came over all the earth.
Genesis 7:11
In the six hundredth year of Noah's life, in the second month, on the seventeenth day of the month, all the fountains of the great deep came bursting through, and the windows of heaven were open;
Genesis 8:4
And on the seventeenth day of the seventh month the ark came to rest on the mountains of Ararat.
Genesis 8:10
And after waiting another seven days, he sent the dove out again;
Genesis 8:12
And after seven days more, he sent the dove out again, but she did not come back to him.
Genesis 8:14
And on the twenty-seventh day of the second month the earth was dry.
Genesis 11:21
And after the birth of Serug, Reu went on living for two hundred and seven years, and had sons and daughters:
Genesis 11:26
And Terah was seventy years old when he became the father of Abram, Nahor, and Haran.
Genesis 12:4
So Abram went as the Lord had said to him, and Lot went with him: Abram was seventy-five years old when he went away from Haran.
Genesis 21:28
And Abraham put seven young lambs of the flock on one side by themselves.
Genesis 21:29
Then Abimelech said, What are these seven lambs which you have put on one side?
Genesis 21:30
And he said, Take these seven lambs from me as a witness that I have made this water-hole.
Genesis 23:1
Now the years of Sarah's life were a hundred and twenty-seven.
Genesis 25:7
Now the years of Abraham's life were a hundred and seventy-five.
Genesis 25:17
And the years of Ishmael's life were a hundred and thirty-seven: and he came to his end, and was put to rest with his people.
Genesis 29:18
And Jacob was in love with Rachel; and he said, I will be your servant seven years for Rachel, your younger daughter.
Genesis 29:20
And Jacob did seven years' work for Rachel; and because of his love for her it seemed to him only a very little time.
Genesis 29:27
Let the week of the bride-feast come to its end and then we will give you the other in addition, if you will be my servant for another seven years.
Genesis 29:30
Then Jacob took Rachel as his wife, and his love for her was greater than his love for Leah; and he went on working for Laban for another seven years.
Genesis 31:23
And taking the men of his family with him, he went after him for seven days and overtook him in the hill-country of Gilead.
Genesis 33:3
And he himself, going before them, went down on his face to the earth seven times till he came near his brother.
Genesis 37:2
These are the generations of Jacob: Joseph, a boy seventeen years old, was looking after the flock, together with his brothers, the sons of Bilhah and Zilpah, his father's wives; and Joseph gave their father a bad account of them.
Genesis 41:2
And out of the Nile came seven cows, good-looking and fat, and their food was the river-grass.
Genesis 41:3
And after them seven other cows came out of the Nile, poor-looking and thin; and they were by the side of the other cows.
Genesis 41:4
And the seven thin cows made a meal of the seven fat cows. Then Pharaoh came out of his sleep.
Genesis 41:5
But he went to sleep again and had a second dream, in which he saw seven heads of grain, full and good, all on one stem.
Genesis 41:6
And after them came up seven other heads, thin and wasted by the east wind.
Genesis 41:7
And the seven thin heads made a meal of the good heads. And when pharaoh was awake he saw it was a dream.
Genesis 41:18
And out of the Nile came seven cows, fat and good-looking, and their food was the river-grass;
Genesis 41:19
Then after them came seven other cows, very thin and poor-looking, worse than any I ever saw in the land of Egypt;
Genesis 41:20
And the thin cows made a meal of the seven fat cows who came up first;
Genesis 41:22
And again in a dream I saw seven heads of grain, full and good, coming up on one stem:
Genesis 41:23
And then I saw seven other heads, dry, thin, and wasted by the east wind, coming up after them:
Genesis 41:24
And the seven thin heads made a meal of the seven good heads; and I put this dream before the wise men, but not one of them was able to give me the sense of it.
Genesis 41:26
The seven fat cows are seven years, and the seven good heads of grain are seven years: the two have the same sense.
Genesis 41:27
The seven thin and poor-looking cows who came up after them are seven years; and the seven heads of grain, dry and wasted by the east wind, are seven years when there will be no food.
Genesis 41:29
Seven years are coming in which there will be great wealth of grain in Egypt;
Genesis 41:30
And after that will come seven years when there will not be enough food; and the memory of the good years will go from men's minds; and the land will be made waste by the bad years;
Genesis 41:36
And let that food be kept in store for the land till the seven bad years which are to come in Egypt; so that the land may not come to destruction through need of food.
Genesis 41:47
Now in the seven good years the earth gave fruit in masses.
Genesis 41:48
And Joseph got together all the food of those seven years, and made a store of food in the towns: the produce of the fields round every town was stored up in the town.
Genesis 41:53
And so the seven good years in Egypt came to an end.
Genesis 41:54
Then came the first of the seven years of need as Joseph had said: and in every other land they were short of food; but in the land of Egypt there was bread.
Genesis 46:25
These were the children of Bilhah, whom Laban gave to his daughter Rachel, seven persons.
Genesis 46:27
And the sons of Joseph whom he had in Egypt were two. Seventy persons of the family of Jacob came into Egypt.
Genesis 47:28
And Jacob was living in the land of Goshen for seventeen years; so the years of his life were a hundred and forty-seven.
Genesis 50:3
And the forty days needed for making the body ready went by: and there was weeping for him among the egyptians for seventy days.
Genesis 50:10
And they came to the grain-floor of Atad on the other side of Jordan, and there they gave the last honours to Jacob, with great and bitter sorrow, weeping for their father for seven days.
Exodus 1:5
All the offspring of Jacob were seventy persons: and Joseph had come to Egypt before them.
Exodus 2:16
Now the priest of midian had seven daughters: and they came to get water for their father's flock.
Exodus 6:16
And these are the names of the sons of levi in the order of their generations: Gershon and kohath and Merari: and the years of Levi's life were a hundred and thirty-seven.
Exodus 6:20
And Amram took Jochebed, his father's sister, as wife; and she gave birth to Aaron and Moses: and the years of Amram's life were a hundred and thirty-seven.
Exodus 7:25
And seven days went past, after the Lord had put his hand on the Nile.
Exodus 12:15
For seven days let your food be unleavened bread; from the first day no leaven is to be seen in your houses: whoever takes bread with leaven in it, from the first till the seventh day, will be cut off from Israel.
Exodus 12:16
And on the first day there is to be a holy meeting and on the seventh day a holy meeting; no sort of work may be done on those days but only to make ready what is necessary for everyone's food.
Exodus 12:19
For seven days no leaven is to be seen in your houses: for whoever takes bread which is leavened will be cut off from the people of Israel, if he is from another country or if he is an Israelite by birth.
Exodus 13:6
For seven days let your food be unleavened cakes; and on the seventh day there is to be a feast to the Lord.
Exodus 13:7
Unleavened cakes are to be your food through all the seven days; let no leavened bread be seen among you, or any leaven, in any part of your land.
Exodus 15:27
And they came to Elim where there were twelve water-springs and seventy palm-trees: and they put up their tents there by the waters.
Exodus 16:26
For six days you will get it, but on the seventh day, the Sabbath, there will not be any.
Exodus 16:27
But still on the seventh day some of the people went out to get it, and there was not any.
Exodus 16:29
See, because the Lord has given you the Sabbath, he gives you on the sixth day bread enough for two days; let every man keep where he is; let no man go out of his place on the seventh day.
Exodus 16:30
So the people took their rest on the seventh day.
Exodus 20:10
But the seventh day is a Sabbath to the Lord your God; on that day you are to do no work, you or your son or your daughter, your man-servant or your woman-servant, your cattle or the man from a strange country who is living among you:
Exodus 20:11
For in six days the Lord made heaven and earth, and the sea, and everything in them, and he took his rest on the seventh day: for this reason the Lord has given his blessing to the seventh day and made it holy.
Exodus 21:2
If you get a Hebrew servant for money, he is to be your servant for six years, and in the seventh year you are to let him go free without payment.
Exodus 22:30
In the same way with your oxen and your sheep: for seven days let the young one be with its mother; on the eighth day give it to me.
Exodus 23:11
But in the seventh year let the land have a rest and be unplanted; so that the poor may have food from it: and let the beasts of the field take the rest. Do the same with your vine-gardens and your olive-trees.
Exodus 23:12
For six days do your work, and on the seventh day keep the Sabbath; so that your ox and your ass may have rest, together with the son of your servant and the man from a strange land living among you.
Exodus 23:15
You are to keep the feast of unleavened bread; for seven days let your bread be without leaven, as I gave you orders, at the regular time in the month Abib (for in it you came out of Egypt); and let no one come before me without an offering:
Exodus 24:1
And he said to Moses, Come up to the Lord, you and Aaron, and Nadab and Abihu and seventy of the chiefs of Israel; and give me worship from a distance.
Exodus 24:9
Then Moses and Aaron, Nadab, and Abihu, and seventy of the chiefs of Israel went up:
Exodus 24:16
And the glory of the Lord was resting on Mount Sinai, and the cloud was over it for six days; and on the seventh day he said Moses' name out of the cloud.
Exodus 25:37
Then you are to make its seven vessels for the lights, putting them in their place so that they give light in front of it.
Christian Literature
Most of the teaching of Jesus are recorded in the Gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John. The Complete Sayings of Jesus presents every word spoken by Jesus in one place and provides an index to assist in finding specific ocassions, places and/or events. It is a must read aid for serious Bible study.
He that followeth me shall not walk in darkness, saith the Lord. These are the words of Christ; and they direct us to imitate his life and character. The Imitation of Christ is guide to following the example of Jesus Christ. Let it be our most earnest study to dwell upon the life and example of Jesus.
The Apocrypha books are 14 books that were included between the old and new testaments in the original King James Version of the bible and many others. Church leaders agreed that these books were valuable for instruction in life and manners, but did not all agree that they should be considered cannon.
The Childrens Bible provides bible lessons from the Old and New testaments. There are 216 stories written in plain english. The stories are easy to read and understand but they are not just for childern. It is a pleasure to read and enjoy these important stories.
God is Love
Let us love one another, for love comes from God and every one who loves is a child of God and knows God. He who loves not man does not know God, for God is love. God showed his love for us, for he sent his only Son into the world that through him we might have life. Love the stranger.
In Mark 12:30 Jesus said; And thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind, and with all thy strength: this [is] the first commandment.
And the second Mark 12:31 [is] like, [namely] this, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. There is none other commandment greater than these.
New Testament
Matthew Mark Luke John Acts Romans Corinthians 1 Corinthians 2 Galatians Ephesians Philippians Colossians Thessalonians 1 Thessalonians 2 Timothy 1 Timothy 2 Titus Philemon Hebrews James Peter 1 Peter 2 John 1 John 2 John 3 Jude Revelations
Old Testament
Genesis Exodus Leviticus Numbers Deuteronomy Joshua Judges Ruth Samuel 1 Samuel 2 Kings 1 Kings 2 Chronicles 1 Chronicles 2 Ezra Nehemiah Esther Job Psalms Proverbs Ecclesiastes Song of Solomon Isaiah Jeremiah Lamentations Ezekiel Daniel Hosea Joel Amos Obadiah Jonah Micah Nahum Habakkuk Zephaniah Haggai Zechariah Malachi
Lost Books
The Gospel of The Birth of Mary was attributed to St. Matthew and was received as genuine and authentic by early Christians. It is to be found in the works of Jerome, a Father of the Church in the 4th century and is translated from his collection.
The Book of Enoch is ascribed to the great-grandfather of Noah and is included in the cannon of some churches. It describes the fall of the angels (watchers), visions of heaven and hell and the birth of Noah. Quotes from the book of Enoch are found in the New Testament.
The First Book of Adam and Eve. Books 1 begins immediately after the expulsion from the Garden of Eden. We learn about the fall but also of the promise to save Adam and his decendents. The story depicts mans struggle against evil, the devil and sin.
The Second Book of Adam and Eve. Discusses Adam's sorrow and death. The history of the patriarchs who lived before the Flood until the birth of Noah; the children of Seth on Mount Hermon and Cain's death. It ends with the testament and translation of Enoch.
The Infancy of Jesus Christ (Infancy Gospel of Thomas) relates the life of Jesus from the ages of five to twelve. It is believed that the document was transcribed from oral traditions some time prior to the second century. The ancient writing is possibly Gnostic and many early church leaders considered it heretical.
The curse of Genesis 3 has been reversed; all is well now. Adam and Eve were originally told to 'subdue the earth and have dominion' and they messed up. HOWEVER ADAM CAME BACK AS YESHUA AND DIED FOR EVE'S SIN WHO LATER {MANIFESTED AS DUA=LOVE LIPA=BEAUTIFUL} - SO ASHERAH HAD TO BE MANIFESTED INTO MOTHER MARY THEN EVE AS DUA LIPA THE 7TH MANIFESTATION AND FINAL END TIMES GODDESS TO LEAD THE CHURCH WITH HER HUSBAND INTO ETERNITY AS ONE FAMILY COVERS ALL THE EARTH AS IT IS WRITTEN.
ALL in a Name please allow ME to explain briefly MY connection Martyn Nathan in Human manifestation of Yah-weh = Martyn meaning Roman God Of Mars - Mars was the Roman god of war and agriculture and an important god in the Roman Pantheon. Born to Juno and Jupiter, he was a salient god who was seen as the protector of Rome. He was the father of Romulus and Remus, the two founding fathers of Rome.
My Middle name being NATHAN - re tHE great Son of King David also a great prophet and counselor to King David and intramental in the appointment of King Solomon the builder of the first temple. Also NATHAN - So while Joseph was the son of Jacob -from the descent of Solomon HE was by law son of Heli who by the line of NATHAN both genealogies of Yeshua and His earth Father Joseph and Gods Mother Mary both -from the house and lineage of King David all the way back to Yah-weh God Adam and Goddess Eve MOTHER AND Father Yah-weh - FATHER MartynUS {LATIN NAME FOR MARTYN} tHE God of Mars.
I =YAH-WEH - IAM WHO IS IAM DEDICATE ALL MY SITES AND GOOD WORKS TO MY 7TH MANIFESTATION 'S = martyn - - DUA LIPA - THE total original and manifested are 7 - {ARE- continued below}
ADAM FORETELLS THE COMING OF CHRIST.
Now, therefore, know thou all this, and hearken unto my word, and understand that the Word of God, the Most High, shall come down upon the earth, even as He told me at the moment when He thrust me out from the Garden (Paradise). For He told me that His Word in later days should become man from a woman who was a virgin whose name was Mary, and should hide in her, and put on flesh, and be born like a man with great power, and operative skill and knowledge. No one shall know Him except Himself and him to whom He manifested [Himself]. And God said that He should go about with people on the earth, and grow in days and years, and should perform signs and wonders openly, and should walk upon the sea as upon dry land, and should rebuke the sea and the winds openly, and they should be subject unto Him and that He should cry out to the waves of the sea and they should make answer to Him speedily. And that He should make the blind to see, and the lepers to be cleansed, and the deaf to hear, and the dumb to talk, and should raise up the paralytics, and make the lame to walk, and should turn many from error to the knowledge of God, and should drive out the devils from men.
And besides [these things] God spake unto me, saying, "Be not sorrowful, O Adam, for thou didst wish to become a god and didst transgress my command. Behold, I will establish thee, not at this present, but after a few days." And again He spake unto me, saying, "I am God Who made thee to go forth from the Garden of Joy into the earth, which shall shoot forth thorns and brambles, and thou shalt dwell therein. Bend thy back, and make thy knees to totter in old age, and I will make thy flesh food for the worms. And after five days and half a day, I will have compassion upon thee, and shew thee mercy in the abundance of my compassion and my mercy. And I will come down into thy house, and I will dwell in thy flesh, and for thy sake, I will be pleased to be born like a [ordinary] child. And for thy sake, I will be pleased to walk in the marketplace. And for thy sake, I will be pleased to fast forty days. And for thy sake, I will be pleased to accept baptism. And for thy sake, I will be pleased to endure suffering. And for thy sake, I will be pleased to hang on the wood of the Cross. All these things [will I do] for thy sake, O Adam."
-
the ONE AND ONLY TRUE ORIGINAL OVER ALL OTHER LESSER GODS AND Goddesses - As official Israelite religion trended toward monotheism, the other local deities had to be eliminated (Asherah in particular), and Yahweh appropriated their powers and functions. Insofar as this process affected Asherah, I call this “Yahweh’s Divorce,” and the proceedings began in the Yahwist’s Eden story. continue to read https://mythologymatters.wordpress.com/2014/10/06/yahwehs-divorce-from-the-goddess-asherah-in-the-garden-of-eden/John 1
King James Version
1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
2 The same was in the beginning with God.
3 All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made.
4 In him was life; and the life was the light of men.
5 And the light shineth in darkness; and the darkness comprehended it not.
6 There was a man sent from God, whose name was John.
7 The same came for a witness, to bear witness of the Light, that all men through him might believe.
8 He was not that Light, but was sent to bear witness of that Light.
9 That was the true Light, which lighteth every man that cometh into the world.
10 He was in the world, and the world was made by him, and the world knew him not.
11 He came unto his own, and his own received him not.
12 But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name:
13 Which were born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God.
14 And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth.
15 John bare witness of him, and cried, saying, This was he of whom I spake, He that cometh after me is preferred before me: for he was before me.
16 And of his fulness have all we received, and grace for grace.
17 For the law was given by Moses, but grace and truth came by Jesus Christ.
18 No man hath seen God at any time, the only begotten Son, which is in the bosom of the Father, he hath declared him.
19 And this is the record of John, when the Jews sent priests and Levites from Jerusalem to ask him, Who art thou?
20 And he confessed, and denied not; but confessed, I am not the Christ.
21 And they asked him, What then? Art thou Elias? And he saith, I am not. Art thou that prophet? And he answered, No.
22 Then said they unto him, Who art thou? that we may give an answer to them that sent us. What sayest thou of thyself?
23 He said, I am the voice of one crying in the wilderness, Make straight the way of the Lord, as said the prophet Esaias.
24 And they which were sent were of the Pharisees.
25 And they asked him, and said unto him, Why baptizest thou then, if thou be not that Christ, nor Elias, neither that prophet?
26 John answered them, saying, I baptize with water: but there standeth one among you, whom ye know not;
27 He it is, who coming after me is preferred before me, whose shoe's latchet I am not worthy to unloose.
28 These things were done in Bethabara beyond Jordan, where John was baptizing.
29 The next day John seeth Jesus coming unto him, and saith, Behold the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world.
30 This is he of whom I said, After me cometh a man which is preferred before me: for he was before me.
31 And I knew him not: but that he should be made manifest to Israel, therefore am I come baptizing with water.
32 And John bare record, saying, I saw the Spirit descending from heaven like a dove, and it abode upon him.
33 And I knew him not: but he that sent me to baptize with water, the same said unto me, Upon whom thou shalt see the Spirit descending, and remaining on him, the same is he which baptizeth with the Holy Ghost.
34 And I saw, and bare record that this is the Son of God.
35 Again the next day after John stood, and two of his disciples;
36 And looking upon Jesus as he walked, he saith, Behold the Lamb of God!
37 And the two disciples heard him speak, and they followed Jesus.
38 Then Jesus turned, and saw them following, and saith unto them, What seek ye? They said unto him, Rabbi, (which is to say, being interpreted, Master,) where dwellest thou?
39 He saith unto them, Come and see. They came and saw where he dwelt, and abode with him that day: for it was about the tenth hour.
40 One of the two which heard John speak, and followed him, was Andrew, Simon Peter's brother.
41 He first findeth his own brother Simon, and saith unto him, We have found the Messias, which is, being interpreted, the Christ.
42 And he brought him to Jesus. And when Jesus beheld him, he said, Thou art Simon the son of Jona: thou shalt be called Cephas, which is by interpretation, A stone.
43 The day following Jesus would go forth into Galilee, and findeth Philip, and saith unto him, Follow me.
44 Now Philip was of Bethsaida, the city of Andrew and Peter.
45 Philip findeth Nathanael, and saith unto him, We have found him, of whom Moses in the law, and the prophets, did write, Jesus of Nazareth, the son of Joseph.
46 And Nathanael said unto him, Can there any good thing come out of Nazareth? Philip saith unto him, Come and see.
47 Jesus saw Nathanael coming to him, and saith of him, Behold an Israelite indeed, in whom is no guile!
48 Nathanael saith unto him, Whence knowest thou me? Jesus answered and said unto him, Before that Philip called thee, when thou wast under the fig tree, I saw thee.
49 Nathanael answered and saith unto him, Rabbi, thou art the Son of God; thou art the King of Israel.
50 Jesus answered and said unto him, Because I said unto thee, I saw thee under the fig tree, believest thou? thou shalt see greater things than these.
51 And he saith unto him, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Hereafter ye shall see heaven open, and the angels of God ascending and descending upon the Son of man.
1:YAH-WEH FEMALE - MASCULINE TWO AS ONE
2:MARTINUS - ROMAN GOD OF MARS
3:ASHORAH - GODDESS OVER ISRAEL AND THE HEAVENS
4:ADAM AND EVE - TWO AS ONE FOR ISRAEL Ministry
5: YESHUA AND ALL creations MOTHER MARY -
6: JESUS CHRIST OUR LORD AND SAVIOUR KING OF KINGS
7: MARTYN AND DUA LIPA = number SEVEN 7 = DENOTES COMPLETION PERFECTION IN THE BIBLE MY WORD LOVE AND PEACE TO ALL OUR FAITH FULL ONE OUR FAMILY OUR TEMPLE
The Number 7 in the Bible
The number 7 is quite significant in the Bible, appearing over 700 times throughout both the Old and New Testaments. In biblical numerology, 7 symbolizes completion or perfection. It is said that God created the world in 6 days and rested on the 7th. Additionally, there are seven churches in the Book of Revelation, seven seals, seven trumpets, and seven bowls. The number 7 is also associated with important biblical figures, such as the seven deacons chosen by the apostles and the seven spirits of God mentioned in Revelation. Some scholars believe that the number 7 represents divine intervention or spiritual completeness. Overall, the number 7 holds significant meaning in the Bible and continues to be studied and analyzed by theologians and scholars today.
The Bible was originally divided into seven major divisions. The Divisions were 1) the Law; 2) the Prophets; 3) the Writings or Psalms; 4) the Gospels and Acts; 5) the General Epistles; 6) the Epistles of Paul, and 7) the book of Revelation. Initially, the total number of books in the Bible was forty-nine, which is 7 x 7, further illustrating the integration of seven into the Word of God.
Seven plays a vital role in the stories and meaning of the Bible. Discover the specific Bible verses that reference number 7 in the collection below!
2 Kings 5:10
10 Elisha sent a messenger to say to him, “Go, wash yourself seven times in the Jordan, and your flesh will be restored and you will be cleansed.”
Deuteronomy 5:12
12 “Observe the Sabbath day by keeping it holy, as the LORD your God has commanded you.
Exodus 22:30
30 Do the same with your cattle and your sheep. Let them stay with their mothers for seven days, but give them to me on the eighth day.
Genesis 2:2
2 By the seventh day God had finished the work he had been doing; so on the seventh day he rested from all his work.
Genesis 4:15
15 But the LORD said to him, “Not so ; anyone who kills Cain will suffer vengeance seven times over.” Then the LORD put a mark on Cain so that no one who found him would kill him.
Genesis 7:2
2 Take with you seven pairs of every kind of clean animal, a male and its mate, and one pair of every kind of unclean animal, a male and its mate,
Genesis 8:12
12 He waited seven more days and sent the dove out again, but this time it did not return to him.
Matthew 12:45
45 Then it goes and takes with it seven other spirits more wicked than itself, and they go in and live there. And the final condition of that person is worse than the first. That is how it will be with this wicked generation.”
Matthew 26:26
26 While they were eating, Jesus took bread, and when he had given thanks, he broke it and gave it to his disciples, saying, “Take and eat; “this is my body.”
Nehemiah 8:18
18 Day after day, from the first day to the last, Ezra read from the Book of the Law of God. They celebrated the festival for seven days, and on the eighth day, in accordance with the regulation, there was an assembly.
Read Chapter
7 “Above the table of the Presence they are to spread a blue cloth and put on it the plates, dishes and bowls, and the jars for drink offerings; the bread that is continually there is to remain on it.
John 6:35
35 Then Jesus declared, “I am the bread of life. Whoever comes to me will never go hungry, and whoever believes in me will never be thirsty.
Revelation 3:1
1 “To the angel of the church in Sardis write: These are the words of him who holds the seven spirits of God and the seven stars. I know your deeds; you have a reputation for being alive, but you are dead.
Revelation 15:1
1 I saw in heaven another great and marvelous sign: seven angels with the seven last plagues—last, because with them God's wrath is completed.
Revelation 16:17
17 The seventh angel poured out his bowl into the air, and out of the temple came a loud voice from the throne, saying, “It is done!”
Revelation 4:5-6
5 From the throne came flashes of lightning, rumblings and peals of thunder. In front of the throne, seven lamps were blazing. These are the seven spirits of God.
6 Also in front of the throne there was what looked like a sea of glass, clear as crystal. In the center, around the throne, were four living creatures, and they were covered with eyes, in front and in back.
Joshua 6:3-4
3 March around the city once with all the armed men. Do this for six days.
4 Have seven priests carry trumpets of rams' horns in front of the ark. On the seventh day, march around the city seven times, with the priests blowing the trumpets.
Revelation 1:3-4
3 Blessed is the one who reads aloud the words of this prophecy, and blessed are those who hear it and take to heart what is written in it, because the time is near.
4 John, To the seven churches in the province of Asia: Grace and peace to you from him who is, and who was, and who is to come, and from the seven spirits before his throne,
Genesis 2:1-3
1 Thus the heavens and the earth were completed in all their vast array.
2 By the seventh day God had finished the work he had been doing; so on the seventh day he rested from all his work.
3 Then God blessed the seventh day and made it holy, because on it he rested from all the work of creating that he had done.
Genesis 9:12-16
12 And God said, “This is the sign of the covenant I am making between me and you and every living creature with you, a covenant for all generations to come:
13 I have set my rainbow in the clouds, and it will be the sign of the covenant between me and the earth.
14 Whenever I bring clouds over the earth and the rainbow appears in the clouds,
15 I will remember my covenant between me and you and all living creatures of every kind. Never again will the waters become a flood to destroy all life.
16 Whenever the rainbow appears in the clouds, I will see it and remember the everlasting covenant between God and all living creatures of every kind on the earth.”
Acts
Chapter 1
Acts 1:1
I have given an earlier account, O Theophilus, of all the things which Jesus did, and of his teaching from the first,
Acts 1:2
Till the day when he was taken up to heaven after he had given his orders, through the Holy Spirit, to the Apostles of whom he had made selection:
Acts 1:3
And to whom he gave clear and certain signs that he was living, after his death; for he was seen by them for forty days, and gave them teaching about the kingdom of God:
Acts 1:4
And when they were all together, with him, he gave them orders not to go away from Jerusalem, but to keep there, waiting till the word of the Father was put into effect, of which, he said, I have given you knowledge:
Acts 1:5
For the baptism of John was with water, but you will have baptism with the Holy Spirit, after a little time.
Acts 1:6
So, when they were together, they said to him, Lord, will you at this time give back the kingdom to Israel?
Acts 1:7
And he said to them, It is not for you to have knowledge of the time and the order of events which the Father has kept in his control.
Acts 1:8
But you will have power, when the Holy Spirit has come on you; and you will be my witnesses in Jerusalem and all Judaea and Samaria, and to the ends of the earth.
Acts 1:9
And when he had said these things, while they were looking, he was taken up, and went from their view into a cloud.
Acts 1:10
And while they were looking up to heaven with great attention, two men came to them, in white clothing,
Acts 1:11
And said, O men of Galilee, why are you looking up into heaven? This Jesus, who was taken from you into heaven, will come again, in the same way as you saw him go into heaven.
Acts 1:12
Then they went back to Jerusalem from the mountain named Olivet, which is near Jerusalem, a Sabbath day's journey away.
Acts 1:13
And when they came in, they went up into the room where they were living; Peter and John and James and Andrew, Philip and Thomas, Bartholomew and Matthew, James, the son of Alphaeus, and Simon the Zealot, and Judas, the son of James.
Acts 1:14
And they all with one mind gave themselves up to prayer, with the women, and Mary the mother of Jesus, and his brothers.
Acts 1:15
And in those days Peter got up among the brothers (there were about one hundred and twenty of them), and said,
Acts 1:16
My brothers, the word of God had to be put into effect, which the Holy Spirit had said before, by the mouth of David, about Judas, who was guide to those who took Jesus,
Acts 1:17
For he was numbered among us, and had his part in our work.
Acts 1:18
(Now this man, with the reward of his evil-doing, got for himself a field, and falling head first, came to a sudden and violent end there.
Acts 1:19
And this came to the knowledge of all those who were living in Jerusalem, so that the field was named in their language, Akel-dama, or, The field of blood.)
Acts 1:20
For in the book of Psalms it says, Let his house be waste, and let no man be living in it: and, Let his position be taken by another.
Acts 1:21
For this reason, of the men who have been with us all the time, while the Lord Jesus went in and out among us,Acts 1:22
Starting from the baptism of John till he went up from us, one will have to be a witness with us of his coming back from death.
Acts 1:23
And they made selection of two, Joseph, named Barsabbas, whose other name was Justus, and Matthias.
Acts 1:24
And they made prayers and said, Lord, having knowledge of the hearts of all men, make clear which of these two has been marked out by you,
Acts 1:25
To take that position as a servant and Apostle, from which Judas by his sin was shut out, so that he might go to his place.
Acts 1:26
And they put it to the decision of chance, and the decision was given for Matthias, and he was numbered with the eleven Apostles.
EVE Goddess by direct creation of Yah-weh - god of war and all creation with MARTYNUS - GOD OF WAR=Mars - Dua = LOVE - LIPA meaning Beautiful and Mother of ALL creation along with Mars with Yeshua - Adam - Yah-weh - Holy Spirit and God Almighty as ONE RULERS and CREATORS of the Universe by way of the Big Bang! A-Man A-Woman
Please CLICK ME GOD'S Kingdom.
http://www.gverstraete.com/.../2012/02/kingdom-of-god.pdf
Please click HERE to HEAL together for ALL
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fzDft0DZRUw...
ONE FOR ISRAEL Ministry WORLD -ONE Family Brothers and Sisters
t`he `new `temple includes but by no means limited to ALL religions as ONE - Genesis - ONE FOR ISRAEL Ministry - SEVENTH DAY ADVENTIST - Secrets Unsealed- ELLERSLIE.COM
https://www.adamandevegodsfirstchurch.org/
https://www.adventist.org/
https://secretsunsealed.org/
https://ellerslie.com/
https://www.oneforisrael.org/
tHE Universal Spiritual Church or Genesis -
https://www.adamandevegodsfirstchurch.org/
MIGHT I please suggest you should click on any YouTube links then let it continue to play after the said link presentation -
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cWNLGJ2Q0jQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TUVcZfQe-Kw
Mary as the Mother of the Church and Mother of God Yeshua on Earth - NOW - MANIFESTED AS DUA = LOVE - LIPA = BEAUTIFUL
Mary is often described as the Mother of God Yeshua. This title refers to her as the mother of Jesus.
The Greek term for this is Theotokos, - which means God-bearing. This term is used to confirm the divinity of Christ as fully God as well as fully man.
Yah-weh - Mary / Asherah / Eve / Dua - also serves as an example of a mother to the rest of humanity. She supported Christ throughout his ministry and she was also there at the time of his death and resurrectionEVE - DUA = ONE
THE CHURCHMAN {CLICK ME TO READALL ISSUES}
Gospel to His praise. Liberalism has not merely undercut the Gospel, it has undercut every type of traditionalism as well. Christians in all traditions have been rendered unsure of their faith by the common enemy. After centuries of complete separation they are being drawn together by virtue of their common faith and their common doubt. And where do they find unity? In a common New Testament. It is a stratagem worthy of Almighty God Himself that He should use liberalism as a means of reforming the apparently irreformable and of reconciling the hitherto irreconcilable. In such a context there can be a glorious expectation of entering into the length and breadth and depth and height of revelation as never before. It looks like the verge of the Promised Land. We have not been this way before.
There are terrible dangers ahead of us, but even greater dangers if we hang back. I believe that we should go forward until the pillar of cloud says " Stop ". Let us work together in those things in which we are agreed, and let us be utterly honest with one another over those things on which we are disagreed. Let us steep our thought in Scripture, knowing that the more fully we are gripped by the Gospel, the less fearful we shall be of letting go of our traditions. Let us press on with reunion studies centred upon the Bible. (The real task of the Anglican-Methodist Commission is, surely, pre-eminently to foster such studies on a national scale.)
Let us resist with all our might any bogus unity. Let us be absolutely firm in refusing any act of union which appears to undercut the Gospel, knowing that our firmness is part of the process whereby the divine will is made known. The removal of the difficulty will be itself an indication of God's continuing guidance. We must remain prepared in the last extremity to face the cost of schism, should unity ever be set above truth. But let us press on with prayer and thanksgiving, looking to the living God to renew us.
The Church of God: Invisible and Visible
I N our day there are some who-at least as far as the Church militant here on earth is concerned-deny the existence of any Church but the visible Church, and in some cases even declare that the concept of the invisible Church is a heretical doctrine. There are others, who emphatically declare that the New Testament Ecclesia and the historical " Church " must not be identified. Both Roman Catholics and Protestants err, "in that they understand the Ecclesia of the New Testament to be the historical Church ". Yet, he has no use for the distinction made by the title of this paper. "Quite useless attempts have been made," he says, "to elucidate the relationship between the two THE CHURCH OF GOD 195 quantities" (that is, the New Testament Ecclesia and the historical " Church ") " by drawing a distinction between a visible and an invisible church. This expedient," he continues, " is of no avail, simply because the invisible church is not a fellowship but a numerus electorum, hence a fundamentally individualistic conception : but no more is the visible church a fellowship : it is rather an institution, a collective, hence an external means of help. Both fail to tally with what was intended and realized in the New Testament." Let us notice for our possible guidance where Brunner thinks the truth lies : not in a list of individuals who enjoy no realized fellowship, for they are not a functioning Church ; nor in a visible earthly institution, for, he says, "as the Body of Christ the Church has nothing to do with an organization, and has nothing of the character of the institutional about it". It is, he says, "nothing other than a fellowship of persons ", or what he calls " a unity of persons ". He thinks Luther showed great discernment when he translated the New Testament word ecclesia by " congregation ". * Before we go further it is therefore clearly advisable that the significance of the distinction invisible and visible should be defined ; and, if possible, vindicated as worthy of continued use. At its simplest the description visible church can apply for me only to a gathering whose local meeting together I personally observe. It is noteworthy that in Article XIX the term " visible church " is limited to this meaning, that is, to a congregation meeting in a particular place which can be recognized as Christian by the faith its participants confess, and by the distinctive actions-preaching and administration of the sacraments-in which they engage. Also, in contrast to the church visible, that is, to the local congregation in which they share, Christians are aware that the Church invisible embraces both fellow-believers in Christ scattered throughout the world, and departed saints who are already with Christ in glory. Just as a thin crescent moon visible in the sky is known to be completed as the moon by much more moon which is invisible, so Christians believe that in Christ their small visible local congregation is one with the whole invisible company of the redeemed. They are persuaded that the one Church is in its full embrace both local and worldwide, both on earth and in heaven, both visible and invisible. It is more common, however, not to interpret the distinction made by invisible and visible in quite so simple a way. While visible then still means discernible by men, invisible virtually means not only not discernible by men, but also, and more positively, known only to God, and known to men only by faith and not by sight. The terms then distinguish the church as God sees it from the church as men see it. To the one belong all who as true children of God are indwelt by God's Spirit-to the other belong all who profess the faith of Christ and call themselves Christians. This understanding and use of the terms invisible and visible is capable of bringing division into a single local congregation. For while, if judged by marks discernible by men, the church visible may • The quotations are from T/18 MisundeYstanding oft/18 Church, London, 1952. 196 THE CHURCHMAN include all who are present, it is always to be expected that some of these will lack essential spiritual marks which are fully discernible only by God. In consequence the church invisible, or the true congregation of God's own people as God Himself sees it, will not be identical with the church visible, or the congregation as men see it.
This truth is recognized in Article XXVI by the statement that in the visible church the evil be forever mixed with the good. In the Old Testament this is illustrated first in the household of Abraham and then in what Stephen called the Church in the Wilderness, that is, in the generation who came out of Egypt under Moses. · In his epistle to the Romans the Apostle Paul recognizes both sides of this distinction between the invisible and the visible church. On the one side, he says, "They are not all Israel, which are of Israel" (Rom. 9 : 6) ; that some who have all the necessary visible marks of personal participation do not belong to God's true people because they lack the unseen but decisive mark of divine election. On the other side, Paul says," He is a Jew which is one inwardly; and circumcision is that of the heart, in the spirit and not in the letter " (Rom. 2 : 29). This indicates unmistakably the possibility that some, who do not belong to the visible Israel because they are not circumcised, nevertheless are true Jews and members of the invisible Israel of God, if inwardly and in spirit they possess and fulfil the necessary spiritual conditions. So we must recognize that Scripture teaches that the invisible or true church of God both does not include some who belong to the visible church, and does include some who are not reckoned by men as members of the visible congregation of God's people. E. J. Bicknell summed up these points well when he wrote that, " the theory of an invisible church contains the truth that God alone knows who are His, and that His true servants may be found in all Christian bodies and indeed outside them ". * * * * * The immediate positive implications of such teaching are of farreaching consequence. Let us notice three of them.
First, the true Church is invisible, adamandevegodsfirstchurch.org and its fellowship is enjoyed only by those who come to "the heavenly Jerusalem" (see Heb. 12: 22-24), or are seated in the heavenlies with Christ. For it is God's new creation. It does not really exist in the natural visible order of this world at all, but only in the unseen spiritual order, the order of the world or age to come. It cannot, therefore, be organized as if it belonged, like earthly empires do, to this present visible creation. If we are to enter more fully into the true communion of the saints we must walk by faith and not by sight.
Second, the new and distinctive unity which Christians are meant to enjoy and to exhibit as a witness to the world is a fellowship of the Spint and not a product of organizational achievement. The very terms in which our Lord prayed for the unity of believers in Himself implies a work of God's Spirit and not an achievement of human effort. • A Theological Int~oduction to tha Thirly-Nine Arlicles, p. 302.
THE SPIRITUAL GENESIS - FIRST - TRUE CHURCH OF GOD
So Paul in Ephesians 4: 1-3 exhorts his readers not to create a unity which does not exist, but to be eager to maintain the unity which is already given " of the Spirit ". Has it not been ever since the continually renewed wonder and miracle of Christian fellowship that Jew and Gentile, bond and free, black and white, ANY SEXUAL PREFERENCES ALL CHILDREN OF THE SAME UNIVERSE AND ALL LOVED UNCONDITIONALLY BY YAH-WEH find themselves, and are seen to be, "all one in Christ Jesus"? It is this spiritual unity, expressed in actual personal fellowship among people, that is still meant of God to convince the world of the truth of the Gospel, and not some new achievement of ecumenical organization.
Third, all earthly fulfilment of this prayer of our Lord's for unity is inevitably incomplete. There is a final consummation of the unity of the whole body of Christ towards which we are to look, and towards which by the grace of God we are being brought. But this is not a unity of this present life. For it must include all the saints, and only a small minority can be alive on earth in any one generation. The " mature manhood ", " the measure of the stature of the fullness of Christ" (Eph. 4: 13), is a goal finally to be realized only in the consummation of a life beyond, after the resurrection of the body, and with the number of the elect complete. We ought not, therefore, to hope and work for an achievement in this world, which according to the purposes and providence of God can only be realiSed in the next. That would be to try to realiSe too much eschatology. If, now, we think of the more earthly and visible level of the many groups of Christians meeting as local congregations all over the world, it is significant that such congregations are, in the New Testament, not collectively called " The Church ", as constituent parts of an organized earthly institution, but rather "the churches". For example, in Revelation 2: 7, John writes: "He who has an ear, let him hear what the Spirit says to the churches ". Similarly, in 1 Corinthians 11 : 16, Paul does not say dogmatically (as some would like to talk) "The Church has no such practice ", but, " If any one is disposed to be contentious, we recogniSe no other practice, nor do the churches of God". Nor in the New Testament writings is any earthly centre regarded as the official headquarters or metropolis of the Church on earth.
The only city that could possibly make such a claim in apostolic times was Jerusalem.
But the earthly Jerusalem is explicitly disowned as a place of bondage. Christians are exhorted to seek rather " the city which is to come " ; and to find the proper focus for their love and loyalty in the heavenly Jerusalem; for she is the one free city and the only true "mother of us all" (see Gal. 4 : 25,26; Heb. 13 : 12-14).
* * * * In the hope of making this study less doctrinaire, and more relevant and profitable, let us now seek to appreciate the practical importance for us of the distinction-rightly understood-between the invisible and the visible Church. This, unmistakably showed itself at the Reformation. The Reformers needed the awareness afforded by this distinction to support their conviction that they were still in the true Church of God, although they had withdrawn from the great visible earthly institution of the so-called Church of Rome. 198 THE CHURCHMAN This awareness corresponded to their rediscovery of the truth of justification by faith. It was inspired and informed by this truth. Luther realized from the Scriptures that the values that matter are discerned by faith not by sight. He saw that this principle applied not only to the acceptance of the individual in God's sight but also to the standing before God of the true Church of God. Justification by faith, he declared, is the article by which the Church stands or falls. The Church which eternally matters, and to which by grace believers in Christ belong, is not the visible Church which men see but the invisible Church, the Church as it is in God's sight, the Church known to us only by faith. This distinction between the invisible and visible Church is at the heart of the difference between two types of Christianity (as Archbishop Ramsey has called them*), which, to look no further afield, are both to be found within our Church of England. For purposes of quick distinction let us call these spiritual and institutional. The spiritual type emphasizes as fundamental the faith of the individual in response to the Word preached and in direct personal relation to the unseen glorified Lord-issuing in acceptance with God, the incoming of the quickening and indwelling Spirit, and consequent membership in God's family-the invisible Church. Here what is primary, indispensable, and decisive is an unseen spiritual relation with God through Christ and by the Spirit. This is then rightly complemented by relation to one's fellow-believers and particularly to the local congregation-the visible church. Here the unseen relation to Christ is confirmed and sealed both by God to the individual, and by the individual before God and his fellow-believers, by his reception of the sacraments of the Gospel and by his own personal confession of faith in Christ. These complementary activities are visible or openly discernible by men. The institutional type is primarily church conscious rather than Christ or Gospel or Spirit conscious. Here the visible earthly Church is literally regarded as the Body of Christ, and the proper relation of the individual to it is treated as indispensable to salvation. The distinguishing marks of this visible Church are found in its hierarchical structure-in its possession of bishops and priests, properly consecrated or ordained, upon whose ministries all depend for incorporation, and for the reception of saving and sustaining grace through the sacraments. Relation to Christ and reception of the Spirit by the individual are to be entered into only in this way. In effect the Church points to herself and not to Christ as the effective agent of salvation. So, for instance, when its members die they are said to be fortified not by Christ and the Spirit but by the Church and her rites. These two types of Christianity clearly differ in the relative position and importance which each assigns either to what is visible or to what is invisible. The institutional type makes the presence of Christ and the Spirit dependent upon the visible organization. It virtually says, Where the Church is-where the Pope or the Bishop is-there Christ is. And by • Gospel and Catholic Church, p. 7.
THE CHURCH OF GOD 199 the Church they obviously mean a visible institution distinguishable by its polity, its sacerdotal rites and its episcopal succession. They attach a primary value and an indispensable place to the visible ecclesiastical strncture. In strong contrast to this the spiritual type regards the true Church as constituted by all those believers in Christ as Lord to whom Christ has given His Spirit. It declares that wherever-and only where-the God-given Spirit dwells there are trne members of Christ and there is the Church. The primary essence of the Church is therefore invisible. The visible expression of realized fellowship, particularly, in properly ordered congregations follows as an outworked consequence. To sum up : the institutional type of Christian makes relation to Christ dependent upon relation to the visible Church ; whereas the spiritual type of Christian makes membership in the invisible Church dependent on relation by faith and in the Spirit to the unseen and glorified Lord.
• • • • May I suggest that this distinction between the invisible and the visible Church is directly relevant to the ecumenical movement? It ought to inform and control what we do to further trne union and intercommunion between Christians and churches unhappily separated. In particular may I suggest that a proper recognition both of the priority of the invisible Church and of the limits of the extent to which the Church can become visible is indispensable, if we are to withstand the pretentious-and, as I believe, unscriptural-claims of the institutional Church ? Let us challenge ourselves to fresh thought and to necessary distinction by noting briefly some of the differing opinions of current writers. Let us start with an emphatic insistence on the place of the institutional Church. In his book entitled What do we mean by Reunion, C. B. Moss has written : The nature of the Church is the fundamental issue today, as the Incarnation was in the 5th century, and Justification by Faith in the 16th. We cannot make any compromise about this; it is a matter of faith not of order. There is one visible Catholic Church which cannot have more than are representative in one place. We (sc. Anglicans) are by Divine Providence that Church in Great Britain and no one else can be . . . no sacraments or ministry, however "valid", however effective, can be accepted by us unless they are the sacraments and ministry of the Catholic Church, and unless their holders clearly repudiate the heretical doctrines of the Invisible Church, the right of secession, and the right of unlimited private judgment. May I add privately in parenthesis that in my judgment this reveals a conceit and expresses a presumption from which I would pray Anglicans may be delivered? Someone qualified to speak with much greater authority than I can has warned us against the danger inherent in this kind of emphasis. Professor T. F. Torrance has declared that "the mythologization of
THE CHURCHMAN the Church as a ' Christus prolongatus ' and the consequent ' obscuring of Christ by the Church" is a major error and temptation against which we must do battle." He says this is characteristic of Roman Catholicism and also rampant among Anglo-Catholics. He adds : "Wherever this error is found the pre-eminence of Christ as Saviour and God is obscured by the Church". "We must ... never ... allow the sacramental enactments in the Church to assume priority over the mighty acts of God in Christ ". The Church ought not to become "identified with a hierarchic institution operating with a false objectivity". "Nothing must be allowed to decentralize the Gospel." "We must refuse at any point to exalt the Church as an end in itself, that Christ may have the pre-eminence in everything."* The present Bishop of Sheffield once put it in this way : " The Gospel the Church proclaims points beyond the Church to the Church's Lord ... (otherwise) the Church comes to take the place of Christ, as no longer His representative but His very self . . . claiming to possess in itself the power to forgive sins and to dispense the blessings of the gospel ". t In The Misunderstanding of the Church (from which I have already quoted) Emil Brunner contends that by the historical process of 1,500 years the original Ecclesia was transformed or distorted into an institutional church. In consequence what was " a communion of persons " has been replaced by " the legal administrative institution ". " If the church is an institution," he continues, " and in some sense all who use the word ' church ' mean this-then Rome is the most churchly church, the norm of ecclesiastical life." Also "one must then recognize that the Ecclesia of the New Testament was not a 'church' and had no intention of being a 'church'. For the Ecclesia as ' Koinonia Christou ' and ' Koinonia Pneumatos ', as the Body of Christ, is a pure communion of persons entirely without institutional character" (pp. 16f.). What Brunner says and suggests is that " because the Holy Spirit is the very life-breath of the Church . . . the Christian society itself is a miracle . . . unintelligible from a purely sociological standpoint ". " It is both Koinonia Christou or Koinonia Pneumatos and ' fellowship with one another ', thus combining the vertical with the horizontal, divine with human communion. The togetherness of Christian men is thus not secondary or contingent, it is integral to their life just as is their abiding in Christ." " It flows from communion with Christ." It is a divinely created spiritual organism not a man-made social organization (p. 12). This means, as I should add, that Christian togetherness is not dependent upon ecclesiastical organization and institutionalintegration. We are called to enjoy and to express a unity with our brethren in Christ which already exists, to make visible horizontally what is already true though invisible vertically. So, in spite of Brunner's dislike of the terms as some use them, I find some suggestive help in thinking of our vertical fellowship with God in Christ by the Spirit as • Conflict and Agl'eement in the Ckul'ch, Vol. !, pp. 14££. t Evangelicals Affil'm, p. 142.
THE CHURCH OF GOD participation in the Church invisible ; and any enjoyment horizontally of realiSed fellowship with our brethren in Christ as a manifestation of the Church visible. In his book One Body in Christ, Ernest Best seeks to expound what the New Testament teaches. He says : " Faith creates a status in Christ" (p. 17). He indicates that "the essential of membership is not relation to the community but relation to Christ" (p. 24). The Christian community is primarily a single world-wide one to which every Christian belongs. " The local manifestation of it as a congregation in a particular place is secondary." "When the Christian travels he is always to be received in Christ." This means that what matters and should be decisive is not what local congregation or denomination he has previously belonged to, but whether he belongs to the Lord. So, adds Ernest Best, "the Church is not to be described in terms of congregations" (and surely still less of denominations) "but in terms of individual and interrelated Christians "-united by their common relation to Christ. " It is impossible to conceive of a Christian who is not a member of the Church which is related to Christ . . . as His Body" (pp. 189f.). It is, as I see it, this common membership of all Christians in the one Church invisible by new birth of God's Spirit which ought to be given proper priority in our reckoning over the claims of our individual membership of particular congregations and denominations .
• • • • Finally, let us seek to arrive at some constructive conclusions or at least some tentative suggestions which may indicate possible helps and hindrances to a fuller enjoyment of true church life and fellowship. Article XIX is, I believe, right. It is an evidence of true discernment and proper restraint. The only way in which the church fellowship which is ours in Christ becomes actually visible, and can be seen functioning in a corporate way, is in a local congregation assembled and active in distinctively Christian practice. There can be on earth no other visible Church, but only a multiplication of local visible churches. Every one of these-including, for instance, the churches of Jerusalem, Alexandria, Antioch, and Rome-is not only very limited in size but also, as the Articles rightly declare, both mixed and fallible in character. They are all prone to err both in faith and conduct. Also, as Article XIX implies, the title " the Church of Rome " describes the congregation of Christian believers meeting in that city. It cannot as "the Church of Rome " normally meet together and corporately function anywhere else. When the members of such a local congregation think of their fellow Christians beyond the visible limits of their own meeting together, they should think at once by faith of the one Lord and of one Christian metropolis the heavenly Jerusalem, and thus realiSe their oneness in the Church invisible with the blessed company of all believing people, who are united, whether in heaven or on earth, by their common relation to the one Lord, and their common participation in the one Spirit. Or they should think of all the individuals on earth who confess the name of Christ and call upon Him as Lord, and of the many local congregations similar to their own in which they regularly meet together. But they should not think, or wish to be able to think, of one visible world-wide earthly institution to which they all belong. They should not look, or be encouraged to look, to some earthly geographical centre and human head whether of diocese, province, country, or worldwhether Durham, York, Canterbury, or Rome. For there is no spiritual or scriptural reason why one earthly city should be a permanent ecclesiastical metropolis, or why the presiding bishop of any local congregation should be regarded as the supreme head of a worldwide ecclesiastical institution.
In the New Testament only one city is metropolitan-the heavenly Jerusalem ; and there is only one Archbishop or Chief Shepherd ; that is Christ Himself.
When Peter exhorted the presbyters of the local churches he did not speak as a pope or archbishop but as a fellow presbyter. He did not speak of "your care and mine" but of each as having his own portion of the flock of God for the episcopal oversight of which he was directly answerable to Christ as the Chief Shepherd, from whom he would receive his reward. Those who contend that the visible Church is the only Church say so because they believe in the theological necessity of a hierarchical structure which cannot find support in the New Testament. This structure gives dominant institutional supremacy to archbishops, bishops, and priests, upon whom the majority becam~ dependent. It is the threatened increase rather than decrease of this form of church order that IS judgment is undesirable.
Emil Brunner rightly says that the Anglo-Catholic revival of early catholicism was made easier in the Church of England than in some other Reformed Churches by the fact that at the Reformation we still retained the traditional hierarchial structure (p. 98). It is, therefore, in my judgment, an undesirable development that the Anglican Communion overseas should at present be so busy forming provinces and metropolitical sees ; and creating archiepiscopal offices which they have not everywhere got the men to fill and offices which often-to say no more-tend to spoil men who occupy them. Even in this year's Spring session of the Church Assembly there was weighty expression of a healthy opposition to these tendencies. The Bishop of Exeter said he disliked the decisive voice in episcopal appointments being given to the two archbishops as if they were the voice of the Church. The Bishop of Manchester added that the Report on Crown Appointments seemed to give a picture of the archbishops as the infallible heavenly twins and the bishops as archbishop's curates.
We do not want, he said, to be launching a dual papacy just when our Roman Catholic friends are seeing the error of their ways. I also venture to suggest that any existing denominational association of local congregations, whether episcopal, presbyterian, or whatever, ought not to be spoken of in the singular as a church but rather as a grouping of churches. Next I would suggest that the fuller union or intercommunion of churches now separated ought not to be sought in terms of ministerial status and unified hierarchical structure and THE CHURCH OF GOD control. For such institutional integration is not an intended manifestation of the Church visible. In a book recently published, entitled Missions in a Time of Testing, R. K. Orchard has written that Christian missions must not " suppose that . . . it is their function to extend a single ecclesiastical structure throughout the world. This is to confuse a political form of universality expressed through a historical institution with the form of Christ's universality" (p. 50). Right understanding of God's revealed truth and present purpose concerning His Church both invisible and visible ought, as I see it, to make us champion methods which are spiritual rather than institutional, methods in which we look for success not to one visible institutional Church and her hierarchical structure and sacerdotal rites but to the unseen Lord and to the indwelling Spirit, who together unite and vitalize the invisible Church, and can, if followed and obeyed, increasingly make one in realized fellowship the visible local churches.
Manifest the Divine within you Truth is the mother; Wisdom is the farther; Righteousness is the brother; Compassion the friend; Peace is the wife; forbearance the son; These six are men's true relations. IN THIS phenomenal world, the physical body has parents who are physical and impermanent. When this is viewed from the spiritual standpoint, the true relations for the real and permanent human spirit are indicated in the opening verse. "Sathyam maatha" (Truth is the mother). Truth is changing. It is the same over all the three categories of time past, present and the future. Such truth is one's real and lasting mother. "Jnaanam pithaa" (Wisdom is the father). What is this wisdom? Does it pertain to the physical world, the mundane existence, the scriptures or science? No. true wisdom is: “Adhvaitha dharshanam Jnaanam" (perception of oneness is true spiritual wisdom). The wisdom that makes one aware of unity alone is wisdom. Such wisdom is one's true father. "Dharma bhraatha" (Righteousness is the brother). we have brothers. Between them there are differences of opinion. But righteousness which is unvarying and ever the same is one's true everlasting brother. Righteousness is Divine. The sages hailed Raama as the very embodiment of righteousness. "Dhaya sakhaa" (Compassion is friend). There is no greater quality than compassion. It is compassion, which redeems human life. Whether one is a deity or a demon, compassion alone can ennoble him. Hence, one's true friend is compassion. "Shaanthih pathni" (Peace is wife). One cannot have a greater wife than peace. Peace is the greatest blessing. Today because there is no peace in the minds of people, the world is plunged in conflict. Peace verily is divine. "Kshama Puthraah" (Forbearance is the son). People believe that the son will help them in this world. But it is not a son who redeems a person. God is the only redeemer. Forbearance is a divine quality Whoever possesses it has a worthy son. Everything is Brahman God is adored as mother, father, kith and kin, friend, wealth and everything else in the world. God is immanent in every atom of the universe. All that you see, the mountains, trees, insects, birds and beasts, the food you cat, the air you breathe are all manifestations of the divine. There is a Thelugu song which proclaims, "All is Brahman-- the stars, the sun, the moon, the heaven, the Lord's abode "Vaikuntha", the mother and father, the words in a speech, the discussions in a debate, the life itself, the birth, growth and death, the wife, the time that passes, the body, the whole of nature, the love you bear to others--all is Brahman. This assemblage is Brahman and this Sai who proclaims this is verily Brahman. What more can I tell you, oh, good people gathered here?" God is omnipotent. Nature is reflection of that omnipotence. All the powers present in the Nature are present in every human being. Hence it should be recognised that God, Nature and the individual are all equally divine. God and the individual are not different from each other. The cosmos and the Lord of the cosmos are not separate from each other. "Sarvam Vishnumayam Jagath." This cosmos is permeated by the Divine. Vishnu is the cause. Nature is the effect. The Divine is the embodiment of Cause and Effect. Hence there is no need to go in quest of God. Man is the repository of all divine potencies. They are all latent in him, remaining incognito like the Paandavas during the last years of their twelveyear term of exile. Not realising this truth, man considers himself ignorant and weak. Energy is Brahman Scientists, after long investigations, have discovered that the whole universe is made up of atoms. The Vedhaanthins (spiritualists) on their part, declared that everything is permeated by the Divine. The terms used are different but the meaning is the same. Energy is Brahman and Brahman is energy. The cosmos is filled with energy. All that you, see and all that you do are energy. You observe an object. You see an individual. Both the object and the individual are manifestations of energy. What the scientists call 'matter' is nothing but energy. An object appears as matter. But it turns into energy later on. Likewise, one may appear to you as. a Jeevi (Individual), but even he becomes energy in due course. Hence, all the forms and names you see are manifestations of energy. What is this energy? It is something, which you cannot see or conceive in the mind. Energy is energy alone. It is Divine. Every physical object has a base. There is electrical energy in man. Likewise, there is radiation energy in man. There must be a basis for all these energies. You see that in the world every object is based on some other object. God is the base for all the energies in the cosmos. The Vedhaanthins called this energy as Atheetha Shakthi (Transcendental Energy). Scientists have termed it "Super power." The names used may vary, but the substance is one and the same. In every man there is numerous latent potencies of which. He is not aware. The scientists have given different names to the different energies such as "psychotronic energy" and "bio-plasmic energy." Vedhaanthins have described it by the compendious term "Transcendental Energy." How is the presence of this energy to be recognized? The Vedhaanthins described the process of recognition as involving maanasika shakthi (will power), dhaarana shakthi (concentration), jnaana shakthi (meditation) and samaadhi (deep awareness). By these four processes, one can experience Aathma shakthi (power of the Spirit). This means that in the final analysis, every individual, every object and every form of energy becomes one with the Divine. Eight potencies of divinity In this context one has to understand the implications of oneness with the Divine. One desires to merge in God and achieve Moksha (liberation). How is this to be secured? God is formless. He is the source of all energy. He is effulgent. Eight kinds of potencies have been attributed to God. He is the source of all sound, all motion, all light, all speech, all bliss, all excellence, all illusion and all prosperity. How is one to realise such an omnipotent Divinity? Water can integrate with water. Air can combine with air. Fire can merge with fire. As God is formless, to become one with God, we have to become formless. What does this imply? It means that we have to get rid of the attachment to the body. This is achieved through dhyaana (meditation). While retaining attachment to the body one cannot hope to achieve oneness with God merely by praying for it. You have to become formless to realise the formless Divine. As God is the embodiment of effulgence, you have to make your life effulgent to experience God. You have to realise that the light of your life has come from that Param-Jyothi (supreme source of all light). This individual flame should merge in the Supreme Divine effulgence from which all other lights have emanated. Meditating on the Param-Jyothi, the individual has to merge his individual effulgence in the Supreme Effulgence. Move from dualism to oneness with God There is one other matter, which you should consider in this context. You are performing bhajans, japa, dhyaana, yaaga, yajna, or other spiritual exercises. All these are external forms of worship which do not serve to promote Nivritthi-maarga (the exploration of internal spirit). They are good acts in themselves. But they are unrelated to spirituality. Spirituality implies relationship of Aathma to Aathma. (Spirit to Spirit). All actions have appropriate consequences. Every act results in its own reward. Good acts yield good results. But they do not contribute to spiritual progress. Hence the good acts should be stepping stones for the spiritual journey You should not remain content with performing rituals and acts of worship--sath-karmas. When will you embark on the real spiritual adventure? You should go forward from Dhvaitha to Adhvaitha (dualism to non-dualism). You become a jnaani only when you have the adhvaithik consciousness (the experience of oneness with the Divine). Magnetism of Divine Love Man possesses within himself the constituents' needed for generating electrical energy, radiation and telecommunication. The whole world is filled with electromagnetic energy. The world is governed by the principle of mutual attraction. Green grass attracts the cow. The child attracts the mother. The law of universal attraction is related to this magnetic power. Raama is the supreme symbol of riffs power of attraction. "Ramayathe ithi Raama" (Because of his powers to please everyone he is called Raama). This Raama is not the son of Dhasharatha but the spiritual Raama who is Aathma-Raama (Indweller in every heart). The Aathma is universal magnet which attracts everything. Today if so many people from all over the world is drawn to this place, it is due to the power of attraction. When you keep a flower here, bees are attracted from afar. They are drawn to the flower because of the sweet honey in it. Not a single bee will be attracted by a plastic flower. The sweetness that attracts people is Prema (love). This love may be manifested in many forms---maternal love, filial love, fraternal affection, marital love, friendly love and so on. Divine Love is the basis of all these forms of attraction. It is a powerful magnet. It is present everywhere including every human being. Every child bears the imprint of its parents. As all human beings have come from God, they should carry the marks of the Creator. Man has taken birth to manifest the Divine in him. Every being and every, object in the world is divine energy. It cannot be destroyed. But it can be changed from one form of energy to another. For instance, magnetic energy can be converted into electricity From electricity you can get light or atomic energy In this manner energy can be converted to different forms, but it cannot be destroyed. This indestructible character is divine. Hence there is no place or object in the cosmos which is not permeated by the Divine. There is divinity in every particle and every cell. The sages therefore declared: “That which is subtler than the subtlest and vaster than the vastest and which is present everywhere as the eternal witness is the Aathma." The Aathma is atom and the atom is Aathma. All the three terms--- Brahman, Aathma and atom--represent one and the same thing. Prahlaadha proclaimed omnipresence of divinity It took the scientists one thousand years to discover that what was present in the whole universe was made up of atoms. But many aeons earlier, in the Kritha Yuga itself, this truth was recognized by Prahlaadha. He told his father that there was no place in the cosmos where the Divine could not be found if searched for. Long ago Prahlaadha confidently proclaimed that the Divine principle was omnipresent. Because he was aware of this transcendental unity of the Divine in the universe, he could overcome every ordeal, discard the body-consciousness and realise the Divine. Immersed in God-consciousness, he fearlessly faced every, ordeal and survived all the tortures to which he was subjected. With the name of Naaraayana on his lips he came out unscathed when he was pushed from a cliff. Likewise he faced ordeals like trampling by elephants or attacks by snakes. He was utterly free from body consciousness. Ever contemplating on God he had no fear at all. (Svaami recited a Thelugu poem describing how Prahlaadha faced cheerfully all the ordeals to which he was subjected by the demonic agents of his father). The one who is immersed in the body consciousness is a prey to all kinds of troubles and worries. It should be realised that the body is only an instrument and is bound to perish some time or other. When death is bound to follow birth why worry about it? The state of no-mind The Gopikas realised that Krishna was beyond the reach of the mind because of His cosmic subtlety and immensity, but they experienced His divinity in their hearts because of their devotion. There is in every human being this divine energy which grows when it is properly used. The water in the well rises as more and more of it is drawn. Likewise, the more you share your wealth and joy, they will multiply. Hence, share your endowments with others. Strive to manifest the latent potencies in you. To realise God., practices like repetition of the name of God are of little avail. What is essential is Amanaska (stilling the mind). The waking state and the dreaming state are the two kinds of dream states. The only reality is the consciousness that is present in both the states. This unifying awareness is the real-it), To experience God you have to proceed from meditation to concentration and then to the amanaska state where the mind is virtually non-existent and one is free from attachment to the bode: In that state one experiences samaadhi. Samaadhi has two meanings. One is equal mindedness in all situations--whether of pain or pleasure, loss or gain. You should not feel distressed by a calamity or elated by a happy event. This state of mind is conducive to the development of extraordinary powers. Certain activities have to be carried on in the day-to-day world. But the teachings of some Gurus in regard to these activities lead to dehumanisation. The term Guru means one who dispels the darkness of ignorance. Gu means one who is beyond gunas (attributes). Ru implies one who is beyond rupas (forms). This refers only to God. That is why the Guru is hailed as Brahma, Vishnu or Shiva. Only God is the true Guru. All others are merely teachers, like the teachers of different subjects in a college. Guru is the one who reveals the guri (target) to the disciple. Guri here refers to Aathmik Principle. Qualities of a true Guru The true Guru is one who has understood his own Self. Emperor Bali promised to give Vaamana----Vishnu who had come in the form of a short Brahmin lad--whatever he wanted. Bali's Guru Shukraachaarya, warned Bali against honouring his promise on the ground that it would prove disastrous, for him. But Bali stood by his promise despite his preceptor's warning and intervention. Bali esteemed God as greater than his preceptor. He declared that there could be no greater sin than breaking one's promise. A Guru who advises his disciple to go back on his plighted word is no Guru at all. In the Mahaabhaaratha, Dhronaachaarya, the teacher in archery for Arjuna, turned away Ekalavya from being his disciple because he had agreed to teach no one else all the arts he had taught' to Arjuna. Ekalavya, however, learnt more than what Arjuna had been taught, by merely worshipping an image of Dhronaachaarya. When Dhronaachaarya came to know about this from Arjuna, he demanded from Ekalvya his right thumb as Guru Dhakshina (offerings to one's preceptor) so as to incapacitate Ekalavya from making use of his proficiency in archery. Ekalavya readily offered his thumb out of his devotion to Dhronaachaarya, whom he regarded as his preceptor. This conduct on the part of Dhronaachaarya in response to a demand from Arjuna, who was envious of Ekalavya's superiority in archery was unworthy of a true Guru. Gurus who are governed by selfish considerations or narrow loyal-tics cause great harm to the cause of spiritual enlightenment. They are worldly teachers, not spiritual preceptors. Place trust in God who is true Guru You may learn from anyone, but dedicate all your knowledge to God. That is true spirituality. That is true devotion. Today is celebrated as Vyaasa Puurnima--the full moon day dedicated to the sage Vyaasa, who codified the Vedhas, and presented them to the world on a full moon day This is the day.when people should seek to make their minds as pure and bright as the full moon. The day should be celebrated by purifying the mind and understanding the mystery of the universe. (Svaami recited a song of Raamadhas in which he describes human life as consisting of seven forts---vices--in the heart of which dwells the Lord, who is very difficult to reach). Place your entire trust in God and not in self-seeking Gurus. Before performing any act utter a prayer offering it to God. Try to understand the sacred teaching in all the Vedhic and other scriptures. Embodiments of love! Realise that God is not separate from you. Strive to strengthen this sense of oneness with the Divine. This was the way Meera experienced the presence of Krishna in her heart, when her husband, the Mahaaraana, expelled her from the Krishna temple built by Him. The light of the Divine is within you. Why go seeking for it elsewhere ? This is the light of love and of bliss. Never forget God, whatever may happen to you. (Thelugu poem). There is no greater form of meditation than constant remembrance of God at all places and on all occasions. God is the indweller in the heart. When you experience this you will lack nothing and will be ever blissful. You will commit no wrong and will fear none. Your conscience will be your guide. Love all. You can see God only through the Jnaana-chakshu (the eye of wisdom). Realising that God dwells within you, you must treat God as the universal Guru, as the preceptor for mankind, irrespective of differences in names. Discourse in Sai Kulvanth Hall on 20-7-1997. Youth is the stage in life when the slightest turn towards wrong will spell disaster. Thoughts shape the career. You plan to earn much wealth, because you imagine that rich people are very happy. The rich have plenty to eat, but hey have no appetite. The rich wield power over others but they are held down by disease. The rich can have many servants but they cannot live in peace. So, plan to be rich in virtue, in devotion and dedication to good causes. Be rich in sovereign character. --Baba
God’s Final Temple: ADAMANDEVEGODSFIRSTCHURCH.ORG New Jerusalem GOD AIMS FOR THE UNIVERSE
God created the universe and humankind as his temple; God and man were destined to be ‘at ease’ with each other. This paradisiacal situation changed after mankind went its own way, but through the liturgy of sacrifices, God could still be approached. God provided the ultimate sacrificial Lamb, Jesus Christ, who in himself reconciled God and man. He became the perfect temple where we can meet with God. His Churches, Ministries etcetera - His Ambassadors and their Families and All His children of FAITH for without FAITH you will never see Him - and all those in the Church, are also temples of GOD - because what Jesus Christ is, they are. In the Church, that is, in the community of Christians, God can be found.
But this is not perfect yet. We still live in the time between the disobedience of mankind, and the restoration of our world to its God-intended status of perfection. The Church and its people belong to that perfect future of God, as we are heirs of God and co-heirs with Christ. ‘If anyone is in Christ, he is a new creation’, St Paul affirms.1 1. 2 Corinthians 5:17
PARADISE RESTORED: REVELATION 21:1-5
Then I saw a new heaven and a new earth, for the first heaven and the first earth had passed away, and the sea was no more. And I saw the holy city, New Jerusalem, coming down out of heaven from God, prepared as a bride adorned for her husband. And I heard a loud voice from the throne saying, “Behold, the dwelling place of God is with man. He will dwell with them, and they will be his people, and God himself will be with them as their God. He will wipe away every tear from their eyes, and death shall be no more, neither shall there be mourning, nor crying, nor pain anymore, for the former things have passed away.” And he who was seated on the throne said, “Behold, I am making all things new.” Also he said, “Write this down, for these words are trustworthy and true.” The apostle John receives a magnificent vision from God of the Christian hope; God will make all things new.
First, we notice the temple language. “Behold, the dwelling place of God is with man. He will dwell with them, and they will be his people, and God himself will be with them as their God.” Second, the Christian hope is heaven and earth will be united fully again, as it was in the beginning. This is not because the earth will be destroyed but because heaven will ‘overwhelm’ the earth by coming ‘down’. ‘Throughout the entire Bible, the ultimate destiny of God’s people is an earthly destiny. [It ‘always] always places man on a redeemed earth, not in a heavenly realm removed from earthly existence’,The idea of a ‘heavenly Jerusalem’ was, by the way, not ‘invented’ by John. He used language that was rather common in Judaism in his days. In book 2 Baruch (1-2 century AD?) for instance, we read that God made the heavenly Jerusalem before he made Paradise, that Adam saw it before he sinned, that it was shown in a vision to Abraham, that Moses saw it on Mt Sinai, and that it is now present with God. The consummation of the Christian hope is supremely social. It is no ‘flight of the alone to the Alone’ but life in the redeemed community of the people of God. Interestingly, John in Revelation 21:3, says literally, ‘they shall be his peoples (plural + GENTILES)’. He changes the quote from the Hebrew Scriptures about Israel being God’s people, into a plural to include all Gentiles.
God will be in the midst of all nations. The New Jerusalem will come down from God, ‘prepared as a bride Dua Lipa adorned for her husband’. Israel, and later the Church, are described in the Bible as represented by the ‘bride’ of God and Christ. The New Jerusalem and the people of God are very intimately connected. “The heavenly Jerusalem is the multitude of Saints and Martyr Prophets Apostles who will come with the Lord, even as Zechariah said: ‘Behold, my Lord God will come, and all his saints with him’”,
It is a city which is a family. The ideal of a perfect community, unrealizable on earth because of the curse of sin which vitiated the first creation, is now embodied in the redeemed from all nations.
We then see Paradise restored: God dwells with humankind again. they will be his people, and God will be with them as their God. This community of people and the presence of God is the essential feature of the age to come.
NEW JERUSALEM AS PEOPLE OF GOD: REVELATION 21:9-16
Then came one of the seven angels who had the seven bowls full of the seven last plagues and spoke to me, saying, “Come, I will show you the Bride, the wife of the Lamb.” And he carried me away in the Spirit to a great, high mountain, and showed me the holy city Jerusalem coming down out of heaven from God, having the glory of God, its radiance like a most jewel, like a jasper, clear as crystal. It had a great, high wall, with twelve gates, and at the gates twelve angels, and on the gates the names of the twelve tribes.
The New Testament conceives of a heavenly Jerusalem as the dwelling place of God, the true homeland of the saints, and the dwelling place of “the spirits of just men made perfect” (Heb. 12:22; see Gal. 4:26; Phil. 3:20. While this heavenly Jerusalem is represented as the dwelling place of the departed saints, heaven is not their ultimate destiny, but only the temporary abode f the saints between death and the resurrection. The twelve tribes of the sons of Israel were inscribed— on the east three gates, on the north three gates, on the south three gates, and on the west three gates. And the wall of the city had twelve foundations, and on them were the twelve names of the twelve apostles of the Lamb. It seems that we now take a closer look at the New Jerusalem. The view is introduced with words that make explicit that this New Jerusalem is really the Church of God, ‘the bride, the wife of the Lamb’. Then we learn more about this New Jerusalem, as we read that it ‘has the glory of God’. Again, this is temple language. The gates have the names of the tribes of Israel written on them, while the apostles are the foundation of the walls. This indicates the unity of the people of God, and underlines that this New Jerusalem really is the people of God, the Church.
THE NEW JERUSALEM IS A TEMPLE: REVELATION 21:22-27 And I saw no temple in the city, for its temple is the Lord God the Almighty and the Lamb. And the city has no need of sun or moon to shine on it, for the glory of God gives it light, and its lamp is the Lamb. By its light will the 104 nations walk, and the kings of the earth will bring their glory into it, and its gates will never be shut by day—and there will be no night there. They will bring into it the glory and the honor of the nations. But nothing unclean will ever enter it, nor anyone who does what is detestable or false, but only those who are written in the Lamb's book of life. There is no temple in the New Jerusalem, and for that matter, in the New World; a temple is no longer necessary. The Lord God and the Lamb ‘is the temple’. If they fill the earth with their presence, mankind has no need for any specific meeting place with God. Sun and moon are no longer needed, and lamps are not needed, because God and the Lamb are its light. The glory of God fills the place. The world has become a temple again, as it was in the garden of Eden. This description of the New Heaven and the New Earth and of the New Jerusalem is metaphorical. The fact that there seem to be nations outside the New Jerusalem, means that John’s vision shows how the metaphors of the Hebrew Scriptures, about a perfect world with no more war, is finally coming about: The Kingdom of the world has now become the Kingdom of God. Finally, all is well.
THRONE OF GOD ON THIS EARTH: REVELATION 22:1-5 Then the angel showed me the river of the water of life, bright as crystal, flowing from the throne of God and of the Lamb through the middle of the street of the city; also, on either side of the river, the tree of life with its twelve kinds of fruit, yielding its fruit each month. The 105 leaves of the tree were for the healing of the nations. No longer will there be anything accursed, but the throne of God and of the Lamb will be in it, and his servants will worship him. They will see his face, and his name will be on their foreheads. And night will be no more. They will need no light of lamp or sun, for the Lord God will be their light, and they will reign forever and ever. Some more temple-details. The river of life is a reference to Ezekiel 47, which is part of the prophet’s long description (Ezekiel 40-48) of the expected eschatological New Temple.
This ‘river of life’ is also an echo of the river mentioned in regard to the Garden of Eden: “A river flowed out of Eden to water the garden, and there it divided and became four rivers.”8 Then, we read in John’s vision of the ‘tree of life’, also a reference to the Genesis-story. After mankind’s disobedience, access to this tree of life was blocked by cherubim: Then the Lord God said, […] Now, lest he reach out his hand and take also of the tree of life and eat, and live forever—” therefore the Lord God sent him out from the garden of Eden to work the ground from which he was taken. He drove out the man, and at the east of the garden of Eden he placed the cherubim and a flaming sword that turned every way to guard the way to the tree of life.
In the New Heaven and the New Earth, man has access to the tree of life again, as well as to the waters of life. Many theologians see these as references to the Holy Spirit and to Jesus Christ. 7. Ezekiel 47:1,12 Then he brought me back to the door of the temple, and behold, water was issuing from below the threshold of the temple toward the east (for the temple faced east). The water was flowing down from below the south end of the threshold of the temple, south of the altar.[…] And on the banks, on both sides of the river, there will grow all kinds of trees for food. Their leaves will not wither, nor their fruit fail, but they will bear fresh fruit every month, because the water for them flows from the sanctuary. Their fruit will be for food, and their leaves for healing.” 8. Genesis 2:10 9. Genesis 3:22-24 106 The throne of God and the Lamb is mentioned once again; God himself is present and this ensures that there is no longer anything accursed in heaven and on earth. The curse of Genesis 3 has been reversed; all is well now. Adam and Eve were originally told to ‘subdue the earth and have dominion’ and they messed up. But in the New Heaven and the New Earth, the servants of God “will reign forever and ever”. And what the saints throughout the centuries have strived for, will become a reality: “They will see God’s face, and his name will be on their foreheads.” Even the great prophet’s of the people of God, were not able and allowed to see God’s face.10 We will have that privilege and joy one day.11 This sight of God is what causes the righteous to be forever happy. In the words of St Chrysostom: There are no words to explain the blessedness which the soul enjoys, the gain which he obtains once his true nature has been restored to him and he is able henceforth to contemplate the Lord.12 God’s ‘name on their foreheads’ may be an allusion to the inscription on the mitre of the high priest's forehead, "holiness to the Lord”. All believers participate in the eternal priesthood. And all will be standing - not one day each year but forever, in God’s presence.
It is God’s people who have continued to extend the borders of the true temple throughout the church age, as they have been guided by the Spirit, as a result of the Father’s plan that was expressed in the redemptive work of the Son, who also consummates the temple building process.
BEFORE THAT DAY This world will become a temple when heaven joins earth again, as it was in the beginning. But before this moment of the ultimate reconciliation of God with mankind, it is interesting to see how the abode of God is described by John: After this I looked, and behold, a door standing open in heaven! And the first voice, which I had heard speaking to me like a trumpet, said, “Come up here, and I will show you what must take place after this.” At once I was in the Spirit, and behold, a throne stood in heaven, with one seated on the throne.14 John is allowed a view of heaven, and what does he see? First, the throne of God. John proceeds to describe that ‘before the throne were burning seven torches of fire, which are the seven spirits of God, and before the throne were as it were a sea of glass, like crystal.’15 Around the throne, ’on each side of the throne' John sees ‘four living creatures […] each of them with six wings, and day and night they never cease to say, ‘Holy, holy, holy’. These angelic beings remind us of the temple-scene in Isaiah 6, just as the whole description of John is a temple-scene. The throne of God is like the ark in the holy of holies, and the angels remind us of the cherubim that cover the ark; 13. G.K. Beale, The Temple and the Church’s Mission’ a biblical theology of the dwelling place of God the seven torches remind us of the candle with seven arms before the holy of holies; the sea of glass is the basin for washing that stood in the temple.16 John then sees the Lamb, ‘standing as if it had been slain’.17 The Lord Jesus Christ stands there as the reminder of the ultimate sacrifice in the heavenly temple. And just as in the earthly temple incense was sacrificed continually, we read of ‘golden bowls full of incense’ before the throne of God.18 We also read of an altar, possibly referring to the same altar for the incense in the temple.19 So when John had his vision of the heavenly abode of God, it was clear for him; he saw heaven as a temple. Remember that Moses was told to construct the tabernacle and its service ‘exactly according to the pattern that was shown to [him] on the mountain’ where God revealed himself and his laws to Moses.
WHAT JESUS DID The letter to the Hebrews explains how the earthly liturgy of the temple was just a dim reflection of the real heavenly temple: When Christ appeared as a high priest of the good things that have come, then through the greater and more perfect tent (not made with hands, that is, not of this 16. Exodus 30:18 17. Revelation 5:6 18. Revelation 5:8 19. Revelation 6:9 20. Hebrews 8:5, Exodus 25:40 109 creation) he entered once for all into the holy places, not by means of the blood of goats and calves but by means of his own blood, thus securing an eternal redemption. For if the blood of goats and bulls, and the sprinkling of defiled persons with the ashes of a heifer, sanctify for the purification of the flesh, how much more will the blood of Christ, who through the eternal Spirit offered himself without blemish to God, purify our conscience from dead works to serve the living God. Therefore he is the mediator of a new covenant, so that those who are called may receive the promised eternal inheritance, since a death has occurred that redeems them from the transgressions committed under the first covenant. For where a will is involved, the death of the one who made it must be established. For a will takes effect only at death, since it is not in force as long as the one who made it is alive. Therefore not even the first covenant was inaugurated without blood. For when every commandment of the law had been declared by Moses to all the people, he took the blood of calves and goats, with water and scarlet wool and hyssop, and sprinkled both the book itself and all the people, saying, “This is the blood of the covenant that God commanded for you.” And in the same way he sprinkled with the blood both the tent and all the vessels used in worship. Indeed, under the law almost everything is purified with blood, and without the shedding of blood there is no forgiveness of sins. Thus it was necessary for the copies of the heavenly things to be purified with these rites, but the heavenly things themselves with better sacrifices than these. For Christ has entered, not into holy places made with hands, which are copies of the true things, but into heaven itself, now to appear in the presence of God on our behalf. Nor was it to offer himself repeatedly, as the high priest enters the holy places every year with blood not his own, for then he would have had to suffer repeatedly since the foundation 110 of the world. But as it is, he has appeared once for all at the end of the ages to put away sin by the sacrifice of himself.
The death of Christ was a sacrifice to God; he secured our eternal redemption by coming with his blood before the throne of God in the heavenly holy of holies. In the heavenly temple, the reconciliation between God and man has been eternally secured, once and for all. In the words of G.K. Beale, Christ not only fulfills all that the OT temple and its prophecies represent but that he is the unpacked meaning for which the temple existed all along. Christ’s establishment of the temple at his first coming and the identification of his people with him as the temple, where God’s tabernacling presence dwells, is a magnified view of the beginning form of the new creational temple, and Revelation 21 is the most ultimate highly magnified picture of the final form of the temple that we will have this side of the consummated new cosmos.
It is this heavenly temple that descends to earth as the New Jerusalem. Just as presently, heaven can be called a temple, one day the whole earth will be God’s temple. But then, we no longer need all the metaphors, all the efforts to explain, all images to indicate. Then the earth no longer needs a temple, because humankind will be able to see God face to face. SOME CONCLUDING REMARKS We cannot do without metaphors when describing God and his dwelling place. The Hebrew and Christian Holy Scriptures are consistent in using the temple-metaphor for describing God, redemption, and eternity. 21. Hebrews 9:11-26 22. Heaven, the abode of God, is like a temple; the temple in Jerusalem was modeled after God’s eternal resting place. In heaven we see references to altars, candles, incense, sacrifice, the ark of the covenant, etc. Eventually, the heavenly temple will descend and fill the earth. We will not build a new earth; the earth will be renewed when the New Jerusalem descends; then heaven and earth will be new. The perfection of the new earth entails that there is no more evil, and that God is all in all. A temple is no longer needed. There is free access to God for all people. The universe has become a temple again; Paradise has been restored. This renewal, this reconciliation between God and man is only possible because of the eternal sacrifice of Jesus Christ, who was not only perfectly human, but he also perfectly represented God. That is why he is the perfect expression of the heavenly temple. By looking at him, we know what God is like. What to do with all this as Christians today? First, we should unashamedly use sacrificial language when speaking of redemption through Jesus Christ. It is the ABC of biblical language. 112 Also, we can rejoice in the future: What the universe and mankind once were, they will be again: the perfect temple where God rests. And we will be so changed and perfect, that we will be able to ‘face God’. Finally, the ‘to be or not to be’ issue is how we can be sure we will participate in the coming New World. For that, today we need to be part of the New Jerusalem, that is, the people of God - the church.thee new temple - churches - ministries as ONE Heaven and Earth joined for all God's children equal and beauti - full individually and as `one Family - for I hold up my lantern of FAITH the light shining in the darkness to lead the way for my FAITH -FULL ones to join in the New Temple which is Yeshua wherever He goes and covers the Universe.tHE Body of God Christ and His Holy Spirit
aMan aWoman peace and love - and I AM to make all my Creations - things new as it is written xxx
WE are LIVE for all our family to learn as ONE - PLEASE NOTE ALL WEBSITES - donations FOR ALL CHARITIES CHILDREN HOMELESS WARS NATURAL DISASTERS STARVING our BROTHERS AND SISTERS WHO DESERVE A CHANCE AND ARE EQUAL WITH ALL - HOW WOULD YOU FEEL IN THEIR POSITION PLEASE GIVE ONLY AS MUCH AS YOU CAN AFFORD ANY AMOUNT WILL MAKE A DIFFERENCE PLEASE MY FAMILY FAITH THROUGH GRACE THANK YOU Love from Yehoshua and Father also tHE Holy Spirit - ONE
GOD'S LAWS TO BE WRITTEN IN OUR HEARTS AND ON OUR FOREHEADS THE 4TH OF THE 10 Commandments:God's Law, the Ten Commandments, is expressed in Exodus 20:2-17 (KJV) with the following:
“I am the Lord thy God, which have brought thee out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage.
1. Thou shalt have no other gods before me.
2. Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image or any likeness of anything that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth. Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the Lord thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me; And shewing mercy unto thousands of them that love me and keep my commandments.
3. Thou shalt not take the name of the Lord thy God in vain; for the Lord will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain.
4. Remember the sabbath day, to keep it holy. Six days shalt thou labour, and do all thy work: But the seventh day is the sabbath of the Lord thy God: in it thou shalt not do any work, thou, nor thy son, nor thy daughter, thy manservant, nor thy maidservant, nor thy cattle, nor thy stranger that is within thy gates: For in six days the Lord made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them is, and rested the seventh day: wherefore the Lord blessed the sabbath day and hallowed it.
5. Honour thy father and thy mother: that thy days may be long upon the land which the Lord thy God giveth thee.
6. Thou shalt not kill.
7. Thou shalt not commit adultery.
8. Thou shalt not steal.
9. Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbour.
10. Thou shalt not covet thy neighbour's house, thou shalt not covet thy neighbour's wife, nor his manservant, nor his maidservant, nor his ox, nor his ass, nor anything that is thy neighbour’s." Amen

🎺 The Exodus. The very word invokes an epic tale of Pharaohs and Israelites, plagues and miracles, the splitting of the sea, the drowning of an army, Moses and revelation. The story is at the very heart of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. After six years of research, working with archeologists, Egyptologists, geologists, and theologians, Simcha Jacobovici came to the groundbreaking conclusion that the Exodus took place hundreds of years earlier than previously thought. With this new timetable in hand, Jacobovici and his colleagues re-examined long ignored archeological artifacts and uncovered the truth about the Exodus and the Egyptian dynasty that ruled at the time. The producers teamed up with some of the world’s most accomplished special effects designers to create a unique digital, organic experience of the Exodus. Blending archeological findings with modern eye-catching effects, Jacobovici built a virtual museum to showcase his discoveries.
Sola Fide: The Erosion of The Chief Article
Justification is by grace alone through faith alone because of Christ alone. This is the article by which the church stands or falls. Today this article is often ignored, distorted, or sometimes even denied by leaders, scholars, and pastors who claim to be evangelical. Although fallen human nature has always recoiled from recognizing its need for Christ's imputed righteousness, modernity greatly fuels the fires of this discontent with the biblical Gospel. We have allowed this discontent to dictate the nature of our ministry and what it is we are preaching.
In John 8:12 Jesus applies the title to himself while debating with the Jews and states: "I am the light of the world. Whoever follows me will never walk in darkness, but will have the light of life : When I am in the world "I am the Light of the World".
🎺 Stephen Bohr 🎺
"Well done Stephen"! "Our Lords Good and Faithful, Servant" Also Our Angel Of Israel ~ Shining The Bright Light and Leading The Way. 🎺
Pastor Stephen Bohr has spent his life in mission service, dedicated decades in ministry, and his deep theological research is ongoing. His love for the Lord is the driving force behind his commitment to spreading the cutting edge gospel message for these last days with clarity and power. On this page you can access his presentation series on the sanctuary with accompanying pdf study guides.
Pastor Bohr was born in Wisconsin but grew up in Venezuela and Colombia where his parents served as missionaries for over 30-years. His heavy speaking schedule has taken him literally around the world. He is also the author of Worship At Satan’s Throne, Hidden Sabbath Truths, Prophecy’s Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde, Taken or Left?, Futurism’s Incredible Journey, The Truth About The Number 666, Reflections on Women’s Ordination, and one in Spanish, Esperanza Para el Planeta Tierra.
Retired from his 40 years of denominational work Pastor Bohr has served as a local church pastor, university theology teacher, conference youth/Pathfinder director, ministerial secretary and evangelist. He is now full-time President/Speaker of Secrets Unsealed. He is also fluent in Spanish and has a variety of topics available in both languages. His 52-part groundbreaking series Cracking The Genesis Code is the result of over 14 years of in-depth studies. In addition, Pastor Bohr teaches a seminary-level course of study for our ANCHOR School of Theology class in Fresno, California on the fundamentals of Seventh-day Adventist theology. His wife, Aurora, is from Colombia, and they have two grown children, Stephen and Jennifer.
Many of his presentations can be seen on SUMTV (Secrets Unsealed Ministry TV) the satellite channels of 3ABN, 3ABN Proclaim, 3ABN Latino, Amazing Facts TV (AFTV), HopeTV, And FirstLight TV in NZ and others also on our YouTube.com/secretsunsealed channel, Facebook and all IPTV channels which include: Roku, MYSDATV, AppleTV. Download the free SUMTV app for iPhone & Android devices. Your spiritual walk with the Lord will be strengthened and grounded in Biblical truths, and our prayer is that many souls will be in God’s kingdom as a direct result of the ministry of Secrets Unsealed.
Our Mission Statement: Secrets Unsealed is a legally incorporated non-profit organization 501(c)3 which is committed to upholding, proclaiming and multiplying the unique end-time Present Truth message which God has entrusted to the Seventh-day Adventist Church to proclaim to the world. Ever conscious of the sacredness of God’s holy truth, we hold high and without apology or compromise all the fundamental teachings of the Bible as well as the distinctive beliefs of our beloved Seventh-day Adventist Church.
🎺 The Alliance of Confessing Evangelicals is a coalition of pastors, scholars, and churchmen who hold the historic creeds and confessions of the Reformed faith and who proclaim biblical doctrine in order to foster a Reformed awakening in today's Church.
The Alliance’s history stretches back over 70 years. The Alliance began as Evangelical Ministries in 1949 when Donald Barnhouse, with the encouragement of Dr. C. Everett Koop, was approached by a major network to pioneer a coast-to-coast ministry. Soon after the first broadcast of The Bible Study Hour aired introducing Dr. Barnhouse’s monumental study of Romans, a series which ran its 455 messages for over a decade.
What Do We Mean by the Name Alliance of Confessing Evangelicals?
The Alliance is a broad coalition of evangelical pastors, scholars, and churchmen from various denominations, including Baptist, Congregational (Independent), Anglican (Episcopal), Presbyterian, Reformed, and Lutheran who hold the historic creeds and confessions of the Reformed faith and who proclaim biblical doctrine in order to foster a Reformed awakening in today's Church. The purpose of the Alliance’s existence is to call the Church, amidst a dying culture, to repent of its worldliness, to recover and confess the truth of God’s Word as did the reformers, and to see that truth embodied in doctrine, worship, and life.
The Cambridge Declaration
In April 1996, the Alliance of Confessing Evangelicals held its first major meeting of evangelical scholars. The Cambridge Declaration, first presented at this meeting, is a call to the evangelical church to turn away from the worldly methods it has come to embrace and to recover the Biblical doctrines of the Reformation. The Cambridge Declaration explains the importance of regaining adherence to the five "solas" of the Reformation.
in Catalan in Chinese en Espanol in German en Romanian
Creeds, Confessions, and Catechisms
The Alliance stands firmly on the Bible—God's inspired, infallible, and authoritative Word—as the final rule for all faith and practice. Because we represent a cross section of confessional evangelicalism, we look to historic documents such as the Westminster Confession of Faith, the Thirty-Nine Articles, and the Lutheran Book of Concord as accurate summaries of the key teachings of the Christian faith.
Broadcasts
Broadcasts are the best means to acquaint a wide and varied audience with the Alliance’s message and goals. Listening requires no initial commitment, providing a risk-free way for almost anyone to be introduced to reformed theology and consider its implications. The Alliance currently produces several broadcasts.
Events
As crucial as broadcast and publishing are to the fulfillment of the Alliance’s mission, they can never substitute for the kind of person-to-person contact that events provide. They encourage Alliance members by assuring them that they are not alone and by allowing them to make contact with other conference-goers and speakers. These contacts often bear unexpected fruit. Consequently, the Alliance is committed to a variety of national and regional gatherings.
Publishing
Publishing offers the Alliance a different way to address the concerns that led Alliance members to form the ministry. Because it allows people to stop and think about what they are considering, the printed page enables and encourages them to think critically in a way that audio and visual media might not. Internet and print periodicals are generally a gateway to more serious reading.
HEre ye HEre ye HEre ye - tHE day of our lord has at last arrived - and HE tHEy are already HEre on earth! Accompanied with HIS Father in wait to be announced once Father has pathed tHE way with security issues etcetera. Therefore unlike His first visit which HE was led to be slayed - sacrificed now HEre as a Roaring Lion. So please read MY posts on Facebook and -
https://www.adamandevegodsfirstchurch.org/
to be trained and prepared. Please continue to read -
DEFINITION
The church is the new covenant people of God, rooted in the promises to Israel and inaugurated by the Holy Spirit, which refers both to all believers in Jesus Christ, both living and dead, and to local gatherings of believers.
SUMMARY
The church is the new covenant people of God. The word church can be used to refer both to all believers, both living and dead (universal church), and to individual local gatherings of believers (local church). The church has its roots in the promises made to God’s people in the Old Testament, particularly that God would bless the world through Abraham’s offspring.
While there is continuity between the Old Testament people of God and the church, the church is the community of Jesus, new at Pentecost. As such, the church is the fulfillment of God’s promise to the prophets that he would make a new and better covenant with his people and write his law on their hearts. The mission of the church is the Great Commission (Matt. 28:18–20): to go out into the world with the authority of the risen Christ and make disciples, baptizing them and teaching them to follow Jesus until he returns, all to the glory of God.
The church has its origin in the eternal purposes of God. It is the new covenant community of Jesus, rooted in Israel, constructed by Jesus, and inaugurated by the Holy Spirit. The church is the people of God, chosen by the Father, and graciously brought into a relationship with the triune God and one another. The church is the redeemed communion of saints, bought by the blood of Christ, universal and invisible, incorporating all believers throughout all ages—those on earth and those in heaven. The church is the adopted family of God, once slaves to sin but now brought into a loving relationship with God as Father and each other as brothers and sisters in Christ. The church is the body of Christ, having him as head, dependent on him, gifted by the Holy Spirit, crafted as a unity with diversity, and reliant on one another, functioning as Christ’s instruments in the world.
The church is the bride of { MANIFESTED AS DUA = love LIPA = beautiful } Christ, particularly loved by him, saved by his sacrificial work on the TREE, exclusively devoted to him, and increasingly adorned in beauty for him, MARTYN the Bridegroom MANIFESTED
ADAM FORETELLS THE COMING OF CHRIST.
Now, therefore, know thou all this, and hearken unto my word, and understand that the Word of God, the Most High, shall come down upon the earth, even as He told me at the moment when He thrust me out from the Garden (Paradise). For He told me that His Word in later days should become man from a woman who was a virgin whose name was Mary, and should hide in her, and put on flesh, and be born like a man with great power, and operative skill and knowledge. No one shall know Him except Himself and him to whom He manifested [Himself]. And God said that He should go about with people on the earth, and grow in days and years, and should perform signs and wonders openly, and should walk upon the sea as upon dry land, and should rebuke the sea and the winds openly, and they should be subject unto Him and that He should cry out to the waves of the sea and they should make answer to Him speedily. And that He should make the blind to see, and the lepers to be cleansed, and the deaf to hear, and the dumb to talk, and should raise up the paralytics, and make the lame to walk, and should turn many from error to the knowledge of God, and should drive out the devils from men.
And besides [these things] God spake unto me, saying, "Be not sorrowful, O Adam, for thou didst wish to become a god and didst transgress my command. Behold, I will establish thee, not at this present, but after a few days." And again He spake unto me, saying, "I am God Who made thee to go forth from the Garden of Joy into the earth, which shall shoot forth thorns and brambles, and thou shalt dwell therein. Bend thy back, and make thy knees to totter in old age, and I will make thy flesh food for the worms. And after five days and half a day, I will have compassion upon thee, and shew thee mercy in the abundance of my compassion and my mercy. And I will come down into thy house, and I will dwell in thy flesh, and for thy sake, I will be pleased to be born like a [ordinary] child. And for thy sake, I will be pleased to walk in the marketplace. And for thy sake, I will be pleased to fast forty days. And for thy sake, I will be pleased to accept baptism. And for thy sake, I will be pleased to endure suffering. And for thy sake, I will be pleased to hang on the wood of the Cross. All these things [will I do] for thy sake, O Adam."
The church is the temple of the Spirit, filled with the fullness of Christ, marked by God’s presence. The church is the new humanity, composed of Jewish and Gentile Christians united in Christ, and demonstrating the way life was always supposed to be. The church is the branch that abides in the true vine that is Christ, in union with him and dependent on him. The church is the gathered covenant community, regularly coming together for worship, communion, discipleship, fellowship, ministry, and mission. The church is the kingdom community, existing in the already and the not yet, living out God’s eternal purpose of cosmic unity, https://www.adamandevegodsfirstchurch.org/ is Gods Spiritual church that which governs all visible {earth bound churches and Ministries} all for God’s glory WHEREEVER GOD MOVES HIS cHURCH - martyn DUA AND FAMILY MOVE WITH HIM COVERING THE EARTH WITH PEACE AND LOVE. as it is written ...
The Origin of the Church
The original Genesis https://www.adamandevegodsfirstchurch.org/ The Tree Of Life the People of God began with Adam and Eve in the garden of Eden. He created them in his image, which means that they are created in fellowship with their Maker (Gen 1:27). Even though they rebelled against him, he did not reject them but promised to send a Redeemer (3:16).
Later, God called Abraham from a family of sun-worshippers and entered into a covenant with him, promising to be his God, both to him and his descendants (Gen. 17:7). God promised to give Abraham a land, to make him into a great nation, and through him to bless all peoples (12:3). From Abraham is born Isaac and to Isaac is born Jacob, whose name God changed to Israel and from whom God brought the twelve tribes of his people. The rest of the Old Testament involves God’s dealings with these twelve tribes of Israel.
Through ten great plagues and a dramatic exodus, God called the nation of Israel out of Egyptian bondage to be his people. He gave them the Ten Commandments, claimed them as his people, and gave them the Promised Land, which they occupied after defeating the Canaanites. Later God gave them David as king in Jerusalem. God promised to make David’s descendants into a dynasty and to establish the throne of one of them forever (2 Sam. 7:14–16).
In mercy, God sent many prophets to warn his Old Testament people of the judgment that would come if they did not repent of their sins and turn to the Lord. Nevertheless, they repeatedly rebelled against him and his prophets. In response, he sent the northern kingdom of ten tribes into captivity in Assyria in 722 BC and the southern kingdom of two tribes, Judah and Benjamin, into captivity in Babylon in 586 BC. Through the prophets, God also promised to provide a Deliverer (Isa. 9:6–7; 52:13–53:12).
God promised to restore his people to their land from Babylonian captivity after seventy years of exile (Jer. 25:11–12), and he brought this about under Ezra and Nehemiah. The people rebuilt the walls of Jerusalem and built a second temple. The Old Testament ends in the book of Malachi with God’s people continuing to turn away from him, but also with a promise of one who would come to prepare the way for Messiah (Mal. 3:1).
After four hundred years, God sent his Son as the promised Messiah, Suffering Servant, King of Israel, and Savior of the world. Jesus made the purpose of his coming clear: “The Son of Man did not come to be served, but to serve, and to give his life as a ransom for many” (Mark 10:45). He formed his new community (Matt. 5–7). He chose disciples, spent time with them, taught them about the kingdom of God, casted out demons, performed miracles, and predicted his death and resurrection. After he was raised, he instructed his disciples to take the gospel to all nations to fulfill his promise to Abraham to bless all peoples (Matt. 28:18–20).
On the day of Pentecost, Jesus sent his Spirit, who forms the church as the New Testament people of God (Acts 2:1–13). The Spirit empowered the disciples to spread the gospel to the world (Acts 1:8) He also empowered the apostles and guided them into truth. Even more, the Spirit still now indwells the church, leads it, and gives every one of its people spiritual gifts to serve God and each other (Eph. 2:19–22; 4:1–16).
The church is often described in Old Testament terms (Gal. 6:16; Phil. 3:3; 1 Pet. 2:9–10), and there is both continuity and discontinuity between Old Testament Israel and the church. On the one hand, there is one single covenant people of God, with roots in the Abrahamic covenant and Israel. On the other hand, the church is the new covenant community of Jesus, new at Pentecost.
The Church Universal and Local
The word “church” (ekklesia) in the New Testament refers to the church in its many manifestations. The term can refer to churches meeting in homes (1 Cor. 16:19; Phlm. 1–2), to city-wide or metropolitan churches (Acts 8:1; 20:17), corporately with the churches in a specific Roman province (Acts 9:31; 1 Cor. 16:19), and on a few occasions to the whole ecumenical church (Acts 15:22). But the most common uses of the term can mean either the universal or local church.
The Universal Spiritual church - adamandevegodsfirstchurch.org
Sometimes “church” is used to depict what some may call the universal church, which speaks of the unity of all believers everywhere, both living and dead (Eph. 1:22; 3:20–22; 5:27). The church in this sense is not identical with any one local church, denomination, or association. It is not entirely visible to human beings and refers to the total of all believers from all places and all times chosen and established by Jesus Christ - Yeshua.
The Local Church
Most of the time in the NT the “church” refers to the local church, the gathered community of God’s people who are covenanted together to worship the triune God, love one another, and witness to the world (Acts 14:23; 16:5). This designation is the main usage of the term “church”; the Bible emphasizes the church as a local group of identifiable believers committed to Christ and each other, working together to glorify God and to serve his mission.
The local church is the primary center of fellowship and worship, and the chief means God uses it for evangelism, disciple-making, and ministry. The local church is where the Word is taught and preached (2 Tim. 3:16–4:2). The local church is where the ordinances are practiced in baptism and the Lord’s Supper (Matt. 28:18–20; 1 Cor. 11:23–26). These truths are why Paul plants local churches, appoints leaders for them, sends delegates to them, and writes epistles to them. Local churches are significant in his theology, and they are crucial in his mission strategy. In the local church, there is a sharing of life together, growing in maturity together, ministering together, worshipping together, and witnessing together.
The Church as the People of God
Under the old covenant, Israel was a mixed community, composed of believers and unbelievers. In the New Testament, the church is the people of God under the new covenant. While evangelicals differ on how to interpret covenant and define how children of believers relate to the church’s membership, there is wide agreement that the New Testament emphasizes the church as the people of God. Jeremiah predicts the superiority of the new covenant to the old. Because of their sins and unbelief, the Israelites whom God delivered from Egypt broke the old Mosaic covenant and died in the wilderness. The new covenant now arrived as godstruechurch.org will be much greater because it will center on God’s work.
The Lord promises that he will be physically manifested as a normal Human and His people’s God, and they will belong to him. He will write his law on their hearts, they will know him, and they will obey him (Jer. 31:31–34). Jesus teaches that his death ratifies the new covenant (Luke 22:20), and so does Paul (1 Cor. 11:25). Although Scripture teaches that there is one people of God through the ages, Jesus’s death and resurrection inaugurates changes for those who know him. He is the “mediator of a new covenant” and ushers in the promises that Jeremiah made.
The church as God’s people is clarified through the images of the church. The church as God’s people are also the body of Christ (Col. 1:18), people united to Christ. The church is the bride of Christ (Eph. 5:25–32), people who are increasingly Holy in Christ. The church is the temple of the Spirit (1 Cor. 6:19–20; 2 Cor. 6:16; Eph. 2:19–22), people who are saints and indwelt by the Spirit. The church is the new humanity (Eph. 2:15; 4:13, 24), people who are reconciled to God. The church is the family of God (Rom. 8:15, 17; Gal. 4:4–5; 1 John 3:1), people who know God as Father and each other as brothers and sisters. As God’s people, the church belongs to him, and, amazingly, he belongs to the church. This truth will be fully realized only in the new heavens and earth, after God raises his own from the dead, glorifies them, and dwells among them (Rev. 21:1–4). godstruechurch.org
The Church and Its Mission
In Matthew 28:18–20, Jesus gives the Great Commission to his disciples, which becomes the marching orders for the church. He begins by asserting that he is the exalted Son who is Lord over all, both in heaven and on earth, and over all nations (28:18; see also Dan. 7:14). The universality of the commission is striking; Jesus has all authority, directs the disciples to make disciples of all nations, instructs them to teach all that he has commanded them, and charges them to do so “all the days,” until the end of the age.
The church not only has its origin in the eternal purposes of God with its roots in Israel, its basis in the saving work of Christ, its inauguration by the Holy Spirit, its life from union with Christ, and its end as the glory of God. The church is also God’s showcase for his eternal plan of bringing forth cosmic reconciliation and highlighting Christ as the focal point of all history.
The church is to showcase not only God’s purposes but even God himself. In and through the church, God shows his grace, wisdom, love, unity, and Holiness (the letter to the Ephesians emphasizes this). Moreover, as God displays himself, he glorifies himself. It is no wonder Paul proclaims, “Now to Him who is able to do above and beyond all that we ask or think according to the power that works in us—to Him be glory in the church and in Christ Jesus to all generations, forever and ever. Amen” (Eph. 3:20–21). So as in previous posts HE asks for you all to prepare and let Him teach you how to be successful and valuable leaders for His and YOUR futures Amen xxx
Divine Revelation: God Making Himself Known.
DEFINITION
God makes himself known as Lord through divine revelation, which is given to all people through creation and human nature and to specific people through events, inspired human words recorded as Scripture, and Jesus Christ himself.
SUMMARY
God makes himself known to his creatures because he first knows himself perfectly as a personal, speaking God. Although all people suppress the knowledge of God in their sin, he has clearly communicated about himself to his creatures through the creation and through human’s being made in the image of God. On top of this general revelation, God communicates about himself to particular people in special revelation, which includes the events of nature and history, human words that are inspired by God and recorded for us in Scripture, and through the person of Jesus Christ, who is the ultimate image of God. In all of these different ways, God reveals himself as Lord, which is comprised of his control, presence, and authority over all things.
T
he God of the Bible is a personal being, in contrast with the gods of many other religions and philosophies who are abstract or impersonal forces. The doctrine of the Trinity underscores this fact, for the biblical God is not only personal but a society of persons, existing eternally in mutual love and deference (John 17).So, whatever God does he makes known. The persons of the Trinity know one another exhaustively, and each understands the thoughts and actions of the others. In human beings, there are hidden depths in our nature so that we cannot fully understand our own actions and motives. But God is fully known to himself. Much about God is mysterious to us, but not to him.One way Scripture describes God’s exhaustive self-knowledge is by saying that he is a speaking God or, simply, that he is Word:In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. (John 1:1)God is not only eternal, Holy, all-powerful, and so on, but he expresses and shares those qualities through something like human speech. In his eternal nature, he has the power to speak (the “Word”), and that power to speak is who he is: his Word is eternally with him, and his Word is his very nature. John identifies this Word with Jesus Christ in John 1:14.
In Jesus, the Word became flesh. So the existence of the Word did not begin with Jesus’s incarnation.
There are hundreds of references to the divine word in Scripture, in both testaments, as the means by which God reveals himself.Moreover, God reveals himself to himself, each Trinitarian person to the other two, and his revelation extends beyond his own being. It comes also to the world he has created, and especially to the intelligent creatures of that world: angels and human beings. Because self-revelation is his nature, he wants all his creatures to know him.The creatures of the world cannot know God exhaustively. One cannot know God exhaustively unless one is God.
But creatures receive great benefits from knowing God; indeed, they cannot live without knowing him, for he is the author of life. This is true both of our natural lives and our spiritual lives.
Adam came alive when God personally breathed into his nostrils the breath of life MAKING HIM A GOD (Gen. 2:7). And Jesus says that the great benefit of eternal life, his salvation from sin, is the benefit of knowing God:And this is eternal life, that they know you the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom you have sent. (John 17:3)
In one sense, all human beings, even the wicked, know God:For what can be known about God is plain to them, because God has shown it to them. For his invisible attributes, namely, his eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly perceived, ever since the creation of the world, in the things that have been made (Rom. 1:18–20).But many reject this revelation, people who, Paul says, “by their unrighteousness suppress the truth.” (Rom. 1:18). Though God is clearly revealed to all, fallen people prefer to deny that they know him, as Adam hid from God in the Garden (Gen. 3:8). When people say they do not know God, it is not because God has failed to reveal himself, or that God’s revelation is not clear enough. Rather, their ignorance of God is something they have done to themselves. They are lying to themselves, trying to convince themselves that God does not exist or that he is obscure, while all the time God is staring them in the face.God Reveals Himself as the Lord - God’s personal name is Lord, which translates the mysterious name I AM which God revealed to Moses in Ex. 3:14–16.
His lordship connotes particularly his control, authority, and presence in relation to the world he has made (see John Frame, The Doctrine of God, pp. 21–240, and The Doctrine of the Word of God, pp. 3–14, 47–68). Everything he does reflects his lordship in these ways, including his revelation. Scripture describes God’s word-revelation in terms of his control as a powerful force:Is not my word like fire, declares the LORD, and like a hammer that breaks the rock in pieces? (Jer. 23:29)For the word of God is living and active, sharper than any two-edged sword, piercing to the division of soul and of spirit, of joints and of marrow, and discerning the thoughts and intentions of the heart. (Heb. 4:12)It also makes clear that God’s word of revelation has supreme authority:The one who rejects me and does not receive my words has a judge; the word that I have spoken will judge him on the last day. (John 12:48)All Scripture is breathed out by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness, that the man of God may be complete, equipped for every good work. (2 Tim. 3:16–17) And God’s word, his revelation, is also his presence, the place where he meets with his people. God’s nearness to Israel is the nearness of his word (Deut. 4:7–8, 30:11–14).
And God comes to be “with us,” Immanuel, in the person of his Son Jesus Christ, his living word to us (John 1:1–14). and again manifested to live amongst his people as it is written in the book of REVELATION. And the Word became flesh and dwelt among us, and we have seen his glory, glory as of the only Son from the Father, full of grace and truth. (John 1:14)It was mentioned earlier that the biblical God is personal, not an abstract force like the gods of the nations. His revelation is particularly a personal encounter between him and his people. When we hear revelation, we hear God himself. Our response to it should be a response appropriate to supreme power, to ultimate authority, and to an intimate Father
General and Special Revelation Theologians make various distinctions among types of revelation. The most common is between general and special revelation. General revelation is revelation of God given to everybody. It is the kind of revelation described in Romans 1. It tells us that God exists, what kind of God he is, and his moral standards. In revealing God’s standards, it shows us that we have not measured up to them. Paul says of general revelation that it reveals God’s wrath on sinners (Rom. 1:18). General revelation comes to us through the natural world (what is called natural revelation) and through our own nature. For we ourselves are revelation, the image of God according to Genesis 1:26–27. On the other hand, special revelation is revelation God gives to selected messengers, charging them to bring the message to others. Those messengers may be angels, prophets, or apostles. The message may be presented orally or may be consigned to writing, as when the apostles wrote authoritative letters to the churches (see 1 Cor. 14:37–38). The Bible as a whole is a special revelation of God in written form (2 Tim. 3:15–17). The messages of special revelation typically contain one or both of two different kinds of contents: threats of judgment and promises of grace. The gospel is a special revelation of grace, a message of supremely good news:
For God so loved the world, that he gave his only Son, that whoever believes in him should not perish but have eternal life (John 3:16).Media of Revelation Another way to distinguish between types of revelation is to distinguish the different ways in which revelation comes to us, the media of revelation. There are basically three types of media: events, words, and persons. These three categories correspond roughly to our earlier distinction between control, authority, and presence. But both these threefold distinctions are perspectives on the whole of revelation.
The events of revelation not only manifest God’s control, but also his authority and presence; similarly the words and persons.Events - God reveals himself in the events of nature and history. We learn of him from the changing seasons, from the power of nature, from the sun, moon, and stars. We also learn of him through history, the particular events that shape the fortunes of human beings. He is the one who gave to all the nations their boundaries (Acts 17:26) and brought Israel out of slavery in Egypt to possess the land of promise. In his plan, general history becomes redemptive history, the events by which God arranges to redeem his people from sin by the coming of Jesus.Words - In one sense, all of God’s revelation is word-revelation, because it proceeds from God’s own speech, the Word of John 1:1–14.
But sometimes God gives us word-revelation in a further sense: revelation in which the medium is human words. But God does not leave us to figure out for ourselves what he is doing in history. He enters our experience and speaks to us in human words. In this way, the words of the prophets are the very words of God himself. God defines prophet to Moses in this way: I will raise up for them a prophet like you from among their brothers. And I will put my words in his mouth, and he shall speak to them all that I commend him. And whoever will not listen to my words that he shall speak in my name, I myself will require it of him. But the prophet who presumes to speak a word in my name that I have not commanded him to speak, or who speaks in the name of other gods, that same prophet shall die.’ And if you say in your heart, ‘How may we know the word that the LORD has not spoken?’—when a prophet speaks in the name of the LORD, if the word does not come to pass or come true, that is a word that the LORD has not spoken; the prophet has spoken it presumptuously. You need not be afraid of him. (Deut. 18:18-22)
When a prophet or apostle writes down God’s words, the document is Holy Scripture, a document to be received as the Lord’s power, authority, and presence (2 Tim. 3:15–17, 2 Pet. 1:19–21).Persons - Since God is a tri-personal being, his revelation is particularly vivid when it takes the form of persons. God made Adam and Eve in his image to be revelations of himself (Gen. 1:26–27). And it should not surprise us that the highest, deepest divine revelation is the incarnate Lord Jesus Christ, God in person.
Jesus displays his Father’s control over all things (Mark 4:41), speaks his Father’s words (John 3:34), and appears as the Father’s glorified presence with his people (Matt. 17:1-8).Conclusion - If we are to know God, it is important for us to seek knowledge in God’s own way. Many have tried to gain knowledge of God through their unaided reason, or through some kind of subjective intuition. But the God of the Bible has told us not only who he is but also how we should seek knowledge of him. That knowledge comes as we attend to his created world, not repressing the truth in unrighteousness, but accepting his own guidance, his special revelation in Scripture and in Jesus. Only through these appointed means can we come to know him as Lord and as our Savior from sin.
"WAY MAKER" in Hebrew, Arabic & English (Worship by Jews & Arabs)
Genesis to Revelation THE BIBLE
In Tim. 3:16, Ps. 119:105, Rev. 22:18-19. The scriptures are not printed, as one of the purposes of this course is to encourage everybody to bring his own Bible. Students please bring your Bibles each week. Teachers, encourage the use of the Bible by having the scr-ipture references read in class. Give out the references before vou start teaching. . KEY WORD-"SALVATION." KEY VERSE-JOHN 3:16. KEY PHRASE-"HOW A LOST WORLD MAY HAVE EVERLASTING LIFE." Read the folIowing passages at home the week preceding the lesson: Sunday-ScrLpture was given by God, 2 Tim. 3:10-17. Monday-Treasuring God's ·Word. Deut. 11:1-9. Tuesday--lHiding God's Word. 's. 119: 9-18. Wednesday_Gad's Word a Lamp. Ps. 119:105-117. Thursday-Scdptures as Food. Is. 55: 1-11. Friday_Scri,pture wlII be Fulfilled. Luke 24:36-45. Saturday-Nothing to be added. Rev. 22: 8-·21. * * * NAME-The word "Bible" fro m the Greek word "Biblos" means "Book." ChristIans reverently calI it "Holy Bible." Our Lord calId it "The Scriptures," Matt. 22: 29. Paul called it the "Holy Scriptures," Rom. 1: 2. also "The Word of God," 2 Cor. 4:2. The word "Testament" means "Covenant," so we have the Old Testament which contains the Covenant and its outworkings, w'hich God gave to Israel, and the New Testament which contains the Covenant of Grace which came through Jesus Christ. The Old Testament was written mostly in Hebrew, and the New Testament whofly in Greek. WRITERS---At least 40 (from the time of Moses 1500 B. C. to John the Apostle 97 A. D.) and the authorship is wonderful. It was written by 'kings and emperors, princes and poets, sages and 'philosophers, fishermen and statesmen. By men learned in the wisdom of Egypt. educated in the schools of Babylon, trained at the feet of rabhis in Jerusalem, It was written by men in exile, in the desert, an-d in shepherds' tents, amid green pastures and beside still waters. The man who wr-ote one book had no communication with the men who wrote the other books. 'How did these men, writing independently, produce such a book. 2 Peter 1: 21. Obher books get out af date in fifty Years. Why does this book Ilve on through the ages and keep abreast of mightiest thought? Mark 13:31. PURPOSE OF THE BIBLE: To record the divine religlon which God gave to man. Particularly to reveal the sinfulness of man, the holiness and love of God and the supreme revelation of that love III Jesus Christ. Also to reveal the eternal doom that awaits the wicked ana the everlasting state of glory that awaits the redeemed. Great Facts. I. Books. II. Inspiration. III. Plan. Great Fact I. The Books of the Bible. There are 39 bookssIn the O. T. arnl 27 In the N. T., 66 in all. Tthese 'books are not arranged In ehronological order in the Bbhle, but the very order in which they appear has been dlvinely overruled. The O. T. has the followlng divisions: 1. The Pentateuch, Gen.-Deut., fi,ve'books. 2. Historical, Joshua to Esther, 12 books. 3. Poetical, JO'b to Songs of Solomon; 5 books. 4. M'ajor prophets. 5. Minor prophets, Isaiah to Daniel, five books. The N. T. has the tollowtng divisions: 1. Biographical, Matthew to John, 4 books. 2. Historical, Acts, one book. 3. Paul's IDpistles,Romans to Philemon, 13 books, 4. General Epistles, Hebrews to ,Jude, eight books. 5. Prophetical, Revelation, one bool There are fourteen books, called the A!'" crypha, which are sometimes bound tn til. covers of the Btble, Some of them contatn excellent jewish history, but they have never had a place in the Canon, or inspired and sucre'! list of the books of the Bible. "The Scriptures have by their own weight crushed all rivals out or existence." • * * * Great Fact II. The Inspiration of the Bible. The Bible was not actuaIIy written by the hand of God. but Jesus and Paul taught that the scriptures were In the fullest sense inspired. Matt. 22: 29. 2 Tim. 3: 16. The spirit of the inspiration breathes In every page.a nd illuminates every word. "Behind and beneath the Bible, above and beyond the Bible is the God of the Bible." The Spi: it of God so influenced the minds of the writers that they recorded without error a prog resstve revelation from God to man. That the Bible is fully inspired, and therefore divine, is seen from the following facts: 1. Hundreds of tablets and ancient records unearthed in Bi'ble lands testify to the accuracy of Bible history. 2. No other sacre-d writings give such a satisfying scheme O'f redemption, and sUch a scientific account of creatlon. In the words "God hangeth the world upon not'h ing," Jab 26:7, scripture teaches that this earth is a planet, floating in space, whereas in the writings of the Hindus t!Iey claim that the earth rests upon the backs of four huge elephants, and they upon the backe of four huge turtles, and they upon the 'backs of four huge snakes, so _it is when either of these shake themselves that 'We get earthquakes! Many similar illustrattons could be given! 3. Scripture is a testimony to Itself, Is. 8: 20. That the very words of the original Greek or Hebrew were inspired, is asserted agaln an-d again. 2 Pet. 1: 21. 2 Tim. 3:'16. Matt. 5: 18. Also there are no less than 333 prophecies in the O. T. concerning the earthly life of Christ. These were written centuries berore they were fUlfilled. What a ridiculous display of human ignorance they would have revealed if they had not been inspired! As a contnast, take the many predictions as to the end of the age, made in recent years. 4. The testimony of Christ. He spent the whole of his ministry expounding the O. T. scriptures. That He believe-d them to be inspired and without error is seen from Matt. 5:18, John 10:35. Furthermore, it is generally admitted that no set of men could have written such a wonderful life in the Gospels of an imaginary Christ. He must ha ve IiI'Cr! and been all that the Bible pictures Him to be. But if He did live, then the Bible is true for Christ and the Bible stand or fall together! * * * * Great Fact m The Plan all through the Bible. (F'ol lowlng Collett.) 1. The Bible begins, as we would expect it to, with God, Gen. 1: I, 'but It ends with man, the last of God's creations. Rev. 22: 21. But in the middle verse of the Bible, Ps, 118: 8, God and man separated by sin so far a-part, are brought together. This indicates that the purpose of the written Word, is the same as that of the LiVing Word (Chrlst ), to bring God and man together. 2. The Old Testament begins with God, Gen. 1: 1. The New Testament ,begins with Christ, Matt. 1: 1. 3. In the Old Testament we have chiefly a revelation of God the Father, In the Gospels. of Gcd the Son; in the Acts, of God the Holy Spirit; and in the Epistles, of the full Trinity, Father, Son and Holy Sptrlt. 4. The History of the Bible takes us back into what woul-dotherwise be the unknown past. The prophecies take us forward into what would otherwise be the unknown future. The spiritual teaching of the Bible leads us into what would otherwise 'be an unknown salvation and character. 5. From Adam to Abraham we have the history of the human race, Ifrom Abrai:!am to Chrfst, the history of the chosen race; but from Ghrist on, we have the history of neither the human race, nor the chosen race, but of the churches of the Ilvtng God. 6. In E-denwe had one law given to man. -jbut it was broken. At Sinal the whole law was given to man--Jbut was 'broken. However, the God-man came to earth and perfectly kept the law for man, so that at the judgment it should not be a witness against him. 7. The Old Testament deals chiefly with the law, yet it nevertheless contains much of grace Is. 53. The New Testament deals chiefly with grace. yet it establishes the Law. Rom. 3:31. 8. The law came ,by Moses, but grace came by Jesus Christ. John 1: 17. In !keePing with this first miracle of Moses was the turning of the water into blood, 'a type of death. Ex. 7: 19. While the first miracle of Christ was the turning of the water into wine. John 2: 1-11, a type of life and strength. 9. There is a distinct iplan in the individual books of the Bible, for example: In Genesis we have the sacrifice tor the individual-Abel. In Exodus, for the household -the Passover, In Levlticus, for the nation. In John, for the world. - 10. There is progress also in the teachings of the gospels, for Matthew closes with the Resurrection, Mark with the Asoenslon, Luke with the ,promise of the Spirit, and John speaks of His Second Coming. 11. There is a divine order In the epistles, for James Is the epistle of WORKS, Pau l's of FAITH, Peter's ('f HOPE, and John's of LOVE! 12. Comparing the beginning of the Bible with the end, we have:
-In the beginning:- God created the heavens and the earth. En·j-New heavens and new earth. Beginning_Satan enters to deceive. End---8atan cast out that he may deceive the nations no more. Beginning-Sin. pain, sorrow, death. End-no more death, neither sorrow nor crying. Beginning-Tree of life, and man drtven a way from it. End-Tree of life, and the leaves of the tree for the healing of the nations. Beginning-Woman taken from man's side. End-s-Church taken .from Christ's side. Beginning-Earth purged by water. End-Earth purged 'by fire. Beginning-Paradise lost. End-Paradise regained. LESSON---'The wonderful inspiration and plan, running through all the 66 booka and 1600 years o,f the Bfble should so impress us 'with its divine origin, that we should receive it with personal faith, approprtate its messages to ourselves. and put our own names in every ,promise. Only. as 'We read it, believe it, and 'pra.ctlce It, shall we be wise. safe and holy!
MARIA MAGDALA Christ Sophia By Dean Carter © Dean Carter 2013 www.centreforpuresound.org Maria Magdala-Christ Sophia 2 his essay seeks to put together all the scattered allusions to Maria Magdala, the Consort of Our Lord, She who is indeed Our Lady, from the so-called ‘Synoptic gospels’, (Gk syn-optikos, ‘seeing with one eye’), those four largely conflicting accounts of the life and ministry of Christ which are all the false Church of Rome and its heirs and successors (including those which claim to have set themselves up in defiance of Rome, but who actually are built on the same foundations of spiritual ignorance) have allowed humanity to see. That is until now. We take it for granted that any reader of this piece will already be familiar, either as a theory or with an innate knowing that comes from the intuitive realm of Sophia/ChoKhMaH (‘Wisdom’) which is indeed Our Lady Maria Magdala’s domain, that She and Jesus Christ were Master and most worthy Successor, Heir and Spiritual Disciple, and, even more controversially, physically man and wife. Maria Magdala was the incarnation of the Christ-Sophia, the Feminine Divine, that balanced complemented and was equal to Jesus the incarnated Christ-Logos, the Divine Masculine. Writers such as Laurence Gardner have in their books sought to uncover the 2000-year old cover-up instigated by the Church of Lies on this issue, which has resulted in a continued repression of the Feminine Divine for this length of time. However, I think this is the first time that the evidence of Her status from the synoptic gospels had been put together all in one continuous and ‘unseamed garment’. It seemed like something that needed to be done. The essay also necessarily quotes from major Gnostic gospels that have been hidden from the world by Rome’s edict until the middle of the last century, and which even now are largely ignored by most who call themselves ‘Christian’. One wonders if the finding of an amazing hoard of hitherto lost texts that purported to be the words of the Buddha would be sidelined and ignored by the Buddhist world? I have to say that were such a find to emerge, the answer would indeed be: no. There is something deeply awry, and has been all along, with established ‘Christianity’ as it has conquered and burned its way to power in the West. As we move to the great leap that our planet and our aspiring souls deeply need at this time, so the lost teachings have resurfaced—‘those who have ears, let them hear!’ Our key starting passage is John 11, the ‘raising of Lazarus’ episode, where it is made clear that Mary, Martha and Lazarus are brothers and sisters and that It was that Mary that anointed the Lord with ointment, and wiped His feet with her hair. So Mary Magdalene is also the woman (un-named in the other Gospels) who anoints Jesus with the ointment from the alabaster box. T 3 Then starting in apparent order of composition (Mark being the first, Matthew being Mark with additions, Luke being Matthew with further additions), we have Mark 14: 3-9. Here Lazarus is referred to as ‘Simon the leper’ and Mary as A woman with an alabaster box of ointment of spikenard, very precious; and she brake the box and poured it on His head. There are murmurings at the waste and the cost, to which Jesus replies …you have the poor with you always, and whensoever ye will ye may do them good: but me ye have not always. She hath done what she could: she is come aforehand to anoint my body to the burying. Verily I say unto you, wheresoever this gospel shall be preached throughout the whole world, this also that she hath done shall be spoken of for a memorial of her. Only a wife could anoint her dead husband. What she has done is ‘her memorial’, a statement of Her true status. Those who have ears, let them hear. Mark 15:40. At the Crucifixion: There were also women looking on afar off: among whom was Mary Magdalene, and Mary the Mother of James the less and of Joses, and Salome. The triple goddess. The other Mary is the mother of Jesus, Joses and James here strangely called the less, Jesus’ brother, James the Just, who is, according to Laurence Gardner, ‘Joseph’ (his title) Ha Rama Theo, corrupted into ‘of Arimathea’, a so-called place which has never been found. And after, (15:47) And Mary Magdalene and Mary the mother of Joses beheld where he was laid. Mark 16: 1 continues directly: And when the Sabbath was past, Mary Magdalene, and Mary the mother of James, and Salome, had brought sweet spices, that they might come and anoint him… 4 Here they find the tomb empty and a single …young man sitting on the right side, clothed in a long white garment; and they were affrighted. He tells them ‘He is risen’ and to …tell his disciples and Peter that he goeth before you into Galilee: there shall ye see him as he said unto you. We are then told in verse 9 Now when Jesus was risen early the first day of the week, he appeared first to Mary Magdalene, out of whom he had cast seven devils. (10) And she went and told them that had been with him, as they mourned and wept. (11) And they when they had heard that he was alive, and had been seen of her, believed not. So while the other two women accompany Maria Magdala to the tomb and see it empty, it is to Her that He first reveals Himself. Now on to Matthew. Matthew 26:6—13 Again Lazarus is referred to as ‘Simon the leper’ and Maria Magdala simply as …a woman having an alabaster box of very precious ointment, and poured it on his head. Again the disciples murmur against this, and the response is virtually the same as in Mark: Why trouble ye the woman? For she hath wrought a good work on me. (11) For ye have the poor with you always; but me ye have not always. (12) For in that she hath poured this ointment on my body, she did it for burial. (13) Verily I say unto you Wheresoever this gospel shall be preached in the whole world, there shall also this, that this woman hath done, be told for a memorial of her. In the next chapter (27) verse 56 the ‘women beholding afar off’ the Crucifixion are again listed as being 5 Mary Magdalene, and Mary the mother of James and Joses [and Jesus, of course], and the mother of Zebedee’s children. [=Salome again?] A few verses later after ‘Joseph of Arimathea’ has laid the body ‘in his own new tomb’ we are told And there was Mary Magdalene and the other Mary [not a very respectful treatment of the Catholic church’s ‘Holy Mother of God’!] sitting over against the sepulchre. The loyal women remain by Jesus’ tomb. Chapter 28: 1 In the end of the Sabbath, as it began to dawn toward the first day of the week, came Mary Magdalene and the other Mary to see the sepulchre. This version makes the announcement of Christ’s rising more dramatic: (2) And behold there was a great earthquake, for the angel of the Lord descended from heaven, and came and rolled back the stone from the door, and sat upon it. Guards had been posted in Matthew’s version: at this supernatural display, these ‘become as dead men’. The angel then addresses the women more or less verbatim as in Mark. As they run to tell the disciples, both the Mother and the Consort are met by Jesus: (9) And they came and held him by the feet, and worshipped him. (10) Then Jesus said unto them, be not afraid: go tell my brethren that they go into Galilee, and there shall they see me. The scene of the women delivering this message to the disciples isn’t described, and we next see Jesus appearing to them, but even then ‘some doubted’. We note that the women do not have this doubt. The debt of Matthew to Mark in literary terms is made obvious by comparing these passages. By Luke things have become expanded, but on the other hand become garbled. Luke 7:36 describes Jesus as being at the home of ‘a Pharisee’ whom we later discover is called Simon, rather than calling him ‘Simon the Leper’—or Lazarus. (37) And behold a woman in the city, which was a sinner, when she knew that Jesus sat at meat in the Pharisee’s house, brought in an alabaster box of ointment, 6 (38) And stood at his feet behind him weeping, and began to wash his feet with tears, and did wipe them with the hairs of her head, and kissed his feet, and anointed them with the ointment. This is the first and indeed only time in the synoptic gospels Maria Magdala is depicted as a ‘sinner’, but we must remember also that ‘Luke’ has departed considerably from the source material as presented in Mark and/or John by now. It is clear to anyone with the least literary training or even simple observation that we have a process of ‘Chinese whispers’ going on, with either deliberate alterations being added to colour what would otherwise be yet another verbatim restatement of Mark, or a simple botching of the telling of the original. In Luke’s version instead of the disciples murmuring against the ‘waste’ of this costly spikenard, ‘Simon’, supposedly now a Pharisee rather than a close disciple ‘whom Jesus loved’ as he is in John, …spake within himself saying, This man, if he were a prophet, would have known who and what manner of woman this is that toucheth him: for she is a sinner. Jesus then rebukes Simon and gives a parable about forgiveness, the implication of which is that the greater the sin, the greater the amount of love demonstrated in forgiving it. (44) And he turned to the woman and said unto Simon, Seest thou this woman? I entered into thine house, thou gavest me no water for my feet: but she hath washed my feet with tears, and wiped them with the hairs of her head. (45) Thou gavest me no kiss: but this woman since the time I came in hath not ceased to kiss my feet. (46) My head with oil thou didst not anoint: but this woman hath anointed my feet with ointment. (47) Wherefore I say unto thee, her sins, which are many, are forgiven; for she loved much: but to whom little is forgiven, the same loveth little. (48) And he said unto her, Thy sins are forgiven… (50) And he said to the woman, Thy faith have saved thee: go in peace.[Chapter ends here.] ‘Luke’ has misunderstood, it seems to me, not knowing the true nature of the relationship of Jesus and Maria, the whole nature of this incident, and it is this expanded but garbled and distorted version which has become the church favourite, if you like. Mary is reduced to a cipher, an object of the author’s invention, providing nothing more than an example of Jesus’ ability to forgive sins. The whole point has been changed, and indeed 7 completely obscured, by this new interpretation on the part of ‘Luke’ or the writer of Luke anyway, that ‘the woman with the alabaster box’ must have been a repentant sinner. This unforgiveable tinkering with a straightforward narrative on the part of ‘Luke’ has left us with a completely false idea of Maria Magdala as being a sinner who is then ‘saved’ by Jesus’ forgiveness. In neither Mark nor Matthew is there any suggestion that ‘the woman with the alabaster box’, who we know via John to be Mary Magdalene, is a ‘sinner’. Luke’s literary inventiveness and flight of fancy is completely against the grain of the earlier versions and that of John, and the writer of Luke is to be blamed here for this disparaging portrayal of womanhood, making a ‘sinner’ of the very Consort of Our Lord, the Christ-Sophia. Women throughout the centuries have paid in blood for such an imposed and distorted perspective. The gospel writers and therefore each gospel are each assigned a Zodiacal beast, and are therefore each equated with one of the four Elements. Churches throughout ‘Christendom’ carry this symbolism, with, often, the Christ depicted in the centre of the four, forming a perfect ma ala exactly analogous to those of Tibetan Buddhism: I daresay most so-called Christians would be horrified to know this, and that the origins of their narrow and reductionist interpretation of spiritual truth carries symbolism which transcends all creeds and predates church history, pertaining instead to the ‘Perennial Philosophy’ that all religions are initially founded upon, but then seem to distort. The four beasts are represented also in the Judaeo-Christian tradition by the ‘ChIUTh Ha QoDeSh’, the ‘Holy Living Creatures’ of Ezekiel’s vision. In this scheme Luke is quite rightly assigned to ‘The Bull’, the leading Earth sign, and therefore the Earth element, the esoteric meaning of which is that, out of the four-only Gospels we have been allowed to view through the centuries by the corrupt churches of history, Luke is the one designed for the ‘hylic’, those at the lowest level of comprehension and spiritual development, who need as many ‘spicy’ incidents, miracles, and so on to grab their attention. The far more spiritually developed John gospel, which is perhaps the most important in many ways, and contains far more teaching and far less incident, is assigned to the Water element, (John = the Eagle, the risen aspect of the chief Water sign Scorpio) the next highest level, for the ‘psychic’, those who are at least aware of the existence of a soul/those who actually have started on the spiritual path and who do spiritual practices. The next highest element (in the QaBaLaH) is Air, and this corresponds to Matthew (the Angel/Man = Aquarius), while Mark (the Lion) = Fire. Both of these higher elements are appropriate for the ‘pneumatic’, those of more advanced degree of spiritual outlook, who are aware of spirit itself, working beyond both the physical (Earth element) and soul/psyche (Water element) levels. 8 Luke’s next chapter begins (1) And it came to pass afterward that he went throughout every city and village, preaching and shewing the glad tidings of the kingdom of God: and the twelve were with him. (2) And certain women, which had been healed of evil spirits and infirmities, Mary called Magdalene, out of whom went seven devils. This is suspiciously close to the previous chapter dealing with the supposedly ‘unknown’ ‘woman with the alabaster box’, is it not? Again attesting to ‘Luke’ having the whole thing garbled, perhaps having seen in John that ‘the woman with the alabaster box’ was indeed Mary Magdalene, but having forgotten the details or having gotten confused—or hearing it at second hand. Of course the casting out of the ‘seven devils’ had also been alluded to in Mark. Anyway, it cannot be coincidental. And we note it is a very different thing for one to be ‘healed’ of ‘seven devils’ than to be described as a ‘sinner’. Instead of Maria Magdala being rightly celebrated as His Consort, for only a wife could perform the function of anointing in this way, ‘Luke’ strips her of what Jesus gives in the other gospels as ‘her memorial’. The detail, though, of the seven devils is perhaps interesting, pointing to what in modern Western spiritual parlance would be called a cleansing of the seven cakras, ‘centres’ which for all true adherents of spiritual philosophy and discipline, then as now, are a reality, but that the fake church founded in the name of Christ still denies the existence of. In the Gnostic The Gospel of Mary Magdalene we actually see this process of Maria’s soul ascending through and triumphing over ‘seven devils’ such as Craving, Ignorance, etc. A far cry from what the ignorant would perceive as a ‘casting out’ of devils in horror-movie style! It is quite obvious that one of the reasons for the destruction and suppression of the nonSynoptic Gospels such as the Pistis Sophia, The Gospel of Mary Magdalene, The Gospel of Thomas, the Gospel of Philip, and so on, is that they show that the Church of Rome knew virtually nothing about the higher degrees of spiritual knowledge and the spiritual path, of Adepthood, and, like all those in ignorance, sought to suppress that which they did not understand for the sake of controlling the populace and keeping both temporal and spiritual power in their own hands. But even the (real, as opposed to the forged) Letters of Paul and the Synoptic gospels, if one knows what one is looking for, are full of clues and signs of the true spiritual science, the ‘Perennial Philosophy’. Jesus the Christ was an Initiate, as was Maria Magdala, the Christ-Sophia to His Christ-Logos. The religion founded in his name became utterly debased and divorced from its true meaning and import, so much so as to become in effect the very opposite of the Church of Light of its time, and it became actually the Church of repression, lies, and Satanism. And it remains so to this day, deflecting any supposed true believers from a path of spiritual 9 ascension and enlightenment in the NOW, and promoting merely a pie-in-the-sky scenario that good people, when they die, will get a reward, while bad people, even if the victims of circumstances in this supposed one life only that a supposedly benign God would give them in which to work it all out, will suffer eternal damnation. The sheer imbecility of the ‘Churchianity’ that arose in the stead of Christ’s true teaching, words, example, message, and practice then gave rise to the ‘Modernist/Materialist’ nightmare of a universe of blind random chance producing, from a complete blank meaningless, a life that will then return, a product of blind random chance and meaninglessness also, to a state of non-existence following on. They should be so lucky to escape the inexorability of Spiritual Law, that of karma! We next encounter Maria Magdala, the beloved of Jesus Christ, in the 10th Chapter of Luke, but, again, the writer seems to be reporting on all these events from a distance, a distance which has resulted in misunderstanding. We know from John that Mary is both ‘the woman with the alabaster box’ and the sister of Martha and Lazarus. The writer of Luke seems curiously oblivious to the actualities of the events and persons about whom he, if it is a he, is writing. This is the ‘Martha and Mary’ episode: (38) Now it came to pass, as they went, that he entered into a certain village: and a certain woman named Martha received him into her house. (39) And she had a sister called Mary, which also sat at Jesus’ feet, and heard his word. (40) But Martha was cumbered about much serving, and came to him and said, Lord, dost thou not care that my sister hath left me to serve alone? Bid her therefore that she help me. (41) And Jesus answered and said unto her Martha, Martha, thou art careful [in the sense of ‘full of care’ one supposes] and troubled about many things: (42) But one thing is needful: and Mary hath chosen that good part, which shall not be taken away from her. Mary here is portrayed as the disciple that is most heedful of and attentive to the Master’s word, as she is in the non-Synoptic/Gnostic gospels which the church tried so hard to suppress, (and for many centuries they were successful in their suppression.) She is the disciple of the disciples, ‘the apostle of the apostles’, and in The Gospel of Philip as many now know is referred to directly as ‘the Consort of the Lord’. The writer of Luke doesn’t really understand the very material he is attempting to set down from the source material of John and/or Mark. ‘Seeing-with-one-eye’ indeed! Luke on the Crucifixion and Resurrection follows the other gospels. 23:55-56 describes how ‘the women…beheld the sepulchre, and how his body was laid’ after ‘Joseph of 10 Arimathea’ has ‘begged the body of Jesus’ from Pontius Pilate. (Gardner points out that surely again only a family member could be given the body. ‘Joseph Ha Rama Theo = James the Just, Jesus’ Brother.) This time when the women come to the empty tomb on the Sabbath day, (24: 1—9) …behold two men stood by them in shining garments: men, not angels, two of them, and no earthquake. They speak to a similar end as in the previous versions, and this time all three women, (and in fact more) we are told deliver the news to the disciples, and are once again not believed: (10) It was Mary Magdalene, and Joanna, and Mary the mother of James, and other women that were with them, which told these things unto the apostles. (11) And their words seemed to them as idle tales, and they believed them not. Salome has turned now into Joanna. Mary Magdalene is not, here, granted a direct oneto-one encounter with Her Lord, nor is His Mother, as, perhaps, one might expect of the dubiously intentioned ‘Luke’ we have come to know and distrust in the re-casting of these events. The post-Resurrection aspect of Luke is much extended compared with Mark and Matthew, and includes the apparition of Christ to the disciples on the road to Emmaus. Unfortunately we now have reason to doubt and distrust the embroiderings and emendations of the writer of Luke. The idea of The Master re-appearing to the disciples and them not knowing who He is, is just too cinematically and aesthetically tempting to ‘Luke’, our would-be novelist/ Hollywood screenwriter. John is a completely different ‘kettle of fish’ from the other three supposed ‘Synoptic’ gospels. In fact it must have been very problematic for the censors who have trimmed down the basis of our understanding of the Master of the Dawn of the Piscean Age, His life or His message, and owes no basis to Mark or its obvious successors. It, though, is the only extant other gospel which attempts to draw some kind of narrative account of the life and acts of Jesus, as well as His teachings. All the other major banned/repressed Gnostic gospels are more focussed on the teaching rather than the life. If there is a narrative, it is about what Jesus did and taught after the Resurrection. In the Pistis Sophia for example Jesus gives a long and complex series of teachings (far beyond the understanding of the uninitiated, it would seem, and therefore of the phoney church erected on the ruins of His ministry) to the disciples, and among them the most prominent is Mary Magdalene. In The Gospel of Mary Magdalene the Christ is again teaching the disciples after the Resurrection, then leaves, leaving Mary Magdalene again the main focus as she ‘rallies 11 the troops’ after The Master’s departure and shares a visionary encounter she had had with him, including her soul’s rising through the seven levels mentioned earlier, revealing Her to be enlightened—which of course is rejected by Andrew and Peter, the ‘simple fishermen’ who don’t understand such advanced spiritual discourse or Pathwork. Peter and Andrew are also often ‘put down’ by Christ Himself in the Pistis Sophia as having not understood the teachings, so no wonder a church founded on the contrived apostolic succession of the bishops of Rome from Peter had the text banned. In the Gospel of Thomas we are given no narrative as such but a simple series of sayings of the teacher, although, again the final ‘Logion’ makes clear Peter’s spiritual emotional and even basic human immaturity when he tries to make Jesus cast Mary Magdalene out of the disciples! (And is again repudiated by The Master.) The Gospel of Thomas also had to be repressed as it makes it very clear that Jesus appointed not Peter but his own brother, James the Just or Righteous, titularly ‘Joseph’ Ha Rama Theo, as His successor. Oops! The whole ‘apostolic succession’ of the Roman church upon which it claims its authority is completely bogus and contrived. Peter was never even the first bishop of Rome, although a Briton, Linus, part of the true bloodline and therefore originally a true descendant either in genetic and/or spiritual terms of Jesus, was! (For more details here I must point the reader to Gardner’s Bloodline of the Holy Grail.) But I digress. John begins with the celebrated ‘In the beginning was The Word’ (logos passage This passage is often confused/conflated with the opening of the Bible itself, in Genesis which also opens with the words (in our translations) ‘In the beginning.’ That this is a mistranslation of the opening of Genesis (real name in Hebrew BeReShITh, ‘Creation’), and that what this text deals with isn’t actually necessarily a matter of the remote past only is something I will just allude to briefly here. By Chapter 2 in John, having briefly mentioned John the Baptist, we are given the ‘first miracle’ of the Marriage at Cana: unmentioned by the other synoptikos gospels. This could be, in fact, allusively, the first mention of Mary Magdalene or her importance in this gospel which in many ways is the clearest on these subjects, as the careful reader will note that after having turned the water into wine, the ‘governor of the feast called the bridegroom’, and it must surely be Jesus who is the bridegroom in this instance, as he is the one who has performed the miracle. John is full of what seems to be very direct observation, and is reckoned to be the earliest of the synoptic gospels, dated as early by some as AD 37, whereas the other synoptic gospels even the churchianitywallahs agree were written far later than the events they portray. 12 John 11, as stated earlier, makes clarity of the confusion of the other three gospels by making it clear that a) Mary Magdalene is ‘the woman with the alabaster box’ b) Mary, Martha and Lazarus are brother and sisters. The ‘raising of Lazarus’ episode is given at far greater length in this gospel, and the details are probably of immense importance, but make little sense, some of them. This is probably due to garbled translation. (The same can be said, frankly, for the entirety of both the Old and the New testaments!) For example, Jesus is initially unmoved by being told of the death of Lazarus, and delays going to the scene to raise him. One strange detail that suddenly makes sense given Laurence Gardner’s reading is in verse 20 where …Martha, as soon as she heard that Jesus was coming, went and met him: but Mary sat still in the house. Later, after conversing with Jesus, Martha returns (28) …and called Mary her sister secretly, saying, the Master is come, and calleth for thee. (29) A soon as she heard that, she arose quickly, and came unto him. This, Gardner says, indicates that Mary and Jesus were man and wife, for it is only when her husband has expressly called for her that she can come. There are many aspects of Gardner’s interpretations of the gospels that I am not convinced of, but that the pair were united in a highly mystically significant marriage, and that Maria Magdala Sophia was the Christ-Sophia to the Christ Logos incarnated by Jesus whom we call the Christ is, for me, beyond doubt. And that ‘Simon the leper’ = ‘Lazarus’ seems equally obvious. ‘Lazar-like’ is an appellation of the disease of leprosy in Shakespeare, for example. The description of Mary’s anointing of her husband follows in John after the raising of her brother in Chapter 12. (3) Then took Mary a pound of spikenard, very costly, and anointed the feet of Jesus, and wiped his feet with her hair: and the house was filled with the odour of the ointment. No ‘sinner’ or apparently anonymous ‘woman’ in this version—and we remember that the gospel of John is said to significantly predate that of Mark and its derivates Matthew and Luke. Mary is clearly named, and instead of being a sinner is one with the rest of the 13 household that is entertaining the Master—and, we believe, actually this act of anointing points to her true status as Christ’s Consort and Holy wedded Wife. However the disciples murmur against the use of the ointment as in the other gospels, and Jesus’ response is largely reported as being the same: (7) Then said Jesus Let her alone: against the day of my burying hath she kept this. (8) for the poor always you have with you; but me you have not always. In John the furore of the raising of Lazarus seems to be the ‘last straw’ for the Pharisees, who from then on intend to put Jesus to death, and His entry into Jerusalem, which itself precipitates the Crucifixion, follows hard upon this incident. Once again, at the Crucifixion, it is the women who stand by Our Lord. Chapter 19 vs 25 states Now there stood by the cross of Jesus his mother, and his mother’s sister, Mary the wife of Cleophas, and Mary Magdalene. The triple goddess again. Is ‘Mary the wife of Cleophas’ Salome aka Joanna? The use of ‘Mary’ is no coincidence if we realise (again this follows Laurence Gardner’s interpretation) that Maria/MIRIaM is actually a title, just like ‘Joseph’ of ‘Arimathea’, like ‘Soloman’, like, even, ‘David’, and not a personal name. Maria/MIRIaM was the name of the prophetess as it were ‘eclipsed’ in the Old Testament by Moses, and to use this name as a title therefore makes sense. There are interesting revelations to be found in the Gematria of both names, for which there is no space here, but interested readers may contact me directly on the subject if they wish. Chapter 20: 1) The first day of the week cometh Mary Magdalene early, when it was yet dark, unto the sepulchre, and seeth the stone taken away from the sepulchre. 2) Then she runneth, and cometh to Simon Peter, and to the other disciple, whom Jesus loved, and saith unto them, They have taken away the Lord out of the sepulchre, and we know not where they have laid him. 3) Peter therefore went forth, and that other disciple, and came to the sepulchre. 4) So they both ran together: and the other disciple did outrun Peter, and came first to the sepulchre. 5) And he stooping low, and looking in, saw the linen clothes lying; yet went he not in. 14 6) The cometh Simon Peter following him, and went into the sepulchre, and seeth the linen clothes lie, 7) And the napkin, that was about his head, not lying with the linen clothes, but wrapped together in a place by itself. 8) Then went in also that other disciple, which came first to the sepulchre, and he saw, and believed. 9) For as yet they knew not the scripture, that he must rise again from the dead. 10)Then the disciples went away again into their own home. 11)But Mary stood without at the sepulchre weeping: and as she wept she stooped down, and looked into the sepulchre, 12) And seeth two angels in white, the one at the head, and the other at the feet, where the body of Jesus had lain. 13)And they say unto her, Woman, why weepest thou? She saith unto them, because they have taken away my Lord, and I know not where they have laid him. 14) And when they had thus said, she turned herself back, and saw Jesus standing, and knew not that it was Jesus. 15) Jesus saith unto her, Woman, why weepest thou? Whom seekest thou? She, supposing him to be the gardener, saith unto him, Sir, if thou hast borne him hence, tell me where thou hast laid him, and I will take him away. 16) Jesus saith unto her, Mary. She turned herself, and saith unto him Rabboni, which is to say, Master. 17) Jesus saith unto her, Touch me not, for I am not yet ascended to my father: but go to my brethren, and say unto them, I ascend unto my father, and your Father, and to my God, and your God. 18) Mary Magdalene came and told the disciples that she had seen the Lord, and that he had spoken these things unto her. I have quoted here from John 20 at length because many factors fall into place from reading this touching, intimate, and crucial scene. We note that, as earlier in the Lazarus episode, it is only in John out of the four synoptic gospels that we are permitted to hear Maria Magdala’s voice: we hear her words, we hear her speak—as she speaks so eloquently in her own gospel and in the Pistis Sophia. She is no longer ‘the woman with the alabaster box’ only, or a mere figure fleshing out a parable. We are given her as a human being. Even if we were to take the narrative gospels as being fiction, she would now have the status of a major rather than a minor character. The fact that She is the one to whom Jesus first reveals His Risen Form, (although, we note, not yet fully Ascended!), makes her in fact THE most major figure in the gospels after Jesus Himself—just what the Church of Rome founded by the misogynist Peter has sought historically at every turn to conceal. 15 As a piece of literature, John’s treatment of the Resurrection is the most simple, real, yet dramatic, and authentic seeming. Bearing in mind that this is the earliest gospel, it is easy to see the others as in some ways pale copies of this original, copies which decay by Luke into outright distortions or embroiderings of events and people. That there is a specific relationship rather than a general one between Jesus and Maria is implied in her use of the word ‘Rabouni’ in addressing Him at the Resurrection, rather than the more familiar (to us) ‘Rabbi’ for ‘Master’. ‘Rabouni’ is interpreted by Jean-Yves Leloup in his excellent translation of The Gospel of Mary Magdalene as meaning ‘beloved Master’. Leaving the ‘synoptic’ gospels, which, we have found, are far from seeing events or persons ‘with one eye’, let us look briefly at two of the most important gospels from the Gnostic tradition, gospels which have been burned and banned for centuries so that our understanding of the spiritual importance of Mary Magdalane to Christianity has been buried by an entirely unenlightened ‘Church of Lies’. The Gospel of Philip has no narrative scheme and comprises of disjointed teachings, commentaries on Christ and the events of his ministry, etc. Among them we hear that There were three who always walked with the lord: Mary his mother and her sister and Magdalene, the one who was called his companion. His sister and his mother and his companion were each a Mary. ‘Mary’, we must remember, we should see as a title not a personal appellation. This passage makes it clear that the three women (whatever the actual name of the third) were if anything more important and of higher rank, i.e. closer to The Master, than any of his male disciples. No wonder the Church of Rome had this gospel burned! But there’s more: And the companion of the […] Mary Magdalene. […] her more than […] the disciples and […] kiss her […] on her […] The rest of [….] They said to him ‘Why do you love her more than all of us?’ ‘Why do I not love you like her? When a blind man and one who sees are both together in darkness they are no different from one another. When the light comes, then he who sees will see the light, and he who is blind will remain in darkness.’ I have left the above passage complete with its ellipses without putting in any conjectural words on the behalf of the reader: he or she may do that for him/her self. That Maria Magdala is the chosen Companion or Consort of The Master is absolutely 16 clear, and that she was regarded by Him in an entirely different light from the other disciples is also made clear from the parable offered, in which an obvious criticism of the disciples is levelled by Jesus: Mary is the one who now ‘the light’ has come, can see, while the others still ‘remain in darkness’. A church founded in the name of a Roman Emperor who then distorted all its precepts and created a bogus ‘apostolic’ succession from Peter (who was never, historically, the first Bishop of Rome) could hardly allow a gospel making it clear that the true disciple and highest ranking person in terms of closeness to the Christ and understanding of His ministry was—a woman! From their distorted perspective it was necessary propaganda to have Christ’s successor on earth and perhaps even the bearer of a Royal Bloodline, the Sang Real of Gardner’s and others’ interpretation, sidelined into a minor character, be deprived of a voice, and even branded ‘a sinner’. The spiritual Stalinism that the suppression of the truth represents triumphed for nearly 2000 years, and it is only in these changing times that the truth is emerging. But it is only emerging for that minority who are true seekers after truth, not lazy adherents of a cosy dogma which they can hide behind. How many so-called Christians have read the amazing hoard of gospels found at Nag Hammadi in the 1940s? These, along with the Dead Sea Scrolls, have revolutionised our perception of Christ and His times—and yet, most so-called Christians, rather than rushing to hear for themselves words of their Master hidden for millennia, have not read any of these gospels. In England the dear old Anglican Church doesn’t even bother to denounce such works or make any kind of fuss, simply ambling along in the same old way, itself a clever form of censorship. I would urge anybody reading these words to actually read The Gospel of Mary Magdalene in its entirety. As well as being available in compilation volume of the Nag Hammadi gospels and tracts, I would recommend the translation by Jean-Yves Leloup, published by Inner Traditions, of Vermont. Some major passages are here reproduced briefly. From the point of view of this essay, we will restrict ourselves to a few passages making clear Maria Magdala’s high status and superior level of spiritual perception. The gospel opens with very ‘Buddhistic’ and Eastern-tradition-sounding pronouncements by Jesus on the nature of the material universe, karma and ‘sin’, the latter being defined as acting ‘by the habits of your corrupted nature’. He is present physically to the other disciples, and, when Jesus then physically departs from them, it is made clear that this is a post-Crucifixion and Resurrection scene when they say 17 How are we to go among the unbelievers and announce the gospel of the kingdom of the Son of Man? They did not spare his life, so why should they spare ours? It is Mary then who emerges as the new spiritual leader of the disciples on The Master’s departure: Then Mary arose, Embraced them all, and began to speak to her brothers: ‘Do not remain in sorrow and doubt, For his Grace will guide and comfort you. Instead let us praise his greatness, For he has prepared us for this. He is calling upon us to become fully human.’ ‘Anthropos’ is the word used. We might say, ‘a whole and complete human being’. Thus Mary turned their hearts toward the Good, And they began to discuss the meaning of the teacher’s words. Peter said to Mary ‘Sister we know that the Teacher loved you differently from other women. Tell us whatever you remember Of any words he told you which we have not yet heard.’ Even Peter here tacitly acknowledges Maria Magdala’s superiority and greater intimacy with the Master, and that she may have been the recipient of secret or higher teachings unknown to the other disciples. Maria duly agrees and tells them about a visionary episode in which the Teacher came to her, and then how her soul travelled up and escaped from all material constraints, until it could say: That which oppressed me has been slain, That which encircled me has vanished; My craving has faded, And I am freed from my ignorance. I left the world with the aid of another world, A design was erased By virtue of a higher design. Henceforward I travel towards repose, Where Time rests in the Eternity of Time. I go now into Silence. 18 This summation of spiritual transcendence has all the hallmarks of authority and actual experience rather than mere theory. This pronouncement, this teaching, from the lips of Maria Madgala herself, we have been robbed of by the church of lies for millennia. But we have Her words now. Andrew, Peter’s brother, and then Peter himself repudiate Mary’s words: How is it possible that the Teacher talked In this manner with a woman About secrets of which we ourselves are ignorant? [How indeed Peter?] Must we change our customs And listen to this woman? Did he really prefer her to us? Sadly, Peter and the Church founded on his name and principles rather than those of the Christ did indeed cling to its ‘customs’ and repudiate spiritual growth and ascension in favour of worldly and political power—and does so until this very day. Then Mary wept, And answered him: ‘My brother Peter, what can you be thinking? Do you believe that this is just my imagination, That I invented this vision? Or do you believe that I would lie about our teacher?’ At this Levi spoke up: ‘Peter, you were always hot-tempered, and now we see you repudiating a woman just as our adversaries do. Yet if our Teacher found her worthy Who are you to reject her? Surely the Teacher knew her very well, For he loved her more than us. Therefore let us atone And become fully human [Anthropos] So that the teacher can take root in us, And walk forth to spread the gospel’. Hooray for Levi, say I! Instead of the pathetically juvenile jealousy and culturallyingrained misogyny of Peter—you know, the one who in all the synoptic gospels 19 denies Christ and is actually referred to by Him as ‘Satan’!—we have true spiritual humility and sense, confirming that The Master was wise in His choice of a Companion and favoured disciple. Levi is another disciple that the subsequent church of lies conveniently sidelined. Yet another reason why if it weren’t for the ‘chance’ finding of the Nag Hammadi hoard just after World War Two, you, dear reader, would not be reading these words from Our Lord and Our Lady, and indeed this whole essay, written in the spirit of Truth, and submitted in the hope for the Ascension of all true light-workers and walkers upon the Inner Path of Light, whatever their external cultural spiritual heritage, at this cusp of the Age of Pisces turning into the Age of Aquarius. May the words, works, presence and Light of all true Masters bring about a Golden Dawn in the hearts of all peace-loving sentient beings; may the Kingdom of Heaven and its Righteousness become manifest reality on earth, and may the heiros gamos/ the Sacred Marriage of Divine Alchemy, the perfect balancing of the polarity of the Divine Masculine and the Divine Feminine, the Bridegroom and the Bride, as exemplified by Our Lord Jesus-Christ Logos, Our Lady Maria-ChristSophia, and of The Mother and The Father in all recognisable forms of all spiritual cultures and traditions through ages past and those to come, take root in all our hearts.
History of the Papacy: JA Wylie The Papacy Its History Dogmas Genius and Prospects
"This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important, and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it."
The loss of temporal sovereignty, which has also befallen the Papacy since the first publication of this volume, is an event of graver consequence. But let it be borne in mind that it is the
🎺 The Garden of Eden ~ God's True church.org ~ ORIGINAL ~ cHURCH From Where God Preached.
In verse 15, humans were placed in the Garden of Eden and instructed to 'work it and take care of it'. In other words, God has given us the responsibility to act as stewards of his creation – to care for, manage, oversee and protect all that God owns!!!!!?

HELP US TO SPREAD OUR
LOVE AND FAITH TRUE TO THE BIBLE
🎺 If you can just take a moment to think ~ Can anyone even imagine how God felt when Jesus was crucified hanging there on a tree oF LiFE and his near last words “at three in the afternoon Jesus cried out in a loud voice, “Eloi, Eloi, lema sabachthani?” (which means “My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?”). Mark 15:34 At that point Yeshua was full of the WORLD'S SIN and our Father being Holier than Holy could not answer His Son as he slowly painfully fell asleep. You see The Father can not forgive his Son or Children until they now repent and pray for forgiveness then turn their lives around and truly "BELIEVE" in the coming resurrection and the 2nd coming of our Lord and Saviour Jesus, Yeshua The Christ Amen.
🎺 This should be a message to all Jews in confirmation of Yeshua as the true Messiah. The below is a historical account of what happened to the Roman leaders from Yeshua's crucifixion to approximately 300 years later and the establishment of Emperor Constantine. I would suggest Constantine and his advisers were aware of the history and premature demise of his predecessors. So he cunningly led by satan brought pagan worship and their gods into his form of Christianity! 🎺 And we all should know where it all led if not please click my Facebook?
The Pharisees / Sanhedrin were not to blame as their hearts were waxed cold and their eyes closed by God, so as the 300 Prophecies throughout the Bible would before filled. However, they still should NOT have allowed this to happen. They were indeed punished by way of the destruction and taking away of their Temple in 70AD. They were not to be trusted anymore So Yeshua HIMself has taken charge of tHE InvisAble cHURCH with selected members Elect and HaNd pickED Ambassadors. Amen ... God would indeed take revenge for the treatment and Martyrdom of the Jewish ~ Christians. Come Judgement Day all will be corrected ~ So Therefore Yeshua is The Promised Messiah; He is the long-awaited for by the Jews. It may have taken 300 years or so to expel and to act revenge on the Romans, but it is but a blink of an eye to the Eternal.
At the first preaching of Christ and coming of the gospel, who should rather have known and received him than the Pharisees and scribes of that people, which had his law? And yet who persecuted and rejected him more than they themselves? What followed? They, in refusing Christ to be their King, and choosing rather be subject unto Cæsar, were by the said their own Cæsar at length destroyed; when as Christ's subjects the same time escaped the danger. Whereby it is to be learned what a dangerous thing it is to refuse the gospel of God when it is so gently offered.
The like example of God's wrathful punishment is to be noted no less in the Romans also themselves. For when Tiberius Cæsar, having received by letters from Pontius Pilate of the doings of Christ, of his miracles, resurrection, and ascension into heaven, and how he was received as God of many, was himself also moved with the belief of the same, and did confer thereof with the whole senate of Rome to have Christ adored as God; they, not agreeing thereunto, refused him, because that, contrary to the law of the Romans, he was consecrated (said they) for God before the senate of Rome had so decreed and approved him. Thus the vain senate, following rather the law of man than of God, and which were contented with the emperor to reign over them, and were not contented with the meek King of glory, the Son of God, to be their King, were after much like the sort to the Jews scourged and entrapped for their unjust refusing, by the same way which they themselves did prefer. For as they preferred the emperor and rejected Christ, so the just permission of God did stir up their own emperors against them in such sort, that both the senators themselves were almost all devoured, and the whole city most horribly afflicted for the space almost of three hundred years together. For, first, the same Tiberius, which form a great part of his reign was a moderate and a tolerable prince, afterward was to them a sharp and heavy tyrant, who neither favoured his own mother, nor spared his own nephews, nor the princes of the city, such as were his own counselors, of whom, to the number of twenty, he left not past two or three alive. Suetonius reporteth him to be so stern of nature and tyrannical, that in time of his reign very many were accused and condemned with their wives and children; maids also first defloured, then put to death, In one day he recordeth twenty persons to be drawn to the place of execution. By whom also, through the just punishment of God, Pilate, under whom Christ was crucified, was apprehended and accused at Rome, deposed, then banished to the town of Lyons, and at length did slay himself. Neither did Herod and Caiaphas long escape, of whom more followeth hereafter. Agrippa also by him was east into prison; albeit afterward he was restored. In the reign of Tiberius, the Lord Jesus, the Son of God, in the three and thirtieth year of his age, which was the seventeenth of this emperor, by the malice of the Jews suffered his blessed passion for the conquering of sin, death, and Satan, the prince of this world, and rose again the third day. After whose blessed passion and resurrection this foresaid Tiberius Nero lived six years, during which time no persecution was yet stirring in Rome against the Christians, through the commandment of the emperor. In the reign also of this emperor, and the year which was the next after the passion of our Saviour, or somewhat more, St. Paul was converted to the faith. After the death of Tiberius, when he had reigned three and twenty years, succeeded C. Cæsar Caligula, Claudius Nero, and Domitius Nero; which three were likewise such scourges to the senate and people of Rome, that the first not only took other men's wives violently from them, but also defloured three of his own sisters, and afterward banished them. So wicked he was, that he commanded himself to be worshipped as God, and temples to be erected in his name and used to sit in the temple among the gods, requiring his images to be set up in all temples, and also in the temple of Jerusalem, which caused great disturbance among the Jews, and then began the abomination of desolation to be set up in the Holy place, spoken of in the gospel. His cruel conduct, or else displeasure, was such towards the Romans, that he wished that all the people of Rome had but one neck, that he at his pleasure might destroy such a multitude. By this said Caligula, Herod, the murderer of John The Baptist and condemner of Christ, was condemned to perpetual banishment, where he died miserably. Caiaphas also, which wickedly sat upon Christ, was the same time removed from the high priest's room, and Jonathan set in his place. The raging fierceness of this Caligula incensed against the Romans had not thus ceased, had not he been cut off by the hands of a tribune and other gentlemen, which slew him in the fourth year of his reign. After whose death was found in his closet two little labels, one called a sword, the other the dagger; in the which, labels were contained the names of those senators and noblemen of Rome whom he had purposed to put to death. Besides this sword and dagger, there was found also a coffer, wherein divers kinds of poison were kept in glasses and vessels for the purpose to destroy a wonderful number of people; which poisons afterward, being thrown into the sea, destroyed a great number of fish. But that which this Caligula had only conceived, the same did the other two which came after bring to pass; Claudius Nero, who reigned thirteen years with no little cruelty; but especially the third of these Neros, called Domitius Nero, which, succeeding after Claudius, reigned fourteen years with such fury and tyranny, that he slew the most part of the senators, and destroyed the whole order of knighthood in Rome. So prodigious a monster of nature was he, more like a beast, yea, rather a devil, than a man, that he seemed to be born to the destruction of men. Such was his monstrous uncleanness, that he abstained not from his own mother, his natural sister, nor from any degree of kindred. Such was his wretched cruelty, that he caused to be put to death his mother, his brother-in-law, his sister, his wife great with child, all his instructors, Seneca, and Lucan, with divers more of his own kindred and consanguinity. Moreover, he commanded Rome to be set on fire in twelve places, and so continued it five days and six nights in burning, while that he, to see the example of how Troy burned, sung the verses of Homer. And to avoid the infamy thereof, he laid the fault upon the Christian men and caused them to be persecuted. And so continued this miserable emperor in his reign fourteen years, till at last the senate proclaiming him a public enemy unto mankind, condemned him to be drawn through the city, and to be whipped to death. For the fear whereof, he, flying the hands of his enemies, in the night fled to a manor of his servant's in the country, where he was forced to slay himself, complaining that he had then neither friend nor enemy left that would do so much for him. At the latter end of this Domitius Nero, Peter and Paul were put to death for the testimony and faith of Christ.
[Footnote: Some chronologists place the martyrdom of St. Peter and St. Paul two years later, and some even four.]Thus ye see, which is worthy to be marked, how the just scourge and heavy indignation of God from time to time ever followeth there, and how all things there go to ruin, neither doth any thing well prosper, where Christ Jesus, the Son of God, is contemned and not received, as by these examples may appear, both of Romans, which not only were thus consumed and plagued by their own emperors, but also by civil wars, whereof three happened in two years at Rome, after the death of Nero, and other casualties, (as in Sueton. is testified,) so that in the days of Tiberius aforesaid five thousand Romans were hurt and slain at one time by the fall of a theatre. And also most especially by the destruction of the Jews, which about this same time, in the year threescore and ten, and nearly forty years after the passion of Christ, and the third year after the suffering of St. Peter and Paul, were destroyed by Titus and Vespasian his father (who succeeded after Nero in the empire) to the number of eleven hundred thousand, besides them which Vespasian slew in subduing the country of Galilee, over and beside them also which were sold and sent into Egypt and other provinces to vile slavery, to the number of seventeen thousand. Two thousand were brought with Titus in his triumph; of which, part he gave to be devoured of the wild beasts, part otherwise most cruelly were slain. By whose case all nations and realms may take an example, what it is to reject the visitation of God's verity being sent, and much more to persecute them which be sent of God for their salvation. And as this wrathful vengeance of God thus hath been showed upon this rebellious people, both of the Jews and of the Romans, for their contempt of Christ, whom God so punished by their own emperors; so neither the emperors themselves, for persecuting Christ in his members, escaped without their just reward. For among so many emperors which put so many Christian martyrs to death, during the space of these first three hundred years, few or none of them scaped either not slain themselves, or by some miserable end or other worthily avenged. First, of the poisoning of Tiberius, and of the slaughter of the other three Neros after him, sufficiently is declared before. After Nero, Domitius Galba within seven months was slain by Otho. And so did Otho afterward slay himself, being overcome by Vitellus. And was not Vitellus shortly after drawn through the city of Rome, and after he was tormented was thrown into the Tiber? Titus, a good emperor, is thought to be poisoned by Domitian, his brother. The said Domitian after he had been a persecutor of the Christians, was slain in his chamber, not without the consent of his wife. Likewise, Commodus was murdered by Narcissus. The like end was of Pertinax and Julianus. Moreover, after that Severus was slain here in England, (and lieth at York,) did not his son Bassianus slay his brother Geta, and he after slain of Martialis? Macrinus with his son Diadumenus were both slain of their own soldiers. After whom Heliogabalus, that monstrous belly- paunch, was of his own people slain, and drawn through the city and cast into the Tiber. Alexander Severus, that worthy and learned emperor, which said he would not feed his servants doing anything with the bowels of the commonwealth, although in life and virtues he was much unlike other emperors, yet proved the like end, being slain at Mentz, with his godly mother Mammea, by Maximinus, whom the emperor before of a muleteer had advanced to great dignities. The which Maximinus also after three years was slain himself of his soldiers. What should I speak of Maximus and Balbinus in like sort both slain in Rome? of Gordian slain by Philip? of Philip, the first christened emperor, slain, or rather martyred, for the same cause? of wicked Decius drowned, and his son slain the same time in battle? of Gallus and Volusianus his son, emperors after Decius, both slain by a conspiracy of Æmilianus, who rose against them both in war and within three months after was slain himself? Next to Æmilianus succeeded Valerianus, and Gallienus his son; of whom Valerianus (who was a persecutor of the Christians) was taken prisoner of the Persians, and there made a riding fool of Sapores their king, who used him for a stool to leap upon his horse; while his son Gallienus, sleeping at Rome, either would not or could not once proffer to revenge his father's ignominy. For after the taking of Valerian, so many emperors rose up as were provinces in the Roman monarchy. At length, Gallienus also was killed by Aureolus which warred against him. It was too long here to speak of Aurelianus, another persecutor, slain of his secretary; of Tacitus and Florinus his brother, of whom the first reigned five months, and was slain at Pontus; the other reigned two months, and was murdered at Tarsis: of Probus, who, although a good civil emperor, yet was he destroyed by his soldiers. After whom Carus, the next emperor was slain by lightning. Next to Carus followed the impious and wicked persecutor Dioclesian, with his fellows Maximian, Valerius, Maximinus, Maxentius, and Licinius, under whom, all at one time, (during the time of Dioclesian,) the greatest and most grievous persecution was moved against the Christians ten years together. After which, Dioclesian and Maximian deposed themselves from the empire. Galerius, the chiefest minister of the persecution, after his terrible persecutions, fell into a wonderful sickness, having such a sore risen in the nether part of his body, which consumed his members, and so did swarm with worms, that being curable neither by surgery nor physic, he confessed that it happened for his cruelty towards the Christians, and so-called in his proclamations against them. Notwithstanding, he is not able to sustain (as some say) his sore, slew himself. Maximinus in his war, being tormented with pain in his guts, there died, Maxentius was vanquished by Constantine and drowned in the Tiber. Licinius likewise, being overcome by the said Constantine the Great, was deposed from his empire, and afterward slain of his soldiers. But, on the other side, after the time of Constantine, when the faith of Christ was received into the imperial seat, we read of no emperor after the like sort destroyed or molested, except it was Julianus, or Basilius, (which expelled one Zeno, and was afterward expelled himself,) or Valens. Besides these, we read of no emperor to come to ruin and decay, like the others before mentioned. And thus have we in brief sum collected out of the chronicles the unquiet and miserable state of the emperors of Rome, until the time of Christian Constantine, with the examples, no less terrible than manifest, of God's severe justice upon them for their contemptuous, refusing and persecuting the faith and name of Christ their Lord.
The Filthy RAGS of The Papacy did not fair any better 🎺🎺 For this is written metaphorically and with respect from the blood of the Saints and the Martyrs SCREAMING! ~ lest we forget. Amen 🎺 👼
🎺 "And the King shall answer and say unto them, Verily I say unto you, Inasmuch as ye have done it unto one of the least of these my brethren, ye have done it unto me". Amen 🎺 👼
🎺 foot note: I am of the humble opinion that God could NOT answer his Son on the cross but that Jesus's spirit being the Arch Angel Michael was there watching over Him. AMEN🎺 👼
Today, many Christians are turning back to the puritans to, “walk in the old paths,” of God’s word, and to continue to proclaim old truth that glorifies Jesus Christ. There is no new theology. In our electronic age, more and more people are looking to add electronic books (ePubs, mobi and PDF formats) to their library – books from the Reformers and Puritans – in order to become a “digital puritan” themselves. Take a moment to visit Puritan Publications (click the banner below) to find the biggest selection of rare puritan works updated in modern English in both print form and in multiple electronic forms. There are new books published every month. All proceeds go to support A Puritan’s Mind.
There are some important points about the distinctions made of the invisible church, and how it is expressed visibly in the world.
When Jesus came to the coasts of Caesarea Philippi, he asked his disciples a question, and received a blessed response. It was a conversation that took place between those disciples and their blessed Lord while they were alone. Jesus asked, “Whom do men say that I the Son of man am? And they said, Some say that thou art John the Baptist: some, Elias; and others, Jeremias, or one of the prophets. He said unto them, But whom say ye that I am? And Simon Peter answered and said, Thou art the Christ, the Son of the living God. And Jesus answered and said unto him, Blessed art thou, Simon Barjona: for flesh and blood hath not revealed it unto thee, but my Father which is in heaven. And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it. And I will give unto thee the keys of the kingdom of heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt bind on earth shall be bound in heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven. Then charged he his disciples that they should tell no man that he was Jesus the Christ.”
It is a sad reality that unregenerate men often have a wrong view of Christ. Many times, if they are forced to give answers about “the Christ” of history, they will say that He was a good teacher, and leave it at that. They do, however, forget, that Christ can only either be Lord of heaven and earth, the Sovereign ruler of all men and the Omnipotent Holy God of His claims, or, He is a liar and lunatic for claiming to be both God and the only Savior of mankind. He is not simply just a good teacher. It is due to the depravity that sits deep in their soul corrupting their mind and hearts about God, and the darkened counsel of their own brain leading them into all sorts of heinous errors. The context of this passage shows us this. As always when studying Scripture, it is important to look at the context. Jesus is about to teach His disciples (and us) about the importance of being regenerated in order to understand who He is, and why he came.[1]
He speaks with the disciples as if to tell them, “I have taught; and I have done many miracles–I fed people with a boy’s lunch, I turned water into wine, I’ve preached about the Kingdom of God and so I ask you, disciples, as you have been with me all this time hearing, seeing and experiencing my ministry—who do the people say that I, the Son of man, am?” It is important to remember that the Son of Man imagery is taken from the book of Daniel, primarily, as the great and powerful “Son of Man” who came riding in on the clouds of glory. It is heavenly imagery. It is imagery that is divine. The Son of Man is the Messianic Warrior King, and ought not to conjure up in our minds thoughts of being lowly and meek (though Christ was lowly and meek in other ways). No, the Son of Man is the power and glory of the Living God. Jesus uses this exalted example to press the answer in somewhat of a rhetoric fashion to the question He is asking. Daniel says in 7:13, “I saw in the night visions, and, behold, one like the Son of man came with the clouds of heaven, and came to the Ancient of days, and they brought him near before him.” Jesus is saying “I am God, the Son of Man, and so I desire to know what you have heard—who do people say that I am?”[2]
The disciples answered Jesus’ question by giving him the people’s response to his ministry. Some people believed Jesus was John the Baptist come back to life. Some people thought he was one of the prophets, like Elijah or Jeremiah, come back from the dead. Jesus then makes a distinguishing mark. He tells them that they have done a good job with the survey of people, as the poll has been taken. The people have said these things, but what do you say? Who do you say I am? So he shifts the importance of the question onto them, when he has already given them the answer as the Son of Man. But He asks them anyway.
Peter, the voice, comes out with an answer. He tells Jesus that He is the “anointed one” or “the Christ;” the Messiah, Son of God, both man and God who has come to earth to save us. Here, Peter has a right view of God. He is the first among the disciples to confess Christ in this particular way as the Lord. (And yet, later, ironically, he will be the first to deny Him as well.)
The interesting point about this confession that Peter makes is this: he does not come up with it on his own. His song was not, “I have decided to follow Jesus.” Peter knows better. Jesus knows better as well. This information came from the Father. TO whom the Father wishes to inform, so such people know about Jesus. The Father does not inform everyone. He only informs some – His elect. Then, through this profession, Jesus makes a statement that helps us to recognize how He will lay the foundation of the church. Christ then blesses Peter in his confession. Jesus tells him “Blessed are you Simon….” Why does he tell him he is blessed? He tells him that it was not by his own flesh that he understood Jesus Christ to be the Son of God. Peter had not just sat down with the multitudes and had taken the poll or survey of Christ. Peter had been divinely given a revelation direct from the Father, about the Son.[3] From heaven, the Father, has revealed to you (Peter), who I am. And unless the Father does this revealing, Peter would never know who Jesus is. Unless the Father reveals the Son to people, people will always have a wrong view of Jesus. People will never know Christ unless the Christ is revealed. The flesh brings forth flesh, and the Spirit of God, by ordinance of the Father, reveals the Son to whom He is pleased to reveal Him (John 3:3ff). Unless God is revealed to a person, they shall never know the Son no matter how many facts you throw their way.
Jesus then begins to extrapolate the doctrine of the church and instructs us in the laying of the foundation of the church. This “foundation” is our point of interest. He makes a play on words. He says, “That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church.” The play on words arises from the two forms of the word “rock” – (petra) pe,tra and (Petros) Pe,troj. Petros is Peter’s name in Greek, which means “a stone”. And the second word “rock” is petra which means “a large stone or crag”. Peter’s name is a masculine form of the word, and petra is a feminine form of the word. Jesus is saying that Peter is a little chunk of “rock”. And this little “rock” has given a testimony about the nature of the Son. He has said something as a piece of the bigger rock which will in turn be the foundational rock. The next rock, the feminine word petra, will be a sure foundation; a founding rock of the church which is Jesus Christ himself. Peter has spoken that Jesus is the Son of God. Upon this rock it is seen that Jesus saves people. It is the profession that Jesus Christ is Lord coming from a changed heart. Thus, Christ is the great foundation to the church which Jesus is building.[4]
Jesus will build his church. The word oivkodomew means “to build a house, erect a building or to found, and establish.” The tense of the word here is vital. Jesus is not a builder who constructs for a moment then quits his work. This is something he will do always. He is going to build his church, (ekklasia) the “called out ones”, of which Peter has been identified as one son among many to follow. God has chosen Peter for salvation, as the Father has revealed His Son to him, and so he testifies to this fact by his confession of Jesus as the Christ. He is illuminated by the Spirit and says that Jesus is the Son. Jesus states that on this rock, himself, He will build it; a building which is superior against everything else which has been built or will be built. It is so powerful that this building has the capability of assaulting other structures. The church is going to assault the very gates of hell itself!
The gates of hell cannot prevail against the church which Jesus is building. The “gates of hell” are referred to here as offensive in strategy. They are gates. These gates keep people in. Satan is always seen as coming against people or hindering people in his attacks against them. Here, Jesus does not say the “armies of hell” will march out against the church, but that their gates will not prevail. He references the gates of hell. Gates keep people in and do not let people out. When the dog needs to stay in the yard, the gate is locked. When there is a need to keep small children in the playpen, they are surrounded by a gate which locks them in. Here, a supernatural profession of faith, the fruit of the Father’s revelation and election of men, looses people from the prison of hell and the gates cannot hold them in; they will be rescued. Satan, the prince of this world, holds people in darkness, the darkness of their carnal and wicked minds, so that they are not saved. Yet Jesus says that though Satan does all he can, and sets up his armies as a barricade against the Lord, and imprisons these people, and even reinforces the gates of his blinding power, all this will still not prevail. Jesus’ church will overcome and upon the profession of faith in Christ, it will be manifested in the eyes of the world. The word which is translated “prevail” is katiskow which means “to be superior in strength or to overcome.” But though Satan tries as he may, he will not prevail or be superior to the Kingdom Jesus is building. Satan’s hellish gates are no match for Christ who may besiege those gates at any time and snatch another soul from the fires of hell and God’s eternal wrath. That is what Jesus has done here with Peter by his profession on Jesus the Rock.
Jesus is setting forth a doctrine concerning the nature of the universal church of His power. Yet, before we proceed, we need to define the term the “True Universal Church”. The definition we will use is this: “the entire remnant of the redeemed elect from all ages; both on earth and in heaven.” There is a small distinction in emphasis between what the Reformers thought and what I am going to be teaching here. Calvin, Luther, Zwingli, Bucer, etc. made a simple distinction between the invisible church and the visible church. They tried to qualify these words by saying that the invisible church was made up of all the elect from all ages and who will ultimately be in heaven. The visible church was that church on earth which could be seen, yet could also have within itself the reprobate, or false professors, whereas the universal church is only the elect. And I believe this to be a somewhat inadequate definition of the body both on earth and in heaven. They focused on only two terms, and I believe the Scripture to make a threefold distinction. I believe the threefold distinction exemplifies more clarity. It is true that the Reformers explains more about this “third manner” which I will explain more fully, but they did not do this in light of the invisible/visible distinction. Instead, they saved their third distinction for ecclesiology and the benefits of the church. However, I am convinced that this third practicum belongs inside the “visible” distinction simply divided into two main areas.
In the time of the reformation, these great men desired to aid the church in understanding its identity. Since they were dealing with the Roman Catholic Church[5], a very visible church, they needed to clarify for the people what these terms meant. Clarification is fine, but I believe they did not take the doctrine to its logical conclusion inside the subset of the “visible church”. The Roman Catholics were (are) external with their pomp and grandeur—masses, penance, last rites etc. Their church had, and still does, depend on outward works which are visible to the eye but not spiritually transforming to the heart.[6] The reformers were trying to reform the church and so they had to go with a catch word which would have been in contrast to the church without using the word universal—so they went with an “invisible” church contrasted with the visible.[7] The Roman Catholic Church professes to be the universal church. They single-handedly are able to save sinners and have the right to dispense grace to the masses. The Reformers said that the redeemed elect alone made up that universal invisible church of Christ, and all true churches on earth were known as the visible church. They put a great emphasis on the invisible nature of the church so as to make a great distinction. The Spirit of God must do an invisible work of grace in the heart. A person is then counted among the invisible number of the elect which are part of the whole body of Christ from all ages. That was their distinction. It is a good distinction, and the same bi-fold treatment is found in the Westminster Confession, chapter 25, “The catholic or universal Church, which is invisible, consists of the whole number of the elect, that have been, are, or shall be gathered into one, under Christ the head thereof; and is the spouse, the body, the fullness of him that filleth all in all.” This is their definition of that which is invisible – all redeemed sinners for all time. The second paragraph in this same chapter states, “The visible Church, which is also catholic or universal under the gospel (not confined to one nation as before under the law) consists of all those, throughout the world, that profess the true religion, and of their children; and is the kingdom of the Lord Jesus Christ, the house and family of God, out of which there is no ordinary possibility of salvation.” This demonstrates the visible nature of the invisible church. These are, for all theological purposes, good definitions of that distinction. But I believe we might be able to take this thought one step further, in order to make an important clarification that I feel is often neglected.
Though the reformers were specific, and I believe successful, in their goal, Jesus seems to be more definitive than the reformers basic visible/invisible distinction. I believe the Scriptures make way for a double distinction that “lives” within the realm of the militant church practically existing in the world. Yes, there is the Invisible Church through all ages encompassing all the elect. But then the Visible Church is divided into the Visible Universal Church-which encompasses all of Christendom, and the Visible Local Church (or meeting house) made up of those professing faith in a specified geographic location. The difference I am making is taking the visible church and dividing that into two parts based on the reality of a made profession and ministry. The universal visible church is not one entity undistinguishable; it is divided into two parts. The local meeting house, or local church, needs to be an entity set on a foundation all its own due to certain privileges and responsibilities of those professing faith in that geographic location. Jesus does not speak in the abstract. The “church” is not simply the invisible church found in Christendom at a given time, but the invisible church arranged in geographic areas that practically bring the message of the Gospel to their immediate areas of effectiveness.
In order to appreciate the local church, and the work of Christ in the church, one must first define, clearly, The Invisible Church. The Invisible Church encompasses all of the elect for all of time; all those who are truly saved. What is its nature? There are seven areas I want to open up to you in seeing the nature of this invisible church first for clarity.
First, we must see that this elect church, this universal church, is not confined to a geographic location. My brother, when he was young, about 9 or 10, went to play hockey in Germany. You would think that someone getting off the plane would want to dine in a German restaurant. But these children, the moment they saw the golden arches, ran for McDonalds. Yes, McDonalds is in Germany. It is so popular that it is nearly in every country, almost everywhere in its scope, or at least it appears that way. McDonalds, though, is not exactly like the True Universal church in that regard. Though it may be placed all over, McDonalds is more like the Universal church of Christendom- visibly seen in various geographic locations all over the world. Jesus is showing us something different in our passage. The True Universal Church is both in heaven and on earth.
Jesus tells us that He is building a church. Is this made of wood and stone? No. At one level, this invisible church is based on election, regeneration and the rock of Christ through enlightened profession. The universal nature of the invisible church in all ages is not the same local church we find in various regions on the earth at a given time. Nor are the saints in heaven the same as a church in a given geographic region. They are distinguishable in their nature, but unified in their universality. At the time Jesus preached this to the disciples there was no local church existing in this regard[8]. Nor had the church made the full transition from the Old Covenant promises to the New Testament realities. This is not a “dispensational statement.” Though all the privileges of father Abraham were given to him as much as you or I, the veil was not torn, the Son of Man had not yet died, or resurrected, and the risen and enthroned Prince of Peace had not yet sent, at God’s right hand, the Spirit of Christ in that manner. Even as Jesus walked the dusty roads of the pax rommana there were still Old Testament saints being ushered into the Kingdom of heaven.[9] Jesus came to build it, and to continue to build it. It is done through the profession of faith that Jesus is Son of God, the Rock and Cornerstone of the Church. The word build is future active indicative in the Greek. It means that “He will do later and continue to do, and He will not stop continuing it until it is completed in heaven.” Wherever Christ is in a Christian, you have the True Invisible Universal Church; for any indwelling believer is a representative of that church. It is knit together by the Spirit of God and will continue to be built until Christ returns. He continues to gather his elect in from the four corners of the globe.
Secondly, the Invisible Church is without corruption. A person may say, “I am part of the true universal church, and I am corrupted with sin. How can the true Universal Church be without sin if I am in it?” As God looks upon the church, and sees the imputed righteousness of Christ on the church (on believers) He sees nothing but the glory and undefiled Christ who fashions the church without spot or wrinkle and ultimately glorious.[10] In a local church and in Christendom as a whole on the earth, this is far different. People in a local church who are not saved corrupt the local body in the sense that, the local body is not perfect. In the invisible church, made up of the elect only, there is no corruption because Jesus Christ has paid the penalty for their sin. God sees a “glorified” church unspotted and unwrinkled in His eternal decree.[11] Ephesians 5:27 states, “That He might make it unto Himself a glorious Church, not having spot or wrinkle, or any such thing, but that it should be holy and without blame.” All this is due to the work of Christ and His imputed righteousness to the church. All our righteousness is as filthy rags, and the best duties which we may try to perform are tainted with sin. Christ’s righteousness alone makes His church a body without corruption.
Thirdly, the Invisible Church is made up of individual members who consist of one body; it includes those alive on the earth right now, and the saints who are in heaven. 1 Corinthians 12:27 states, “Now ye are the body of Christ and members for your part.” Paul is speaking to the regenerate in the church at Corinth. Each believer, who is sealed with the Spirit is part of the body of Christ. Each person who is a true believer must, then, function in that body to which he/she is called. It is robbery to the body and to God, not to use your gifts. Imagine if your eye, one day, decided that it was not going to look or see anymore. Or imagine if you had a stroke and half of your body became handicapped. It would be a limited body with limited use, where the body in reality, to be a full functioning body, needs to use all of its parts. The whole church must work together to be a body. Paul says the body is not one part but many parts. Even those saints in heaven, though you cannot see them, nor fellowship with them now, are part of this universal body. One day we will be with them. 2 Corinthians 5:6-8 states, “Nevertheless, we are bold, and love rather to remove out of the body, and to dwell with the Lord.” When we die, we shall be with the Lord, together, in the household of faith as a body serving Christ forever. We will one day be with them all in paradise. The True Universal Church will then be one body in Christ in location as well as spirit.
Fourthly, a distinction between what the Reformers thought and what I concentrating on as a distinguishable element of the invisible church, is that the invisible church has visible elements to it, both in its Christian nature as a whole in any historical time (Christendom) and as a visible local body responsible for a geographic region. It is an important point to make plain. When someone makes a promise to you, and then time comes when they are to deliver, and they do not, they make an excuse. They were not able to fulfill their promise; though they professed to something, they did not live up to their profession. In the same way the visibility of the Invisible Church rests on the profession of faith but also in obedience to Christ’s commands. The professors have to deliver what they say. These people in the Invisible Church are known by their profession of faith coupled with a wholehearted obedience to Christ’s commands.[12] This makes up both the visible nature of Christ’s church which is everywhere based on profession (as the Westminster Confession stated) but also in specific geographic regions in local bodies that take up privileged parts of Christ’s commission in their ministry of the Word to that area that God has given them to sanctify.
Regeneration and a profession of faith are prerequisites to being in the Invisible Church. Hebrews 10:23 states, “…let us keep the profession of our hope without wavering.” We are to keep this profession together. However, that profession is then worked out in the body of Christ, throughout human history, in Christendom (as a unit) and in local bodies, as covenanted believers come together to hear the Word of God preached, and to deliver that Word in obedience to Christ’s command through evangelism. We should be able to see our profession of faith at work among the body. The body should be able to visibly recognize what they audibly attested and professed. Our profession is not just saying, “I believe in Jesus.” It is also fused together with “I will obey Jesus.” It is not enough to believe in God. The demons believe in God but that does not make them saved.[13] God desires more than just simple belief. True belief brings forth the fruit of obedience which is seen by others, and this obedience coagulates the local body in a geographic region. When we see the fruit expressed in the life of a church and in the life of those individual covenanted members of a church, this is one way in which the church is a light. We act differently than the rest of the world. Philippians 2:15 states, “shine as lights in the world…” We are to shine forth the truth of our profession in our obedience. Matthew 5:16 states, “Let your light so shine before men…” People should see that we are Christians. They should have no doubt that we are Christians when we act accordingly in our heavenly conversation.[14] You have professed what Peter professed, and they know it, and you live it and they see it. That is the visibility of the invisible church in the world (Christendom) through the local church (in a geographic area).
Yet, we also want to take into account those who seem to be spiritual who fall away, or even those who are wicked who come to true a understanding of electing faith. Some men may seem truly converted and yet still be lost. Sometimes people may exemplify the works of the greatest Christians, but then ultimately they leave the church and fall away.[15] Or there are others which we would have thought were the most detestable people on the planet, desperately wicked, and yet, Christ saves them. Here God gives us no room to judge the heart.[16] Even though we may not know the heart of a man, God requires we still push and prod a person to be sure of their election. 2 Timothy 2:19 says, “But the foundation of God remaineth sure, and has this seal, the Lord knoweth who are his; and let everyone that calleth on the name of Christ depart from iniquity.” Saved people are God’s property. Not only does God know all His sheep in the visible church, and also who are the goats, but all His sheep are to outwardly demonstrate that they are real sheep, not just covenanted members of a local church. The local church must demonstrate fruit to the world in order that the light of Gospel will shine. They are to put off iniquity and must have obedience to Christ. The Church is not invisible in this respect, but in obedience to Jesus Christ the church manifests itself as the light of the world on behalf of its Savior. The invisible church is very visible in this manner.
Fifthly, the next characteristic of the Invisible Church is its unity. How are we unified together? My wife likes the Little Rascals. Alfalfa and Spanky used to promise something to each other by the “spit pact”. They had a secret club house (The he-man women haters club) where only those who had the special knock could get into. You then were part of their “gang” if you followed their rules and used the special knock to gain entrance. That special knock and the spit pact knitted the members of the club together. That which knits the church together is the Spirit of God. He is not a secret knock, but the living fountain of eternal life, which, though foreign to us, has been given to us without money and without price through Jesus Christ. The inward dwelling of the Spirit is that which binds the church together and the fruit of the Spirit is that which outwards unifies us together.[17] Ephesians 5:30 shows us, “For we are members of His body, of His flesh and of His bones.” Acts 4:32 states, “And the multitude of them that believed, were of one heart and one soul.” In the idea of being unified together we act in like-mindedness with one heart and soul. When that works in us it then goes out from us. 1 John 5:1 says, “Whosoever believeth that Jesus is that Christ, is borne of God: and everyone that loveth Him, which begat, loveth also which is begotten of Him.” Our unification then moves us to love one another in the Spirit. All that is begotten of God, all the saints, will love one another in the unity of the Spirit and bond of peace. When we come together in that mindset, and in worship, we come to glorify God greatly. Acts 2:1 teaches us that worship is bound in unity; “And when the day of Pentecost was come they were all with one accord in one place…” One accord in one place characterized those saints who worshipped God together.
Those who are not unified receive the rebuke Paul gives to the church at Corinth. 1 Corinthians 1:13, “Is Christ divided?” Christ is not divided but unified together. We are to work in the unified power of God’s Spirit. We are linked together then, in love and we exemplify that love. Division is almost always wicked. People divide over petty issues that they should not divide over which ultimately hurts the Kingdom of God. And yet, sometimes people divide over things they should divide over which shows they are holding steadfast in one mind to the doctrines which Christ teaches us in the Word.[18] The color of the pew Bible or how much money the Sunday School should spend on material is not something to divide over; and more churches do this than naught. The invisible church manifests itself locally though the unity that a covenanted church has together in its doctrine, and in its sanctification.
Sixthly, the Invisible Church is distinguished from the local church by its organization. There is God, Christ and the saints. Other than that organizational hierarchy, there is none in this respect. The Invisible Church has no visible organization like the local church. There is no humanly constructed organization, rather it is a unity created by the Spirit of God. Christ is the builder. He makes the church what it is. Christ says, “Upon this rock I will build my Church…” Jesus does this and as a result the universal church grows. Acts 2:47 states, “the Lord added to the Church from day to day, such that should be saved.” Human beings are incapable of this; God is the great Architect and Builder. We will see that in the local church there is organization which is visible. But for now, we must see that the Invisible Church is the household of faith; the kingdom of brothers and sisters before Jesus Christ, organized not by human effort, but by God in the spirit of men.
Lastly, there is the consistency of the Invisible Church. Psalm 46:5 says, “Even the Sanctuary of the Tabernacle of the most High, God is in the midst of it, therefore shall it not be moved…” The Invisible Church is built on the character of God because God is in its midst. It’s His nature; He is the Rock, Cornerstone, Head, and sets His church in stone. Christ loves His church and came to build it, and it does not matter if you do not like it or others want to destroy it; it will always prevail. Lone Ranger Christians can say whatever they want about the church, but God is building it whether they like it or not. It may be (and I emphasize “may be”) that the Lone Ranger Christian may be saved. He may be part of the Invisible Church. And he may be, in this way, part of the visible church as one in “Christendom”. But he is not part of the visible local body, which, importantly, Christ commands that he be a part (Hebrews 13). Jesus loves His church so much that He intercedes for His church; John 17:24, “Father I will that they which Thou hast given me, be with Me even where I am, that they may behold that My glory, which Thou hast given Me; for Thou lovest Me before the foundation of the world.” This church is unified together under the Head of the church until one day, when He sees fit, to bring us all to heaven that we may all behold His glory. We will be so exuberant excited about this God which has built His church, that we will remove our reward, the golden crown, and cast it before His throne.
You may say, “I have never studied the Invisible Church and distinctions of the visible church, and I do not know how this really applies to me and my life? Why do I need to know this?” The Invisible Church is not an abstract idea which does not concern you. The nature of the church concerns all of us from the least to the greatest. The church houses the purpose of Christ in it and the salvation of men; the very purpose of creation itself. Outside the Invisible Church and the Visible Church people will burn in Hell forever; as the Confession stated, “outside of which there is no possibility of salvation.” I have to say, they were not kidding when they wrote that. You must be part of the Church to gain heaven. You will never experience the joy that Christ has to offer without being part of it. How can you love Jesus and not love His church, or want to be part of His church? You will not have a crown to cast before the throne of Christ because you will be in eternal torment under the wrath of God by rejecting that which Christ came to build, and that which He came to die for – Acts 20:28, “to care for the church of God, which he obtained with his own blood.” This is not a doctrine to throw away. You need to care about the Church in its entire array.
We are not talking about a building; rather, we are talking about people. Some churches do not have a church building to meet in. They may meet in a school or in a City Hall. But the church is not a church just because it does not have a building since the church is the people, not the wood and the stone of the structure. 1 Peter 2:5 tells us, “Ye also as lively stone, be made into a spiritual house…” That is the church. The body is a redeem group of people, not an abstract idea. Think of the idea of the Army. The US Army went out one day and fought the Russians. In that last sentence I made the Army an abstract entity. The Army went out one day to fight. But what is the Army? It is people. People who make up the fighting forces of our nation are labeled “Army”. But that does not make them any less people. The Army is not an abstract idea, especially when the telegram comes to the wife’s home that tells her that her husband was killed in the war.
Redeemed people constitute the church. The church is people. This concept is not for ivory tower theologians; rather, it is for you. And you must ask yourself, “Do I have an interest in Christ and His visible church? Am I knit together by the same Spirit in the same body? Am I fighting corruption? Am I delighting in the commands of Christ? Am I on the road of holiness? Is there a war going on between my flesh and the Spirit of God which dwells in me? Do people see me as a Christian? Do Christians see me as a Christian? Am I a light in a dark world? Am I visibly a Christian?” It is not enough to say that you are part of the invisible church and that you live, today, in Christendom. Jesus is more practical than that. He desires your sanctification. Hebrews 13:12 states, “ So Jesus also suffered outside the gate in order to sanctify the people through his own blood.” Where does Jesus do this? He does this under the preaching of the Word. Ephesians 5:26-27, “…that he might sanctify her, having cleansed her by the washing of water with the word, so that he might present the church to himself in splendor, without spot or wrinkle or any such thing, that she might be holy and without blemish.” Again, how can you say you love Christ, if you do not care for “organized religion?” Jesus came to be professed by people He saved and organized into a body to affect not only the greater “realm of Christendom” but individually in geographic areas all over the world.
The Reformers often talked about the visible church as a separate theological idea from the practicality of the local body and its privileges and membership. Here, I hoped to knit together the uniformity of the distinguishable nature of the invisible church in and through the visible local body. In an age where church hopping and covenant breaking is so widely acceptable we must hold much closer to the reality of the profession of our faith in Christ’s work to build His church as a local body expressing the true intent of Christendom and the invisible church. It is not enough to simply say we are Christians, rather, we must demonstrate that our profession is credible. You will not believe me if I say one thing, and do another. I am only as valuable to the kingdom of God is my profession matches the realities that stand behind that confession – as Peter.
The Westminster Confession was not unwise to the idea that the visible church is divided into two parts. In Chapter 25 of the Confession they write, “Unto this catholic visible Church Christ hath given the ministry, oracles, and ordinances of God, for the gathering and perfecting of the saints, in this life, to the end of the world: and doth by his own presence and Spirit, according to his promise, make them effectual thereunto. (Isaiah 59:21; Matthew 28:19-20; 1 Corinthians 12:28; Ephesians 4:11-13).” They specifically state that the visible church is seen in its ministry. This is a description of its usefulness and practicality as a local church in a geographic area. It becomes clear that they are following this line of thought when they write in the fourth point, “This catholic Church hath been sometimes more, sometimes less visible. And particular churches, which are members thereof, are more or less pure, according as the doctrine of the gospel is taught and embraced, ordinances administered, and public worship performed more or less purely in them.” Particular churches are seen, and sometimes they are more or less visible as a result of how close they hold the reality of the profession of Christ, which in turn demonstrates their doctrine. How close one may understand the words of Peter about Christ, and Christ’s commentary about Peter’s words (which came from the Father), will in turn demonstrate the reality of a more pure church or not. But, the point here is that the Confession separates, or rather expounds the visible church not only into the larger “professed church” of “Christendom”, but more “particularly” expounds the nature of the effectiveness of the invisible church and its visibility in the world. This is not abstract theology. This is talking about how well your church is “Christ’s church” and stands upon the Rock of God in doctrine, purity, worship, life, ministry and the truths of the Word of God.
It may be, Christian, that you don’t love your church. Maybe you are finding fault with its worship. Maybe you are finding fault with its leadership. Maybe you are finding fault in some of its doctrines. Maybe you are finding fault in its members, or lack thereof. There are no perfect churches. But the church that resides on the earth, which in the very least glimmers the truths of the Gospel and the Christ of the Bible, and holds to the faith once delivered to the saints, is still God’s church that He is building. It is not built just yet. It is in process of being built. The Invisible Church alone is without corruption. The visible local meeting house is sometimes more and sometimes less visible because it sins, and there is truth to that, but is still God’s church, and it is still being built up. It is disheartening and sad when particular churches are more or less pure, according as the doctrine of the gospel is taught and embraced, ordinances administered, and public worship performed more or less purely in them. Yet, if they hold to the faith once delivered, they are still God’s church, and they are still the very same church that Christ was building in Matthew 16. (That is a big “if”, but an “if” nonetheless.) Think for a moment about those disciples. What a motley crew they were! And yet, these are those Spirit-filled men in which Christ desired to build His church along side of the man-made church of the Pharisees. If God can build a local congregation of Christians out of those men, who in turn were used greatly of God, what about you? It may be that your church is not what you hoped for. But think about how Jesus Christ views your life. Is God ashamed to be called your God?
God is taking sanctifying steps to wash His church clean. It is His church, and He will cleanse it in the time and manner He sees fit. When God is finished, Christ will return, and in the twinkling of an eye, the church will be made perfect. It will then be the Universal Visible Church. That does not now discard our Spirit-filled ability to be sanctified daily. But it does causes us pause when we look at the church we attend. Our churches, in every individual case, are a works in progress. If they were fully sanctified, all those people in those churches would be in heaven. Now, equally true, it may very well be that you are not in Christ’s church. It may very well be that the “church” that you attend is not a church that holds dear the truths of the Gospel, and the faith of Matthew 16. It may not be a church Christ is building, even though it has pews, bibles, and stained glass. It may even have thousands of people. But if it is not one of Christ’s churches, the lack of growth, vigor, preaching, true worship, sound doctrine and love for the brethren will be apparent. The Bible and the Westminster Confession calls such places “synagogues of Satan.” Those are not visible representations of the invisible church. They are counterfeits that give Christianity a bad name. They are not true, visible local meeting houses. They are part of “Christendom” because they “speak Christianese”, but they are fakes. The Confession states that various churches may in fact “so degenerated as to become no churches of Christ, but synagogues of Satan.” This is a tragedy, but does not hinder the work God has begun in His people, and visibly seen in the local body.
On earth, now, as through all history since the time of man, God has taken “the Rock” and broken that Rock up in little geographical areas all over the earth (to use that imagery). Jesus is the Rock, and the affects of His work are seen daily in the life of believers all over the world. But you see, when I say it like that, it is far too abstract. Let’s think of it this way – Jesus is the Rock, who builds His church out of individual regenerate saints that profess Him outwardly to the world they live in, and He gathers them together into bodies under the authority of His ambassadors who preach and teach the word of God in order to sanctify those bodies all over the world. Why? It is because those local meeting houses must affect the “history” that they live in. They must, in fact, make history by the way they affect their fellow covenanted believers, their neighborhoods, their co-workers, and their families. It is not enough to simply be content with being part of the invisible church and part of Christendom as a whole. Instead, one must be radically enthralled with the vitality and usefulness of their local church in the hands of God. So you don’t like organized religion? Well, then you do not love the Christ of the Bible. Christ is organized. Not only has He organized His church theologically into the invisible and visible church, but He has made the visible church practically important by heightening the worth of the local meeting house. 1 Peter 2:5, “you yourselves like living stones are being built up as a spiritual house, to be a holy priesthood, to offer spiritual sacrifices acceptable to God through Jesus Christ.”
——————————————————————————–
[1] Regeneration is both a biblical term and a theological term used to describe the renewing of the heart in salvation. The heart is the inner being of man, that which makes up the man as a human being and living spirit. It does not mean to take what is already there and “fix it up.” It is not as if we are a dilapidated old build which needs a new paint job. Rather, the Spirit completely destroys the building and builds a new one in its place. There are various Scripture references that communicate the idea, and two explicit uses of the word itself. Matthew 19:28 and Titus 3:5 use the word unequivocally, where Ezekiel 11:19, 36:26, Jeremiah 31:31, Romans 2:29, 2 Corinthians 3:3, and the like use it in its sense.
[2] Oftentimes the reference “Son of Man” is deemed as a low, meek title ascribed to Christ in his human nature. But the term designates far more than that. It designates the exalted Lord who, in time, took the form of a man, veiling his glory, yet never lessening his power—only the immediate use of it through the human nature in His incarnation. In Daniel 7, though we are made aware of Daniel’s prophecy of things to come. Here is the Son of Man, exalted, and given all authority, where the books are opened and the judgment of all mankind is handed to him to execute in righteousness and power. Here he is to rule the nations with a rod of iron. Daniels shows the moments after the ascension of Christ. He leaves the earth and enters into heaven in Luke 24:51, and Daniel 7:13 shows us that entrance.
[3] This is not the same kind of direct revelation that the self appointed prophets of 21st Century Christendom claims. This is the affect of the regenerating power of the Spirit of God bearing fruit in the life and soul of a believer. Because God saved Peter, he now had eyes to see and ears to hear. It was not dreamed up of his own accord, or carefully placed together through rationalism alone. Peter, in the moment of Jesus’ question, scanned through the evidences which he had already previously seen while being with Jesus and hearing him preach, and mixed that with faith. The outcome of a rational biblical theology mixed with faith is Peter’s confession.
[4] We find this same idea in Matthew 7:24 in the parable of the one who built his house on the petra or the rock of Christ. Also 1 Cor. 3:11 tells us that no other foundation can be laid except that of Jesus Christ. Jesus, then in essence, states that upon the immovable rock of himself he will build the church. Satan and all the powers of hell cannot, and will not prevail against him. He is the rock that will smash his enemies and crush them under foot. John Gill and Matthew Henry, in their respective commentaries on the Gospel of Matthew agree with this interpretation, as does Francis Turretin in his Institutes (page 162-63, volume 3). Calvin agrees somewhat, in that he sees the passage teaching that Christ is “almost as if he descended from heaven itself” in the profession of Him being the Son of God so that the profession is so vitally linked to Christ that they are inseparable. (see Calvin’s commentary in his harmony of the Gospels, Matthew, Mark and Luke, page 294ff)
Images of Christ being the Rock can be found in Genesis 3:15 (the one who crushes the serpent), Exodus 17:6; 33:21; Numbers 20:8; Deut 32:4; 2 Sam. 22:3; Psalm 18:2; 31:2; 118:22; Isaiah 17:10; Romans 9:33; 1 Cor. 10:4; 1 Peter 2:8.
[5] Theology oftentimes, has it experimental roots in the aversion to heresy. The Roman Catholic Church is built upon an ecclesiastical system created by man, and not the Bible. The Reformers, in juxtaposition to this, desired to define the church more specifically. For the task at hand, the Reformation, they did this.
[6] For an introductory study of the basic views of the Roman Catholic Church, see Loraine Boettner’s book Roman Catholicism, or Calvin’s work (soon to be published by Puritan Publications) on the Council of Trent.
[7] To utilize the word “universal” would have been playing into the hands of the word “Catholic” which literally is translated “universal” from the Latin. The reformers could have justly used this word, but it would have taken away from the force and vigor of the argument and point they sought to teach.
[8] Jesus and the disciples made up the first “gathering” of this new organization of the people of God as redeemed elect believers (not including Judas Iscariot) subsequent to the coming of the promised Messiah. Yet the presence of Judas Iscariot argues more for a pattern after the local body – a group of professing Christians made up of the elect and reprobate.
[9] Take careful note of John the Baptist for “there is not a greater prophet than John the Baptist” (Luke 7:28). He is the last Old Testament saint in the Bible according to Jesus’ own testimony. (See Matthew 11:12ff)
[10] The church is the perfect bride. It is being washed by the Word of God day in and day out. As the Spirit sanctifies the remaining sin in believers the church becomes more holy in the visible world. But in the judgment courts of heaven, where the books are opened and the Lord God sovereignly rules over the salvation and reprobation of men, the imputed righteousness of Christ is resting on the church. The church can be seen in type in Zechariah 3:1ff where the high priest is brought before God, and Satan accuses him of being defiled. The Lord then rebukes Satan and silents him, and replaces the filthy rags of the priest with new clothes, white and clean. He receives a new robe and a new turban on his head. Then God makes a solemn oath to Joshua and states that the righteous Branch shall come forth and God will “remove the iniquity of the land in one day.” God did this for the church through the death of Christ.
[11] Romans 8:29-30 teach us that God sees Christian as already glorified though they are not in heaven.
[12] Luke 6:46 states, “Why do you call me Lord and do not do the things which I speak?” It is not enough for the sinner to profess to follow Jesus, he must abide in Christ and His Word. Without an earnest striving and yearning after the commands of God, the sinner’s profession is nothing more than lip service. 1 John 3:9 states, “Whoever is born of God does not commit sin.” The present active 3rd person singular form of the word (poieow) poiei. means to continue habitually in sin. The saved redeemed elect do not continue habitually in unhindered sin; they are in war with the flesh and are constantly desiring to mortify the deeds of the flesh (Romans 8:13). It is abhorrent to God and blasphemous to Christ to believe that men can be saved and never change. The very intrusion of the Kingdom of Heaven into time pushes us to see the truth of it.
[13] Faith is more than belief. It consists in notitia, assensus and fiducia. Notitia is the noting of a thing; like saying, “I see the chair”. Assensus is assenting to the truth that you do, ipso facto, see the chair. At this point, you have the same amount of belief that the demons do. They note and assent to the statement, “Jesus Christ is God’s Son, the only Savior of men.” But they do not have fiducia. Men can rationally work out, from the pages of the Bible, that Jesus claims to be the Son of God, the only Savior. They can have notitia and assensus, but only God can cause them to have fiducia. They must wholly lean on Jesus, trusting in Him with their whole being. This can only be done (seeing the truth of it, assenting to the truth, and wholly leaning upon that truth for sustenance) if God, in His mercy, regenerates the sinner’s heart, grants repentance and then implants the divine influence of faith.
[14] Our heavenly conversation is that disposition which a believer carries out because he knows he is a child of heaven and should act like one. Jeremiah Burroughs gives an exemplary treatment of this in his book, Gospel Conversation (Soli Deo Gloria Publishers, 1995) using Philippians 1:27 as the base text.
[15] 1 John 2:19
[16] It is not an ordinary working which He allows, but sometimes this does happen; more the former than the latter.
[17] The symbol of Christianity is not the cross; it is love (John 13:34). Love is to be shown to the brethren. If we love one another, we will show the world we are Christ’s disciples. To love is only possible if we know the God of love and if His love is alive in our hearts. Unless the Spirit of God dwells in us we can never love. It is the work of the Spirit in our souls, towards each other that show the world we are something different. The Spirit of the living God is inside of us if we are born anew. He is the symbol, in love, which the crux of Christianity. Defining the symbol of Christianity is easy once we understand it is an internal work expressing itself: it is the love of God procured by the Holy Spirit burning in our heart to such a degree that it motivates us to love one another.
[18] Jude v3 states that we should “contend for the faith once for all entrusted to the saints.” This contending is to be an agonizing over, or contention over the truth of God’s Word. The “faith” is the body of doctrine delivered to the church. It has once for all been delivered and is so sacred and important, that the saints are required to guard it, to contend for it no matter what.

A Paradigm of Earth and Biological Origins by Intelligent Design - 3rd Edition
The ground is shifting. New research programs, and new discoveries, are constantly changing the landscape of our knowledge of “how it all began.” And for those considering these matters from a position of biblical faith, there are new and promising frontiers to explore.
Many of those remarkable recent changes are addressed in this fully updated third edition of this landmark work, now in its twentieth year of publication. With additional contributions from joint author Arthur Chadwick, Faith, Reason, and Earth History presents Leonard Brand’s continuing argument for constructive thinking about origins and earth history in the context of Scripture, showing readers how to analyze available scientific data and approach unsolved problems. Faith does not need to fear the data but can contribute to progress in understanding earth history within the context of God’s Word while still being honest about unanswered questions. Faith, Reason, and Earth History presents Leonard Brand's argument for constructive thinking about origins and earth history in the context of Scripture, showing readers how to analyze available scientific data and approach unsolved problems. Faith does not need to fear the data but can contribute to progress in understanding earth within the context of God's Word while still being honest about unanswered questions. In this patient explanation of the mission of science, the author models his conviction that above all, it is essential that we treat each other with respect, even if we disagree on fundamental issues, The original editions of the work (1997) was one of the first books on this topic written from the point of view of an experienced research scientist. A career biologist, paleontologist, and teacher, Brand brings to this well-illustrated book a rich assortment of practical scientific examples. This thoughtful and rigorous presentation makes Brand's landmark work highly useful both as a college-level text and as an easily accessible treatment for the educated layperson.
In this patient explanation of the mission of science and its application to questions about origins and earth history, the authors model their conviction that “above all, it is essential that we treat each other with respect, even if we disagree on fundamental issues.”
The original edition of this work (1997) was one of the first books on this topic written from the point of view of experienced research scientists. Brand and Chadwick, career researchers and teachers in biology and paleontology, bring to this well-illustrated book a rich assortment of practical scientific examples.
This thoughtful, rigorous, and thoroughly up-to-date presentation makes this classic work highly useful both as a college-level text and as an easily accessible treatment for the educated layperson.
Leonard Brand (Ph.D., Cornell) is a professor of biology and paleontology at Loma Linda University and has been teaching at the university level for four decades. An active researcher, he is well-published in professional scientific journals in the fields of paleontology, animal behavior, and ecology.
Arthur Chadwick (Ph.D., University of Miami) is a research professor of biology and geology at Southwestern Adventist University. Chadwick began his professional career by retraining in geology and paleontology at the University of California (Riverside) and accepting a visiting professorship at the University of Oklahoma in geology and geophysics before taking his current position. His research and publication profile spans these disciplines.
"For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life. ... Whoever believes in him is not condemned, but whoever does not believe stands condemned already because he has not believed in the name of God's one and only Son".
🎺 What Is the Difference between God's Manifest Presence and Omnipresence, Ubiquitous? The UBIQUITOUS or omnipresence of God explains how He is everywhere all at once, while the manifest presence of God is His presence made clear. The omnipresence of God can exist without our awareness, but the manifest presence cannot, for the point manifest presence of the Lord is that our awareness of Him is awakened to reality as defined by Him. NASA is dedicated primarily to one mission: to explore the created universe. They can go to the very ends of the earth and our surrounding galaxies, but they cannot hope to exhaust the God of the Bible. The God of the Bible cannot be contained by space (Psalm 147:5). When we compare NASA to the Lord, the Lord has zero spatial limitations, while NASA is limited by finances and technological advancements. The Lord also is infinite, majestic, holy, and everywhere present and all-knowing unconstrained by either time or space, along with having complete knowledge of everything at all times and places. Jeremiah 23:24 is one text among many that reveal the Creator’s everywhere present nature.“‘Who can hide in secret places so that I cannot see them?’ declares the LORD. ‘Do not I fill heaven and earth While SEEING ALL?’ declares the LORD" UBIQUITOUS":
St. Peter proclaims Jesus as the cornerstone, without which there could be no Church (Acts 4:11, 1 Pet. 2:6-7).
The reference to Jesus as the cornerstone comes from Old Testament passages like Psalm 118:22 and Isaiah 8:4, and refers to the sanctuary or Temple of God where the Israelite people worshipped. In other words, Jesus is the new Temple of a New Covenant form of worship (John 2:18-22), who was sadly rejected by many. Without Jesus, there could be no fulfillment of Israel, including a new form of worship centered on Jesus and his Sacrifice of Calvary and its sacramental re-presentation in the celebration of the Mass (Luke 22:19-20), vs. the Old Covenant sacrifices offered at the Temple in Jerusalem that could not provide eternal salvation.
And so there could be no Church, which is the fulfillment of Israel, without Jesus as the cornerstone of the New Covenant and its salvific worship. And yet Jesus chooses Peter as the rock (Aramaic: kepha) upon which to build his Church (Matt. 16:18-19).
https://martynkenney3.wixsite.com/holyspirit
🙏📜🌄🎺 Welcome - Shalom to tHE 4th Commandment tHE 7th Day Sabbath - A time for Rest and a time for Prayer -
Time to reflect and thank your Lord for Always being there =
tHE Alpha tHE Omega tHE Beginning and tHE ending
Of each A NEW Day -
To Live our Lives One DAy at a Time
As WE journey through Life
Living Our Lives one day at a time.
Every Moment A MOMENT - TO Memory
WHILST Collecting Memories along tHE WAY -
So that in later days
In Times Of FearS
In Times Of TearS
We can call ON Our Memories
Gathered Along tHE WAY
To Help and guide US Through
ON Our Journey through Life - AS ONE Family https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZpDQJnI4OhU
Past and Present
Spiritual and Physical
Past and Present
All For ONE And ONE for All
For ITt Is Not How we begin
But How We Finish
THANK YOU LORD
AND OUR GREAT CREATORS
This Wonderful Life - DON'T LET IIT GET AWAY
Such A Beautiful Gift
From Up Above
LIVE each Beautiful New Day TO THE FULL
Don't Let It GET AWAY https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1mdDFyrGkCE c
TO THANK, love and respect Our great Creator, and Sustainer
AND ALL THEIR GOOD WORKS OF CREATION AND ALL Divine
The Christian doctrine of immortality cannot be understood apart from the right conception of the
tripartite nature of men. Many think that man is a physical being only. There is a great danger of any
man thinking thus of himself. In his desire to satisfy the needs of the body there is the tendency on
man’s part to lose sight of the fact that he is immortal. There have been persons who have lived all of
their lives either in ignorance or willful neglect of life after death, but upon their deathbed, they
suddenly realized that they were more than physical beings.
There is an idea also that prevails largely today that man consists of only two component parts:
namely, body and spirit. In the thinking of the writer, this view appears to be one that might create
confusion in the minds of many Christians. While soul and spirit are so closely related that it is
sometimes difficult to distinguish accurately between them, there seems to be only one logical
conclusion: namely, that “soul” and “spirit” are not the same. The Bible does make a distinction.
Man is a triune being because he is created in the image of God. “God said, Let us make man in Our
image” (Genesis 1:26). We know that God is a Trinity. The Holy Trinity is clearly set forth in the
Apostle Paul’s benediction that closed his Second Corinthian Epistle: “The grace of the Lord Jesus
Christ¨†and the love of God, and the communion of the Holy Ghost, be with you all. Amen” (2
Corinthians 13:14). Our Lord Himself said, in what we call “The Great Commission”: “Go ye therefore
and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy
Ghost” (Matthew 28:19). Created in the image of God, man is likewise a trinity. He has a spiritual
nature that is separate and distinct from the body in which it dwells.
The two following passages from the Bible clearly establish the fact that man is a triune being
composed of spirit, soul, and body:
I pray God your whole spirit†and soul†and body†be preserved blameless unto the coming of our Lord
Jesus Christ (1 Thessalonians 5:23).
For the word of God is quick, powerful, and sharper than any two-edged sword, piercing even to
the dividing asunder of soul†and spirit, and of the joints and marrow (body), and is a discerner of the
thoughts and intents of the heart (Hebrews 4:12).
In spite of the erroneous teaching of “Jehovah’s Witnesses” and of other false sects that “no man has
a soul,” the Bible states emphatically that man was created as a trinity of spirit, soul, and body even as
the eternal God is Himself a trinity of Father, Son, and Holy Ghost. The trinity of man is an essential
part of the image relationship between him and God. Life is not ultimately physical and the body is
not the whole man. And we might add that neither the body in itself, nor the soul in itself, nor the spirit
in itself makes up the whole man, but he is “spirit and soul and body.” This must be seriously
considered and definitely agreed to before we can comprehend with any accuracy the subject of life
after death. In this opening chapter, we shall confine our material to the spirit and the soul in as much as
the body will be considered in succeeding chapters on the resurrection.
The word “spirit” when used in the Scriptures has several meanings. Whenever the word “Spirit”
appears used with a capital letter, it has but one meaning. It is the name of the third Person of the
Trinity, the Holy Spirit of God. The word “spirit” spelt with a small letter may have one of several
different meanings. It can have direct reference to the spirit of man which is as much a part of the
tripartite nature of man as the Spirit of the living God is a Person of the Holy Trinity. Or it can indicate
an evil spirit such as any agent of the Devil. We will confine ourselves here to the Biblical usage of the
word only as it relates to the spirit of man, one of the three constituent parts of his being.
The threefold nature of man might be illustrated in several ways. Dr Clarence Larkin uses three
circles (Rightly†Dividing†The†Word¨†). The outer circle stands for the body†of man, the middle
circle for the soul¨†and the inner for the spiritƆAt this point it will be well to quote a portion from Dr.
Larkin’s book:
In the outer circle, the ‘Body’ is shown as touching the Material world through the five senses of
‘Sight,’ ‘Smell,’ ‘Hearing,’ ‘Taste’ and ‘Touch.’
The Gates to the ‘Soul’ are ‘Imagination,’ ‘Conscience,’ ‘Memory,’ ‘Reason’ and the ‘Affections.’
The “Spirit” receives impressions of outward and material things through the soul. The spiritual
faculties of the ‘Spirit’ are ‘Faith,’ ‘Hope,’ ‘Reverence,’ ‘Prayer’ and ‘Worship.’
In his unfallen state the ‘Spirit’ of man was illuminated from Heaven, but when the human race fell in
Adam, sin closed the window of the Spirit, pulled down the curtain, and the chamber of the spirit
became a death chamber and remains so in every unregenerate heart, until the Life and Light giving
power of the Holy Spirit floods that chamber with the Life and Light giving power of the new life in
Christ Jesus.
It develops then that the spirit of man, being the sphere of God-consciousness,
is the inner or private office of man where the work of regeneration takes place. Dr James R. Graham says that the main
theatre of the Holy Spirit’s activity in man, and the part of man’s nature with which He has peculiar
affinity is the spirit†of†manƆThe Apostle Paul gives us the Word of God on this, a passage that is
sadly neglected. Quoting from the sixty-fourth chapter of the book of the Prophet Isaiah, Paul wrote:
But as it is written, Eye hath not seen, nor ear heard, neither have entered into the heart of man, the
things which God hath prepared for them that love Him.
A great many people stop here, content to remain in ignorance. However, Paul continues:
But God hath revealed them unto us by His Spirit; for the Spirit searcheth all things, yea, the deep
things of God.
For what man knoweth the things of a man, save the spirit of man which is in him? Even so the things
of God knoweth no man, but the Spirit of God (1 Corinthians 2:911).
Man in his unregenerate state comes to know the things of man by the operator of “the spirit of man”
which is in him. If I have a will to know certain scientific facts, by my human spirit I am enabled to
investigate, think, and weigh the evidence. If I set myself to the task, I may become a scientist of world-renowned
and of great accomplishments. However, my human spirit is “limited to the things of man.” If I
want to know about the things of God, my dead and dormant spirit is not able to know them.
The natural man receiveth, not the things of the Spirit of God; for they are foolishness unto him;
neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned (1 Corinthians 2:14).
The human spirit requires “the spark of regeneration” before there is an understanding of the things
of God. Man’s spiritual nature must be renewed before there is a true conception of Godliness. Only
one thing stands as a guard at the door of man’s spirit, and that is his own will. When the will is
surrendered, the Holy Spirit takes up His abode in the spirit of man. And when that transaction takes
place we will know it, for, says Paul:
The Spirit Himself (meaning the Holy Spirit) beareth witness with our spirit, that we are children of
God (Romans 8:16 R.V.).
Many people confess that they get nothing out of the Bible even though they attend church and read
their Bibles regularly. Perhaps they do not know that they are not regenerated and that they need to
yield their will to the Spirit of God so that He can renew their human spirits. The deep things of God
never will be understood by the world outside of Jesus Christ. Our Lord warned His disciples,
Give not that which is holy unto the dogs, neither cast ye your pearls before swine (Matthew 7:6).
The spirit of the unregenerate man has no more capacity to appreciate the things of God than a dog
has to appreciate holy things, or a hog a genuine pearl necklace. We read that “The dog is turned to
his own vomit again; and the sow that was washed to her wallowing in the mire” (2 Peter 2:22). This
they did because the dog was a dog and the sow was a sow. No amount of religion or church activity
can change the spirit of the unregenerate man. “Remember,” says Dr G. Campbell Morgan, “if out of
false charity or pity you allow men of material ideals and worldly wisdom to touch holy things, to
handle the pearls of the Kingdom, presently they will turn and rend you. This is the whole history of
Christendom’s ruin, in the measure in which Christendom is ruined. We gave holy things to dogs. We
cast the pearls of the Kingdom before swine.” The ministry of Christ’s Church dare not be entrusted
to any man who has not been born again, for “That which is born of the flesh is flesh; and that which
is born of the Spirit is spirit” (John 3:6).
The Bible says; “There is a spirit in man; and the inspiration of the Almighty giveth them
understanding” (Job 32:8). Here we are told that it is the spirit of man that is given understanding.
The materialist tells us that the spirit of man is the air that he breathes, and that man’s body is all
there is to his personality. Such is not the case. The spirit of man is his personality and it is that which
differentiates him from the lower animal creation. If “spirit” meant merely “breath,” God certainly
would not deal with it as a personality. He is called “The God of the spirits of all flesh”
(Numbers 16:22), and “the Father of spirits” (Hebrews 12:9). It is by his spirit that the Christian both serves and
worships God. Paul testified: “For God is my witness, Whom I serve with my spirit in the Gospel”
(Romans 1:9). Jesus said: “God is a spirit; and they that worship Him must worship Him in spirit and
in truth” (John 4:24).
Man not only has a living soul but he is a living soul. The Bible says: “And the Lord God formed man
of the dust of the ground and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life, and man became a living
soul” (Genesis 2:7). We must be careful not to confound that which is truly spiritual and that which is
merely soulish or psychical. We have seen that the spirit of man is the sphere of activity where the
Holy Spirit operates in regeneration. Just so is the soul the sphere of activity where Satan operates
making his appeal to the affections and emotions of man.
Satan knows full well that he dominates the psychical or the soulish man. Therefore he does not care
if a man goes to a church where the Spirit of God is not in evidence. He knows that his victim is a
creature of emotions, and it matters not if the emotions are stirred to sentimentalism or even to tears,
just so long as man’s spirit does not come in contact with God’s Holy Spirit. I believe that
Satan would rather have a man go to a modernistic church where there is false worship than he would
have him go to a house of prostitution. The soul is the seat of the passions, the feelings, and the
desires of man; and Satan is satisfied if he can master these. F. W. Grant has said that the soul is the
seat of the affections, right or wrong, of love, hate, lusts, and even the appetites of the body.
Hamor said to Jacob, “The soul of my son Shechem longeth for your daughter” (Genesis 34:8). Of
David and Jonathan it is written: “The soul of Jonathan was knit with the soul of David, and Jonathan
loved him as his own soul” (1 Samuel 18:1). These passages show the soul to be the seat of the
affections. But as the soul loves, so it also hates. We read of those “that are hated of David’s soul”
(2 Samuel 5:8).
It is in the soul where fleshly lusts, desires, and appetites arise:
Abstain from fleshly lusts which war against the soul (Peter 2:11).
As cold waters to a thirsty soul, so is good news from a far country (Proverbs 25:25).
It shall be even as when a hungry man dreameth, and behold, he eateth; but he awaketh, and his
the soul is empty; or as when a thirsty man dreameth, and behold, he drinketh; but he awaketh, and
behold, he is faint, and his†soul†hath†appetite†(Isaiah 29:8).
The soul of man, that is, his affections and desires, are never directed Godward until after the spirit
has become regenerated. Man can never love God nor the things of God until he is born from above.
He may have a troubled conscience or be so stirred emotionally that he may weep bitterly, and still
remain dead in trespasses and in sins. We do not feel that we are guilty of judging men when we
state that some who have answered an altar call and shed tears never were born again. Man’s
desires and affections are turned toward God when he realizes his sinful condition and God’s grace
in salvation. When the Spirit of God illuminates the spirit of a man with divine light and life, that man
begins to yield his affections and faculties to God.
The Virgin Mary said; “My soul doth magnify the Lord, And my spirit hath rejoiced in God my Saviour”
(Luke 1:46, 47). She could not extol the Lord in her soul until she had recognized God in her spirit as
her Saviour. The initial triumph is in the spirit when Jesus Christ is acknowledged as personal Saviour.
In tHE immortal classic of the Psalms, David says: “He restoreth my soul” (Psalm 23:3). The Hebrew
word translated “restoreth” is said to mean quite literally “turneth back.” At no time had David lost his
salvation, but there were times when his affections and desires were turned from the Lord, as in the
case of his sin with Bathsheba. Having become one of the Divine Shepherd’s flock, he testified: “The
Lord turneth back my soul.” The Christian who is enjoying unbroken communion with his Lord will
then be able to say, “Bless the Lord, O my soul, and all that is within me, bless His holy name”
(Psalm 103:1).